***The rookie hype has begun*** (1 Viewer)

[Spike]

Traded the 1.1 pick in my dynasty league for Steve smith a couple of months ago..

Unless it's PPR, I would think I would not go in this direction.

 

[sib]

Traded the 1.1 pick in my dynasty league for Steve smith a couple of months ago..

Unless it's PPR, I would think I would not go in this direction.

Yea PPR league...I just wasn't sold on Mcfadden to the point where I could decline steve smith

 

[switz]

Those replies are rediculous and must have been sent by morons. I would take Cedric Benson over ANY of next years rookie RBs.

Funny, but before I knew this was about LAST year, I thought the Benson & Jackson trade would be a good one for the guy receiving the pick. In hindsight it's even MORE lopsided for the guy receiving the pick.

 

[phthalatemagic]

Those replies are rediculous and must have been sent by morons. I would take Cedric Benson over ANY of next years rookie RBs.

Funny, but before I knew this was about LAST year, I thought the Benson & Jackson trade would be a good one for the guy receiving the pick. In hindsight it's even MORE lopsided for the guy receiving the pick.

 

[eom]

Just received this little Dynasty Gem the other day:I give: T.Henry,1.2I get 1.1So I basically give up a potential top 5-10 rb just for the luxury of getting Adrian Peterson instead of Calvin... either of whom I would be very happy with and help my team.Thanks for playing kid.. No thanks.

hahahahahahaha....!!!!!awesome thread.

 

[cstu]

Just received and immediately rejected this:I give 1.01, Rudi, Mark ClaytonI get 1.11, LJ, Demetrius Williams

Someone's kicking themselves right now.

 

[SayWhat?]

Just received and immediately rejected this:I give 1.01, Rudi, Mark ClaytonI get 1.11, LJ, Demetrius Williams

Someone's kicking themselves right now.

I doubt he's kicking himself for turning that offer down. Most people would likely prefer AP, Rudi and Mark Clayton to LJ, 1.11 and Dem Williams.

 

[FBGPoker]

ya, he must have mis-read it.

The Peterson side is way better.

 

[FBGPoker]

Peterson was recently voted the #17 RB in dynasty leagues. According to these polls, he (or the 1.01) has about the same value of McGahee, Jones-Drew or Caddy.

Everyone needs to read this and remember to not trust any of the dynasty voting polls from now through the start of next season, too many people who vote in them are completely clueless and don't even play in dynasty leagues.

 

[cstu]

ya, he must have mis-read it.The Peterson side is way better.

Yeah, I read it wrong and thought purplehaze made the offer.

 

[Ryan_21]

Those replies are rediculous and must have been sent by morons. I would take Cedric Benson over ANY of next years rookie RBs.

Ouch!Even when this was posted - Ouch!

Lets not forget 3 things. 1. This post was about a dynasty league. Certainly one year (or 10 1/2 games in Ceds case) out of the next 5-10 years isnt a clear representation of value.

2. Cedric Benson missed the last 5 1/2 games this year so of course his #s are low.

3. Over the last 6 weeks of the season AD was ranked RB#21 and Lynch was ranked RB#34. Was their fast start fluky? Have teams figured out how to game plan against them?

I would say at this point Adrian Peterson is the best out of the 3 with Lynch and Benson probably close to even. My main point when I wrote that though is that last years RB class was overall very weak top to bottom. Sure it was top heavy, but only in one player, as Lynch is still only a slightly above average RB at this point, he was just lucky to be on a run first team that pounded the ball.

 

[BigTex]

Those replies are rediculous and must have been sent by morons. I would take Cedric Benson over ANY of next years rookie RBs.

Ouch!Even when this was posted - Ouch!

Lets not forget 3 things. 1. This post was about a dynasty league. Certainly one year (or 10 1/2 games in Ceds case) out of the next 5-10 years isnt a clear representation of value.

2. Cedric Benson missed the last 5 1/2 games this year so of course his #s are low.

3. Over the last 6 weeks of the season AD was ranked RB#21 and Lynch was ranked RB#34. Was their fast start fluky? Have teams figured out how to game plan against them?

I would say at this point Adrian Peterson is the best out of the 3 with Lynch and Benson probably close to even. My main point when I wrote that though is that last years RB class was overall very weak top to bottom. Sure it was top heavy, but only in one player, as Lynch is still only a slightly above average RB at this point, he was just lucky to be on a run first team that pounded the ball.

Dude?

 

[Ryan_21]

Those replies are rediculous and must have been sent by morons. I would take Cedric Benson over ANY of next years rookie RBs.

Ouch!Even when this was posted - Ouch!

Lets not forget 3 things. 1. This post was about a dynasty league. Certainly one year (or 10 1/2 games in Ceds case) out of the next 5-10 years isnt a clear representation of value.

2. Cedric Benson missed the last 5 1/2 games this year so of course his #s are low.

3. Over the last 6 weeks of the season AD was ranked RB#21 and Lynch was ranked RB#34. Was their fast start fluky? Have teams figured out how to game plan against them?

