modogg
Footballguy
I think the UFC can influence and let people know their opinion, but only athletic commissions i think can make the change. and the problem is each state, if they have one, has it's own athletic commission. each state has their own interpretation of the rules.10-8 are pretty rare though I think. I wonder if the 9.5's would be more common which could then lead to more draws?i think they are doing it now on the amateur level in a few states. and yes, the point is they just add .5 increments. so theoretically we would see more 9.5, 9, 8.5, 8 rounds. as it is now, i don't think we will ever see a 10-7 round (or at least scored 10-7), so the rule change was brought up to provide more options than 9 and 8. That is a good point about the draws, but theoretically we would see the same result now if a guy had 2 10-9 rounds and the other had a 10-8. gotta do good training for judges, and i haven't heard much about it since they started it a year or 2 ago.can you explain this proposed rule change in scoring more? Can you still have 10-9 rounds along with 10-9.5 rounds?so, completely different topic here but i am watching TUF and it made me thinking of scoring changes that have been proposed. one that seems to be the more popular is using .5 points. I have heard arguments against it, but watching this fight on TUF, i think one of the best things .5 point scoring would do is get rid of this f'n lay and pray. Dude laid on the other guy for most of the round, through wild punches from time to time, and spent the last 30 seconds of the 1st round running from the guy. Seems like a wonderful place to have .5 point scoring where that guy would win that round 10-9.5. no way a round like that should equate to many of the 10-9 rounds out there that exist
I would appreciate any rule that hurts the lay and pray guys (they are awful to watch).
Could the .5 lead to more fights that are draws? (say two 10-9.5 rounds for one guy and then one 10-9 for the other?)
If they are already doing it at the amateur levels in a few areas, then they could see the stats on that accord I guess.
Who makes this decision? Can the UFC by themselves make the decision to make the change or does some governing body that oversees MMA have to make the change?
and yeah i think that was the point of letting it go for a yaer or 2 in the amateurs to see how it worked. haven't heard much about it though, so maybe it isn't having an impact. I wouldn't be surprised if judges still kept doing 10-9s and didn't use the .5 increments much.