Billy Ball Thorton
Footballguy
Henry will be a top 3 pick next year.
PPR?Just took him #5 in a $500 redraft league
.05 perI think Henry will have 40 + receptions this year.PPR?Just took him #5 in a $500 redraft league
You mean 0.5 PPR, right?Same as my league. Debating on who to take at #4. Hoping LJ slides to me but thinking about Gore or Henry if he doesn't. Westbrook seems too risky..05 perI think Henry will have 40 + receptions this year.If you look at game logs from 06 the Bells had 44 rec between them, now look when they came. They all (90%) came once Cutler took over. With Jake they just didnt pass to the back much. I have also read camp reports that have stated they are using Henry allot in the passing game and lastly he's already had a 40+ reception year.PPR?Just took him #5 in a $500 redraft league
0.5 is correct. I see a portis type year in Henry futureYou mean 0.5 PPR, right?Same as my league. Debating on who to take at #4. Hoping LJ slides to me but thinking about Gore or Henry if he doesn't. Westbrook seems too risky..05 perI think Henry will have 40 + receptions this year.If you look at game logs from 06 the Bells had 44 rec between them, now look when they came. They all (90%) came once Cutler took over. With Jake they just didnt pass to the back much. I have also read camp reports that have stated they are using Henry allot in the passing game and lastly he's already had a 40+ reception year.PPR?Just took him #5 in a $500 redraft league
You're expecting him to get hurt? Bump up Cobbs...0.5 is correct. I see a portis type year in Henry futureYou mean 0.5 PPR, right?Same as my league. Debating on who to take at #4. Hoping LJ slides to me but thinking about Gore or Henry if he doesn't. Westbrook seems too risky..05 perI think Henry will have 40 + receptions this year.If you look at game logs from 06 the Bells had 44 rec between them, now look when they came. They all (90%) came once Cutler took over. With Jake they just didnt pass to the back much. I have also read camp reports that have stated they are using Henry allot in the passing game and lastly he's already had a 40+ reception year.PPR?Just took him #5 in a $500 redraft league
I keep bumping his numbers up but I still have him as the #10rb.![]()
I think your "problem" is that you forget how potent Shanahan's offense can be when working fluently. Although if you expect Bell or Sapp to siphon carries, then your prediction is understandable. However, if he does carry the load and Denver's offense does indeed show the expected improvement (at least fulfills my expectationsI keep bumping his numbers up but I still have him as the #10rb.![]()
i can't justify him as being a top 10 RB even though i thought i was being really aggressive back in the spring when i did my first cut of projections.problem with me is that where i would take him in the late 2nd round, i prefer WRs that are available there more.i don't think he'll be on any of my teams this year.i don't get the love especially in PPR leagues. i just don't see more than 20 receptions for him. this may be where i am missing the boat on him as i have him projected for 1300 yards and 10 TDs rushing...i just have negligible stats receiving for him. thus he is languishing in the teens in my rankings.
well i am thirsty. could you pass the kool aid?lol at nothing less.I think your "problem" is that you forget how potent Shanahan's offense can be when working fluently. Although if you expect Bell or Sapp to siphon carries, then your prediction is understandable. However, if he does carry the load and Denver's offense does indeed show the expected improvement (at least fulfills my expectationsI keep bumping his numbers up but I still have him as the #10rb.![]()
i can't justify him as being a top 10 RB even though i thought i was being really aggressive back in the spring when i did my first cut of projections.problem with me is that where i would take him in the late 2nd round, i prefer WRs that are available there more.i don't think he'll be on any of my teams this year.i don't get the love especially in PPR leagues. i just don't see more than 20 receptions for him. this may be where i am missing the boat on him as i have him projected for 1300 yards and 10 TDs rushing...i just have negligible stats receiving for him. thus he is languishing in the teens in my rankings.
), I see nothing less than 330 carries/1600-1700 yds/14 TDs.
