What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

The NFL Schedule (1 Viewer)

Jeff Pasquino

Footballguy
According to Adam Schefter:

The NFL Schedule is being rather problematic. They had slated to release it this week (April 5th) but it could be 1-2 weeks behind now. They've had issues with getting the right games / dates / TV packages aligned.

 
If they have the BYE weeks figured out, they could at least release those.
I agree, but I am sick of bye weeks. there are 32 teams, no need for byes. When there were 28 teams, there weren't any byes. Only when The Cleveland Browns expansion franchise joined the league did the byes start. They had to because of the odd # of teams. I blame the Ravens for byes. If they had never left Cleveland, there wouldn't have ever been a need for an odd # of teams. End of meaningless rant!!! Sorry!
 
If they have the BYE weeks figured out, they could at least release those.
I agree, but I am sick of bye weeks. there are 32 teams, no need for byes. When there were 28 teams, there weren't any byes. Only when The Cleveland Browns expansion franchise joined the league did the byes start. They had to because of the odd # of teams. I blame the Ravens for byes. If they had never left Cleveland, there wouldn't have ever been a need for an odd # of teams. End of meaningless rant!!! Sorry!
The NFL has had bye weeks as long as I can remember and that was way before Cleveland got their expansion team.The only thing Cleveland's expansion did was force the league to have at least one team on bye every week.When the Patriots won their first SB, they had a week 17 bye.
 
As annoying as byes can be for us, they're definitely needed. Also the owner who is looking ahead can find convenient trading opportunities because of the byes.

 
Week three byes are stupid. They ought to have four weeks of byes in the middle of the season. Have two divisions (one from each conference) off each of those four weeks. And then everyone gets the bye roughly half-way through the season. Either weeks seven through ten or weeks eight through eleven.

 
The PATS had a week 17 bye becuase of 9/11. They were supposed to have it like week 2-3 whenever the week fell.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Roger Goodell is to Commissioners what Rex Grossman is to Quarterbacks.

I'm unimpressed with him so far. What exactly has he done to put 'his stamp' on the NFL besides nothing.

 
Week three byes are stupid. They ought to have four weeks of byes in the middle of the season. Have two divisions (one from each conference) off each of those four weeks. And then everyone gets the bye roughly half-way through the season. Either weeks seven through ten or weeks eight through eleven.
:shrug: I can understand why they want bye weeks (stretch a 16 game schedule over 17 weeks) but I don't like some teams getting a bye in week 3 and others getting a bye in week 10. They could do a better job of grouping the byes in the middle of the season.
 
I agree, but I am sick of bye weeks. there are 32 teams, no need for byes. When there were 28 teams, there weren't any byes. Only when The Cleveland Browns expansion franchise joined the league did the byes start. They had to because of the odd # of teams. I blame the Ravens for byes. If they had never left Cleveland, there wouldn't have ever been a need for an odd # of teams. End of meaningless rant!!! Sorry!
For years there used to be 2 byes for each team. I wouldn't complain about one. I'm usually thankful for the bye week each year, it usually helps the team get healthy and regroup.
 
If they have the BYE weeks figured out, they could at least release those.
I agree, but I am sick of bye weeks. there are 32 teams, no need for byes. When there were 28 teams, there weren't any byes. Only when The Cleveland Browns expansion franchise joined the league did the byes start. They had to because of the odd # of teams. I blame the Ravens for byes. If they had never left Cleveland, there wouldn't have ever been a need for an odd # of teams. End of meaningless rant!!! Sorry!
The NFL has had bye weeks as long as I can remember and that was way before Cleveland got their expansion team.The only thing Cleveland's expansion did was force the league to have at least one team on bye every week.