I would say at this point Adrian Peterson is the best out of the 3 with Lynch and Benson probably close to even. My main point when I wrote that though is that last years RB class was overall very weak top to bottom. Sure it was top heavy, but only in one player, as Lynch is still only a slightly above average RB at this point, he was just lucky to be on a run first team that pounded the ball.

Dude?

Dude? Cedric Benson clearly ran behind the worst offensive line in the league, maybe in the last 10 years.

 

[teamroc]

Dude? Cedric Benson clearly ran behind the worst offensive line in the league, maybe in the last 10 years.

You are a) drunkb) high on crackc) Benson's agentd) Bensone) Benson's momf) a, b and cg) a, b and dh) a, b and ei) a, bRegardless, you're nuts.

 

[moderated]

Those replies are rediculous and must have been sent by morons. I would take Cedric Benson over ANY of next years rookie RBs.

Ouch!Even when this was posted - Ouch!

Lets not forget 3 things. 1. This post was about a dynasty league. Certainly one year (or 10 1/2 games in Ceds case) out of the next 5-10 years isnt a clear representation of value.

2. Cedric Benson missed the last 5 1/2 games this year so of course his #s are low.

3. Over the last 6 weeks of the season AD was ranked RB#21 and Lynch was ranked RB#34. Was their fast start fluky? Have teams figured out how to game plan against them?

I would say at this point Adrian Peterson is the best out of the 3 with Lynch and Benson probably close to even. My main point when I wrote that though is that last years RB class was overall very weak top to bottom. Sure it was top heavy, but only in one player, as Lynch is still only a slightly above average RB at this point, he was just lucky to be on a run first team that pounded the ball.

Please don't make it worse trying to justify that nonsense you initially wrote..

 

[Ryan_21]

Dude? Cedric Benson clearly ran behind the worst offensive line in the league, maybe in the last 10 years.

You are a) drunkb) high on crackc) Benson's agentd) Bensone) Benson's momf) a, b and cg) a, b and dh) a, b and ei) a, bRegardless, you're nuts.

What team had a worse offensive line than the Bears this year? They were bad in pass protection and very bad in run blocking, plus their WRs do not run block well at all.

 

[Jeff Tefertiller]

come on guys, let's be excellent to one another ...

 

[Burning Sensation]

Those replies are rediculous and must have been sent by morons. I would take Cedric Benson over ANY of next years rookie RBs.

Ouch!Even when this was posted - Ouch!

Lets not forget 3 things. 1. This post was about a dynasty league. Certainly one year (or 10 1/2 games in Ceds case) out of the next 5-10 years isnt a clear representation of value.

2. Cedric Benson missed the last 5 1/2 games this year so of course his #s are low.

3. Over the last 6 weeks of the season AD was ranked RB#21 and Lynch was ranked RB#34. Was their fast start fluky? Have teams figured out how to game plan against them?

I would say at this point Adrian Peterson is the best out of the 3 with Lynch and Benson probably close to even. My main point when I wrote that though is that last years RB class was overall very weak top to bottom. Sure it was top heavy, but only in one player, as Lynch is still only a slightly above average RB at this point, he was just lucky to be on a run first team that pounded the ball.

Do you watch the games? Lynch runs through more tackles on one carry than Benson will in a whole year. Benson has no heart, Lynch runs like every carry is going to be his last.

 

[identikit]

Those replies are rediculous and must have been sent by morons. I would take Cedric Benson over ANY of next years rookie RBs.

Ouch!Even when this was posted - Ouch!

Lets not forget 3 things. 1. This post was about a dynasty league. Certainly one year (or 10 1/2 games in Ceds case) out of the next 5-10 years isnt a clear representation of value.

2. Cedric Benson missed the last 5 1/2 games this year so of course his #s are low.

3. Over the last 6 weeks of the season AD was ranked RB#21 and Lynch was ranked RB#34. Was their fast start fluky? Have teams figured out how to game plan against them?

I would say at this point Adrian Peterson is the best out of the 3 with Lynch and Benson probably close to even. My main point when I wrote that though is that last years RB class was overall very weak top to bottom. Sure it was top heavy, but only in one player, as Lynch is still only a slightly above average RB at this point, he was just lucky to be on a run first team that pounded the ball.

Do you watch the games? Lynch runs through more tackles on one carry than Benson will in a whole year. Benson has no heart, Lynch runs like every carry is going to be his last.

 

[phthalatemagic]

Those replies are rediculous and must have been sent by morons. I would take Cedric Benson over ANY of next years rookie RBs.

Ouch!Even when this was posted - Ouch!

Lets not forget 3 things. 1. This post was about a dynasty league. Certainly one year (or 10 1/2 games in Ceds case) out of the next 5-10 years isnt a clear representation of value.

2. Cedric Benson missed the last 5 1/2 games this year so of course his #s are low.

3. Over the last 6 weeks of the season AD was ranked RB#21 and Lynch was ranked RB#34. Was their fast start fluky? Have teams figured out how to game plan against them?

I would say at this point Adrian Peterson is the best out of the 3 with Lynch and Benson probably close to even. My main point when I wrote that though is that last years RB class was overall very weak top to bottom. Sure it was top heavy, but only in one player, as Lynch is still only a slightly above average RB at this point, he was just lucky to be on a run first team that pounded the ball.