What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Undercover Boss (1 Viewer)

If Hooters CEO is going to make changes after watching this show then I may never end up going to the place again. You knew the outfits and name degraded women when you created the idea. and lets be honest, we don't go to Hooters for the wings
I'm pretty sure he said they needed to appeal to a broader audience without changing the uniform.
they've changed it as much as they're going to.
:no: I'm pleased to inform you that this is incorrect. They just switched to cotton shorts which are even shorter and tighter than the spandex ones! You can read about it here, and there are pics of them everywhere:

http://thehootersgirl.blogspot.com/2009/07...op-tops-my.html

BTW, there are some GREAT blogs out there from Hooters waitresses. Hours upon hours of enjoyment.

Here is one recent entry:

LET'S PLAY DRESS UP

As many of you could have guessed, Monday Night Football is big at Hooters. It's the busiest night of the week and the only thing that brings in more people than that is the UFC fights. I'm not exactly sure what the reasoning behind it is but every Monday night, the girls that are working have to dress up. There's a list of themes in the back that tell you what you will be dressing up as for each game and there's a little booklet with ideas of what to wear for each week.

I've worked almost every Monday Night Football since I started (tonight I have the night off though!!!) and at first, dressing up was fun. Now it's really just turned into an expensive pain in the ###. I spend, on average $50.00 every week on a costume that I will probably never wear again. I do make the money back in tips that night plus a lot more but if I saved that $50.00 every week, it wouldn't take me long to have enough money for new tires on my car. Which I desperately need before the snow comes...

It also is a bit of a scramble to get a costume together since the schedule for the next week usually up until the Thursday before. I don't work Thursdays, and although I could call and ask what days I work, I don't find out my schedule until Friday night, when I'm working and unable to go shopping for a costume. Saturdays I like to sleep in a little bit and then go out with friends and not think about work and then Sunday I work until about 5PM at which point all the stores close for the night. So Monday, in the 3 hours I have between school and work, I have to rush around the city trying to find myself a costume. Not fun and pretty stressful.

Last week, we had to dress as cheerleaders. So on Monday afternoon I went to 4 costume stores, all of which had no cheerleader costumes left. I went to a couple sex stores but decided that I didn't want people to actually see my breasts while I served them their food and putting a shirt underneath that top just wouldn't look right. I went to a fifth costume shop and found a pink cheerleader costume that came with white pompoms. It was $120.00. At that point, I was getting pretty desperate so I tried it on. The thing was too damn big. So I went to the mall and pieced a costume together. I got a white skirt, a red sweater with a big letter H (perfect!) on the front and some pompoms from the dollar store.

I got to work and changed into my costume. The other girls usually dress a little bit more revealing than me but not too much. This week, they outdid themselves, though. There were miniscule skirts with no shorts underneath, bare midriffs and v-necks cut so deep that nip-slips were inevitable.

:homer:

I still felt good about what I was wearing because I wouldn't constantly be worrying about what was hanging out of where. I walked over to the table where we were doing jump start and GM F told us to give him a second. He came back with a pair of scissors and handed them to Tink.

"Go fix HGWB." Seriously?

My skirt was kind of short and the sweater was a v-neck. It wasn't nearly as extreme as the other girls but it's not like I looked like I was wearing a burka or anything. Me and Tink went to the back and laughed about how ridiculous our job is. We cut an inch or two from my skirt and cut the neck of my sweater to make it a deeper V. GM F was pleased with the results. I was glad I wore spandex shorts under my skirt.

Things like this happen a lot at Hooters. Most weeks, there's a girl who isn't showing enough skin and just a few weeks ago we were told that on the days when our city's hockey team is playing we were no longer allowed to wear jerseys or t-shirts for the team since, according to GM F, "nobody wants to go to Hooters and see a girl in a plain t-shirt serving their food."

