What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

True Featured Backs (1 Viewer)

shnikies

Footballguy
My guess is, barring injury:

Adrian Peterson

Ray Rice

Chris Johnson

MJD

Frank Gore

Cedric Benson

Rashard Mendenhall

Jahvid Best

Michael Turner

Steven Jackson

Ryan Mathews

Who do you add or remove from that list?

 
My guess is, barring injury:Adrian PetersonRay RiceChris JohnsonMJDFrank GoreCedric BensonRashard MendenhallJahvid BestMichael TurnerSteven JacksonRyan MathewsWho do you add or remove from that list?
I expect Charles to be close over the 2nd half of the year.
 
Add Cadillac and I agree that Ryan Grant should be there too.
Cadillac got barely over 50% last year. He's not getting younger and Graham and Huggins are there. I'd say the chance of him getting 65% of the carries is about .65%. Grant had 65% on the button last year and I could see him losing a few more carries this year.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Add Cadillac and I agree that Ryan Grant should be there too.
Cadillac got barely over 50% last year. He's not getting younger and Graham and Huggins are there.
That's not the complete story. He was babied early in the year, had 22 carries the first three weeks. Graham and Huggins are there, but every team has backup RBs. Neither one is guaranteed to get a certain number of carries. The team isn't going to gameplan to make sure Earnest Graham gets carries. Huggins looked nice this summer, but there are plenty of August Hall of Famers that never went anywhere.I think Caddy is definitely the man there. Now, the OP said barring injury, but with Caddy you can't discount injury. But I think, when healthy, he gets at least 65% of the carries.
 
Ryan Grant HAS to be on that list.
I think Grant is right on the fence. I have a strange feeling that Brandon Jackson + miscellaneous keeps him under 65%.
Grant had 281 carries last year...which was >75% of the total.Jackson had 37 carries last year.

Right now...the Packers only have two RB's on the roster.
I see 282 out of 438 = 64.3%I might be looking at the wrong page.

http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/gnb/2009.htm

 
Ryan Grant HAS to be on that list.
I think Grant is right on the fence. I have a strange feeling that Brandon Jackson + miscellaneous keeps him under 65%.
Grant had 281 carries last year...which was >75% of the total.Jackson had 37 carries last year.

Right now...the Packers only have two RB's on the roster.
I see 282 out of 438 = 64.3%I might be looking at the wrong page.

http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/gnb/2009.htm
Humpback was right. I was looking at RB carries only. Yep...just under 65% is the right number.Aside from my poor math skills...I still think Grant is a good bet for the list.

 
Moreno had 247 carries as a rookie. You can expect him to get more than that this year as a featured back. Yes, I know he can get injured just like any other running back in the NFL. I am sure this thread has the standard "barring injuries" disclaimer like all other predictions.

 
Moreno had 247 carries as a rookie. You can expect him to get more than that this year as a featured back. Yes, I know he can get injured just like any other running back in the NFL. I am sure this thread has the standard "barring injuries" disclaimer like all other predictions.
There is the standard "barring injuries" disclaimer but not "barring injured". They might ease him back slowly, falling too far behind in carries to catch up.
 
OK, out on a limb...

Addai.

I know, I know, Donald Brown.

Brown has been having a hard time in pass protection/picking up blitzes.

If this doesn't change, I can't see him becoming more than a change-of-pace back. If he's in and teams know he can't really pass-protect, they can stack the box knowing it will likely be a run.

 
Good List...I'd add Arian Foster due to no quality depth behind him.
I think Slaton is a bigger part of the offense than most think. Slaton + miscellaneous and I see Foster in the 50-55% range.
Slaton will not see nearly the number of carries he did when healthy 2 years ago. And he's not fully healthy now. He has turf toe. And, you think a neck/back injury just goes away?He's a 'scat/3rd down/pass-catching' (fill in the cliche) type back. They will pound the rock with Foster and get Slaton in there for passing situations mainly.
 
Moreno had 247 carries as a rookie. You can expect him to get more than that this year as a featured back. Yes, I know he can get injured just like any other running back in the NFL. I am sure this thread has the standard "barring injuries" disclaimer like all other predictions.
There is the standard "barring injuries" disclaimer but not "barring injured". They might ease him back slowly, falling too far behind in carries to catch up.
I think what you meant was "injured on the first day of practice 36 days ago" which is plenty of time to heal before the first game. If he injured himself a week ago, I could see your point. He has been practicing for a week now.
 
