What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***UNOFFICIAL*** pats/eagles monday game thread (1 Viewer)

Ridley not playing thus far tells me he is the starter. NE trying to save their starters because they leave for Tampa tinsight and practice tomorrow for friday's game.
As a Vereen owner, I have to agree. I was hoping Ridley would come in against 2nd string. So far he hasn't seen the field... Not great for Vereen owners.Add to that that Vereen didn't exactly distinguish himself on 13 touches. I'd say Ridley's still the starter for now and through next week at the very least. It's not over for Vereen, but it's looking very unlikely that he'll beat out Ridley for week 1 starter.
I got the feeling when Bolden went in the real evaluation was between 2 and 3. However I wouldn't be surprised either to find out Ridley is hurt worse that they are letting on and are trying to hide it.
so you are saying he was warming up on the sideline just to fake out future opponents?
No I am saying I wouldn't put it above the guy that is sitting all his starters in a nationally televised game to do it. I don't think that is what the situation is, but with Belichick anything is possible....and right on cue there is Ridley. :) :nerd:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Have to say I'm impressed with the Eagles backup QB.

I would probably take him more seriously if he didn't look like the actor that played Napolean Dynamite.



 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ridley not playing thus far tells me he is the starter. NE trying to save their starters because they leave for Tampa tinsight and practice tomorrow for friday's game.
As a Vereen owner, I have to agree. I was hoping Ridley would come in against 2nd string. So far he hasn't seen the field... Not great for Vereen owners.Add to that that Vereen didn't exactly distinguish himself on 13 touches. I'd say Ridley's still the starter for now and through next week at the very least. It's not over for Vereen, but it's looking very unlikely that he'll beat out Ridley for week 1 starter.
I got the feeling when Bolden went in the real evaluation was between 2 and 3. However I wouldn't be surprised either to find out Ridley is hurt worse that they are letting on and are trying to hide it.
Well. Seeing Ridley get some carries this late in the game is slightly promising... again, I'd have liked to see Vereen distinguish himself more... but to put Ridley in this LATE? that's promising... i'll rephrase my earlier statement and say Vereen still has an adequate shot at #1 RB for Week 1.
 
weird that the "incumbent" is playing with the scrubs in the second half - definitely not a customary thing, but the hoodie doesnt do customary.

 
Is Alex Henery officially the scrawniest athlete in sports? He looks hilarious in full pads/helmet. On yahoo sports he's listed at 170 lbs and 6'3"

 
I've been pretty high on Bryce Brown as a dynasty stash. He looks good. Seems to want to bounce to the outside too much though.

 
4th quarter and Ridley is STILL in the game. I don't get it.
Could be matter of wanting to see Vereen and Bolden with 1st/2nd string without wearing them down since they play next Friday. Or could be that Ridley slipped down the depth chart. Obviously we can rule out that Belichick wanted to save Ridley for week 3 of the preseason...Tough call. My guess is that heading into this game, Belichick wanted to see if Vereen would take the reigns as a number one back. Since it's pretty clear he didn't, who knows at this point. Vereen gets a bump after this game, even though he didn't blow anyone's pants off. Ridley owners HAVE to lose quite a bit of confidence in their guy coming in and taking handoffs so late in a week 2 preseason game. Ultimately, though, everyone will have to tune in to see who week 3 starter is.
 
IRRC BB did thing last year right? Didn't he switch the RBs from 1st team to 2nd/3rd and vise-versa? I think you guys are looking way too much into this. IMHO he just seeing how these guys are responding when the rolls are reversed.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top