Portis is quite the injury risk, after all he missed 4 games in his entire NFL career before last year. You should avoid those proven RBs that have a fluky injury.You're expecting him to get hurt? Bump up Cobbs...0.5 is correct. I see a portis type year in Henry futureYou mean 0.5 PPR, right?Same as my league. Debating on who to take at #4. Hoping LJ slides to me but thinking about Gore or Henry if he doesn't. Westbrook seems too risky..05 perI think Henry will have 40 + receptions this year.If you look at game logs from 06 the Bells had 44 rec between them, now look when they came. They all (90%) came once Cutler took over. With Jake they just didnt pass to the back much. I have also read camp reports that have stated they are using Henry allot in the passing game and lastly he's already had a 40+ reception year.PPR?Just took him #5 in a $500 redraft league
Sheesh, way to kill a bad joke.Portis is quite the injury risk, after all he missed 4 games in his entire NFL career before last year. You should avoid those proven RBs that have a fluky injury.You're expecting him to get hurt? Bump up Cobbs...0.5 is correct. I see a portis type year in Henry futureYou mean 0.5 PPR, right?Same as my league. Debating on who to take at #4. Hoping LJ slides to me but thinking about Gore or Henry if he doesn't. Westbrook seems too risky..05 perI think Henry will have 40 + receptions this year.If you look at game logs from 06 the Bells had 44 rec between them, now look when they came. They all (90%) came once Cutler took over. With Jake they just didnt pass to the back much. I have also read camp reports that have stated they are using Henry allot in the passing game and lastly he's already had a 40+ reception year.PPR?Just took him #5 in a $500 redraft league
Sheesh, way to kill a bad joke.Portis is quite the injury risk, after all he missed 4 games in his entire NFL career before last year. You should avoid those proven RBs that have a fluky injury.You're expecting him to get hurt? Bump up Cobbs...0.5 is correct. I see a portis type year in Henry futureYou mean 0.5 PPR, right?Same as my league. Debating on who to take at #4. Hoping LJ slides to me but thinking about Gore or Henry if he doesn't. Westbrook seems too risky..05 perI think Henry will have 40 + receptions this year.If you look at game logs from 06 the Bells had 44 rec between them, now look when they came. They all (90%) came once Cutler took over. With Jake they just didnt pass to the back much. I have also read camp reports that have stated they are using Henry allot in the passing game and lastly he's already had a 40+ reception year.PPR?Just took him #5 in a $500 redraft league![]()
Maybe 'nothing less' was a bit dramtic. ha. But in all seriousness, you have a talented Denver RB who is projected to carry most of the load ranked in the teens? Why? Is it your lack of faith in Henry himself? In Denver's system? I'm interested. The Bell's shared 44 receptions last year, Henry should get a large chunk of that this year considering both that Denver's O figures to spend more time on the field and Henry has better hands than either.well i am thirsty. could you pass the kool aid?lol at nothing less.I think your "problem" is that you forget how potent Shanahan's offense can be when working fluently. Although if you expect Bell or Sapp to siphon carries, then your prediction is understandable. However, if he does carry the load and Denver's offense does indeed show the expected improvement (at least fulfills my expectationsI keep bumping his numbers up but I still have him as the #10rb.![]()
i can't justify him as being a top 10 RB even though i thought i was being really aggressive back in the spring when i did my first cut of projections.problem with me is that where i would take him in the late 2nd round, i prefer WRs that are available there more.i don't think he'll be on any of my teams this year.i don't get the love especially in PPR leagues. i just don't see more than 20 receptions for him. this may be where i am missing the boat on him as i have him projected for 1300 yards and 10 TDs rushing...i just have negligible stats receiving for him. thus he is languishing in the teens in my rankings.
), I see nothing less than 330 carries/1600-1700 yds/14 TDs.
Not too mention 90% of those receptions happend once Cutler was the starter AND the fact Henry has shown he can catch 40+ ball alraedy in a season.Maybe 'nothing less' was a bit dramtic. ha. But in all seriousness, you have a talented Denver RB who is projected to carry most of the load ranked in the teens? Why? Is it your lack of faith in Henry himself? In Denver's system? I'm interested. The Bell's shared 44 receptions last year, Henry should get a large chunk of that this year considering both that Denver's O figures to spend more time on the field and Henry has better hands than either.well i am thirsty. could you pass the kool aid?lol at nothing less.I think your "problem" is that you forget how potent Shanahan's offense can be when working fluently. Although if you expect Bell or Sapp to siphon carries, then your prediction is understandable. However, if he does carry the load and Denver's offense does indeed show the expected improvement (at least fulfills my expectationsI keep bumping his numbers up but I still have him as the #10rb.![]()
i can't justify him as being a top 10 RB even though i thought i was being really aggressive back in the spring when i did my first cut of projections.problem with me is that where i would take him in the late 2nd round, i prefer WRs that are available there more.i don't think he'll be on any of my teams this year.i don't get the love especially in PPR leagues. i just don't see more than 20 receptions for him. this may be where i am missing the boat on him as i have him projected for 1300 yards and 10 TDs rushing...i just have negligible stats receiving for him. thus he is languishing in the teens in my rankings.
), I see nothing less than 330 carries/1600-1700 yds/14 TDs.
