Yeah, I remember 2000 and 2016 when they also complained about stolen elections.The defeated President who perpetuates myths about a stolen election is the anti-American singularly.
News Flash!Yeah, I remember 2000 and 2016 when they also complained about stolen elections.
Stacey Abrahams still hasn’t conceded her election. To this day she says it was stolen.Yeah, I remember 2000 and 2016 when they also complained about stolen elections.
See, that's also anti-American. Just like Trump. The idea that Trump is somehow the salve for anti-Americanism is laughable given his behavior, words, and actionsStacey Abrahams still hasn’t conceded her election. To this day she says it was stolen.
Nothing is more American than the left.Trump is just one giant ball of far-Left antimatter. As long as that anti-American threat exists, so will Trump. It’s really that simple.
huh? The left fought FOR slavery, implemented Jim Crowe and started the KKK. "The Left" has been responsible for some of the most heinous crimes not only in American history, but World history as well.Nothing is more American than the left.
Ended slavery, saved the union, helped women get the vote, ended company towns, child labor and murderous working conditions, created the 40 hour work week + weekends, provided social security and Medicare, restored clean water and clean air.
It's a good list.
Yeah, you guys keep brining that up, but that doesn't explain the left fighting for slavery during the Civil War, Jim Crowe and the KKK.
Where your conflating things is assuming the “left” always means Dems. The “left” is liberalism (taking hold primarily in the north), that is what freed the slaves. Some where along the way the sides flipped. Today what is classic red republicans in the south would have been southern Democrats during the civil war.Yeah, you guys keep brining that up, but that doesn't explain the left fighting for slavery during the Civil War, Jim Crowe and the KKK.
It's about time you guys come to grips with your history instead of blaming it on someone else. It's absurd that someone would post that the left freed the slaves and saved the union. Absolutely absurd and it's indicative of someone who knows nothing of history and wants to revise it as if they were the heroes.
Absurd.
The Left has caused more death and misery worldwide than any other form of government.Nothing is more American than the left.
Ended slavery, saved the union, helped women get the vote, ended company towns, child labor and murderous working conditions, created the 40 hour work week + weekends, provided social security and Medicare, restored clean water and clean air.
It's a good list.
The level of ignorance among Liberals these days astounds me. Completely ignorant of basic history.Yeah, you guys keep brining that up, but that doesn't explain the left fighting for slavery during the Civil War, Jim Crowe and the KKK.
It's about time you guys come to grips with your history instead of blaming it on someone else. It's absurd that someone would post that the left freed the slaves and saved the union. Absolutely absurd and it's indicative of someone who knows nothing of history and wants to revise it as if they were the heroes.
Absurd.
Negative. That's another BS attempt to try to pin slavery, Jim Crow and the KKK on anyone else other than the Democrats where it squarely belongs.Where your conflating things is assuming the “left” always means Dems. The “left” is liberalism (taking hold primarily in the north), that is what freed the slaves. Some where along the way the sides flipped. Today what is classic red republicans in the south would have been southern Democrats during the civil war.
So what were the people of the Deep South at the time of the civil war? And what were the liberals in the north?Negative. That's another BS attempt to try to pin slavery, Jim Crow and the KKK on anyone else other than the Democrats where it squarely belongs.
It was the idea of conservatives in the South who wanted to keep slaves shortly before the war. They wanted things to stay the same (literally the definition of conservatism, by the way). Your history and assertions are very much wrong.huh? The left fought FOR slavery, implemented Jim Crowe and started the KKK. "The Left" has been responsible for some of the most heinous crimes not only in American history, but World history as well.
Your revisionist history may work on the rubes, but it ain't working on anyone else.
Ignorance is simply not knowing the facts. However, blaming slavery on liberal ideologies is much worseThe level of ignorance among Liberals these days astounds me. Completely ignorant of basic history.
I’m a liberal. Are you calling me ignorant?The level of ignorance among Liberals these days astounds me. Completely ignorant of basic history.
Because when they find an opening on the smallest of points, they jump on it - cause they are failing on the big issuesWhy the common hot potato pissing contest over what the parties might or might not have done 100+ years ago? What does that have to do at all about what the current make up and tone of the political parties are today?
Oof!It was the idea of conservatives in the South who wanted to keep slaves shortly before the war. They wanted things to stay the same (literally the definition of conservatism, by the way). Your history and assertions are very much wrong.
