Hakuna your ta-tas.I don't know tim. It just didn't work for me. I guess it's because I have actually had several conversations recently with people who are truly worried about what will happen to them so currently I got no chuckles to give on the subject.
I still don't understand him in that role. Guy was a brain surgeon...obviously intelligent...but how that does that background fit this new role?Liz Warren voted for Ben Carson for HUD Secretary. Do Justice Democrats now consider her a DINO?
She was hardly the only one it was unanimous after all. Both she and Sherrod Brown voted for Carson. They cited his promises on homelessness, on equal access and continuing programs designed to reduce rent. Basically he didn't terrify them, he didn't seem like he wanted to crater the dept and they felt they may be able to work with him on some stuff. So we'll see how that decision works out for them. I'd they get somewhere with him it will look better than it does now. If he is an abject horror they will.pay a political price.Liz Warren voted for Ben Carson for HUD Secretary. Do Justice Democrats now consider her a DINO?
No. Just like any other time when one party is asked to confirm the choices of the other party's POTUS they have to pick their battles and/or settle.Liz Warren voted for Ben Carson for HUD Secretary. Do Justice Democrats now consider her a DINO?
The democrat party has a MUCH bigger problem on a fundamental level.This is the only way to get the movement we want in Washington. We must remove money from the equation. Or we all lose regardless of party.
Well we are getting back into the street now it's time to get back into the capitol. It's time for policy to reflect the people not a few dozen rich guys.
This is exactly what the real owners of this country want and they are well on their way to getting it (after all, they make the poicy). The recent election is going to speed up the process.I love the effort to counter the influence of money in politics, and most of the platform here. But I agree with others that universal college education would be hugely inefficient. If we re-conceptualized it as universal career preparation/training, based on merit and aptitude, I'd be all for it.
On a related note, most of us are going to be out of a job within the next 25 years due to advances in AI and robotics, so any sweeping changes would hopefully try to get is ahead of that. I don't know if universal basic income is the answer, but we have to do something to make sure our economy isn't 300 mil broke people and a handful of old money guys who own the machines.
Which extreme do you consider the JD's chasing?Those of us in the center are being pushed out of the way as both political parties chase the extremes. This is another example of that phenomenon.
They wouldn't be easier to obtain, they would be less expensive to obtain, making them equally available across classes.Still don't like the idea of free college education. It's not fair, imo, to those paid for it already and I think it lowers the value of all degrees because degrees would now be easier to obtain. There would be a lot of things to be considered to make it okay in my eyes.
Yeah because the saintly Republicans and especially that.pictire or restraint Trump never attack or marginalize anyone. Why it is all those ugly Democrats Poor helpless Republicans just have to sit back and take it.The democrat party has a MUCH bigger problem on a fundamental level.
In the old days, when mom and dad wanted to know about politics, they turned on the TV news or picked up a newspaper. You reached these people by organizing marches, getting out in the streets, and trying to win over voters. But something happened in the last 10 years. Mom and dad got on the internet. The internet is the new "streets" as you put it. They go on forums, or read twitter or facebook. They ignore what the media tells them. They ignore the marches. They don't look at the facade anymore.
Mom and dad can go DIRECTLY to democrats on the internet and interact with them. And what do they see? They see democrats running forums, allowing other democrats to attack republicans. They see them banning republicans from forums. They see a DEEPLY ingrained intolerance of blue collar workers, whom are CONSTANTLY referred to as stupid. They see rural people totally disrespected by rank and file democrats on the internet all day.
The democrats ARE on the streets. They have been for quite some time. The problem is they aren't trying to win over voters. They are acting incredibly ugly, intolerant, and sometimes border on fascism. The nasty things they post about guns, religion, farmers, people with just a high school education. Maybe you are blind to it but I guarantee mom and dad are starting to read all of that now and its going to have a really negative effect.
Going out and organizing a demonstration or a march is SO 20th century. Mom and dad see through that now. The march is the advertisement. The real thing is how they see people act on the internet. I think this is probably why Trump is president now. I think we could be looking at some very very long term dominance of republicans in government at all levels...unless democrats learn to show more respect for people on the internet.
How do win over a religious person after they've been exposed to some of the incredibly nasty things rank and file democrats say on a daily basis about religion on the internet. There is no leader of the democrat party that can overcome the DAILY assault of religion. Its going to drive them away from voting democrat. Before everyone got online, this was hidden. Not anymore.
When they look at Trump, he's just fighting BACK..