Good List...I'd add Arian Foster due to no quality depth behind him.
I think Slaton is a bigger part of the offense than most think. Slaton + miscellaneous and I see Foster in the 50-55% range.
Slaton will not see nearly the number of carries he did when healthy 2 years ago. And he's not fully healthy now. He has turf toe. And, you think a neck/back injury just goes away?He's a 'scat/3rd down/pass-catching' (fill in the cliche) type back. They will pound the rock with Foster and get Slaton in there for passing situations mainly.
The Texans carried the ball 425 times last year and if they carry it the same amount this year Foster would need 276 carries and I don't see that happening.
 
Moreno had 247 carries as a rookie. You can expect him to get more than that this year as a featured back. Yes, I know he can get injured just like any other running back in the NFL. I am sure this thread has the standard "barring injuries" disclaimer like all other predictions.
There is the standard "barring injuries" disclaimer but not "barring injured". They might ease him back slowly, falling too far behind in carries to catch up.
I think what you meant was "injured on the first day of practice 36 days ago" which is plenty of time to heal before the first game. If he injured himself a week ago, I could see your point. He has been practicing for a week now.
Didn't he say himself that he only felt 80% recently? Throw in the fact he hasn't seen full contact and you really think they'll give him 20 carries + receptions week 1?
 
good list. I definitely think Grant is on it. As for Foster, he could be, but lots has to go right. Stay healthy, don't fumble, etc. Don't think Shonn Greene will - I'm convinced LT gets a bunch of carries.

 
good list. I definitely think Grant is on it. As for Foster, he could be, but lots has to go right. Stay healthy, don't fumble, etc. Don't think Shonn Greene will - I'm convinced LT gets a bunch of carries.
Plus, on volume alone, how could anyone project Greene to get 65% of a possible 600 team carries?
 
Provided he stays healthy, I'd add Portis to this list.
Wow, with Shanahan calling the shots? I think he has too many carries on those legs to hold up to that workload.I would agree with adding Grant just based on options in GB.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Moreno had 247 carries as a rookie. You can expect him to get more than that this year as a featured back. Yes, I know he can get injured just like any other running back in the NFL. I am sure this thread has the standard "barring injuries" disclaimer like all other predictions.
There is the standard "barring injuries" disclaimer but not "barring injured". They might ease him back slowly, falling too far behind in carries to catch up.
I think what you meant was "injured on the first day of practice 36 days ago" which is plenty of time to heal before the first game. If he injured himself a week ago, I could see your point. He has been practicing for a week now.
Didn't he say himself that he only felt 80% recently? Throw in the fact he hasn't seen full contact and you really think they'll give him 20 carries + receptions week 1?
Maybe not, but if you are trying to get together a list of lead dogs, he needs to be on it.
 
Maybe it's just me but I don't think the 47 carries Rodgers got for the Packers should count towards what percentage Grant is going to get.

:lmao:

 
good list. I definitely think Grant is on it. As for Foster, he could be, but lots has to go right. Stay healthy, don't fumble, etc. Don't think Shonn Greene will - I'm convinced LT gets a bunch of carries.
Plus, on volume alone, how could anyone project Greene to get 65% of a possible 600 team carries?
I think percentage stats are misleading. Greene could get >65% and still get more carries over the year than backs who get <65% of their teams carries.
 
Maybe it's just me but I don't think the 47 carries Rodgers got for the Packers should count towards what percentage Grant is going to get. :thumbup:
Maybe but by doing total carries you don't have to differentiate a busted pass play turned into QB run from an intended QB run like a sneak or a naked bootleg. There are other flaws in making this list like the fact Shonn Greene probably won't get 65% of the Jets' carries but he'll almost certainly get more than Best who is on this list.
 
My guess is, barring injury:Adrian PetersonRay RiceChris JohnsonMJDFrank GoreCedric BensonRashard MendenhallJahvid BestMichael TurnerSteven JacksonRyan MathewsWho do you add or remove from that list?
I'd remove Rice - didn't do last year. Benson - lot of carries so he still gets 300. Plenty carries left for B. ScottBest - it will be a more of a rbbc than people realize IMOI'd addGrant - did last year, no reason to think he won't do it againForte - even though he was horrible, he did it last year and I'd don't think Chester will be able to make any difference.Portis - because LJ is done.Spiller - because he will be Buffalo's offense.
 
Based on Team RB carries, with injuries blended into the mix, 65% is a high percentage. Here were the only backs that got 50% of his team's RB carries . . .

