1) Roethlisberger - - MIRAGE. Has his injury been fully revealed yet? I heard that X-rays were negative, but . . . I say that he will be only slightly better than the NFL average for the rest of the season. Holmes, I have no idea. I bought into him in a significant way this season and he's been a dud.
Last season they just did NOT run in the red zone. They threw alot of short passes there, padding that 32 TD total. They have seem to found some push on the o-line and not afraid to run in the red zone. Still, Ben got sacked alot last season, and gets hit alot. Same is true this season. I think they are running more, meaning fewer passing TDs for Ben, and they need to protect him, or we'll see alot more of Leftwich.
2) CLE - - MIRAGE. I think they were one and done. There was something transitory about the Anderson magic last season, and I think Crennel is one of the most cretinous head coaches in the league.
Their schedule was LIGHT last year...180 degrees different than this season. They have been 'punched in the mouf' weeks 1-3 and Edwards' drops are killing them. It's like watching a good kicker just start shanking everything...so probably a concentration issue? Jamal is hurt, so all you have left is Winslow. Maybe they get right vs. CIN DEF...if not, how soon til Quinn time?
3) SD defense - - MIRAGE. I think they have bigger problems than just missing Merriman. Cromartie has just simply looked terrible so far this season, and the LB corps seems slow. I say shootouts all year.
Last season, San Diego started slowly, primarily b/c they were not aggressive. Cromatie and Jammer are gamblers (although Cromatie didn't start til mid season last year?) Anyways, you need QB pressure to make those guys look good and get INTs. About mid-season, they came on. Fast forward to this season...Te Cottrell (notice no D) is not being very aggressive. If they decide to get after the QB (as they should have vs. DEN), they will look better.
4) NE run D - - MIRAGE. Yeah, sieve all year. Their amazing aerial show last season masked a lot of defensive weaknesses.
I don't know here, except when the CBs are not good, and the linebackers have lost a step, you can't always outthink the opponent. When the opponent is forced to throw every play and becomes one-dimensional, it's alot easier to look good.
5) CIN - - agree totally. TREND. They can't really be this bad.
I don't know what changed here. Anyone? System? Some o-line guys I don't know by name? Are they using Chris Perry different than Kenny Watson was used last year? Carson looked pissed but focused during a pregame talk with Boomer, so I was thinking something might happen (with Housh on my bench of course).
A big trend - - Buffalo. I think that their offense has the weapons to wear opposing teams down. For some reason, Edwards took three quarters to figure out the Raiders today, but once he did, they might as well not have been out there.
What has changed here? Was the QB carousel that bad on this team? Lynch is 100 yards and a TD, Evans not doing that much. Trent is not lighting it up exactly... Maybe just alot of young players gelling and the Def healthy now. Seems like a solid team, young, good Def, good running game, and a capable RB backup in Fred Jackson.
A big mirage - - Atlanta. I like the Burner and Ryan too (although he's a year or two away), but the defense is horrible.
I liked the comment above...vs. some VERY subpar teams (DET, KC) they will look like rock stars. Start em all. Against good teams, they may just not be able to stand up, since Ryan can't carry them, and you can't just run MTO left/right.