I just have to laugh about it.
guarantee they can't get shorter than "the good ole days". like the girls were joking about tonight, "they come in small and extra small..." With the cut of the shorts if a girl that maybe should be in a small wore an extra small instead, or even an extra extra small, there wasn't much covering a nice round butt. Pleasant memories of "butts eating the shorts."and the "new" shorts have been around here for a while. not impressed. the girls probably like them better though.

 
At the end they did say that that when the female manager returned from vacaton she took a less stressful job with Hooters. I agree that the #### manager should have been fired. I am willing to guess that was not his first time having the waitresses do stupid crap like that.

For those of you complaining about the uniforms at Hooters, do you have a Tilted Kilt near you?? There is one not far from me, and the scenery is far better than the Hooters that are around here.

 
I assumed that the horrible manager 'Jimbo' couldn't be fired for legal reasons considering the whole undercover aspect to everything. Think it was even slightly alluded to at the end when they showed the CEO speaking with the other high-ups and one of them said, "Legally we could re-train him"... Or something to that affect.

 
That manager was the only thing that prevented this weeks episode from being a complete snooze fest, sans some eye candy.

His "scooter" shtick was pretty good.

 
That manager was the only thing that prevented this weeks episode from being a complete snooze fest, sans some eye candy. His "scooter" shtick was pretty good.
He was trying to be too cool for himself. Going overboard to show his coolness without knowing how to do it. He nicknamed the CEO "scooter" to assert his jerk authority and immediately put his "underling" in his place. The dude was made a fool out of on National TV and probaly is totally reformed now realizing that this is the best gig his idiot self is ever going to get and he better get his act together. :bag:
 
That manager was the only thing that prevented this weeks episode from being a complete snooze fest, sans some eye candy. His "scooter" shtick was pretty good.
He was trying to be too cool for himself. Going overboard to show his coolness without knowing how to do it. He nicknamed the CEO "scooter" to assert his jerk authority and immediately put his "underling" in his place. The dude was made a fool out of on National TV and probaly is totally reformed now realizing that this is the best gig his idiot self is ever going to get and he better get his act together. :bag:
I don't think a guy like that is capable of reforming.
 
I assumed that the horrible manager 'Jimbo' couldn't be fired for legal reasons considering the whole undercover aspect to everything. Think it was even slightly alluded to at the end when they showed the CEO speaking with the other high-ups and one of them said, "Legally we could re-train him"... Or something to that affect.
:bag: Exactly...Fire him and i'm sure you're looking at instant lawsuit.... surprised that it took this long to be brought up with the amount of "Lawyers" we have on the board.
 
playin4beer said:
Frankbot said:
I assumed that the horrible manager 'Jimbo' couldn't be fired for legal reasons considering the whole undercover aspect to everything. Think it was even slightly alluded to at the end when they showed the CEO speaking with the other high-ups and one of them said, "Legally we could re-train him"... Or something to that affect.
:excited: Exactly...

Fire him and i'm sure you're looking at instant lawsuit.... surprised that it took this long to be brought up with the amount of "Lawyers" we have on the board.
I would think that after he brought Jimbo in for the talk and he went the route of "man it works" he would have the right to push for a firing. Maybe the franchise owner has to do the firing though. Maybe Jimbo "got it" a little after "Scotty" said he would never let his daughters work for him. :shrug:
 
playin4beer said:
Frankbot said:
I assumed that the horrible manager 'Jimbo' couldn't be fired for legal reasons considering the whole undercover aspect to everything. Think it was even slightly alluded to at the end when they showed the CEO speaking with the other high-ups and one of them said, "Legally we could re-train him"... Or something to that affect.
:lol: Exactly...

Fire him and i'm sure you're looking at instant lawsuit.... surprised that it took this long to be brought up with the amount of "Lawyers" we have on the board.
I would think that after he brought Jimbo in for the talk and he went the route of "man it works" he would have the right to push for a firing. Maybe the franchise owner has to do the firing though. Maybe Jimbo "got it" a little after "Scotty" said he would never let his daughters work for him. :wolf:
I would have fired his ### on the spot. Any money lost from a lawsuit would have been more than made up for with the positive publicity gained by showing that losers like that wouldn't be tolerated in the restaurants.Of course, it was probably all staged, and the 'manager' was an actor, not the actual manager of the restaurant.

