What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Urban Outfitters was selling tasteless Kent State sweatshirt... (1 Viewer)

Tom Servo

Nittany Beavers
...until common sense people with a brain and a sense of decency prevailed.

The "one-of-a-kind" sweatshirt was sold as part of Urban Outfitters' "sun-faded vintage collection" and was not altered in any way, according to the statement. There is no blood on the garment and Urban Outfitters said the red stains are due to "discoloration," while holes in the sweatshirt are due to "natural wear and fray."
What :bs:

 
...until common sense people with a brain and a sense of decency prevailed.

The "one-of-a-kind" sweatshirt was sold as part of Urban Outfitters' "sun-faded vintage collection" and was not altered in any way, according to the statement. There is no blood on the garment and Urban Outfitters said the red stains are due to "discoloration," while holes in the sweatshirt are due to "natural wear and fray."
What :bs:
So you think they were going for a "bloodstained" look?

 
Was this the only college they offered? If not, I'd say horrible coincidence. If so, I'd say horrible decision.

 
Odds are whomever designed this (ridiculously priced) sweatshirt was born in 1990 and hasn't the foggiest idea what happened at Kent in 1970.

 
Odds are whomever designed this (ridiculously priced) sweatshirt was born in 1990 and hasn't the foggiest idea what happened at Kent in 1970.
The biggest question is, why would someone pay $129 for an old disgusting ### sweatshirt that would be a downgrade for most bums?

 
Odds are whomever designed this (ridiculously priced) sweatshirt was born in 1990 and hasn't the foggiest idea what happened at Kent in 1970.
Seriously. I've got a Kent State t-shirt but haven't worn it since '74 or so.

 
FWIW, the Southern Poverty Law Center mentioned in the article is a great organization.

 
FWIW, the Southern Poverty Law Center mentioned in the article is a great organization.
Never heard of it. Must have existed before I was born so apparently I'm excused.
That and the fact that you're neither poor or southern so I wouldn't expect you to have. Hence my post raising attention. Now just picture me dumping a bucket of southern friend chicken on my head.

 
It's pretty offensive - taking it off the market should have been done long ago. What if you knew one of the people who got shot there? What if you found her dead on the ground?

You wouldn't think it's so funny then.

 
It's pretty offensive - taking it off the market should have been done long ago. What if you knew one of the people who got shot there? What if you found her dead on the ground?

You wouldn't think it's so funny then.
I'd probably ask them to autograph it.

 
That's a lousy sweatshirt. Wildly offensive.

Also, the SPLC is now a race-baiting leftist crap organization, depending on your political disposition. Not too excited about their involvement.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Tom Servo said:
...until common sense people with a brain and a sense of decency prevailed.

The "one-of-a-kind" sweatshirt was sold as part of Urban Outfitters' "sun-faded vintage collection" and was not altered in any way, according to the statement. There is no blood on the garment and Urban Outfitters said the red stains are due to "discoloration," while holes in the sweatshirt are due to "natural wear and fray."
What :bs:
Even more offensive than the shirt itself if the company pretending to no have done this on purpose. At least have the balls to say you tried to do something and it didn't come off right.

 
Apple Jack said:
RhymesMcJuice said:
Without these controversies would anyone know what Urban Outfitters is?
Anybody who lives in civilization, yes.
I haven't been in a mall in a decade.
Neither here nor there, but I've never seen one in a mall.
Urban Outfitters generally equals gentrified urban planning.

Those that live in rural, suburban, exurban, bohemian urban, or deep urban (I suppose that "deep urban and bohemian urban" satisfies the "civilization" requirement) might never have seen one.

Those that are culturally literate, yes. Not so much for the others.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well the one who pointed out to me was born in 1992. She seemed to have a pretty good read on why this was a bad idea.

As far as cultural literacy goes if you measure it by ones knowledge of Urban Outfitters which is just another crappy, overpriced mall retailer well then I suspect your own cultural literacy may be a bit stunted.

 
Well the one who pointed out to me was born in 1992. She seemed to have a pretty good read on why this was a bad idea.

As far as cultural literacy goes if you measure it by ones knowledge of Urban Outfitters which is just another crappy, overpriced mall retailer well then I suspect your own cultural literacy may be a bit stunted.
I agree, and my larger point was that people might not know this stuff, and that a lack of knowledge of UO may be completely worthy and even desirable. Note how I phrased it. But cultural literacy is just that. A function of how well you operate within the common knowledge and consensus and experiences of the culture.

It is value-neutral.

 
The university has to approve any use of their name and logo before any item using them can be sold.

Someone at Kent State approved this.
Or someone at Kent State approved UO using their logo for various articles of clothing in various shades and colors. I'm sure nobody at Kent State actually saw shirt in question.

 
The university has to approve any use of their name and logo before any item using them can be sold.

Someone at Kent State approved this.
Or someone at Kent State approved UO using their logo for various articles of clothing in various shades and colors. I'm sure nobody at Kent State actually saw shirt in question.
I'm sure there are some uncomfortable internal discussions occuring internally at Kent State right now.

 
Zow said:
FWIW, the Southern Poverty Law Center mentioned in the article is a great organization.
If by intentionally lying about and misrepresenting/misquoting people and organizations they do not like makes them great, then yes, you are right. They are fantastic.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top