Buffaloes
Footballguy
Meh, I don't have a problem with expecting a playoff team to play defenseIn the playoffs they should give each team a chance. One of the dumbest rules ever.
Meh, I don't have a problem with expecting a playoff team to play defenseIn the playoffs they should give each team a chance. One of the dumbest rules ever.
I'm not in either camp on Cousins. I'm in the camp that this forum is full of a lot very critical Doritos eaters who might not even know how to throw a football.Youa re one of those come in after the fact kinda guys.
So is Cousins a good QB all of a sudden? Dalvin won that game for them.
There have been at least a couple this year, including the Vikings getting one called back against GBThey haven’t overturned a TD with an after-the-fact offensive PI call ever, nor will they. It was likely PI, but that’s not getting called there upon review. Ever.
Just like PI itself, its always gonna be a judgment call and there's gonna be gray area cases, but that wasn't one of them. I'd rather have a couple of questionable review judgment calls then no means to reverse egregious bad initial calls. I'm a review fan in general though while I know other people aren't.Problem is they can't pick and choose how bad the infraction needs to be. It doesn't work. Just scrap it IMO. Refs are going to mess stuff up.
Missed a 30ish yard fg.Saints probably should have scored more than 20 in regulation.
Yeah, Cousins went 19-31 for 250 or so, whereas Tannehill went 8-15 for 72. My word.You mean those like 4 times he actually threw it?
He needs to learn to step out of bounds late in gamesLots of really stupid stuff happened when you think back on it...that Brees fumble was ridiculous, and Kamara had a number of bonehead plays
You can extend your arm and "interfere". You can't PUSH. I don't think there was conclusive pushing, I mean you gotta let them play.Just get rid of the pass int review.
FFS, between this and the Seattle game. Whats the point of having it?
NFL is becoming a joke in itself. If not for fantasy we wouldnt watch most of this trash.
He clearly extended his arm when the ball was in the air and interfered with the defender.
What am I missing?
That was PI on a player setting a pick. Not on a push off that wasn’t called on the field.There have been at least a couple this year, including the Vikings getting one called back against GB
A pick is still OPI, so I was just responding to the "They haven’t overturned a TD with an after-the-fact offensive PI call ever" comment. I agree though, a push off would likely have to involve weaponry to get a TD called backThat was PI on a player setting a pick. Not on a push off that wasn’t called on the field.
I love Doritos but I throw the 5-yard out like the love child of Montana and Brady.I'm not in either camp on Cousins. I'm in the camp that this forum is full of a lot very critical Doritos eaters who might not even know how to throw a football.
Then they disappear.
Huh. I'll allow it.Pass Interference on the defense is the dumbest penalty name in existence. Interfering with the other guys trying to make a catch is literally the whole point of playing the game
thisthey will change it now....sean payton gonna bellyache all off season
And if you look at the actual “big” games that cousins has lost, his defense should gets credited for some of those.Youa re one of those come in after the fact kinda guys.
So is Cousins a good QB all of a sudden? Dalvin won that game for them.
It would also attract more wrestling fan to the game.Pass Interference on the defense is the dumbest penalty name in existence. Interfering with the other guys trying to make a catch is literally the whole point of playing the game
Interesting. So the DEF should be able to just blast a guy trying to make a catch? Tackle him, blast him, anything to stop the catch?Pass Interference on the defense is the dumbest penalty name in existence. Interfering with the other guys trying to make a catch is literally the whole point of playing the game
The key is getting the ball out quick.I love Doritos but I throw the 5-yard out like the love child of Montana and Brady.
You cant lose when your playing both sides of this thing I guess.I picked 4 vikes including the D/ST
And a couple Texans. All I’ve lost is NEP D/ST.
One more week from my Vikings!![]()
Yikes. I don't know about that. If anything, I thought the Packers would have had a better shot against the saints. January, in Green Bay, against a warm weather, dome team that hasn't traveled well in the past? I think they could've won that. But not against the seahawks or eagles. Philly already played there earlier this year and won...GB is being forgotten as well......hell, most people were already pencilling in the saints over GB next week in Lambeau.....now GB gets winner of Philly and Seattle on the frozen tundra.....I'm glad I stocked up on GB players for playoff FF.