 
Another factor in the Jimbo thing is that I'm pretty sure he is an employee of the local franchise owner. I'm not sure "scotty" had any authority to fire him. Maybe somebody more familiar with franchises can clarify how it works.

 
It is unrealistic because everyday workers who are being "filmed" by a camera crew will not act the same as the do in a regular work day.

 
Random thoughts.

Probably right about Jerk-Bo in that the franchisee has to be one to fire him. I think them filming his apology might've been a bit more :goodposting: . Still the response seemed more than a bit weak ultimately. The best theater would've been him showing up with a tray full of beans and smushing the guy's face in it :)

Transferring the good manager to a less-stressful position sounded actually like it was a demotion.

The military donation, while :kicksrock: in and of itself of course seemed to be a "how do we close out this storyline" type of deal. He mentioned that they didn't seem to take much care of the backend of the restaurant (and really by the looks of things that seemed true) yet there was no pledge to see how they could make the work environment better for the guys working in the back.

Ultimately I think this show is going to burn out fast.

-QG

 
hammerva said:
If Hooters CEO is going to make changes after watching this show then I may never end up going to the place again. You knew the outfits and name degraded women when you created the idea. and lets be honest, we don't go to Hooters for the wings
Just to clarify, the CEO's father didn't create the idea...he bought the idea from a group of 6 guys in Clearwater that created it, and blew it up world-wide. The son was in the real estate division for years, then suddenly became the new CEO around 5 years ago. I'm not sure how much he personally has invested in the 'idea'....wouldn't be surprised at changes.
 
hammerva said:
If Hooters CEO is going to make changes after watching this show then I may never end up going to the place again. You knew the outfits and name degraded women when you created the idea. and lets be honest, we don't go to Hooters for the wings
Just to clarify, the CEO's father didn't create the idea...he bought the idea from a group of 6 guys in Clearwater that created it, and blew it up world-wide. The son was in the real estate division for years, then suddenly became the new CEO around 5 years ago. I'm not sure how much he personally has invested in the 'idea'....wouldn't be surprised at changes.
Anyone believe that line of BS about planning on studying law enforcement rather than taking over Hooters? What a dimwit.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Random thoughts.Probably right about Jerk-Bo in that the franchisee has to be one to fire him. I think them filming his apology might've been a bit more :mellow: . Still the response seemed more than a bit weak ultimately. The best theater would've been him showing up with a tray full of beans and smushing the guy's face in it :hot:Transferring the good manager to a less-stressful position sounded actually like it was a demotion.The military donation, while :hot: in and of itself of course seemed to be a "how do we close out this storyline" type of deal. He mentioned that they didn't seem to take much care of the backend of the restaurant (and really by the looks of things that seemed true) yet there was no pledge to see how they could make the work environment better for the guys working in the back.Ultimately I think this show is going to burn out fast.-QG
I thought last weeks show with the CEO of Waste Management was much better. The CEO seemed much more interested in making changes based on the things he learned during the week. Not sure this guy learned much or plans any significant changes.
 
Random thoughts.Probably right about Jerk-Bo in that the franchisee has to be one to fire him. I think them filming his apology might've been a bit more :thumbup: . Still the response seemed more than a bit weak ultimately. The best theater would've been him showing up with a tray full of beans and smushing the guy's face in it :)Transferring the good manager to a less-stressful position sounded actually like it was a demotion.The military donation, while :ninja: in and of itself of course seemed to be a "how do we close out this storyline" type of deal. He mentioned that they didn't seem to take much care of the backend of the restaurant (and really by the looks of things that seemed true) yet there was no pledge to see how they could make the work environment better for the guys working in the back.Ultimately I think this show is going to burn out fast.-QG
I thought last weeks show with the CEO of Waste Management was much better. The CEO seemed much more interested in making changes based on the things he learned during the week. Not sure this guy learned much or plans any significant changes.
Exactly. I get the sense that the Waste Management episode was probably their best one so they led off with it. That they chose this one to keep the momentum going makes me think it'll go downhill fast. Next week is 7-eleven :lmao: Seems to me like the number of companies that this would work well with (and would be willing to do it) and would maintain interest isn't necessarily that big. Most white-collar stuff would seem to be out, for example.This episode showed that the 'reward' segment needs delivery no matter what. I mean, if the company works well there's not that payoff of the boss learning about what needs to be improved. Canning that guy or busting him down would've actually added a little more drama - that there'd be potential consequences for truly problematic employees (other than every customer at his Hooters say "Hey, you're that jerk from Undercover Boss").How this doesn't become repetitive is what seems uncertain to me.-QG
 
