I expect Charles to be close over the 2nd half of the year.My guess is, barring injury:Adrian PetersonRay RiceChris JohnsonMJDFrank GoreCedric BensonRashard MendenhallJahvid BestMichael TurnerSteven JacksonRyan MathewsWho do you add or remove from that list?
I think Grant is right on the fence. I have a strange feeling that Brandon Jackson + miscellaneous keeps him under 65%.Ryan Grant HAS to be on that list.
I think Slaton is a bigger part of the offense than most think. Slaton + miscellaneous and I see Foster in the 50-55% range.Good List...I'd add Arian Foster due to no quality depth behind him.
Cadillac got barely over 50% last year. He's not getting younger and Graham and Huggins are there. I'd say the chance of him getting 65% of the carries is about .65%. Grant had 65% on the button last year and I could see him losing a few more carries this year.Add Cadillac and I agree that Ryan Grant should be there too.
Grant had 281 carries last year...which was >75% of the total.Jackson had 37 carries last year.Right now...the Packers only have two RB's on the roster.I think Grant is right on the fence. I have a strange feeling that Brandon Jackson + miscellaneous keeps him under 65%.Ryan Grant HAS to be on that list.
That's not the complete story. He was babied early in the year, had 22 carries the first three weeks. Graham and Huggins are there, but every team has backup RBs. Neither one is guaranteed to get a certain number of carries. The team isn't going to gameplan to make sure Earnest Graham gets carries. Huggins looked nice this summer, but there are plenty of August Hall of Famers that never went anywhere.I think Caddy is definitely the man there. Now, the OP said barring injury, but with Caddy you can't discount injury. But I think, when healthy, he gets at least 65% of the carries.Cadillac got barely over 50% last year. He's not getting younger and Graham and Huggins are there.Add Cadillac and I agree that Ryan Grant should be there too.
I see 282 out of 438 = 64.3%I might be looking at the wrong page.Grant had 281 carries last year...which was >75% of the total.Jackson had 37 carries last year.I think Grant is right on the fence. I have a strange feeling that Brandon Jackson + miscellaneous keeps him under 65%.Ryan Grant HAS to be on that list.
Right now...the Packers only have two RB's on the roster.
Yeah, I said team carries in the topic title.I think people are confusing team carries and RB carries.
Humpback was right. I was looking at RB carries only. Yep...just under 65% is the right number.Aside from my poor math skills...I still think Grant is a good bet for the list.I see 282 out of 438 = 64.3%I might be looking at the wrong page.Grant had 281 carries last year...which was >75% of the total.Jackson had 37 carries last year.I think Grant is right on the fence. I have a strange feeling that Brandon Jackson + miscellaneous keeps him under 65%.Ryan Grant HAS to be on that list.
Right now...the Packers only have two RB's on the roster.
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/gnb/2009.htm
There is the standard "barring injuries" disclaimer but not "barring injured". They might ease him back slowly, falling too far behind in carries to catch up.Moreno had 247 carries as a rookie. You can expect him to get more than that this year as a featured back. Yes, I know he can get injured just like any other running back in the NFL. I am sure this thread has the standard "barring injuries" disclaimer like all other predictions.
Slaton will not see nearly the number of carries he did when healthy 2 years ago. And he's not fully healthy now. He has turf toe. And, you think a neck/back injury just goes away?He's a 'scat/3rd down/pass-catching' (fill in the cliche) type back. They will pound the rock with Foster and get Slaton in there for passing situations mainly.I think Slaton is a bigger part of the offense than most think. Slaton + miscellaneous and I see Foster in the 50-55% range.Good List...I'd add Arian Foster due to no quality depth behind him.
I think what you meant was "injured on the first day of practice 36 days ago" which is plenty of time to heal before the first game. If he injured himself a week ago, I could see your point. He has been practicing for a week now.There is the standard "barring injuries" disclaimer but not "barring injured". They might ease him back slowly, falling too far behind in carries to catch up.Moreno had 247 carries as a rookie. You can expect him to get more than that this year as a featured back. Yes, I know he can get injured just like any other running back in the NFL. I am sure this thread has the standard "barring injuries" disclaimer like all other predictions.