MJD 87.4

Steven Jackson 85.8

Chris Johnson 83.1

Matt Forte 78.9

Ryan Grant 75.4

ADP 74.5

Frank Gore 69.6

Cedric Benson 66.6

Joseph Addai 64.8

Fred Jackson 64.7

Rashard Mendenhall 64.2

Thomas Jones 62.2

Kevin Smith 61.6

Knowshon Moreno 61.0

Cadillac Williams 60.8

LT 57.9

Marion Barber 54.3

Brandon Jacobs 54.2

Chris Wells 53.7

Ricky Williams 53.0

LeSean McCoy 51.5

Julius Jones 50.7

Jamal Charles 50.4

 
Last edited by a moderator:
My guess is, barring injury:

Adrian Peterson

Ray Rice

Chris Johnson

MJD

Frank Gore

Cedric Benson

Rashard Mendenhall

Jahvid Best

Michael Turner

Steven Jackson

Ryan Mathews

Who do you add or remove from that list?
I'd remove

Benson - lot of carries so he still gets 300. Plenty carries left for B. Scott
Why? According to Yudkin's stats, he got 2/3 of team carries. And he did that in essentially 12 uninjured games. Barring injury, he'll easily clear that number this year.
 
good list. I definitely think Grant is on it. As for Foster, he could be, but lots has to go right. Stay healthy, don't fumble, etc. Don't think Shonn Greene will - I'm convinced LT gets a bunch of carries.
Plus, on volume alone, how could anyone project Greene to get 65% of a possible 600 team carries?
I think percentage stats are misleading. Greene could get >65% and still get more carries over the year than backs who get <65% of their teams carries.
They're especially misleading when you misuse the > and < signs.
 
good list. I definitely think Grant is on it. As for Foster, he could be, but lots has to go right. Stay healthy, don't fumble, etc. Don't think Shonn Greene will - I'm convinced LT gets a bunch of carries.
Plus, on volume alone, how could anyone project Greene to get 65% of a possible 600 team carries?
I think percentage stats are misleading. Greene could get >65% and still get more carries over the year than backs who get <65% of their teams carries.
They're especially misleading when you misuse the > and < signs.
ya that confused me too.........smaller number eats (<) the bigger number.
 
Moreno had 247 carries as a rookie. You can expect him to get more than that this year as a featured back. Yes, I know he can get injured just like any other running back in the NFL. I am sure this thread has the standard "barring injuries" disclaimer like all other predictions.
There is the standard "barring injuries" disclaimer but not "barring injured". They might ease him back slowly, falling too far behind in carries to catch up.
I think what you meant was "injured on the first day of practice 36 days ago" which is plenty of time to heal before the first game. If he injured himself a week ago, I could see your point. He has been practicing for a week now.
Didn't he say himself that he only felt 80% recently? Throw in the fact he hasn't seen full contact and you really think they'll give him 20 carries + receptions week 1?
Nope. He did not say that. He said "80-some percent". Also, he said that on Aug 31. The Broncos play their first game on Sept 12th, which will give them plenty of extra time to give ice, massage and electrical stimulation. The trainers for the Broncos are certainly on top of it. Is it possible that he is limited in week 1? Sure. IMHO he should not play at all until he is 100%. No need to take chances with a hammy.
 
Portis for sure. LJ can't catch, and can't pass protect. Portis will be a 3 down back this year for sure. If he can stay healthy, he might be one of the steals of the draft this year. That's the million dollar question of course.

 
Add Cadillac and I agree that Ryan Grant should be there too.
Cadillac got barely over 50% last year. He's not getting younger and Graham and Huggins are there.
That's not the complete story. He was babied early in the year, had 22 carries the first three weeks. Graham and Huggins are there, but every team has backup RBs. Neither one is guaranteed to get a certain number of carries. The team isn't going to gameplan to make sure Earnest Graham gets carries. Huggins looked nice this summer, but there are plenty of August Hall of Famers that never went anywhere.I think Caddy is definitely the man there. Now, the OP said barring injury, but with Caddy you can't discount injury. But I think, when healthy, he gets at least 65% of the carries.
;)
 
I used 65% because I was referring to team carries. If it were only running back carries, 75% would probably have the same effect.

 
I used 65% because I was referring to team carries. If it were only running back carries, 75% would probably have the same effect.
Only 5 guys in the league had over 75% of the RB carries last year. If you're saying that 75% of RB carries is basically the same as 65% of team carries, then you really think that the number of RBs to get that percentage will more than double from last year? I don't think so.And I'd take Best off the list and add Forte and Grant. That would be the list of guys I think would have a shot at having those numbers anyway.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top