I'm not sure that was his point, but I may be wrong. When I read it, it read as something they have to combat now (just like the GOP) that they didn't used to have to combat because it wasn't a big part of their motivation tactics. They've seen the success this approach has had in the GOP and began to use it themselves. Personally, I've seen the "ugly" from both sides. It's always been there. The GOP went all in well before the Democrats even thought about it. This is a big reason people don't want to be identified as Democrat or Republican anymore. I was prepared for someYeah because the saintly Republicans and especially that.pictire or restraint Trump never attack or marginalize anyone. Why it is all those ugly Democrats Poor helpless Republicans just have to sit back and take it.The democrat party has a MUCH bigger problem on a fundamental level.
In the old days, when mom and dad wanted to know about politics, they turned on the TV news or picked up a newspaper. You reached these people by organizing marches, getting out in the streets, and trying to win over voters. But something happened in the last 10 years. Mom and dad got on the internet. The internet is the new "streets" as you put it. They go on forums, or read twitter or facebook. They ignore what the media tells them. They ignore the marches. They don't look at the facade anymore.
Mom and dad can go DIRECTLY to democrats on the internet and interact with them. And what do they see? They see democrats running forums, allowing other democrats to attack republicans. They see them banning republicans from forums. They see a DEEPLY ingrained intolerance of blue collar workers, whom are CONSTANTLY referred to as stupid. They see rural people totally disrespected by rank and file democrats on the internet all day.
The democrats ARE on the streets. They have been for quite some time. The problem is they aren't trying to win over voters. They are acting incredibly ugly, intolerant, and sometimes border on fascism. The nasty things they post about guns, religion, farmers, people with just a high school education. Maybe you are blind to it but I guarantee mom and dad are starting to read all of that now and its going to have a really negative effect.
Going out and organizing a demonstration or a march is SO 20th century. Mom and dad see through that now. The march is the advertisement. The real thing is how they see people act on the internet. I think this is probably why Trump is president now. I think we could be looking at some very very long term dominance of republicans in government at all levels...unless democrats learn to show more respect for people on the internet.
How do win over a religious person after they've been exposed to some of the incredibly nasty things rank and file democrats say on a daily basis about religion on the internet. There is no leader of the democrat party that can overcome the DAILY assault of religion. Its going to drive them away from voting democrat. Before everyone got online, this was hidden. Not anymore.
When they look at Trump, he's just fighting BACK..
Speaking of being blind to something.
I think the problem is those are just the loudest people not the majority. For instance what I said about working with people we disagree with on other things isn't just me. It's a lot of people that are part of Our Revolution and Justice Democrats. If Trump really wants to do a solid infrastructure bill we'll help him. There is one on the table the Dems.put forward. Estimated to create 15 million jobs. Let's do it President Trump. We are ready to stand with Trump if he really wants to fight for SS, Medicare and Medicaid as he promised to on the trail many times. Let's do it. We are ready to work with faith groups on all those things I listed. Again not just me but the leaders of these movements.I'm not sure that was his point, but I may be wrong. When I read it, it read as something they have to combat now (just like the GOP) that they didn't used to have to combat because it wasn't a big part of their motivation tactics. They've seen the success this approach has had in the GOP and began to use it themselves. Personally, I've seen the "ugly" from both sides. It's always been there. The GOP went all in well before the Democrats even thought about it. This is a big reason people don't want to be identified as Democrat or Republican anymore. I was prepared for someand
after the "loss", but what I've witnessed here and IRL is truly amazing to me. It's also sad. I was HOPING that the dems would remain relatively sane while the GOP figured itself out and corrected course. Doesn't look like I'll be getting that.
On a positive note, it's out there for everyone to see now. It's not hidden anymore. A good portion of it has bubbled to the top. That's typically the hardest part. Hopefully we can now begin to address the real issues and stop addressing the symptoms of the larger, clear problem.
You might be the one blind here. I hear it all the time these days that its the democrats on the internet that marginalize people.Yeah because the saintly Republicans and especially that.pictire or restraint Trump never attack or marginalize anyone. Why it is all those ugly Democrats Poor helpless Republicans just have to sit back and take it.
Speaking of being blind to something.