The timing of the announcement that Hooters is up for sale is interesting, given that the CEO didn't seem to have the drive/zeal for the company that his old man did.

 
The timing of the announcement that Hooters is up for sale is interesting, given that the CEO didn't seem to have the drive/zeal for the company that his old man did.
Quite. Wonder if Jerk-bo could round up some backers. Anyhow, here's an article from a quality news source:Linky

-QG

 
The timing of the announcement that Hooters is up for sale is interesting, given that the CEO didn't seem to have the drive/zeal for the company that his old man did.
That is interesting timing.Brooks was extremely unimpressive to me. I know CEO's don't all have to be cut from the same cloth, but he excudes no leadership in any way. Maybe he's the brains and surrounds himself with strong leaders? Didn't seem cut out for that job though.
 
The hooters girls eating out of that plate without using their hands was really sad. Hopefully the manager will lose his job over that decision. Sad to see what some people must endure at their jobs.
The surprising thing is he didn't lose his job! He got a slap on the wrists and had to apologize to the girls. I would've booted his big ####.
 
Did anyone see last night's episode?

COO of Churchill Downs works alongside a jockey valet. He learns that the valet's daughter - whom he was grooming to be a jockey - died a few months ago of heart defects.

A the reveal, COO tells the valet they are going to name a race after his daughter to debut in the 2010 season.

Got a little dusty.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I haven't read this thread so forgive if it's been covered but doesn't this thing seem a bit too scripted?

Seems the same formula every week...CEO is able to go undercover, even though cameras follow his every move. Coworkers tell him intimate details of their lives, on camera. CEO finds one employee with a special gift that's not being fully realized by the company. CEO finds some flaw in the company that makes it all seem worthwhile. CEO finds an employee that's doing fantastic and deserves a raise or promotion.

Blah, blah, blah...it just feels too scripted.

 
I haven't read this thread so forgive if it's been covered but doesn't this thing seem a bit too scripted?Seems the same formula every week...CEO is able to go undercover, even though cameras follow his every move. Coworkers tell him intimate details of their lives, on camera. CEO finds one employee with a special gift that's not being fully realized by the company. CEO finds some flaw in the company that makes it all seem worthwhile. CEO finds an employee that's doing fantastic and deserves a raise or promotion.Blah, blah, blah...it just feels too scripted.
:lmao:
 
I haven't read this thread so forgive if it's been covered but doesn't this thing seem a bit too scripted?Seems the same formula every week...CEO is able to go undercover, even though cameras follow his every move. Coworkers tell him intimate details of their lives, on camera. CEO finds one employee with a special gift that's not being fully realized by the company. CEO finds some flaw in the company that makes it all seem worthwhile. CEO finds an employee that's doing fantastic and deserves a raise or promotion.Blah, blah, blah...it just feels too scripted.
Bingo. I watched three of these episodes and decided I'm not interested enough to watch another one. As you said, same thing over and over again.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I enjoyed the show tonight about Checkers/Rally's. The CEO actually shut down a restaurant. Awesome!

 
My question. The money being paid by the undercover bosses to the employees is coming from the sponsors of the show? I'ts hard to believe that kind of money being tossed out is coming from the undercover bosses pockets.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top