it wouldn't surprise me if he hit the numbers you say.however, i am projecting him at about 1400 yards and 10 TDs, with only 15 rec for 100 yards. i base my base projections off a weighted average of the past 3 years of data. i gave henry a boost for going to DEN, but the boost i am giving him isn't enough to get him as a first rounder. that may be too conservative, but i hate taking someone in the first round who's projected stats are based mainly on a bump on his base stats.henry is a guy who i'd love to grab in the 2nd round in a non PPR league. but there is the hype factor that is precluding from that ever happening. if i miss out on him, i am ok with that.Maybe 'nothing less' was a bit dramtic. ha. But in all seriousness, you have a talented Denver RB who is projected to carry most of the load ranked in the teens? Why? Is it your lack of faith in Henry himself? In Denver's system? I'm interested. The Bell's shared 44 receptions last year, Henry should get a large chunk of that this year considering both that Denver's O figures to spend more time on the field and Henry has better hands than either.well i am thirsty. could you pass the kool aid?lol at nothing less.I think your "problem" is that you forget how potent Shanahan's offense can be when working fluently. Although if you expect Bell or Sapp to siphon carries, then your prediction is understandable. However, if he does carry the load and Denver's offense does indeed show the expected improvement (at least fulfills my expectationsI keep bumping his numbers up but I still have him as the #10rb.![]()
i can't justify him as being a top 10 RB even though i thought i was being really aggressive back in the spring when i did my first cut of projections.problem with me is that where i would take him in the late 2nd round, i prefer WRs that are available there more.i don't think he'll be on any of my teams this year.i don't get the love especially in PPR leagues. i just don't see more than 20 receptions for him. this may be where i am missing the boat on him as i have him projected for 1300 yards and 10 TDs rushing...i just have negligible stats receiving for him. thus he is languishing in the teens in my rankings.
), I see nothing less than 330 carries/1600-1700 yds/14 TDs.
...AND the fact Henry has shown he can catch 40+ ball alraedy in a season.
+--------------------------+-------------------------+ | Rushing | Receiving |+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+| Year TM | G | Att Yards Y/A TD | Rec Yards Y/R TD |+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+| 2001 buf | 13 | 213 729 3.4 4 | 22 179 8.1 0 || 2002 buf | 16 | 325 1438 4.4 13 | 43 309 7.2 1 || 2003 buf | 15 | 331 1356 4.1 10 | 28 158 5.6 1 || 2004 buf | 10 | 94 326 3.5 0 | 10 45 4.5 0 || 2005 ten | 9 | 88 335 3.8 0 | 13 117 9.0 0 || 2006 ten | 14 | 270 1211 4.5 7 | 18 78 4.3 0 |+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+| TOTAL | 77 | 1321 5395 4.1 34 | 134 886 6.6 2 |+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+
Fair enough my friend, fair enough. Although having watched Denver's offense pretty closely since Elway left I'm fairly confident in my prediction... but it is just that, a prediction. After all the shenanigans Shanahan has pulled over the last few years in regard to his RB situations, your skepticism holds plenty of water. Call me an optimist.bagger said:it wouldn't surprise me if he hit the numbers you say.however, i am projecting him at about 1400 yards and 10 TDs, with only 15 rec for 100 yards. i base my base projections off a weighted average of the past 3 years of data. i gave henry a boost for going to DEN, but the boost i am giving him isn't enough to get him as a first rounder. that may be too conservative, but i hate taking someone in the first round who's projected stats are based mainly on a bump on his base stats.henry is a guy who i'd love to grab in the 2nd round in a non PPR league. but there is the hype factor that is precluding from that ever happening. if i miss out on him, i am ok with that.MogusMaximus said:Maybe 'nothing less' was a bit dramtic. ha. But in all seriousness, you have a talented Denver RB who is projected to carry most of the load ranked in the teens? Why? Is it your lack of faith in Henry himself? In Denver's system? I'm interested. The Bell's shared 44 receptions last year, Henry should get a large chunk of that this year considering both that Denver's O figures to spend more time on the field and Henry has better hands than either.bagger said:well i am thirsty. could you pass the kool aid?lol at nothing less.MogusMaximus said:I think your "problem" is that you forget how potent Shanahan's offense can be when working fluently. Although if you expect Bell or Sapp to siphon carries, then your prediction is understandable. However, if he does carry the load and Denver's offense does indeed show the expected improvement (at least fulfills my expectationsbagger said:I keep bumping his numbers up but I still have him as the #10rb.![]()
i can't justify him as being a top 10 RB even though i thought i was being really aggressive back in the spring when i did my first cut of projections.problem with me is that where i would take him in the late 2nd round, i prefer WRs that are available there more.i don't think he'll be on any of my teams this year.i don't get the love especially in PPR leagues. i just don't see more than 20 receptions for him. this may be where i am missing the boat on him as i have him projected for 1300 yards and 10 TDs rushing...i just have negligible stats receiving for him. thus he is languishing in the teens in my rankings.
), I see nothing less than 330 carries/1600-1700 yds/14 TDs.
bagger said:the way people are talking about henry in here reminds me of the Barlow Bloodbath of Ought Three.
:bwih:
:X that wasn't fun.bagger said:the way people are talking about henry in here reminds me of the Barlow Bloodbath of Ought Three.
:bwih:![]()
pretty different situations, but i hear where you're comin' from. it's amazing what you can talk yourself into.this coming from a guy who took Barlow at 1.11 in WCOFF that year.bagger said:the way people are talking about henry in here reminds me of the Barlow Bloodbath of Ought Three.
:bwih:
yeah i took barlow in the late first round that year too.pretty rough.pretty different situations, but i hear where you're comin' from. it's amazing what you can talk yourself into.this coming from a guy who took Barlow at 1.11 in WCOFF that year.bagger said:the way people are talking about henry in here reminds me of the Barlow Bloodbath of Ought Three.
:bwih: