What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

The Jaguars . . . (1 Viewer)

Are they an elite team?

  • Yes

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Let's see how they do against IND first

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0

David Yudkin

Footballguy
After coming off a 12-4 season and back-to-back wins against SB contender Dallas and defending league champ Pittsburgh, should the Jags be considered in the top tier of teams? Are they worthy of elite status? They could go 12-4 again this year given their schedule. Thoughts?

 
Their D looks even better than I expected and while the O isn't wowing anyone, it's doing enough. Kinda reminds me of the Ravens during their SB run (although I wouldn't put the D at being that good yet....or the O at being that bad). I expected 9-10 wins this year tops but now re-thinking. GDB it as a Colts fan.

 
I think the Jags have been very impressive in winning games by adapting to what is given them.

This coming week will be the true test. This will make three tough games to open the season.

 
I think they were an elite team last year that largely went unnoticed because they couldn't beat Indy and lost in NE in the first round of the playoffs. Really no shame in any of these losses but until the Jags either win their division or a playoff game they will be questioned.

They do seem to have 3 things that make them legit Super Bowl contenders:

Great D

Solid QB

Playmaker at RB (when healthy)

If the Jags were in the NFC they'd likely be the frontrunner for the Super Bowl.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The 1995 expansion Carolina Panthers very nearly shutout the then defending champion 49ers and no one considered them elite.

They need to keep it up, otherwise this game was just a fluke.

 
Who?

I have never heard of this team let alone the town they reside in.

They are complete unknowns to me.

At least that what Tony Kornheiser led me to believe last night.

 
After coming off a 12-4 season and back-to-back wins against SB contender Dallas and defending league champ Pittsburgh, should the Jags be considered in the top tier of teams? Are they worthy of elite status? They could go 12-4 again this year given their schedule. Thoughts?
One of the reasons, the Jags are playing well is the play of Fred Taylor and Byron Lefwich. Neither one of these guys can seem to stay healthy. Whenever an injury happens (and you know it will...) I see the Jags struggling..
 
Last edited by a moderator:
apart from the first quarter against dallas they have looked like one of the 2 or 3 best teams in the league.

indy game will be huge

 
After coming off a 12-4 season and back-to-back wins against SB contender Dallas and defending league champ Pittsburgh, should the Jags be considered in the top tier of teams? Are they worthy of elite status? They could go 12-4 again this year given their schedule. Thoughts?
One of the reasons, the Jags are playing well is the play of Fred Taylor and Byron Lefwich. Whenever this happens (and you know it will...) I see the Jags struggling..
Garrard is a great backup. One that most teams would kill for. Last year in the games he played while Leftwich was out, he went 5 - 1 with a 83.9 QB rating. Threw for 4 TDs, picked once and added 3 more TDs on the ground.I'd be worried about Fred going down a lot more than Leftwich
 
Their D looks even better than I expected and while the O isn't wowing anyone, it's doing enough. Kinda reminds me of the Ravens during their SB run (although I wouldn't put the D at being that good yet....or the O at being that bad). I expected 9-10 wins this year tops but now re-thinking. GDB it as a Colts fan.
:goodposting: on all counts. That defense is absolutely nasty. Another comparison that might be valid would be the 2002 Bucs.
 
the Jags have been a big, physical team for a few years now... for a while they've been one of those teams the you'll probably beat, but you don't want to play again because of their size and physicality.

Finally, it seems they've matured a bit on offense.

I have never been a huge Leftwich fan. I always considered him a bit of a baby-huey, soft, non-leader, lacking intangibles, doesn't have "IT" type QB... but he really did show composure and leadership in that Monday night game... and IMO, that game had a playoff feel to it. I still don't like his big windup and slow release, but you've got to give him credit. He lead that team well last night. His one INT wasn't his fault; it was a great defensive play.

*IF* the Jags do indeed take that next step to being an elite NFL team. If they go deep into the playoffs. I believe the Mon. night win over PIT will be looked at as the game that Leftwich took a huge step forward in his development/maturity process.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'd like to see them play a tough road game before saying anything definitive. I imagine if either one of their wins so far was on the road that they'd more than likely be 1-1.

 
I voted No-

Dont read to much into the Win against the Steelers last night.

A few years ago thier was a debate around the NFL about who had the most physical team which sparked this whole rivalry. Ever since the Jags and Steelers regardless of record play each other hard everytime.