When the Patriots won their first SB, they had a week 17 bye.
So, you haven't been watching football long then....ETA - The NFL added byes to its schedule in 1990.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I agree, but I am sick of bye weeks. there are 32 teams, no need for byes. When there were 28 teams, there weren't any byes. Only when The Cleveland Browns expansion franchise joined the league did the byes start. They had to because of the odd # of teams. I blame the Ravens for byes. If they had never left Cleveland, there wouldn't have ever been a need for an odd # of teams. End of meaningless rant!!! Sorry!
For years there used to be 2 byes for each team. I wouldn't complain about one. I'm usually thankful for the bye week each year, it usually helps the team get healthy and regroup.
When was taht :yes:
 
If they have the BYE weeks figured out, they could at least release those.
I agree, but I am sick of bye weeks. there are 32 teams, no need for byes. When there were 28 teams, there weren't any byes. Only when The Cleveland Browns expansion franchise joined the league did the byes start. They had to because of the odd # of teams. I blame the Ravens for byes. If they had never left Cleveland, there wouldn't have ever been a need for an odd # of teams. End of meaningless rant!!! Sorry!
The NFL has had bye weeks as long as I can remember and that was way before Cleveland got their expansion team.The only thing Cleveland's expansion did was force the league to have at least one team on bye every week.

When the Patriots won their first SB, they had a week 17 bye.
So, you haven't been watching football long then....ETA - The NFL added byes to its schedule in 1990.
I stand corrected. Sorry for posting without knowing the facts. I thought the byes started when the Browns come back into the league. I remember when I was a kid there were no byes. I liked it because it was fair. You guys hit it on the head of why I don't like byes. The teams that have one in week 3 are at a disadvantage to those with byes in week 10. If byes are a neccessity then I guess I prefer houdini's idea to have 4 weeks of byes with 2 divisions off at a time. Early and late byes could be rotated year to year. Although Ozymandias' idea of football for over half the year (10 byes in a 20 game season) sounds pretty good to me.
 
I agree, but I am sick of bye weeks. there are 32 teams, no need for byes. When there were 28 teams, there weren't any byes. Only when The Cleveland Browns expansion franchise joined the league did the byes start. They had to because of the odd # of teams. I blame the Ravens for byes. If they had never left Cleveland, there wouldn't have ever been a need for an odd # of teams. End of meaningless rant!!! Sorry!
For years there used to be 2 byes for each team. I wouldn't complain about one. I'm usually thankful for the bye week each year, it usually helps the team get healthy and regroup.
When was taht :rolleyes:
The only year I could find was 1993-http://www.profootballreference.com/teams/phi1993.htm

 
I agree, but I am sick of bye weeks. there are 32 teams, no need for byes. When there were 28 teams, there weren't any byes. Only when The Cleveland Browns expansion franchise joined the league did the byes start. They had to because of the odd # of teams. I blame the Ravens for byes. If they had never left Cleveland, there wouldn't have ever been a need for an odd # of teams. End of meaningless rant!!! Sorry!
For years there used to be 2 byes for each team. I wouldn't complain about one. I'm usually thankful for the bye week each year, it usually helps the team get healthy and regroup.
When was taht :shrug:
The only year I could find was 1993-http://www.profootballreference.com/teams/phi1993.htm
Yep. It lasted one year. The NFL wanted it's season to go a week longer. But everyone - players, coaches and fans - hated it. It made the Super Bowl really late and teams that were terrible and had late season byes lost all fan support and any existing momentum after the second bye.I thought too that byes started with an expansion team entering the league because there were odd numbers. Any idea which team came in? I just remember that being a mess, because one team had a week 1 bye that year and someone else ended their season a week early because of a week 17 bye.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes normally every year, I get excited and hope the Bills get a primetime game. Then I see the schedule. I have season tickets and like to plan road trips based on the schedule.

Cant wait.

