What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

U.S. Navy Invents Railgun (1 Viewer)

Henry Ford said:
TheIronSheik said:
Quint said:
Copeman said:
What kind of "projectile" would it shoot? I mean, would it be explosive or what?
something like this (non explosive, that's the key)
I don't get why it's $25,000 a pop. Who are they buying their metal from?
It's 23 pounds.
That conversion rate doesn't seem right. Is the dollar really doing that poorly against it's British counterpart? :confused:
What do you pay people for depleted uranium projectiles?
I have a guy who can get it real cheap. Send me a PM if you need some.
PM sent. To clarify, they don't have to be shaped like penises, but I do need 200 of them.
You guys are so going to get us NSA'd
Oh, so now Middle Eastern men can't sell acquired military weaponry over the internet to strangers? Thanks a lot, Obama! :hot:

 
You guys are so going to get us NSA'd
How many depleted uranium phalluses am I allowed to have?
Is this for personal use or may there be a religious ceremony involved? It makes a difference.
Without getting into specifics, there will be a number of references to a religious deity.
Oh well in that case it's a religious freedom thing, own as many as you want.

 
My father first mentioned this concept to me about 30 years ago back when he was working in the defense sector. The idea's been around for quite a while.
Was brought up first during the Reagan administration as part of the Star Wars program.

 
The current version of this railgun:

- fires a projectile at a rate of speed twice that of any other artillery shell

- has a range of 100 miles

- delivers 32 megajoules of damage - equal to 5 pounds of C4

- it can do this 10 times per minute

The great potential of these weapons are for defensive purposes - once railguns have guided projectiles the threat of missiles is greatly diminished, if not eliminated.

Hypervelocity Rail Gun (CHECMATE)


Research out of hypervelocity railgun technology was done to build an information base about rail guns so that SDI planners would know how to apply the technology to the proposed defense system. The SDI rail gun investigation, called the Compact High Energy Capacitor Module Advanced Technology Experiment (CHECMATE), had been able to fire two projectiles per day during the initiative. This represented a significant improvement over previous efforts, which were only able to achieve about one shot per month. Hypervelocity rail guns are, at least conceptually, an attractive alternative to a space-based defense system because of their envisioned ability to quickly shoot at many targets. Also, since only the projectile leaves the gun, a railgun system can potentially fire many times before needing to be resupplied.

A hypervelocity railgun works very much like a particle accelerator insofar as it converts electrical potential energy into kinetic energy imparted to the projectile. A conductive pellet (the projectile) is attracted down the rails by electric current flowing through a rail. Through the magnetic forces that this system achieves, a force is exerted on the projectile moving it down the rail. Railguns can generate muzzle-velocities in excess of 2.4 kilometers per second.[64] At this velocity, even a rifle-bullet sized projectile will penetrate the front armor of a main battle tank, let alone a thinly protected missile guidance system.

Rail guns face a host of technical challenges before they will be ready for battlefield deployment. First, the rails guiding the projectile must carry very high power. Each firing of the railgun produces tremendous current flow (almost half a million amperes) through the rails, causing rapid erosion of the rail's surfaces (through ohmic heating, and even vaporization of the rail surface.) Early prototypes were essentially single-use weapons, requiring complete replacement of the rails after each firing. Another challenge with the rail gun system is projectile survivability. The projectiles experience acceleration force in excess of 100,000 g. In order to be effective, the fired projectile must first survive the mechanical stress of firing and the thermal effects of a trip through the atmosphere at many times the speed of sound before its subsequent impact with the target. In-flight guidance, if implemented, would require the onboard navigation system to be built to the same level of sturdiness as the main mass of the projectile.

In addition to being considered for destroying ballistic missile threats, rail guns were also being planned for service in space platform (sensor and battle station) defense. This potential role reflected defense planner expectations that the rail guns of the future would be capable of not only rapid fire, but also of multiple firings (on the order of tens to hundreds of shots).[65]

 
I guess this may be a very dumb question but if they want to put these things in space to shoot down missiles to work like the Star Wars sytem "worked"....... um, what happens when they miss a moving missile by half a degree? I think the eggheads may want to watch "Ronin" this weekend on Starz before their first round of tests.

 
Meh, if the pentagon was going to spend a billion and change to "invent" movie props from Arnold movies I would rather have alien broads with a third jug. (Shrug) Let Isis try to motorboat that! USA! USA!! USA!!!

 
I guess this may be a very dumb question but if they want to put these things in space to shoot down missiles to work like the Star Wars sytem "worked"....... um, what happens when they miss a moving missile by half a degree? I think the eggheads may want to watch "Ronin" this weekend on Starz before their first round of tests.
I don't think they're intended to be like Star Wars.  I think the discussion of mounting in space is specifically to address the issue of in-space defense systems.  Which are tougher to build because lack of oxygen cuts down the available defense options.

 
I guess this may be a very dumb question but if they want to put these things in space to shoot down missiles to work like the Star Wars sytem "worked"....... um, what happens when they miss a moving missile by half a degree? I think the eggheads may want to watch "Ronin" this weekend on Starz before their first round of tests.
The 'CHECMATE' system was from the SDI program in the 80's, not how we're planning to use railguns now.  There would be serious problems from misguided projectiles raining down from space. :lol:

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top