As for week one against the Cowboys. *new flash Bledsoe sucks*. Thier O line is subpar the QB play is horrible and TO is not on the same page with the team. This wasnt a huge win for the Jags. And yes the Cowboys beat the skins but the skins are going to finish last in thier division this year.

The Jags will be lucky if they make the wildcard. and FWIW I think Garrard is a better Qb than lefty

 
After coming off a 12-4 season and back-to-back wins against SB contender Dallas and defending league champ Pittsburgh, should the Jags be considered in the top tier of teams? Are they worthy of elite status? They could go 12-4 again this year given their schedule. Thoughts?
One of the reasons, the Jags are playing well is the play of Fred Taylor and Byron Lefwich. Whenever this happens (and you know it will...) I see the Jags struggling..
Garrard is a great backup. One that most teams would kill for. Last year in the games he played while Leftwich was out, he went 5 - 1 with a 83.9 QB rating. Threw for 4 TDs, picked once and added 3 more TDs on the ground.I'd be worried about Fred going down a lot more than Leftwich
Hmm.. Garrard 5-1 as a starter last year? Gee.. Who did he play against to earn that 5-1 record? Tenn 2xSFAZHoustonClevelandWOW!!I'm not saying he sucks, he's just unproven.
 
After coming off a 12-4 season and back-to-back wins against SB contender Dallas and defending league champ Pittsburgh, should the Jags be considered in the top tier of teams? Are they worthy of elite status? They could go 12-4 again this year given their schedule. Thoughts?
One of the reasons, the Jags are playing well is the play of Fred Taylor and Byron Lefwich. Whenever this happens (and you know it will...) I see the Jags struggling..
Garrard is a great backup. One that most teams would kill for. Last year in the games he played while Leftwich was out, he went 5 - 1 with a 83.9 QB rating. Threw for 4 TDs, picked once and added 3 more TDs on the ground.I'd be worried about Fred going down a lot more than Leftwich
He's good, but great might be too generous. He did not garner much interest the other year as a UFA or RFA (or whatever he was) and played well last year but all but 1 of those games were cupcakes. I think Lefty is the key to the team. They have a better record of showing they can make due without Freddy, though this year would make it even more difficult with Jones out (leaving the likes of Maurice and Alvin). :2cents: I would like to see Lefty get his first full 16 game season under his belt.
 
They will drop the next 2 games and this thread will endlessly be bumped to ridicule you.

Then they will end up with an 11-5 record and an impressive 1st RD playoff win, in which you will prematurely bump this only to see them lose in the divisional game.

Elite

–noun 1. (often used with a plural verb) the choice or best of anything considered collectively, as of a group or class of persons.

2. (used with a plural verb) persons of the highest class: Only the elite were there.

That being said I think they are one of the better teams in the league, but anyone who hasn't won a playoff game yet, I can't consider elite.

 
Is this even a question? Of course they are. Reasons....

1. 12-4 last season

2. 2-0 this season

3. Came from behind to beat Dallas, and pimped slapped the defending Super Bowl champs Steelers.

4. Tough defense, tough quarterback.

5. As for Indianapolis they shut them down in Indy last season holding them to 10 points I believe. When they played in Jacksonville later in the season they gave Indy a scare late in the game. They lost both games last year but they held their own considering how the Colts rolled over everyone last season not named San Diego and Pittsburgh.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
it is easy for ffballers to forget just how important the physical aspect of the game is.

There's no way to statistically measure toughness and punishment.

The bottom line is that you may be fast, you may have great hands, you may have the most complete skill set of anyone on the field... but if they guy across the line is just gonna' physically kick your ### every time, there's nothing you can do about it.

 
A part of last night's victory is the matchup element. With their imposing DL and overall physicality, the Jaguars match up very well with the Steelers. Plus it's like a college rivalry, where for the most part, these two teams seem to play close games regardless of the location or each team's record.

Still, the Jaguars have done as much as they can do so far this season. Elite can be defined many ways. I can see them being called that already by loose definition, but a loss at Indy (no shame in that, of course) and they'll still be thought of as good but not elite. Ultimately, playoff victories earn the most respect.