 
I agree, but I am sick of bye weeks. there are 32 teams, no need for byes. When there were 28 teams, there weren't any byes. Only when The Cleveland Browns expansion franchise joined the league did the byes start. They had to because of the odd # of teams. I blame the Ravens for byes. If they had never left Cleveland, there wouldn't have ever been a need for an odd # of teams. End of meaningless rant!!! Sorry!
For years there used to be 2 byes for each team. I wouldn't complain about one. I'm usually thankful for the bye week each year, it usually helps the team get healthy and regroup.
When was taht :scared:
The only year I could find was 1993-http://www.profootballreference.com/teams/phi1993.htm
Yep. It lasted one year. The NFL wanted it's season to go a week longer. But everyone - players, coaches and fans - hated it. It made the Super Bowl really late and teams that were terrible and had late season byes lost all fan support and any existing momentum after the second bye.I thought too that byes started with an expansion team entering the league because there were odd numbers. Any idea which team came in? I just remember that being a mess, because one team had a week 1 bye that year and someone else ended their season a week early because of a week 17 bye.
Another reason that 2 BYE weeks only lasted one year was that there was a lack of quality games on those weeks when there were 8 teams off instead of 4 teams.IIRC BYE weeks started before expansion. There was a problem when Cleveland re-entered the league, and that gave the league an odd number of teams. That made it necessary to have one team on BYE each week from week 1 to week 17. IIRC the last year of this type of schedule Denver was off on week 16 and people were debating on if they should draft Bronco players as high as normally would due to them being off on championship weekend.

 
There ought to be 10 byes in a 20 game season. Football more than half the year...Yes! :scared:
I've toyed with the concept of increasing the number of byes to 4 or 5 as a way to extend the season for our viewing and FF-playing pleasure and for keeping teams fresh. But then came the following post and I wondered if my thinking was wrong:
Yep. It lasted one year. The NFL wanted it's season to go a week longer. But everyone - players, coaches and fans - hated it. It made the Super Bowl really late and teams that were terrible and had late season byes lost all fan support and any existing momentum after the second bye.
 
There ought to be 10 byes in a 20 game season. Football more than half the year...Yes! :banned:
I've toyed with the concept of increasing the number of byes to 4 or 5 as a way to extend the season for our viewing and FF-playing pleasure and for keeping teams fresh. But then came the following post and I wondered if my thinking was wrong:
Yep. It lasted one year. The NFL wanted it's season to go a week longer. But everyone - players, coaches and fans - hated it. It made the Super Bowl really late and teams that were terrible and had late season byes lost all fan support and any existing momentum after the second bye.
"Absence makes the heart grow fonder...."Or just watch Arena Football, AF2 or CFL....
 
I have not seen the schedule, but am willing to bet every single one of the Buc's games will be at 1:00. Except for 1 game that we travel to S.F., which will be @ 4:00. :lmao:

 
Week three byes are stupid. They ought to have four weeks of byes in the middle of the season. Have two divisions (one from each conference) off each of those four weeks. And then everyone gets the bye roughly half-way through the season. Either weeks seven through ten or weeks eight through eleven.
You do have to remember, though, that the season really starts in the middle to end of July. It is really more like 23 weeks long. Getting a bye in week 3 of the regular season is a lot closer to the middle of the whole season than you think.
 
QUEZILLA said:
Sidewinder said:
QUEZILLA said:
I have not seen the schedule, but am willing to bet every single one of the Buc's games will be at 1:00. Except for 1 game that we travel to S.F., which will be @ 4:00. :thumbdown:
Pretty standard for a team coming off of a 4-12 season. :yes:
Not really. We had a similar schedule coming off an 11-5 season :(
03 - 3 MNFs and 1 Sunday nighter after SB win season04 - 1 MNF and 1 Sunday nighter after 7-9 season05 - none after 5-11 season06 - 1 MNF and Thanksgiving day game after 11-5 + division title (and one & done in playoffs)07 - TBD after 4-12 seasonBased on the above, you expect much else in 2007 ? 2004 seems the one season that might be the aberration. JMHO.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
QUEZILLA said:
Sidewinder said:
QUEZILLA said:
I have not seen the schedule, but am willing to bet every single one of the Buc's games will be at 1:00. Except for 1 game that we travel to S.F., which will be @ 4:00. :lmao:
Pretty standard for a team coming off of a 4-12 season. :lmao:
Not really. We had a similar schedule coming off an 11-5 season :no:
03 - 3 MNFs and 1 Sunday nighter after SB win season04 - 1 MNF and 1 Sunday nighter after 7-9 season05 - none after 5-11 season06 - 1 MNF and Thanksgiving day game after 11-5 + division title (and one & done in playoffs)07 - TBD after 4-12 seasonBased on the above, you expect much else in 2007 ? 2004 seems the one season that might be the aberration. JMHO.
I am primarily talking about 4:00 games, and the fact we rarely get them even after winning the division. They are not prime time games, so ratings can't be that big of a deal. My gripe is that it's about 90 degrees and humid as hell in TB for the first half of the season. I guess it gives us an advantage playing in the heat, but it sucks for the fans.
 
