What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

US economy thread (4 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well this thread got fun the past couple of pages. Used to be the worst parts were just the thinly-veiled partisan complaints about the vibecession, which are all pretty harmless in the grand scheme of what has largely been good discussion. But it's now full on junior high lunchtime in here complete with name calling. Sweet.

Things aren't perfect. They never are. But they're pretty damned good.

Unemployment is rising a little, but outside of the Covid-spike has basically been under 4% for two presidential terms.

REAL wages are higher than ever (other than the drop from artificial covid highs), and have risen consistently since 2014. That's with the big inflation spike we saw, that has dropped back down near target levels. No, prices aren't coming back down. That's not how growth works. We all know that guy griping about how gas only cost $.30 gallon in 1960 (when he got like 11 miles per gallon). Of course that guy never mentions that the very same year they spent about 17% of their income on food, which is down to 10-12% now.

US stock markets area at all time highs. For the 62% of Americans that own equities, that seems like a good thing. Same with all-time highs in home equity for the 65% of Americans that own a home.

Now both of those might mean that for the 35-38% left out, things are tougher. No doubt, and many of us have kids in their teens and twenties that are going to face some challenging times as they start careers and families. But didn't many of us? The challenges might be slightly different, but it can be hard out there to get started. I started my career, in tech, about 12 months before the dot com bubble burst. Bought my first home with no money down and a sweet 5/1 interest-only ARM a few years later - you can guess how that went. But having things be hard isn't a new phenomenon, considering my grandfather told me (once, he wasn't about to complain about it) about the tent he lived in outside of Oakland when he got married during the depression, with a chest full of wedding china their only belongings outside of a few changes of clothes. He worked hard (blue collar) bought a home, raised four kids, and retired to his garden and wood shop.

We'll have another recession. Maybe it'll start tomorrow, maybe 5-10 years from now. And it will be painful for a lot of people, likely even a bunch of us. But look how often they used to happen, and how long they lasted. Two or three a decade were normal! Compare that to the last 40+ years. We've had a grand total of a few months of recession since the beginning of 2010!

We should strive to make things better for our kids and theirs. We aren't allowed to talk about our opinions on how to do that here, which quite frankly is fine by me as it's rarely a productive exercise.

But I'm screaming into the interwebs void here, not under any delusions that anything I (or anyone else) posts will change a single mind. All good, staying grounded in reality and the data makes me feel better. Have a great Sunday, all!
 
You make great points, @SFBayDuck, but how can we do more for those "left behind"? That's 35% is a pretty big chunk of the population, and it seems like it's only going to grow as home ownership rates drop.
Stop spending like drunken sailors so that inflation cools and interest rates are allowed to drop. Also not importing 10M more people in in an uncontrolled manner to compete for housing. These two items will dramatically help.
 
You make great points, @SFBayDuck, but how can we do more for those "left behind"? That's 35% is a pretty big chunk of the population, and it seems like it's only going to grow as home ownership rates drop.
home ownership rates have fluctuated between 62-69% since the 80s. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/RHORUSQ156N

stock ownership is at an all time high per this
 
You make great points, @SFBayDuck, but how can we do more for those "left behind"? That's 35% is a pretty big chunk of the population, and it seems like it's only going to grow as home ownership rates drop.
Stop spending like drunken sailors so that inflation cools and interest rates are allowed to drop. Also not importing 10M more people in in an uncontrolled manner to compete for housing. These two items will dramatically help.
so what, stop immigration? you realize the impacts to the economy if that happens, right?

the issue is that less homes/apartments per year were built since ~ 2020.
 
You make great points, @SFBayDuck, but how can we do more for those "left behind"? That's 35% is a pretty big chunk of the population, and it seems like it's only going to grow as home ownership rates drop.
home ownership rates have fluctuated between 62-69% since the 80s. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/RHORUSQ156N

stock ownership is at an all time high per this
Glad to hear stock ownership is at an all time high. I could see home ownership rates declining until the baby boomers (or their heirs) sell off their property. But the lack of housing starts for like 2 decades plus increased corporate ownership of property will really hurt home ownership stats IMO.
 
What is the going rate for a living wage these days?
Highly dependent upon where one lives. NYC is different cost of living than Des Moines, Iowa.
I know. It was a loaded question. I think what qualifies as a "living wage" has changed over the years.

