What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Todd Bouman...is this guy going to kill all JAX player value? (1 Viewer)

Black

Footballguy
I have seen (somewhat) favorable rankings for Jacksonville for Mike Thomas, even MJD.

How is this possible with a terrible team, previously under an average Garrard, but now handed over to a 38-year old journeyman? Bouman hasn't won a game since 2001; hasn't started a game since 2005; and only has six career starts.

How is KC not a lock, the KC D/ST not top 5 and more than 3 points a possibility?

Even in PPR, MJD hasn't had more than 4 targets all year (3 1 3 2 4 2)...

I am considering benching MJD for M. Lynch. Anyone else have such plans?

 
Not a stretch, but I'm benching MJD for Jamaal Charles in one league.

Keeping him in the lineup in another because my other options are Ronnie Brown and Green-Ellis. ugh.

 
In one league, because of byes, I was going to start Thomas in the flex, but with Bouman at QB I'm putting in Whitehead in that spot. Edwards targeted Thomas a lot, but who knows what will happen with Bouman throwing it.

 
Seriously considering benching MJD for Jonathan Stewart. As an aside, I scooped up KC Defense in two league for this matchup. They also have Buffalo next week which is nice (shout out to lakerstan's thread here for the headsup on that).

 
I'm sort of thinking Lewis may be the valve play for Bouman, so still tempted to keep him in at a flex spot with Djax injured, Garcon on bye, Stewart, MSW and Tate unreliable. It's just unlikely he remains the red zone target (On their 0 red zone plays :2cents: )

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just traded MJD this week, I know its selling low but I managed to get Mendenhall in the deal (it included other players, had to give up Beanie). Redraft leagues I would say trade MJD asap while he has some name value.

 
Remember earlier in the year when plugging in the St. Louis D against the Lions seemed like a good idea with a journeyman at QB? Sure, Bowman is no Hill, but while we have no idea of what to expect out of him, neither does the opposing Defense. I am not saying he will light it up, but I would rather face Garrard (who I have a ton of film on) than a guy like Bowman who I know little about overall, and nothing about how he uses his teammates.

 
I have seen (somewhat) favorable rankings for Jacksonville for Mike Thomas, even MJD. How is this possible with a terrible team, previously under an average Garrard, but now handed over to a 38-year old journeyman? Bouman hasn't won a game since 2001; hasn't started a game since 2005; and only has six career starts.How is KC not a lock, the KC D/ST not top 5 and more than 3 points a possibility?Even in PPR, MJD hasn't had more than 4 targets all year (3 1 3 2 4 2)...I am considering benching MJD for M. Lynch. Anyone else have such plans?
I don't understand the low ranking for KC's D either. Then again, the defensive rankings have really been way off base all year.
 
Seriously considering benching MJD for Jonathan Stewart. As an aside, I scooped up KC Defense in two league for this matchup. They also have Buffalo next week which is nice (shout out to lakerstan's thread here for the headsup on that).
Saber, no RB for Carolina has played well...stay with MJD with that choice
 
He did well for the Vikings and Saints earlier in his career but that was 8 years ago. He could surprise.

 
He did well for the Vikings and Saints earlier in his career but that was 8 years ago. He could surprise.
This is my feeling too. I am more depending on him this week than "touting" him, but I do think the element of surprise may help him some. Think about Todd Collins...he spent years on the KC bench without having thrown a ball and when called to duty did well in short spurts. I believe this could have just been because he was (1) prepared and (2) caught defenses off guard. Fast forward to 2010 and he put up an all-time stinker in his one opportunity, but I think that may have been due to speed of the pash rush versus the defense "knowing" him.Either way, it will be really interesting to see what he can or can't do...the guy is in on a team for some reason and I have casually realized that most NFL teams are not real generous about keeping on old vets in the QB#3 slot.
 
