Gopher State
Footballguy
Sounds like a deal is almost done with Mexico, with increased purchases of our farm products as part of the deal.
Sounds like we're going to need more illegals to harvest the crops that we sent to Mexico to prevent them from sending illegals over to harvest our crops.Sounds like a deal is almost done with Mexico, with increased purchases of our farm products as part of the deal.
It also won't work.This article makes it clear what Trump’s main demand is:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usatoday.com/amp/1370610001
He wants Mexico to designate itself an “asylum country”. The treaty we agreed to allows us to refuse asylum to any migrant who had already reached a previous “asylum country” without specific consideration- this will allow our judges at the border to basically refuse ALL asylum requests and deport them all.
So far Mexico has refused this demand.
Is that a big issue for independents in those states?timschochet said:IF Mexico were to agree to this, Trump really could stop the migrant issue- we’d simply turn all applicants away. Would that be enough of a “win” on immigration to turn the tide next year in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania?
Unfortunately it might.
Let’s take a look at his tax returns to see if he would personally profit from lower tax rates.So the fed may lower interest rates in response to the increased tariffs?
which is something trump also wanted.
part of a grand strategy?
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/us-makes-deal-with-mexico-on-tariffs-immigration-trump-announcesMexico agrees to demands, tariffs suspended. Republicans will claim victory, Democrats will claim this was all a show.
enjoy your weekend
Martha Barcena, Mexican ambassador to Washington, tweeted late Friday that the two countries reached an agreement “to address the humanitarian crisis stemming from the recent migratory flows that have affected our two countries.” She said that Mexico will strengthen immigration enforcement and “provide job, education and health opportunities for people who wait in Mexican territory for the end of their asylum process in the U.S.”
Not really. What Trump wanted was for Mexico to offer the migrants asylum so that the US could reject them. That’s not going to happen, For Mexico to send a few troops to the their border with Guatamala is meaningless, because they’re not keeping the migrants out anyhow; the troops are going to watch them go past. For Mexico to offer programs for the migrants to stay there while their American applications are being processed is also meaningless because they’re not forcing them to stay and they likely won’t, not if jobs are available in the US.More Winning.
No one’s surprised you will try to frame it this way. Same Tim thread, different day.Not really. What Trump wanted was for Mexico to offer the migrants asylum so that the US could reject them. That’s not going to happen, For Mexico to send a few troops to the their border with Guatamala is meaningless, because they’re not keeping the migrants out anyhow; the troops are going to watch them go past. For Mexico to offer programs for the migrants to stay there while their American applications are being processed is also meaningless because they’re not forcing them to stay and they likely won’t, not if jobs are available in the US.
This is all a bunch of window dressing. Trump bluffed, was called on it, and surrendered again. None of this will have the slightest effect on the number of migrants coming in.
Link?Not really. What Trump wanted was for Mexico to offer the migrants asylum so that the US could reject them. That’s not going to happen, For Mexico to send a few troops to the their border with Guatamala is meaningless, because they’re not keeping the migrants out anyhow; the troops are going to watch them go past. For Mexico to offer programs for the migrants to stay there while their American applications are being processed is also meaningless because they’re not forcing them to stay and they likely won’t, not if jobs are available in the US.
This is all a bunch of window dressing. Trump bluffed, was called on it, and surrendered again. None of this will have the slightest effect on the number of migrants coming in.
The Mexican ambassador said, "provide job, education and health opportunities". How can that not be better than the cages and separations we force on them? . They can't have it both ways, they can't stand seeing Trump accomplish anything.No one’s surprised you will try to frame it this way. Same Tim thread, different day.
carry on.
That part is certainly better depending on the details. But you’re missing the key point. These people are still coming to the United States to seek asylum. They will not be staying in Mexico; it’s only temporary. That’s why I wrote that it was meaningless.The Mexican ambassador said, "provide job, education and health opportunities". How can that not be better than the cages and separations we force on them? . They can't have it both ways, they can't stand seeing Trump accomplish anything.
This is what I’m seeing reported on the news. I’m sure there will be a written decision shortly.Link?
I like giving Trump credit when I can. I believe he deserves credit for the good economy and I started a thread about it.No one’s surprised you will try to frame it this way. Same Tim thread, different day.
carry on.
Russia hacked the Mexican Ambassador's Twitter account? Possible I guess.The generalities you guys accept is mind blowing. It’s the very definition of a press release, lots of buzz words but absolutely zero specifics. Unreal. The same people who claim the Russian Facebook campaign couldn’t have possibly had an impact eat up this marketing fluff hook line and sinker.
So Mexico can offer them jobs, education, and health opportunities while the best America can offer is cages and separation. Winning?The Mexican ambassador said, "provide job, education and health opportunities". How can that not be better than the cages and separations we force on them? . They can't have it both ways, they can't stand seeing Trump accomplish anything.