The Texans carried the ball 425 times last year and if they carry it the same amount this year Foster would need 276 carries and I don't see that happening.Slaton will not see nearly the number of carries he did when healthy 2 years ago. And he's not fully healthy now. He has turf toe. And, you think a neck/back injury just goes away?He's a 'scat/3rd down/pass-catching' (fill in the cliche) type back. They will pound the rock with Foster and get Slaton in there for passing situations mainly.I think Slaton is a bigger part of the offense than most think. Slaton + miscellaneous and I see Foster in the 50-55% range.Good List...I'd add Arian Foster due to no quality depth behind him.
Didn't he say himself that he only felt 80% recently? Throw in the fact he hasn't seen full contact and you really think they'll give him 20 carries + receptions week 1?I think what you meant was "injured on the first day of practice 36 days ago" which is plenty of time to heal before the first game. If he injured himself a week ago, I could see your point. He has been practicing for a week now.There is the standard "barring injuries" disclaimer but not "barring injured". They might ease him back slowly, falling too far behind in carries to catch up.Moreno had 247 carries as a rookie. You can expect him to get more than that this year as a featured back. Yes, I know he can get injured just like any other running back in the NFL. I am sure this thread has the standard "barring injuries" disclaimer like all other predictions.
Plus, on volume alone, how could anyone project Greene to get 65% of a possible 600 team carries?good list. I definitely think Grant is on it. As for Foster, he could be, but lots has to go right. Stay healthy, don't fumble, etc. Don't think Shonn Greene will - I'm convinced LT gets a bunch of carries.
Wow, with Shanahan calling the shots? I think he has too many carries on those legs to hold up to that workload.I would agree with adding Grant just based on options in GB.Provided he stays healthy, I'd add Portis to this list.
Maybe not, but if you are trying to get together a list of lead dogs, he needs to be on it.Didn't he say himself that he only felt 80% recently? Throw in the fact he hasn't seen full contact and you really think they'll give him 20 carries + receptions week 1?I think what you meant was "injured on the first day of practice 36 days ago" which is plenty of time to heal before the first game. If he injured himself a week ago, I could see your point. He has been practicing for a week now.There is the standard "barring injuries" disclaimer but not "barring injured". They might ease him back slowly, falling too far behind in carries to catch up.Moreno had 247 carries as a rookie. You can expect him to get more than that this year as a featured back. Yes, I know he can get injured just like any other running back in the NFL. I am sure this thread has the standard "barring injuries" disclaimer like all other predictions.
I think percentage stats are misleading. Greene could get >65% and still get more carries over the year than backs who get <65% of their teams carries.Plus, on volume alone, how could anyone project Greene to get 65% of a possible 600 team carries?good list. I definitely think Grant is on it. As for Foster, he could be, but lots has to go right. Stay healthy, don't fumble, etc. Don't think Shonn Greene will - I'm convinced LT gets a bunch of carries.
Maybe but by doing total carries you don't have to differentiate a busted pass play turned into QB run from an intended QB run like a sneak or a naked bootleg. There are other flaws in making this list like the fact Shonn Greene probably won't get 65% of the Jets' carries but he'll almost certainly get more than Best who is on this list.Maybe it's just me but I don't think the 47 carries Rodgers got for the Packers should count towards what percentage Grant is going to get.![]()
I'd remove Rice - didn't do last year. Benson - lot of carries so he still gets 300. Plenty carries left for B. ScottBest - it will be a more of a rbbc than people realize IMOI'd addGrant - did last year, no reason to think he won't do it againForte - even though he was horrible, he did it last year and I'd don't think Chester will be able to make any difference.Portis - because LJ is done.Spiller - because he will be Buffalo's offense.My guess is, barring injury:Adrian PetersonRay RiceChris JohnsonMJDFrank GoreCedric BensonRashard MendenhallJahvid BestMichael TurnerSteven JacksonRyan MathewsWho do you add or remove from that list?