I don't disagree that the bold is true and has been true for a long time, but when do WE stop allowing it to be true? I notice the same thing in my faith, and fortunately, there seems to be a movement to take back the faith from the loud VERY WRONG people. I feel like we (on both sides) who are the majority, who aren't bat#### crazy, who aren't trying to turn everything into a comparison between two really bad options as justification, who ARE trying to talk about the issues need to start making our presence known. How do we do that when media is in the business of eyeballs and not issues?I think the problem is those are just the loudest people not the majority. For instance what I said about working with people we disagree with on other things isn't just me. It's a lot of people that are part of Our Revolution and Justice Democrats. If Trump really wants to do a solid infrastructure bill we'll help him. There is one on the table the Dems.put forward. Estimated to create 15 million jobs. Let's do it President Trump. We are ready to stand with Trump if he really wants to fight for SS, Medicare and Medicaid as he promised to on the trail many times. Let's do it. We are ready to work with faith groups on all those things I listed. Again not just me but the leaders of these movements.I'm not sure that was his point, but I may be wrong. When I read it, it read as something they have to combat now (just like the GOP) that they didn't used to have to combat because it wasn't a big part of their motivation tactics. They've seen the success this approach has had in the GOP and began to use it themselves. Personally, I've seen the "ugly" from both sides. It's always been there. The GOP went all in well before the Democrats even thought about it. This is a big reason people don't want to be identified as Democrat or Republican anymore. I was prepared for someand
after the "loss", but what I've witnessed here and IRL is truly amazing to me. It's also sad. I was HOPING that the dems would remain relatively sane while the GOP figured itself out and corrected course. Doesn't look like I'll be getting that.
On a positive note, it's out there for everyone to see now. It's not hidden anymore. A good portion of it has bubbled to the top. That's typically the hardest part. Hopefully we can now begin to address the real issues and stop addressing the symptoms of the larger, clear problem.
So as we all know there are #######s in every camp. They don't define that camp generally but they do embarrass it regularly. So no one really gets to claim any kind of superiority on the subject. Mom and Dad may need to expand their horizons a bit. Go out meet the people. At the March in Charlotte they would have met a lot of young women and families. Not guys in black masks. No bricks through windows. Just people who are concerned about the direction they perceive the country to be headed. No Madonna being an ###. Just folks. Their neighbors. That nice young couple down the street. Not the troll on the internet.
You and I change it in spite of them. We don't need them. We find common ground and we come together in those topics. That's the invitation being put out by Bernie and the leaders of these movements. I would like to think we can come together and stop falling victim to political wedges. We don't have to agree on everything to agree on a lot of things.I don't disagree that the bold is true and has been true for a long time, but when do WE stop allowing it to be true? I notice the same thing in my faith, and fortunately, there seems to be a movement to take back the faith from the loud VERY WRONG people. I feel like we (on both sides) who are the majority, who aren't bat#### crazy, who aren't trying to turn everything into a comparison between two really bad options as justification, who ARE trying to talk about the issues need to start making our presence known. How do we do that when media is in the business of eyeballs and not issues?
I don't think you know what marginalize means. Here's a definition:Riversco said:Wow it just happened AGAIN in this thread. I bring up an example of mom and dad not likng how rank and file democrats marginalize people, and the FIRST reaction is "well maybe mom and dad should broaden their horizons". Thats EXACTLY what im talking about. Immediately they marginalize mom and dad. Thats not how to win people over.
Saying someone should meet more people and/or broaden their horizons is not marginalizing them. You may think its condescending, but its not marginalizing.
But, WAIT! You must instantly understand what i feel inside and proclaim it to be wonderful as soon as i pronounce!! You don't, you be harshin'.I don't think you know what marginalize means. Here's a definition:
Saying someone should meet more people and/or broaden their horizons is not marginalizing them. You may think its condescending, but its not marginalizing.
This is a problem I see with a lot of discourse on this board and in general. People use words and either don't understand what they mean or are purposefully misusing them to twist the conversation.
You joke, but up to recently I really have tried to give people the benefit of the doubt, assume the best case and try and work out what they really mean without jumping straight to judgement. But there's just been so much straight up sloppy, shallow thinking lately that I don't have the time or energy for that anymore. More and more it's obvious that there's a ton of ignorance getting voiced out there. The only question is whether its genuine (true lack of exposure) or willful (denial of reality that doesn't fit with a pre-existing worldview).But, WAIT! You must instantly understand what i feel inside and proclaim it to be wonderful as soon as i pronounce!! You don't, you be harshin'.
And by the way I would have said the same thing to someone saying all Trump voters are.mysoginist, racist, homophobes. Get out and meet them you'll come away feeling differently about quite a few of them. Broaden your horizons you'll be glad you did.I don't think you know what marginalize means. Here's a definition:
Saying someone should meet more people and/or broaden their horizons is not marginalizing them. You may think its condescending, but its not marginalizing.
This is a problem I see with a lot of discourse on this board and in general. People use words and either don't understand what they mean or are purposefully misusing them to twist the conversation.
Expect more before less, my friend. Sixty years ago or so, the social Big Bang began when America started letting several 'sub-classes' of humans begin to find freedom for themselves and loosening the rules for everyone, after basically 10,000 years of barbarians, popes, royals, and patricians. With those freedoms came the right to question every institution and moral underpinning by which we governed ourselves. No puzzle at all, then, how quickly liberty became license. Few thought that explosion would cross over into the absolute silliness of today but, looking back and doing the math on 60 v. 10000, expecting a society still in explosion phase, freedomwise, to rein itself in or even slow its progression to madness is probably naive.You joke, but up to recently I really have tried to give people the benefit of the doubt, assume the best case and try and work out what they really mean without jumping straight to judgement. But there's just been so much straight up sloppy, shallow thinking lately that I don't have the time or energy for that anymore. More and more it's obvious that there's a ton of ignorance getting voiced out there. The only question is whether its genuine (true lack of exposure) or willful (denial of reality that doesn't fit with a pre-existing worldview).
