baconisgood
Footballguy
There was a two part article on the Martz effect last week for subscribers and I felt it was of very low value. I won't discuss protected content but I would like to list my reasons for thinking the Martz effect on the 49ers this year will be overblown, and would like to hear counterpoints since I know I am biased against Martz and love hating him.
Exhibit 1 is his time as Rams offensive coordinator. When he signed up in 1999 the Rams had a poor offense, they went on to be huge the next few years. How much of this can we attribute to Mike Martz though? There were massive personal changes to the Rams that year.
a. Marshall Faulk. 26 year old, future Hall of Fame RB. Thats a hell of an addition, especially considering the Rams leading rusher in 1998 was Robert Holcombe with 98 carries for 230 yards (or june henley with 88 attempts for 313 yards). Their situation in 1997 was better, but not that much.
b. Tory Holt's rookie year, 788 yards + 6tds. Hes been to two pro bowls without Martz. An upgrade over Amp Lee and Ricky Proehl (leading receivers in 1998) for sure.
c. Return of Issac Bruce. Bruce played in 5 games in 1998 and 16 in 1999. Also a big upgrade over the top receivers in 1998.
d. Kurt Warner. Sure he was an amazing story, but since leaving the Rams he has shown that when healthy he is an NFL talent. The 1998 version? Tony Banks and his career 54.2% completion percentage with a few games of Steve Bono and his career 54.9% thrown in.
4 upgrades at skill positions with talent on the offensive line already in place. How much credit are we going to give Martz's system and how much for those upgrades?
Exhibit 2 2006 Detroit had another bad offense that Martz 'boosted'. addtions?
a. Kitna > Harrington/Garcia. Kitna is no world beater, but has show that he is certainly better that Harrington in his career, and Garcia was clearly bad when in a system that didn't suit him (detroit/cleveland)
b. Roy Williams plays 16 games instead of 13 the year before.
c. Mike Furrey is brought in as a number 2 receiver. He hasn't had much of a career (well none really) other than his time in Detroit, but he was replacing scotty vines he spent two years in the league and totalled 43 catches.
Kevin Jones, Artose Pinner and Marcus Pollard combine for 87 catches in 2005 (46 Pollard, 21 Pinner, 20 Jones), and Jones, Pollard and Daniel Campbell combine for 93 in 2006 (61, 21, 12).
From 2006-2007 the Lions add
Calvin Johnson who has a solid season, Shaun McDonald who is more effective than hes ever been. They lose 4 games from Roy Williams and 6 starts from Kevin Jones.
From these two examples I feel its dubios to claim anything more than a moderate 'martz effect', he takes over poor offenses with crap personal. Better personal and he gets better results. This year he is again taking over crap, since it was the worst offense in the league last year its reasonable to assume an improvement. But hes still looking at the same guys as his QB, and hes got a 36 yr old Bruce and Bryant Johnson as his upgrades.
Exhibit 1 is his time as Rams offensive coordinator. When he signed up in 1999 the Rams had a poor offense, they went on to be huge the next few years. How much of this can we attribute to Mike Martz though? There were massive personal changes to the Rams that year.
a. Marshall Faulk. 26 year old, future Hall of Fame RB. Thats a hell of an addition, especially considering the Rams leading rusher in 1998 was Robert Holcombe with 98 carries for 230 yards (or june henley with 88 attempts for 313 yards). Their situation in 1997 was better, but not that much.
b. Tory Holt's rookie year, 788 yards + 6tds. Hes been to two pro bowls without Martz. An upgrade over Amp Lee and Ricky Proehl (leading receivers in 1998) for sure.
c. Return of Issac Bruce. Bruce played in 5 games in 1998 and 16 in 1999. Also a big upgrade over the top receivers in 1998.
d. Kurt Warner. Sure he was an amazing story, but since leaving the Rams he has shown that when healthy he is an NFL talent. The 1998 version? Tony Banks and his career 54.2% completion percentage with a few games of Steve Bono and his career 54.9% thrown in.
4 upgrades at skill positions with talent on the offensive line already in place. How much credit are we going to give Martz's system and how much for those upgrades?
Exhibit 2 2006 Detroit had another bad offense that Martz 'boosted'. addtions?
a. Kitna > Harrington/Garcia. Kitna is no world beater, but has show that he is certainly better that Harrington in his career, and Garcia was clearly bad when in a system that didn't suit him (detroit/cleveland)
b. Roy Williams plays 16 games instead of 13 the year before.
c. Mike Furrey is brought in as a number 2 receiver. He hasn't had much of a career (well none really) other than his time in Detroit, but he was replacing scotty vines he spent two years in the league and totalled 43 catches.
Kevin Jones, Artose Pinner and Marcus Pollard combine for 87 catches in 2005 (46 Pollard, 21 Pinner, 20 Jones), and Jones, Pollard and Daniel Campbell combine for 93 in 2006 (61, 21, 12).
From 2006-2007 the Lions add
Calvin Johnson who has a solid season, Shaun McDonald who is more effective than hes ever been. They lose 4 games from Roy Williams and 6 starts from Kevin Jones.
From these two examples I feel its dubios to claim anything more than a moderate 'martz effect', he takes over poor offenses with crap personal. Better personal and he gets better results. This year he is again taking over crap, since it was the worst offense in the league last year its reasonable to assume an improvement. But hes still looking at the same guys as his QB, and hes got a 36 yr old Bruce and Bryant Johnson as his upgrades.