Sabertooth
Footballguy
Pretty much.The Dems thought it was more important to focus on minorities, illegal aliens, LGBT's and women. Suffering white laborers didn't make the cut.
Pretty much.The Dems thought it was more important to focus on minorities, illegal aliens, LGBT's and women. Suffering white laborers didn't make the cut.
Where are you, Barrow?Sabertooth said:Tell me about it. I'd love to move. Wife just won't even hear it.
Seriously. If you're not ####ing the little guy to benefit the country club set, you're just not doing it right.If t weren't a "union" thing, it would be recognized as price gouging. So, #### the little guy to benefit the little guy? Pass
Because, according to the Dems, anything white is the root of all evil.The Dems thought it was more important to focus on minorities, illegal aliens, LGBT's and women. Suffering white laborers didn't make the cut.
Just wowSmack Tripper said:But they like the short line gain of some tax savings and probably dislike minorities.
The Dems thought it was more important to focus on minorities, illegal aliens, LGBT's and women. Suffering white laborers didn't make the cut.
Smack Tripper said:It's incredibly common amongst union folks. It becomes an "I got mine" mentality and they don't realize they're voting against people who openly plot against them. But they like the short line gain of some tax savings and probably dislike minorities.
As long as you recognize union leaders are the same ####ers you hate and want to line their pockets, I like it.Seriously. If you're not ####ing the little guy to benefit the country club set, you're just not doing it right.
They didn't just not make the cut, they were (and continue to be) openly mocked by the Democratic Party.The Dems thought it was more important to focus on minorities, illegal aliens, LGBT's and women. Suffering white laborers didn't make the cut.
And they still sit and wonder why they lostThey didn't just not make the cut, they were (and continue to be) openly mocked by the Democratic Party.
Plenty of good jobs around here not being filled. Maybe more people should be willing to go where the jobs are instead of complaining about the people who are.in the 2020 election, trump will look at whoever the dems trot out and say it was dem judges that blocked his immigration policy which has hurt jobs. He'll say dems love immgrants more than the hard working people already here.
That isn't exactly how right to work works. Plus it is a little more difficult to tell because several states have just recently passed right to work and it is hard to judge if right to work does lower wages.How are the rates and worker protections in right to work states as compared to union states?
So are you saying wages should stay low so prices would stay low?If t weren't a "union" thing, it would be recognized as price gouging. So, #### the little guy to benefit the little guy? Pass
You do realize that it still costs money for unions to hire/train people. It costs them to fight for their workers rights, and the people that do that need to get paid whether it is the leaders, lawyers, accounts or anyone else.As long as you recognize union leaders are the same ####ers you hate and want to line their pockets, I like it.
And political donations.You do realize that it still costs money for unions to hire/train people. It costs them to fight for their workers rights, and the people that do that need to get paid whether it is the leaders, lawyers, accounts or anyone else.
true, it is hard to mention everything that unions collect money for, but they can't do it for free.And political donations.
True they may just be morons voting against their own self interestNobody can stereotype like a modern day Lefty.
If management is going to donate to politicians who will seek to rollback union gains, do you have an issue with the opposition doing the same?And it's mostly political donations.
Of course they do.If management is going to donate to politicians who will seek to rollback union gains, do you have an issue with the opposition doing the same?
I would gladly vote against my "interests" as defined by you in a lot of cases.Sabertooth said:I see a lot of people driving around with Trump stickers and MAGA and all that nonsense on their vehicles. People I know to be union members. And yet they vote consistently Republican right on down the line. With the recent attack on OT laws, they won't be impacted because of their union status. But why would you vote against your own best interests like this? It's truly puzzling to me. I'd love to hear the rationale here.
The best I can come up with is that bought the whole "He's coming for my guns" BS hook, line, and sinker. But even still. Why would you vote to weaken your own livelihood?
sweet. Sounds like working on Wall Street.I am a member of IATSE. And I can freelance non union jobs too. The scale is great. That OT and penalty time are just sweet sweet gravy. Lead calls just fat $$. Most gigs are in air conditioning and I sit and hit cues all day. Or just sit and monitor the system. Or sit and try to stay awake, but that's on those boring corporate gigs who are spending gobs of $$ on union work, and that's a good thing. Because I still will get my scale and more if it wasn't a union gig. But the union gigs are sweeeeeet
I work in the same field as drummer and when we have a gig in a union hotel, we have to hire one union worker for every two technicians we bring in. A vast majority of them are useless and are merely shadows who sit there doing nothing for most of the job. many times they disappear because the hotel double dips them and they do some work elsewhere in the hotel on our dime. Nothing we can do about it unless we can catch them. It's a racket.sweet. Sounds like working on Wall Street.