 
Is this even a question? Of course they are. Reasons....1. 12-4 last season2. 2-0 this season3. Came from behind to beat Dallas, and pimped slapped the defending Super Bowl champs Steelers.4. Tough defense, tough quarterback.5. As for Indianapolis they shut them down in Indy last season holding them to 10 points I believe. When they played in Jacksonville later in the season they came Indy a scare late in the game. They lost both games last year but they held their own considering how the Colts rolled over everyone last season not named San Diego and Pittsburgh.
Wow surprised to see how many people vote YES.You didn't mention last years playoff game that they lost 28-3They were 12-4 last year; pretty impressive2004 9-72003 5-112002 6-102001 6-10Denver was 13-3 last year and the only team able to beat Tom Brady in the playoffs.Had they started 2-0 Im not sure we would consider them elite.Maybe I have a different view of elite.If the Detroit Tigers get swept in the 1st RD of the playoffs this year, and start off next year with a 25-10 record, I am not sure anyone would consider them elite.If that were to happen, I feel that is somewhat what Jax would have accomplished so far.
 
The 1995 expansion Carolina Panthers very nearly shutout the then defending champion 49ers and no one considered them elite. They need to keep it up, otherwise this game was just a fluke.
They were a 12-4 playoff team last year they made a very solid Dallas team look silly in week one and shut the defending SB champs out. I just don't understand how anyone could call anything they've done a fluke? :confused: :confused:
 
There are no "elite" teams in september. But any 2-0 team can claim they are on the way to becming one. I like what Jack Del Rio said after the dallas game; when asked what he learned about his team that game he said(paraphrase), Nothing. I already knew it, it's just that other people are starting to see it now.

If the Jags win this week and start season off 3-0 against dallas, pitt, and indy it's going to be very hard for the non-beleivers. But of course the Jags always have an easy schedule right? That's the only reason they win any games. :)

 
Pittsburgh 25, Jacksonville 23 - 2002

Pittsburgh 17, Jacksonville 16 - 2004

Jacksonville 23, Pittsburgh 17 - 2005

Jacksonville 9, Pittsburgh 0 - 2006

Please dont read too much into this weeks game. This is a Rivalry.

I doesnt matter if the Jags are 0-7 and play the 7-0 Steelers the Game is ALWAYS close.

Both the coaches pride thier teams off of being the most physical in the NFL thats why heads butt when they meet.

The Jags will be lucky to make the playoffs. Sig bet me if you like

 
Last edited by a moderator:
This coming week will be the true test. This will make three tough games to open the season.
It's a shame the NFL schedule is so heavily in favor of the Colts for this game. Indy comes off a patty cake game on Sunday. Jack off the most physical game of the year on a short week and then to travel to Indy. If they win this, needless to say. I think they are the best team in the NFL right now.
 
Pittsburgh 25, Jacksonville 23 - 2002

Pittsburgh 17, Jacksonville 16 - 2004

Jacksonville 23, Pittsburgh 17 - 2005

Jacksonville 9, Pittsburgh 0 - 2006

Please dont read too much into this weeks game. This is a Rivalry.

I doesnt matter if the Jags are 0-7 and play the 7-0 Steelers the Game is ALWAYS close.

Both the coaches pride thier teams off of being the most physical in the NFL thats why heads butt when they meet.

The Jags will be lucky to make the playoffs. Sig bet me if you like
Accepted.
 
They will drop the next 2 games and this thread will endlessly be bumped to ridicule you. Then they will end up with an 11-5 record and an impressive 1st RD playoff win, in which you will prematurely bump this only to see them lose in the divisional game.Elite–noun 1. (often used with a plural verb) the choice or best of anything considered collectively, as of a group or class of persons. 2. (used with a plural verb) persons of the highest class: Only the elite were there. That being said I think they are one of the better teams in the league, but anyone who hasn't won a playoff game yet, I can't consider elite.
NOTE: I did not say they were elite, I was only asking what people's perceptions of them are.The only teams with more regular season wins than JAX between 2005 and 2006 are the Colts and Seahawks. I am a firm believer that gaudy regular season records does not mean a whole heck of a lot if you go nowhere in the postseason, so I can see both sides of this argument.
 
Pittsburgh 25, Jacksonville 23 - 2002

Pittsburgh 17, Jacksonville 16 - 2004

Jacksonville 23, Pittsburgh 17 - 2005

Jacksonville 9, Pittsburgh 0 - 2006

Please dont read too much into this weeks game. This is a Rivalry.