Nobody is seeking your approval.I like giving Trump credit when I can. I believe he deserves credit for the good economy and I started a thread about it.
On this issue, however I could never give him credit if he succeeds at what he’s trying to do (IMO he hasn’t) because my goal is not his. I want these people to come here and be welcomed. I can’t stand the fact that they might have to spend even an extra day in Mexico. Just let them in
Not a hint of sarcasm detected at all huh?So Mexico can offer them jobs, education, and health opportunities while the best America can offer is cages and separation. Winning?
Not exactly the shining city on the hill. Thank you Mexico for doing what America won't.
A random tweet for the American press with generalities about jobs and education that will likely never be verified or followed up on so Trump can claim victory is a small price for Mexico to pay.Russia hacked the Mexican Ambassador's Twitter account? Possible I guess.
We need an investigation ASAP.Russia hacked the Mexican Ambassador's Twitter account? Possible I guess.
you posted the quote twice, was it sarcastic? I'm just going by your post.Not a hint of sarcasm detected at all huh?So Mexico can offer them jobs, education, and health opportunities while the best America can offer is cages and separation. Winning?
Not exactly the shining city on the hill. Thank you Mexico for doing what America won't.
I guess we will find out if "details of the agreement will be released by the state department shortly" is just part of the big con.A random tweet for the American press with generalities about jobs and education that will likely never be verified or followed up on so Trump can claim victory is a small price for Mexico to pay.
lol, not that part. Never mind, carry on.you posted the quote twice, was it sarcastic? I'm just going by your post.
Yep. And when those get released and there is detailed actionable items in there then the Trump crowd can claim the victory. Until then it’s just marketing.I guess we will find out if "details of the agreement will be released by the state department shortly" is just part of the big con.
You're hoping for an agreement without actionable items? Oh, I see, going on defense already.Yep. And when those get released and there is detailed actionable items in there then the Trump crowd can claim the victory. Until then it’s just marketing.
Let's just take the Mexican Ambassador tweet at face value. Pretend it's true and included in the agreement. Big win for both Trump and the left right? If not, why not?Yep. And when those get released and there is detailed actionable items in there then the Trump crowd can claim the victory. Until then it’s just marketing.
Nice try. Not even close. I hope a great deal is struck. I’m an American and prefer if our President makes good deals despite my dislike for him. I know it sounds crazy to want details of something prior to making a claim of victory or failure. And with the king of “big and beautiful deal in 2 weeks” in charge I will remain skeptical until I see those details.You're hoping for an agreement without actionable items? Oh, I see, going on defense already.
Plus didn’t he already make a deal with Mexico...did it ever actually get ratified?Nice try. Not even close. I hope a great deal is struck. I’m an American and prefer if our President make good deals despite my dislike for him. I know it sounds crazy to want details of something prior to making a claiming victory or failure. And with the king of “big and beautiful deal in 2 weeks” in charge I will remain skeptical until I see those details.
If a deal was struck that will actually impact the issue with any reasonable level of success then yes it’s absolutely a win for Trump. I have zero issue giving credit where credit’s due.Let's just take the Mexican Ambassador tweet at face value. Pretend it's true and included in the agreement. Big win for both Trump and the left right? If not, why not?
LEFT.If a deal was struck that will actually impact the issue with any reasonable level of success then yes it’s absolutely a win for Trump. I have zero issue giving credit where credit’s due.
? Not sure what you’re going for here.LEFT.
Just getting someone on record that this would, should be seen as a good deal from the left.? Not sure what you’re going for here.
A great deal struck is a win for everyone obviously, but clearly a win on Trump Presidency score card.
lol, deadlines make deals. It's not like they knew and waited.As @NREC34 posted in the Trump Stock thread, it's pretty telling that they would release this on a Friday night when nobody is paying attention.
CUSMAPlus didn’t he already make a deal with Mexico...did it ever actually get ratified?
What did we give up here for Mexico to do what they did ? How many actually choose to stay in Mexico while awaiting asylum? Details again that make a difference.
Moved the wall to Guatemala.So no need for the wall, and the national emergency is over?
Yes CUSMA...the deal that is still not ratified, correct?CUSMA
What did we give up? lol
No not really. Keeping these people in Mexico, even for a short period of time, is not something I would think anyone on the left would like. Personally I hate it. Again I ask, why not just let them in? Why are we so afraid of these people?Just getting someone on record that this would, should be seen as a good deal from the left.
Bad hombres iircNo not really. Keeping these people in Mexico, even for a short period of time, is not something I would think anyone on the left would like. Personally I hate it. Again I ask, why not just let them in? Why are we so afraid of these people?
You do realize that just because some want stronger borders does not mean that they are afraid of those people who want to enter the country, right?No not really. Keeping these people in Mexico, even for a short period of time, is not something I would think anyone on the left would like. Personally I hate it. Again I ask, why not just let them in? Why are we so afraid of these people?