QUEZILLA said:
Sidewinder said:
QUEZILLA said:
I have not seen the schedule, but am willing to bet every single one of the Buc's games will be at 1:00. Except for 1 game that we travel to S.F., which will be @ 4:00. ;)
Pretty standard for a team coming off of a 4-12 season. :shrug:
Not really. We had a similar schedule coming off an 11-5 season :shrug:
03 - 3 MNFs and 1 Sunday nighter after SB win season04 - 1 MNF and 1 Sunday nighter after 7-9 season05 - none after 5-11 season06 - 1 MNF and Thanksgiving day game after 11-5 + division title (and one & done in playoffs)07 - TBD after 4-12 seasonBased on the above, you expect much else in 2007 ? 2004 seems the one season that might be the aberration. JMHO.
I am primarily talking about 4:00 games, and the fact we rarely get them even after winning the division. They are not prime time games, so ratings can't be that big of a deal. My gripe is that it's about 90 degrees and humid as hell in TB for the first half of the season. I guess it gives us an advantage playing in the heat, but it sucks for the fans.
Aren't the 4:00 EST games just all the West Coast 1 PST games? I don't think there's anything else to it then that, I could be wrong though.
 
QUEZILLA said:
I have not seen the schedule, but am willing to bet every single one of the Buc's games will be at 1:00. Except for 1 game that we travel to S.F., which will be @ 4:00. :lmao:
Bills ask for all 1:00pm games. Perhaps the Bucs do the same?
 
...I am primarily talking about 4:00 games, and the fact we rarely get them even after winning the division. They are not prime time games, so ratings can't be that big of a deal. My gripe is that it's about 90 degrees and humid as hell in TB for the first half of the season. I guess it gives us an advantage playing in the heat, but it sucks for the fans.
Ahhhh, gotcha. Yeah, I certainly understand that. I've never been a big fan of indoor football, but in Sept. and early Oct., it's definitely nice to walk into the Dome's 72 degree air after tailgating for 4 or 5 hours in the Louisiana heat and humidity.
 
Five Networks fighting over games:

NBC (Sun Night)

CBS (Sunday)

FOX (Sunday)

ESPN (Mon Night)

NFL-N (8 games)

That has to be fun... :unsure:

 
If they have the BYE weeks figured out, they could at least release those.
I agree, but I am sick of bye weeks. there are 32 teams, no need for byes. When there were 28 teams, there weren't any byes. Only when The Cleveland Browns expansion franchise joined the league did the byes start. They had to because of the odd # of teams. I blame the Ravens for byes. If they had never left Cleveland, there wouldn't have ever been a need for an odd # of teams. End of meaningless rant!!! Sorry!
The NFL has had bye weeks as long as I can remember and that was way before Cleveland got their expansion team.The only thing Cleveland's expansion did was force the league to have at least one team on bye every week.

When the Patriots won their first SB, they had a week 17 bye.
So, you haven't been watching football long then....ETA - The NFL added byes to its schedule in 1990.
1990?That sounds about right. I was 11 or 12. Didn't get into football til late because I grew up with my mother. Anyway, once I saw the Magik Man play I was hooked. LOL.