I can see why you union types love wall street...same gig, really. Overpaid to do jack ####.
I agree. Whatever positives the Unions brought, they brought some serious negatives along with them.I work in the same field as drummer and when we have a gig in a union hotel, we have to hire one union worker for every two technicians we bring in. A vast majority of them are useless and are merely shadows who sit there doing nothing for most of the job. many times they disappear because the hotel double dips them and they do some work elsewhere in the hotel on our dime. Nothing we can do about it unless we can catch them. It's a racket.
eta: That said, union workers in theaters are top notch and always great to work with. It's the flunkies they hire for hotel work that are the problem.
In Michigan if you opt out of the union they still have to provide full representation. Only thing you lose out on is the job training and apprenticeships.No. Whether you are a fan of the union or not, opting out is stupid. You still pay the dues but dont get the benefit of any representation.
I'd say they WERE a significant contributing factor to making employee conditions better. Like 50-150 years ago. Now they are just a way to scam money out of the union members so the top union brass can get paid. Most labor laws the unions successfully and thankfully changed back then are now federal or state law. Unions have little merit these days IMO.Love them or hate them but unions have a huge impact in how you work today. If not for he unions, jobs/careers, may not have as many benefits as the American worker has now. Get rid of the unions and you think the American worker will be better off? That is lolz. Again, like them or hate them, the unions are largely responsible for the conditions/benefits you are all working with today.
I will tell you one thing I DON"T do when I am working, Union gig or not:MarvinTScamper said:sweet. Sounds like working on Wall Street.
I can see why you union types love wall street...same gig, really. Overpaid to do jack ####.
Your opinion is fine and in some instances, probably, pretty accurate. However, to think that to get rid of unions, those same laws unions helped to enact may than be lessened, outlawed, changed drastically, is also a naive stance. A businesses goal is to make money and they will do anything to make more at the expense of the worker. This notion has been true throughout history. Unions have their place but they do need some self policing... not gotten rid of.I'd say they WERE a significant contributing factor to making employee conditions better. Like 50-150 years ago. Now they are just a way to scam money out of the union members so the top union brass can get paid. Most labor laws the unions successfully and thankfully changed back then are now federal or state law. Unions have little merit these days IMO.
Funny considering the role unions played in actuality creating "The Rust Belt"Most union members are still pro-Democrat. The ones that voted for Trump are concentrated in areas Obama ignored and Hillary openly mocked. I can't blame them for voting Trump seeing how Democrats largely treated them with disdain.
Whether or not they stay Republican is now up to Trump. I don't have a lot of faith in his abilities, but it would be a massive win for Republicans if the rust belt flipped.
Good post. It isn't the unions that need to be policed it is the people in positions power and that is true in all different aspects. Greed is the root of problem.Your opinion is fine and in some instances, probably, pretty accurate. However, to think that to get rid of unions, those same laws unions helped to enact may than be lessened, outlawed, changed drastically, is also a naive stance. A businesses goal is to make money and they will do anything to make more at the expense of the worker. This notion has been true throughout history. Unions have their place but they do need some self policing... not gotten rid of.
How does this really work in practice though? I mean you are working every day with guys who are paying dues, I'd imagine there are a lot of comments and stuff to deal with.Raging weasel said:In Michigan if you opt out of the union they still have to provide full representation. Only thing you lose out on is the job training and apprenticeships.
exactly. You don't just "leave" the union without repercussion. My buddy in Detroit that worked for the union had to replace the windows of his Toyota truck....a lot.How does this really work in practice though? I mean you are working every day with guys who are paying dues, I'd imagine there are a lot of comments and stuff to deal with.
That's kind of what I figured.exactly. You don't just "leave" the union without repercussion. My buddy in Detroit that worked for the union had to replace the windows of his Toyota truck....a lot.
Probably-I don't know of anyone in my union that has done it. I was just correcting a previous poster that in some states you can opt out.How does this really work in practice though? I mean you are working every day with guys who are paying dues, I'd imagine there are a lot of comments and stuff to deal with.
If you have time for a long story which sort of illustrates wikkid's sentiments here, I recommend this new one from Fusion's Hamilton Nolan. I have no idea how we're gonna solve the West Virginia situation in particular and I share wikkid's concerns about the rest of us, too.I have strong doubts that unions, as presently constituted, have any relevance and wont be counterproductive to the economic future - and, as a former organizer & shop steward it hurts me to say that - but there is not a doubt in my mind that unions are the single, greatest reason so many of us are at leisure to post on forums at this moment and, watching the unscrupulousness with which corporations treat the value of work slots, that we will need them again as guarantors of the quality of American life in your lifetime.