If you are the Eagles pretty much.Interesting. So the DEF should be able to just blast a guy trying to make a catch? Tackle him, blast him, anything to stop the catch?
![]()
Just one of them, though?Meh, I don't have a problem with expecting a playoff team to play defense
? I'm very confused, I dont think I said anything of the sortInteresting. So the DEF should be able to just blast a guy trying to make a catch? Tackle him, blast him, anything to stop the catch?
![]()
Pass Interference on the defense is the dumbest penalty name in existence. Interfering with the other guys trying to make a catch is literally the whole point of playing the game
? I'm very confused, I dont think I said anything of the sort
Ultimately, this is the case.That was an ugly game. Saints played like crap. Vikings deserved to win.
I'll take Rodgers and GB, at home, against either of these teams.Yikes. I don't know about that. If anything, I thought the Packers would have had a better shot against the saints. January, in Green Bay, against a warm weather, dome team that hasn't traveled well in the past? I think they could've won that. But not against the seahawks or eagles. Philly already played there earlier this year and won...
He has an issue with the name of the penalty, not the penalty itself.Interesting. So the DEF should be able to just blast a guy trying to make a catch? Tackle him, blast him, anything to stop the catch?
![]()
I have a problem with illegal touching...I mean, not me personally doing that...umm, never mind.He has an issue with the name of the penalty, not the penalty itself.
Current NFL refs say that it shouldn’t have been flagged.
Well duh, current refs only want to protect their jobs and the shield.Current NFL refs say that it shouldn’t have been flagged.
You can extend your arm and "interfere". You can't PUSH. I don't think there was conclusive pushing, I mean you gotta let them play.
I disagree entirely with you both. No question there was conclusive pushing, the defender's entire posture changed (his head and chest going backwards) given the shove Rudolph gave him.CBS already trying to start a no call controversy. Claiming Rudolph should have been called for offensive pass interference. Give me a flippin break.
While I appreciate your perspective I think it lacks some context.I disagree entirely with you both. No question there was conclusive pushing, the defender's entire posture changed (his head and chest going backwards) given the shove Rudolph gave him.
I literally don't have a single stake in either of these teams or the outcome of this game, and I still think Vikes deserved to win as NO simply didn't play anywhere near their potential and couldn't put the game away in any sense.
That said, I just don't like seeing games with this level of importance decided on a call that should have easily been made -- especially given all the unbelievable (and wrong) ticky/tacky PIs I've seen the refs badly call all year, and the league's feeble attempt to put ad nauseum replay into effect for the sake of fairness. And here, where it was fairly clear, they blow the call.
If the defense does its job that's a moot point. I don't see the big deal with the rule as it is.Just one of them, though?
Fair points. But I don't think I've ever seen NFL refs approach NHL refs in their attempts to often "even out" calls that grant a team a power play. And in my eyes, I don't think it was a clear "no-call" nor was it just two guys hand-fighting as opposed to a play that clearly advantaged Rudolph to win a playoff game in overtime.While I appreciate your perspective I think it lacks some context.
The refs were not calling many penalties all game from my perspective. Earlier in the game Rudolph was held pretty obviously on a 3rd down. No call on the defense.
This is just one of many examples one could give of the refs consistently not calling the game very tight. If you are going to let defenders play physical in coverage then offensive players get to push and grab a hit too.
I looked it up and the NFL averages over one fewer penalties called on average in the playoffs compared to the regular season.
My point is if that is a non call that should have been then the same is true for plays that were not called throughout the game
Rudolph did push off and obviously has a lot of advantages over the DB in that situation.
I am not saying they should be doing make up calls.Fair points. But I don't think I've ever seen NFL refs approach NHL refs in their attempts to often "even out" calls that grant a team a power play. And in my eyes, I don't think it was a clear "no-call" nor was it just two guys hand-fighting as opposed to a play that clearly advantaged Rudolph to win a playoff game in overtime.
PI was specifically made reviewable this year. I guess I don't see how anyone reviewing that play could say the evidence wasn't there and/or wasn't clear enough to assess an OPI.
Again, this game takes no skin off my nose whatsoever, I guess just don't like seeing games at this point in the season end so controversially (in my eyes).