I doesnt matter if the Jags are 0-7 and play the 7-0 STeelers the Game is ALWAYS close.

Both themas coaches pride thier teams off of being the most physical i nthe NFL that why heads butt when they meet.

The Jags will be lucky to make the playoffs.
2002 - Kordell Stewart was filling in for Maddox2004 - I'll give you that one

2005 - Maddox in for Rothlisburger plus Jags had a great season

2006 - The Jags are for real

 
They will drop the next 2 games and this thread will endlessly be bumped to ridicule you. Then they will end up with an 11-5 record and an impressive 1st RD playoff win, in which you will prematurely bump this only to see them lose in the divisional game.Elite–noun 1. (often used with a plural verb) the choice or best of anything considered collectively, as of a group or class of persons. 2. (used with a plural verb) persons of the highest class: Only the elite were there. That being said I think they are one of the better teams in the league, but anyone who hasn't won a playoff game yet, I can't consider elite.
NOTE: I did not say they were elite, I was only asking what people's perceptions of them are.The only teams with more regular season wins than JAX between 2005 and 2006 are the Colts and Seahawks. I am a firm believer that gaudy regular season records does not mean a whole heck of a lot if you go nowhere in the postseason, so I can see both sides of this argument.
I know you didn't say they were elite...Just thought that this was the way the thread will end up
 
They will drop the next 2 games and this thread will endlessly be bumped to ridicule you.
NOTE: I did not say they were elite, I was only asking what people's perceptions of them are.The only teams with more regular season wins than JAX between 2005 and 2006 are the Colts and Seahawks. I am a firm believer that gaudy regular season records does not mean a whole heck of a lot if you go nowhere in the postseason, so I can see both sides of this argument.
And the Jags have beaten both those teams in that time period. The Jags have also won 10 of their last 11 regular season games. But I agree that the postseason is where the elites are made. The colts have proven that repeatedly. Until the Jags win some in the tourney it's all just college/BCS style posturing. Talk and public opinion that means little in the end.
 
Not enough offense to be considered elite. Sure their D looks great now, but let's see how well it's playing in late November & December after several games have taken their physical toll and opponents have much more game film to create a gameplan to attack their D with. The 2003 Bills looked like world-beaters after two games, too.

 
Not enough offense to be considered elite. Sure their D looks great now, but let's see how well it's playing in late November & December after several games have taken their physical toll and opponents have much more game film to create a gameplan to attack their D with. The 2003 Bills looked like world-beaters after two games, too.
The Jags have been playing the same defensive system with close to the same personel for years. Why would teams need more film? This is not a team that was 5-11 the last few years that started 2-0, the Jags were 12-4 in 2005 and 9-7 in 2004(missed the playoffs in week 17).
 
It's too early to tell what teams are "elite" after 2 weeks of the season. A year ago, the Steelers had fought through an injury to Roethlisberger and stood at 7-5 after 12 games, but they were playing at a MUCH higher level heading into the playoffs... and that's when it really matters.

If they play every week with the same intensity that they did last night, I think the Jags are a very, very good team that has a chance to be one of the NFL's elite teams at the end of the year. I know they won 12 games last year, but taking a look at who they beat and how soundly they got beat in the playoffs tells a slightly different story. They were probably a 9 or 10 win team last year, but a little improvement and all of sudden they're right there with the top contenders.

They have a physical defense that has the ability to stop the run and a physical secondary that's made some big plays. They don't have an overly explosive passing attack, but it's efficient and has the capability of racking up yards and taking what the defense gives them. And as long as Taylor is healthy, they have a physical running back who can grind out the tough yards and take pressure off the quarterback.

Just like the Steelers were last year (and might end up this year, too).