The problem is that we're at a point where many of our actions have global implications, and the fallout happens much more rapidly than it used to. We can't afford a whole lot of madness.expecting a society still in explosion phase, freedomwise, to rein itself in or even slow its progression to madness is probably naive
absolutely, but methinks too late (tho i'll likely soon be joining the best left effort i can find). i been pimpin' the Crash (precipitating event: RE-electing Dubya) as inevitable since i became a FFApper and even i am flabbergasted by how Pythonsketch society has become in the past decade.The problem is that we're at a point where many of our actions have global implications, and the fallout happens much more rapidly than it used to. We can't afford a whole lot of madness.
It's aggravating to watch people from essentially the same economic and social strata blast each other continuously over non-essential differences (color of skin, flavor of faith, region of country, who needs jobs more) to the extent that we can't have any reasoned communication, much less agreement, resulting in our choices for President (and to a great extent governance in general) being representatives from a completely different social and economic strata whose only interest in the wide swath of humanity is how to exploit them, whether it be for political gain, economic gain or both. This is what @NCCommish is about here - correcting that situation. It needs correction.
We are close to the edge but we don't have to Thelma and Louise off it. We can turn around. You only lose when you quit.absolutely, but methinks too late (tho i'll likely soon be joining the best left effort i can find). i been pimpin' the Crash (precipitating event: RE-electing Dubya) since i became a FFApper and even i am flabbergasted by how Pythonsketch society has become in the past decade.
How can you take the mote from your neighbors eye when you ignore the plank in yours?Riversco said:You might be the one blind here. I hear it all the time these days that its the democrats on the internet that marginalize people.
Your logic makes no sense.Short Corner said:They wouldn't be easier to obtain, they would be less expensive to obtain, making them equally available across classes.
Going doesn't get you a degree. Passing gets you a degree. So unless they also lower standards no it doesn't get easier to get it it's just easier to afford. Even if you never get a degree.Your logic makes no sense.
Making something less expensive means you made it easier to obtain.
There are people who don't go to college simply because of the cost. If you lower the cost, these people will then go. Wala....easier to obtain a degree.
Counterpoint: the Tea Party.I really believe this is a terrible time to divide the Democratic Party. President Trump is in the process of seriously screwing up this country. Those of us who oppose him should stay united by the principles we can agree upon.
Having litmus tests and shrinking down the tent is only going to lose more elections, IMO.
The fact that your centrist / blue dog approach gave us President Trump pretty much kills this viewpoint.I really believe this is a terrible time to divide the Democratic Party. President Trump is in the process of seriously screwing up this country. Those of us who oppose him should stay united by the principles we can agree upon.
Having litmus tests and shrinking down the tent is only going to lose more elections, IMO.
Too late for that Tim. While it was my belief that both parties would implode at some point, it was my hope they'd do it at different times. Looks like I won't be getting that wish and this really did escalate quickly. Hopefully, the more sensible side of the Dem party can work to fix the foundation and provide for a stronger future while the nuts of the party are outI really believe this is a terrible time to divide the Democratic Party. President Trump is in the process of seriously screwing up this country. Those of us who oppose him should stay united by the principles we can agree upon.
Having litmus tests and shrinking down the tent is only going to lose more elections, IMO.
well maybe the DNC shouldn't have shrunk the party. Marginalized liberals, unions, and working class voters . They didn't need us and our principles. They were going to replace us with moderate Republicans. Chuck.made that clear.I really believe this is a terrible time to divide the Democratic Party. President Trump is in the process of seriously screwing up this country. Those of us who oppose him should stay united by the principles we can agree upon.
Having litmus tests and shrinking down the tent is only going to lose more elections, IMO.
So do you think the schools will just open enrollment to accept everyone that meets current admission standards?Your logic makes no sense.
Making something less expensive means you made it easier to obtain.
There are people who don't go to college simply because of the cost. If you lower the cost, these people will then go. Wala....easier to obtain a degree.
I still won't pull the lever for a DINO should they choose to run one again.I really believe this is a terrible time to divide the Democratic Party. President Trump is in the process of seriously screwing up this country. Those of us who oppose him should stay united by the principles we can agree upon.
Having litmus tests and shrinking down the tent is only going to lose more elections, IMO.