Uh oh NFL N is asking (1 Viewer)

[MDSkinner]

As a Bears fan, obviously I hate them both. However Favre's dominance over the Bears (particularly at home) will be a tough thing for Rodgers to equal, though certainly not impossible with the way he is playing. I am not saying that these numbers make Favre better than Rodgers historically, but from the perspective of a rival this perspective holds some value.

Rodgers is 6-2 against the Bears as a starter ...and was a blocked FG away from being 7-1 against them (includes the NFC title game).

No question and this is why it is certainly not impossible with the way he has been playing. However, his record against the Bears as a Starter at Soldier Field is I believe 3-2 (one this year). Obviously there is no worse loss in my lifetime than last year at home in the NFC Championship but, Rodgers would have to go 9-1 at Solidier Field to do what Favre did on our field. Not impossible, but you have to admit it would be impressive. It may seem silly but that dominance at Soldier Field has really stuck out to me about Favre, and I doubt it goes away. Subjective, clearly but it matters to me.

 

[Warrior]

Lets continue this conversation after Rodgers goes 20 years without missing a single start.

 

[Reepicheep]

Lets continue this conversation after Rodgers goes 20 years without missing a single start.

Is that a requirement to be considered better than Favre?

 

[Bruce Leroy]

Favre is lucky he didn't have to follow Rodgers

 

[RhymesMcJuice]

Rodgers is going to go down in history as the best QB ever to play the game, and it won't even be close.

Maybe if he had started his career earlier, but Brady already had 3 SB rings by the time he was Rodgers' age.

 

[kinghill]

Rodgers is going to go down in history as the best QB ever to play the game, and it won't even be close.

Maybe if he had started his career earlier, but Brady already had 3 SB rings by the time he was Rodgers' age.

Important point, lot of people forget this, and reason why Rodgers will never get to Favre's level of career stats (especially INT ) so Rodgers will have to win multiple superbowls to end up being considered better than Favre. Pretty sure he will.

 

[GreenNGold]

Rodgers is going to go down in history as the best QB ever to play the game, and it won't even be close.

Maybe if he had started his career earlier, but Brady already had 3 SB rings by the time he was Rodgers' age.

Brady is 34. Rodgers is 27. Brady will be lucky to win another ring. Rodgers will have more rings than Brady by the time he is 34.

 

[Mario Kart]

Rodgers is going to go down in history as the best QB ever to play the game, and it won't even be close.

Maybe if he had started his career earlier, but Brady already had 3 SB rings by the time he was Rodgers' age.

Brady is 34. Rodgers is 27. Brady will be lucky to win another ring. Rodgers will have more rings than Brady by the time he is 34.

The Packers will win three of the next seven Super Bowls? I'm a Packers fan but I'll throw money down that that won't happen. What odds are you giving?

 

[Nefari]

Rodgers is going to go down in history as the best QB ever to play the game, and it won't even be close.

Maybe if he had started his career earlier, but Brady already had 3 SB rings by the time he was Rodgers' age.

Brady is 34. Rodgers is 27. Brady will be lucky to win another ring. Rodgers will have more rings than Brady by the time he is 34.

The Packers will win three of the next seven Super Bowls? I'm a Packers fan but I'll throw money down that that won't happen. What odds are you giving?

Fine but would it be that ridiculous to see them win two of the next seven and have Rodgers tied with Brady? Not in my mind.

 

[Mario Kart]

I'm optimistic but winning three Super Bowls in 8 years is definitely not easy. Don't count the chickens before they hatch.