This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
![[scooter]](/data/avatars/m/22/22287.jpg?1659477690){kind=avatar}
In the eyes of many...he did when his campaign knowingly took all of those meetings with Russia. That there is not enough evidence to show criminal conspiracy does not mean it all didn’t happen.
Thread title is accurate. "Conspire" means "to agree to do something wrong".
Nothing about it is misleading or disgusting.
Well what did happen then? Let’s see.ren hoek said:
Roger Stone apparently. By his own court filings Barr’s DOJ is pursuing communications involving phishing Podesta, Russian data transfers to wikileaks, Stone Communications with WikiLeaks. Barr’s doing that not Mueller if you believe in Org charts.
He's right.
Or voters want legitimate information gained by legitimate means. Not by breaking laws and working with a foreign government to try and get that information.He's right.
Just because it helps somebody doesn't mean it's not true. We shouldn't be afraid of information.
That's what's so mindboggling and scary about this. Voters want to know less information about their candidates, and bury their head in the sand lest the big boogeyman influences our pristine elections.
The offer of information came from the Kremlin, not Karl Rove’s consulting LLC.He's right.
Just because it helps somebody doesn't mean it's not true. We shouldn't be afraid of information.
That's what's so mindboggling and scary about this. Voters want to know less information about their candidates, and bury their head in the sand lest the big boogeyman influences our pristine elections.
Within the confines of the law, yes. Foreign governments are not allowed to. How is Israel doing it in a manner close to What’s Russia did (Andrew o say what they did because it’s established fact).?Dow Chemical, Goldman Sachs, Raytheon, Saudi Arabia and Israel can keep influencing them though.
in his .
I’m glad you asked that, John.
The other thread is there. It just wasn’t allowed to have the title after complaints.
Well clearly it is Bluto, you just insulted a random online pdf. Otherwise all the distinctions still exist.
So now Joe says we have to start a new thread for every time there is breaking news on the Russia inquiry since the title of that thread can't be updated. Okie Dokie Pokie, we will do that...
Trump called the FBI in the '80s when he was trying to buy a casino. Basically, he was afraid of the mob so he thought he could get the feds to do his dirty work for him -- if he could get the FBI to clear the mob out of Atlantic City, then Trump could buy a casino for a rock-bottom price.
Yet, an investigation to get information is called "treasonous" and an "attempted coup". And, when a candidate refuses to provide the same information about tax returns that every other candidate for the last 50 years has provided, his supporters bury their heads in the sand lest the information influence the same elections. Go figure.He's right.
Just because it helps somebody doesn't mean it's not true. We shouldn't be afraid of information.
That's what's so mindboggling and scary about this. Voters want to know less information about their candidates, and bury their head in the sand lest the big boogeyman influences our pristine elections.
By all means keep flipping away. If you haven’t figured out that only the Democrat base, the main stream media and a few never Trump folks have any interest in this still AFTER the Mueller report I don’t know what to tell you.
