I don't dislike Bell. Never have. And I do think the Steelers should make the right decision for the team, not for him.
And given my (and most people's) thoughts on their ability to trade or trust him, the two week roster exemption is simply the right move for the Steelers. It wouldn't be a stupid move at all. When I said screw him, I didnt mean that the Steelers should make a poor decision just to screw him over. I mean that if the Steelers best decision screws him out of another $1.7M, I don't care. If he wanted paid this year, he couldve reported.
If by some miracle, some team offers something crazy during those two weeks, reinstate and trade him. If not, he can wait and get ready forbhisblast games as a Steeler.
It's just business to Bell, so it should be to the Steelers too.
You’re operating under the belief that saving $1.7M is a smart decision. Is it, really, though, if it costs them a draft pick in 2019?
If they lose Bell next off-season, they should get a 3rd round comp pick in the 2020 draft, right?
Thats one less year of Bens prime where that pick could help. If they trade h8m this year, it’s reasonable to assume it will be for a 2019 pick.
Youre also assuming that they know now if a deal will be made, but that might also be a bad assumption. Jimmy G was traded at the deadline last year, and AFAIK, no one was reporting it as a possibility earlier. It’s not 8mpossible that a team might decide at the deadline that trading for a rental player like Bell is a good idea.
Youre also assuming that Bells approach to this situation is going to be some kind of “Scarlett letter” that will dissuade other teams from pursuing him. IMO, that’s a bad assumption. Didn’t stop Chi from trading for Mack; didn’t stop Seattle from trading for Brown last year; I don’t think it’ll be the reason a team doesn’t pursue Bell.
Maybe right before the deadline, the Texans decide they have a shot at the AFC South, but they can’t do it with Miller & Foreman’ Achilles injury is, well, an Achilles injury. They have ample cap room this year, plenty of space to try to get a deal w/Bell done in 2019, and gave all (AFAIK) their 2019 picks to trade. A 2019 3rd is better than a 2020 comp; a 2019 4th might be relatively equal to a 2020 comp. That’s a realistic possibility..
Matbe right at the deadline, the Colts have won a couple & think they have a shot. The6 have plenty of 2018 cap room to make the trade, 2019 cap room to try to get a long-term deal done, no one great at RB, and all their picks (+ an extra 2nd in 2019).
Thats 2 viable trades that could pop up at the deadline. But if, as you suggest, Pitt decides to screw Bell, they could screw themselves out of those possibilities. Its reasonable to assume that if Pitt says, “we’re gonna make you go 2 weeks without pay,” Bell will just wait till 10/30 to sign (@4:01). Pitt saving some money could cost them draft capital. Obviously nothing is guaranteed, but it’s all but guaranteed that if Pitt tries to screw Bell, they’ll lose any chance of being able to trade him.