I'm just using the Values at pro-football-reference.com.i would imagine this would depend on what baseline you are using.
so you're using whatever baseline Drinen does. do you know what that is?I'm just using the Values at pro-football-reference.com.i would imagine this would depend on what baseline you are using.
QB12, TE12, RB24, WR36.so you're using whatever baseline Drinen does. do you know what that is?I'm just using the Values at pro-football-reference.com.i would imagine this would depend on what baseline you are using.
thanks. that is helpful in this discussion.QB12, TE12, RB24, WR36.so you're using whatever baseline Drinen does. do you know what that is?I'm just using the Values at pro-football-reference.com.i would imagine this would depend on what baseline you are using.
Wow, that's going to be tough to beat.1982 San Diego Chargers
Fouts 120
Muncie 92
Chandler 190
Winslow 121
TOTAL 523
Yeah, if we could calculate way back, we might find some pretty good combos. Unitas, Moore, Berry, and Mackey probably put together a good year or two.It's hard to compare, but I think the 1942 Green Bay Packers might win this one. Even if you readjust the baselines, Hutson's 1211 yards and 17 TDs is almost pure VBD, and Isbell threw for 2021 and 24 TDs when there were only three other QBs who threw for even 1000 yards. And that's in only 11 games.
Chamberlain's best year was a 9 and that was a year (2001) Culpepper split time due to injury and they had absolutely no running game.How was Minnesota when Chamberlain had a good season at TE?
I actually use WR30 as sort of a compromise. In most years, there is probably little difference between WR30 and WR36, but just so you know...Here is an article that addresses a related (but not identical) question. It won't give you your answer, but it might be a good starting point.QB12, TE12, RB24, WR36.
I don't think it can be beat, but I'm not sure if it should even count. 1982 was the strike-shortened 9 game season and the VBD numbers on PFR appear to be prorated.Wow, that's going to be tough to beat.1982 San Diego Chargers
Fouts 120
Muncie 92
Chandler 190
Winslow 121
TOTAL 523
1995 looks to be the best year to use:Mitchell 133 (his only season of much value)tooo lazy
what about Barry Sanders, Scott Mitchel, herman moore... maye perriman over a TE...
Pretty sure the '82 Chargers are the winners, by far. The '82 VBD numbers are not prorated.I don't think it can be beat, but I'm not sure if it should even count. 1982 was the strike-shortened 9 game season and the VBD numbers on PFR appear to be prorated.Wow, that's going to be tough to beat.1982 San Diego Chargers
Fouts 120
Muncie 92
Chandler 190
Winslow 121
TOTAL 523
If not, then how did Wes Chandler score 160 FP and have a VBD of 190?Pretty sure the '82 Chargers are the winners, by far. The '82 VBD numbers are not prorated.I don't think it can be beat, but I'm not sure if it should even count. 1982 was the strike-shortened 9 game season and the VBD numbers on PFR appear to be prorated.Wow, that's going to be tough to beat.1982 San Diego Chargers
Fouts 120
Muncie 92
Chandler 190
Winslow 121
TOTAL 523
Stupid Saints!!!!!Muncie 92Chandler 190