 
Not enough offense to be considered elite. Sure their D looks great now, but let's see how well it's playing in late November & December after several games have taken their physical toll and opponents have much more game film to create a gameplan to attack their D with. The 2003 Bills looked like world-beaters after two games, too.
The Jags have been playing the same defensive system with close to the same personel for years. Why would teams need more film? This is not a team that was 5-11 the last few years that started 2-0, the Jags were 12-4 in 2005 and 9-7 in 2004(missed the playoffs in week 17).
The question isn't if they are *good*. The question is if they are *elite*. Last year's 12-4 was a result of a soft schedule. The Pats tanked their season finale in order to draw the Jags. The 28pts the Pats put up in the playoffs is slightly deceiving (Watson's long TD and the INT-TD were game-breaking plays that likely would not be repeated in a rematch), but the 3 the Jags put up was the truth. The Jags were in trouble in the postseason if they had to count on a 9-0 type win like they had last night. The playoff teams were too good to bet on that kind of outcome.As for the same defensive system, you can't tell me the Jags haven't tweaked their tendencies on various situations over the years. The Pats have been in a 3-4 since 2003, but have varied their situational calls over the years. That's what the game film is for.
 
Not elite until they beat the Colts, but I sure wouldn't be betting against them.

I've said most of this before, but it holds true IMO. I absolutely love the way the Jags structure their defense. Give me two elite (yes, it's appropriate here) DTs, a very good MLB and solid players throughout the defense and you'll win many games.

Now, for their offense, it can improve, but the potential is huge. A QB whom I happen to like more than many around here do (more so as an NFL QB than FF), a young talented WR corps, and a RB who somehow remains underrated despite excelling.

The team is built for a super bowl run, but as usual, things have to break their way. There's areas to be improved, but overall, I like this team a lot.

 
Not enough offense to be considered elite. Sure their D looks great now, but let's see how well it's playing in late November & December after several games have taken their physical toll and opponents have much more game film to create a gameplan to attack their D with. The 2003 Bills looked like world-beaters after two games, too.
The Jags have been playing the same defensive system with close to the same personel for years. Why would teams need more film? This is not a team that was 5-11 the last few years that started 2-0, the Jags were 12-4 in 2005 and 9-7 in 2004(missed the playoffs in week 17).
The question isn't if they are *good*. The question is if they are *elite*. Last year's 12-4 was a result of a soft schedule. The Pats tanked their season finale in order to draw the Jags. The 28pts the Pats put up in the playoffs is slightly deceiving (Watson's long TD and the INT-TD were game-breaking plays that likely would not be repeated in a rematch), but the 3 the Jags put up was the truth. The Jags were in trouble in the postseason if they had to count on a 9-0 type win like they had last night. The playoff teams were too good to bet on that kind of outcome.As for the same defensive system, you can't tell me the Jags haven't tweaked their tendencies on various situations over the years. The Pats have been in a 3-4 since 2003, but have varied their situational calls over the years. That's what the game film is for.
Of course they'll tweak changes. But it's 3+ years of the same head coach, same DC, same basic scheme, and mostly the same players. It not like the Jags ran a new look at Pitt last night. Pitt knew what to expect and had plenty of game film to study.
 
Who?I have never heard of this team let alone the town they reside in.They are complete unknowns to me.At least that what Tony Kornheiser led me to believe last night.
That tool is making Theisman look like an absolute genius. My god, he knows next to nothing about the game of football, except that in some countries it's called soccer.
 
Where've you been? They've been among the elite for about a year now. The only reason no one talks about them is because Indy is is in the same division and has all of the star power.

 
Where've you been? They've been among the elite for about a year now. The only reason no one talks about them is because Indy is is in the same division and has all of the star power.
They may be elite this year, but hardly for about a year. They had very few quality wins last season. They beat the Seahawks and Bengals early last year at home, and a Maddox-QB Steelers squad in OT on the road. To their credit, the Jaguars beat who they played, but they lacked signature wins.These first two games of 2006 have been very impressive, yet I can see some basis for arguing that good teams are supposed to win their home games. Elite teams win on the road and in the playoffs. As a Steeler fan, I compliment them on a great performance yesterday. At least for one night, they were much closer to elite than Pittsburgh, yet as dominant as they were statistically, and as feeble as the Steelers offense looked for 55 minutes, they were one drive away from a victory. Take that for what it's worth.Bottom line: If Jax beats Indy Sunday, they'll be the most impressive team so far this year, beating Dallas, Pittsburgh and Indy in succession. Elite status as far as I'm concerned for 2006. But again, playoffs are a different story. Few considered the Patriots elite in 2001 or the Bucs in 2002 or the Steelers in 2005, but come playoff team, they played their best football. Who cares what people think? Win the Lombardi Trophy and let everyone else debate how great you are.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top