They really like gaslighting. I’m not sure who they think they’re confusing, but they do it all the same. I just throw up an occasional link so the casual reader can see the truth when it gets a little thick.I’m a liberal. Are you calling me ignorant?
Oh wow. This is a tone-deaf post considering what forum you're in.They really like gaslighting. I’m not sure who they think they’re confusing, but they do it all the same. I just throw up an occasional link so the casual reader can see the truth when it gets a little thick.
When you post things like this your credibility really takes a hit.Yeah, I remember 2000 and 2016 when they also complained about stolen elections.
Oh, so now the left wasn't complaining about stolen elections? Wow.When you post things like this your credibility really takes a hit.
It does a pretty good job of deflecting from the thread topic and derailing the thread, no?Why the common hot potato pissing contest over what the parties might or might not have done 100+ years ago? What does that have to do at all about what the current make up and tone of the political parties are today?
Anything other than self-reflection. It seems that conspiracy theory has become the platform, governance be damned. It’s a sad and dangerous game that the party heads are playing right now.The Rs aren't failing on the big issues. They aren't even trying. No platform beyond conspiracy and complaining (sometimes rightfully so) about what the Ds are doing. I dream for the day the Rs return to attempting active governance so we can have a healthy debate on policies and direction. Unfortunately, that is not the path the party appears to be going down, instead doubling down on conspiracy and wild complaint.
Similar to yelling BLM/Antifa in the January 6 thread.It does a pretty good job of deflecting from the thread topic and derailing the thread, no?
You are correct on that and as far as I can tell no one is disputing that all.The Democrats didn't create the KKK? Revisionist history at its finest!
Exactly...the parties even today are different than in the 80s. This is not the same Republican party of Reagan...nor the same Democratic party. Things shift all the time.You are correct on that and as far as I can tell no one is disputing that all.
The disagreement seems to lie in your assertion that the Democratic party before 1960 was leftist and/or liberal.
The Democratic party went through a major change, as happens with political parties. So oddly, what seems to be a major tangent in this thread is somehow completely on point (Parties fracturing and changing).
All my points exactly.You are correct on that and as far as I can tell no one is disputing that all.
The disagreement seems to lie in your assertion that the Democratic party before 1960 was leftist and/or liberal.
The Democratic party went through a major change, as happens with political parties. So oddly, what seems to be a major tangent in this thread is somehow completely on point (Parties fracturing and changing).
Mine too. Which is why he conveniently didn’t answer my next post.All my points exactly.
The Democrats have always been the party of big government, and therefore have always been "liberal" in that sense.The disagreement seems to lie in your assertion that the Democratic party before 1960 was leftist and/or liberal.
The Democrats were conservative in the 1800s. They’re republicans now. Your history is wrong again.Oof!
You should own your history of being racists. The DNC has tried to revise history for the last 156 years and blame slavery and its horrendous treatment of black people on everyone else but themselves.
So when posters make the absurd claim that the left fought to end slavery and saved the union, it is VERY much laughable. And pathetic.
Oof. You are both correct and horribly, horribly wrong.The Democrats didn't create the KKK? Revisionist history at its finest!
In 1964 Ted Kennedy and Strom Thurmond were both US Senators and members of the Democratic Party. I don't think there would be any problem finding current Democrats with Kennedy's political philosophy. There are no Democrats that are anything like Thurmond.pollardsvision said:You are correct on that and as far as I can tell no one is disputing that all.
The disagreement seems to lie in your assertion that the Democratic party before 1960 was leftist and/or liberal.
The Democratic party went through a major change, as happens with political parties. So oddly, what seems to be a major tangent in this thread is somehow completely on point (Parties fracturing and changing).
Rove's been a RINO for a while now according to the posse.The Dude said:Meanwhile Rove hosts a summit for top candidates and the Cheeto isn’t invited or mentioned
I've never really understood that narrative. If we kept all else constant, the most meaningful thing that changes current day is that the current day "republican" would have been "democrat" 200 years ago and vice versa. It's some bizarre Twilight Zone stuff to not understand that, but it seems pretty prevalent.The Football Freak said:
Maybe I’m missing something but where did he say Democratic Party?pollardsvision said:You are correct on that and as far as I can tell no one is disputing that all.
The disagreement seems to lie in your assertion that the Democratic party before 1960 was leftist and/or liberal.
He didn’t but has. But that’s the point I was making. The “left” as it’s defined today is liberals. The liberals of the day during the civil war were not pro slavery and were on the side of freeing the slaves.Maybe I’m missing something but where did he say Democratic Party?