He did well for the Vikings and Saints earlier in his career but that was 8 years ago. He could surprise.
This is my feeling too. I am more depending on him this week than "touting" him, but I do think the element of surprise may help him some. Think about Todd Collins...he spent years on the KC bench without having thrown a ball and when called to duty did well in short spurts. I believe this could have just been because he was (1) prepared and (2) caught defenses off guard. Fast forward to 2010 and he put up an all-time stinker in his one opportunity, but I think that may have been due to speed of the pash rush versus the defense "knowing" him.Either way, it will be really interesting to see what he can or can't do...the guy is in on a team for some reason and I have casually realized that most NFL teams are not real generous about keeping on old vets in the QB#3 slot.
I don't know guys. KC is an awfully tough place to play in, let along your first game in quite some time. If he was that impressive he wouldn't have been passed on the depth chart by a QB picked up off the street after being cut by the Bills.
 
He did well for the Vikings and Saints earlier in his career but that was 8 years ago. He could surprise.
This is my feeling too. I am more depending on him this week than "touting" him, but I do think the element of surprise may help him some. Think about Todd Collins...he spent years on the KC bench without having thrown a ball and when called to duty did well in short spurts. I believe this could have just been because he was (1) prepared and (2) caught defenses off guard. Fast forward to 2010 and he put up an all-time stinker in his one opportunity, but I think that may have been due to speed of the pash rush versus the defense "knowing" him.Either way, it will be really interesting to see what he can or can't do...the guy is in on a team for some reason and I have casually realized that most NFL teams are not real generous about keeping on old vets in the QB#3 slot.
lol I think todd collins is a perfect comparison --- and what'd he do in his second opportunity?yeah, he's on a team for some mysterious reason, and that reason is because their qb's both got knocked out and they have to field somebody at the position.he did well for the vikings and saints.....who are you even talking about??
 
He did well for the Vikings and Saints earlier in his career but that was 8 years ago. He could surprise.
started a hella game in week 13 of 2001 pitching for more than 300 yards and hitting on 3 TDs.i remember so well because week 13 is week 1 of our playoffs. my bro-bro started him against me. ouch!
 
I am putting MJD on the bench for Ryan Torain. If I would have played Torain last week instead of MJD, I would have won. Because I played MJD I lost by 3 points! MJD has been a real disappointment this year. I took him 3rd overall in the draft and wish I hadn't.

I am now riding "The Train"

 
patrick ramsey second half. I am starting MJD over Wells, tough call, also starting Mike Thomas over Ronnie Brown for now

 
I have seen (somewhat) favorable rankings for Jacksonville for Mike Thomas, even MJD. How is this possible with a terrible team, previously under an average Garrard, but now handed over to a 38-year old journeyman? Bouman hasn't won a game since 2001; hasn't started a game since 2005; and only has six career starts.How is KC not a lock, the KC D/ST not top 5 and more than 3 points a possibility?Even in PPR, MJD hasn't had more than 4 targets all year (3 1 3 2 4 2)...I am considering benching MJD for M. Lynch. Anyone else have such plans?
I don't understand the low ranking for KC's D either. Then again, the defensive rankings have really been way off base all year.
Last week the Bears D was projected top 2 (~20 pts) vs. Seattle, and only because of a very late return TD did they end up with any points at all.
 
Hmm.. After reading this thread, I'm tempted to bench MJD and start Ryan Mathews.

MJD cost me my first loss this year, I was 5-0 till last week. He has been such a disappointment this year.

 
Since everyone seems to be benching MJD this week he is now guaranteed to blow up against the Chiefs. I am starting him with confidence and expect him to carry the team today.

 
I have no other option really in a league where Floyd at WR 2 is out for me.. Starting MSW, expecting straight 0's. If he breaks 50 yards I'd be happy with that. I wouldn't expect much out of any Jags today but that's just me.. MJD is the only one I could see starting and it's because he should get about 50-60 carries with the noodle arms hucking the ball around for the Jags..

 
Since everyone seems to be benching MJD this week he is now guaranteed to blow up against the Chiefs. I am starting him with confidence and expect him to carry the team today.
Yep; I like the contrarian play too.... I don't have MJD, but am thinking of starting Bears DST instead of the Chiefs since everyone's on their jock now, assuming Jags offense poses no threat.
 
Bouman threw for 400 yards in a game for the Vikes like 50 years ago
Somehow I survived benching MJD who had a very good game in PPR. The most action he's had all year. The Mike Thomas benching was a bit more apropos. Not sure what to think going forward, but probably will find a way to keep MJD in there.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top