+1Add Cadillac and I agree that Ryan Grant should be there too.
Why? According to Yudkin's stats, he got 2/3 of team carries. And he did that in essentially 12 uninjured games. Barring injury, he'll easily clear that number this year.I'd removeMy guess is, barring injury:
Adrian Peterson
Ray Rice
Chris Johnson
MJD
Frank Gore
Cedric Benson
Rashard Mendenhall
Jahvid Best
Michael Turner
Steven Jackson
Ryan Mathews
Who do you add or remove from that list?
Benson - lot of carries so he still gets 300. Plenty carries left for B. Scott
They're especially misleading when you misuse the > and < signs.I think percentage stats are misleading. Greene could get >65% and still get more carries over the year than backs who get <65% of their teams carries.Plus, on volume alone, how could anyone project Greene to get 65% of a possible 600 team carries?good list. I definitely think Grant is on it. As for Foster, he could be, but lots has to go right. Stay healthy, don't fumble, etc. Don't think Shonn Greene will - I'm convinced LT gets a bunch of carries.
ya that confused me too.........smaller number eats (<They're especially misleading when you misuse the > and < signs.I think percentage stats are misleading. Greene could get >65% and still get more carries over the year than backs who get <65% of their teams carries.Plus, on volume alone, how could anyone project Greene to get 65% of a possible 600 team carries?good list. I definitely think Grant is on it. As for Foster, he could be, but lots has to go right. Stay healthy, don't fumble, etc. Don't think Shonn Greene will - I'm convinced LT gets a bunch of carries.
I strongly disagree. Barring injury Mendenhall will be the bell cow for the Steelers.I think M.Moore and RR keep Mendenhall below that this year. Just not a believer in the guy.
Nope. He did not say that. He said "80-some percent". Also, he said that on Aug 31. The Broncos play their first game on Sept 12th, which will give them plenty of extra time to give ice, massage and electrical stimulation. The trainers for the Broncos are certainly on top of it. Is it possible that he is limited in week 1? Sure. IMHO he should not play at all until he is 100%. No need to take chances with a hammy.Didn't he say himself that he only felt 80% recently? Throw in the fact he hasn't seen full contact and you really think they'll give him 20 carries + receptions week 1?I think what you meant was "injured on the first day of practice 36 days ago" which is plenty of time to heal before the first game. If he injured himself a week ago, I could see your point. He has been practicing for a week now.There is the standard "barring injuries" disclaimer but not "barring injured". They might ease him back slowly, falling too far behind in carries to catch up.Moreno had 247 carries as a rookie. You can expect him to get more than that this year as a featured back. Yes, I know he can get injured just like any other running back in the NFL. I am sure this thread has the standard "barring injuries" disclaimer like all other predictions.
That's not the complete story. He was babied early in the year, had 22 carries the first three weeks. Graham and Huggins are there, but every team has backup RBs. Neither one is guaranteed to get a certain number of carries. The team isn't going to gameplan to make sure Earnest Graham gets carries. Huggins looked nice this summer, but there are plenty of August Hall of Famers that never went anywhere.I think Caddy is definitely the man there. Now, the OP said barring injury, but with Caddy you can't discount injury. But I think, when healthy, he gets at least 65% of the carries.Cadillac got barely over 50% last year. He's not getting younger and Graham and Huggins are there.Add Cadillac and I agree that Ryan Grant should be there too.
I strongly disagree with this. I think that LT2 will take a significant amount of carries and playing time away from Greene.Shonn Greene.
No way. Bush is too great of a weapon.I think Pierre Thomas is going to sneak in to this category.![]()
Only 5 guys in the league had over 75% of the RB carries last year. If you're saying that 75% of RB carries is basically the same as 65% of team carries, then you really think that the number of RBs to get that percentage will more than double from last year? I don't think so.And I'd take Best off the list and add Forte and Grant. That would be the list of guys I think would have a shot at having those numbers anyway.I used 65% because I was referring to team carries. If it were only running back carries, 75% would probably have the same effect.