 
I have not seen the schedule, but am willing to bet every single one of the Buc's games will be at 1:00. Except for 1 game that we travel to S.F., which will be @ 4:00. :bow:
Bills ask for all 1:00pm games. Perhaps the Bucs do the same?
Why would they do this? :D And the NFL actually accomidates?
Tailgating / drinking issues is one reason.
Jags usually get at least one 4:00 or 8:00 home start in September due to the heat. Of course, that minimally negates their "home field advantage".Jags also usually ask for 2-3 weeks away/off in mid to late-October for FL-GA game. (Portable bleachers are set up to boost capacity from 74K to 87K, plus the fair is in town and right next door.)
 
If they have the BYE weeks figured out, they could at least release those.
I agree, but I am sick of bye weeks. there are 32 teams, no need for byes. When there were 28 teams, there weren't any byes. Only when The Cleveland Browns expansion franchise joined the league did the byes start. They had to because of the odd # of teams. I blame the Ravens for byes. If they had never left Cleveland, there wouldn't have ever been a need for an odd # of teams. End of meaningless rant!!! Sorry!
The NFL has had bye weeks as long as I can remember and that was way before Cleveland got their expansion team.The only thing Cleveland's expansion did was force the league to have at least one team on bye every week.

When the Patriots won their first SB, they had a week 17 bye.
So, you haven't been watching football long then....ETA - The NFL added byes to its schedule in 1990.
1990?That sounds about right. I was 11 or 12. Didn't get into football til late because I grew up with my mother. Anyway, once I saw the Magik Man play I was hooked. LOL.
That one year he had w/ Sharpe was thrilling, I'll say that. :thumbup:

 
I asked the guys at PR if the Buc's requested 1:00 games, and they said they were not aware of it. Although, they did say that Jon Gruden prefers the 1:00 games because he doesn't like to break the routine. JG has also said he doesn't like to wait around all day for the game to start, he wakes up at 4:00 am , so if a game starts late he's up way past his bed time. :no: So, the NFL may indeed accomidate request for teams that want to play at 1:00. :excited:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Has anyone seen confirmation/denial that the schedule will be released tomorrow?
There was an article on ESPN.com on Monday.
...A league official confirmed Monday that the much-anticipated announcement of the regular-season schedule, originally set for Thursday, will be delayed. The schedule could be released as early as next week now, with the roll-out coming no later than April 19...
 
Has anyone seen confirmation/denial that the schedule will be released tomorrow?
There was an article on ESPN.com on Monday.
...A league official confirmed Monday that the much-anticipated announcement of the regular-season schedule, originally set for Thursday, will be delayed. The schedule could be released as early as next week now, with the roll-out coming no later than April 19...
Son of a................Trying to plan a roadtrip and need to know if the Steelers will be home or away on 9/9.

 
Looks like the schedule will be released on ESPN at 2pm Eastern time. Atleast that's what is scheduled to come on at that time. :headbang:

 
Looks like the schedule will be released on ESPN at 2pm Eastern time. Atleast that's what is scheduled to come on at that time. :thumbup:
That is an old listing which hasn't been changed. Like the other posters have said, the schedule is not ready yet. No definite date has been set.
 
Strange. It does not show it at espn.com but it is listed on my comcast guide. If this has already been hashed and rehashed then I apologize. I just noticed it looking for baseball games and thought I'd pass it along. FWIW.

 
Strange. It does not show it at espn.com but it is listed on my comcast guide. If this has already been hashed and rehashed then I apologize. I just noticed it looking for baseball games and thought I'd pass it along. FWIW.
Bummer. I guess I have to wait.
 
Hopefully they make the last two preseason games regular-sesaon games soon. That's one of those things that seems a long time in coming but also feels inevitable. Everyone hates the length of the pre-season - they say that it used to make sense when players needed training camp to get in shape, but nowadays players are in shape all year long.

I suppose you could add a second bye when the schedule moves to 18 games, so you get a 20 game regular season and its just about a half-year long.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top