ROYALWITCHEESE said:
Adam Harstad said:
ROYALWITCHEESE said:
Players should have their own motivation. At least the great ones do. This is not a good sign for him becoming the superstar many believe IMO. This is not the first time he has been put in the corner. I think he can be a decent player, but he may not have "it".
If superstars all just motivated themselves and didn't need coaches pushing their buttons, I'm pretty sure Phil Jackson would have a lot fewer championship rings. And Bill Parcells would have a much shorter resume.
Michael Jordan, Scottie Pippen, Kobe Bryant, and Shaquille Oneal did not, I repeat, NOT need motivating. Horrible example. They needed Phil for getting then to trust each other. They were going to be superstars with or without him.
Oh and lmao at comparing Hunter to those guys and Wisenhunt to Phil. Pure comedy!
If you are a crap/fringe player, maybe motivation and punishment are things you need. True stars don't need it. The drive is inherent in their DNA.
Just watch and see. This will continue to be a recurring theme with Hunter. Bad practice habits, poor routes, and alligator arms over the middle.
The Bulls and Lakers had more than two players on their teams that won multiple championships, Jackson's coaching could have impacted on them as well. Jackson did have the benefit of some great players, but it is an open question if the team's he coached would have done the same without him. Not sure Shaq is the best example of a driven player, if he played with the intensity of Rodman he would have averaged 20-25 rebounds per game.
You are the only person making the straw man comparisons you are laughing at. Jordan and Bryant are two of the greatest in NBA history. Hunter could have something less than their level of intensity and urgency in his practice habits and play (similar to 99% of NBA and NFL players) and have upside over his current ADP in redraft and dynasty. Whisenhunt doesn't have to be identical to Vince Lombardi or John Wooden to make the point that different players don't have the exact same level of self-motivation, and can respond to coaching differently.
It may not be as black and white as there are only two categories, transcendently talented players that are always self-motivated and worthless players that need constant prodding, that is extremely simplistic, there are a continuum of possibilities (with most of them probably not occupying the extremes - players like Jordan are by definition rare). Hunter doesn't need to be as driven or play with the hair on fire intensity of Jerry Rice every practice snap to be productive.
Moss and Green were mentioned below. I can't speak to every context those names have been thrown around in the thread, but some were sceptical that Hunter could play at a high level being so skinny, and it was pointed out early on that he had a similar build to those two (therefore, his lack of David Boston-like physical stature isn't NECESSARILY a deal breaker). I haven't seen too many state Hunter's talent and game have a 100% correspondence with them, or that his career should be expected to unfold identically. Taking things too literally causes a lot of mischief.
If someone said an updated road map was useful for driving from Los Angeles to New York because it accurately showed some recent road changes, I wouldn't be LMAO and saying that was a horrible example because it isn't identical in a one-to-one-correspondence manner with the terrain it is mapping, and isn't more than 3,000 miles wide because it needed to be scaled to fold-up glove box size.
* I think Hunter has future WR1 physical ability and talent, but don't know if he will realize it. Fortunately, at his prices, you don't have to blow up your team to acquire him as if he was a lock to be a WR1. Needless to say, there is a lot of room for him to not be a WR1 (let alone a one of the greatest WRs in NFL history analogue to Michael Jordan

) and still have upside over his current redraft and dynasty ADP.