Asking AI...

These numbers seem crazy high me.
 
What is the going rate for a living wage these days?
Highly dependent upon where one lives. NYC is different cost of living than Des Moines, Iowa.
I know. It was a loaded question. I think what qualifies as a "living wage" has changed over the years.

Asking AI...

These numbers seem crazy high me.
Why? They don't seem that high to me.
 
What is the going rate for a living wage these days?
Highly dependent upon where one lives. NYC is different cost of living than Des Moines, Iowa.
I know. It was a loaded question. I think what qualifies as a "living wage" has changed over the years.

Asking AI...

These numbers seem crazy high me.
I'm currently single and $43,000 is LOW for me to be comfortable and I live in a central Maryland suburb not a large urban center. I would have a difficult time doing anything but living paycheck to paycheck at that level.
 
What is the going rate for a living wage these days?
Highly dependent upon where one lives. NYC is different cost of living than Des Moines, Iowa.
I know. It was a loaded question. I think what qualifies as a "living wage" has changed over the years.

Asking AI...

These numbers seem crazy high me.
Why? They don't seem that high to me.
I think they are high if we're working off the idea that everyone should earn a living wage. "Living wage" gets tossed around like its the minimum someone working a full time job should expect to make.

Its interesting to see Childcare and transportation added to basic needs. Feels like those are more recent additions to the basic needs list.
 
What is the going rate for a living wage these days?
Highly dependent upon where one lives. NYC is different cost of living than Des Moines, Iowa.
I know. It was a loaded question. I think what qualifies as a "living wage" has changed over the years.

Asking AI...

These numbers seem crazy high me.
I'm currently single and $43,000 is LOW for me to be comfortable and I live in a central Maryland suburb not a large urban center. I would have a difficult time doing anything but living paycheck to paycheck at that level.
I was looking at it from the basic needs angle and not comfortable level.
 
What is the going rate for a living wage these days?
Highly dependent upon where one lives. NYC is different cost of living than Des Moines, Iowa.
I know. It was a loaded question. I think what qualifies as a "living wage" has changed over the years.

Asking AI...

These numbers seem crazy high me.
Why? They don't seem that high to me.
I think they are high if we're working off the idea that everyone should earn a living wage. "Living wage" gets tossed around like its the minimum someone working a full time job should expect to make.

Its interesting to see Childcare and transportation added to basic needs. Feels like those are more recent additions to the basic needs list.
Not sure of timing of the costs in the calculation but transportation is definitely a need for living expenses. Can't get to and from by walking or biking all the time and often the chance at a better job requires a car.
 
What is the going rate for a living wage these days?
Highly dependent upon where one lives. NYC is different cost of living than Des Moines, Iowa.
I know. It was a loaded question. I think what qualifies as a "living wage" has changed over the years.

Asking AI...

These numbers seem crazy high me.
I'm currently single and $43,000 is LOW for me to be comfortable and I live in a central Maryland suburb not a large urban center. I would have a difficult time doing anything but living paycheck to paycheck at that level.
I was looking at it from the basic needs angle and not comfortable level.
Yes, thats what paycheck to paycheck is
 
What is the going rate for a living wage these days?
Highly dependent upon where one lives. NYC is different cost of living than Des Moines, Iowa.
I know. It was a loaded question. I think what qualifies as a "living wage" has changed over the years.

Asking AI...

These numbers seem crazy high me.
Why? They don't seem that high to me.
I think they are high if we're working off the idea that everyone should earn a living wage. "Living wage" gets tossed around like its the minimum someone working a full time job should expect to make.

Its interesting to see Childcare and transportation added to basic needs. Feels like those are more recent additions to the basic needs list.
Not sure of timing of the costs in the calculation but transportation is definitely a need for living expenses. Can't get to and from by walking or biking all the time and often the chance at a better job requires a car.
I agree a vehicle increases a person's chances of getting a better job. I don't agree that it needs to be on the basic needs list. Everyone's transportation costs are going to vary by situation, typically if transportation costs are higher for a worker it's because of a tradeoff somewhere else... location, salary, ect.
 
What is the going rate for a living wage these days?
Highly dependent upon where one lives. NYC is different cost of living than Des Moines, Iowa.
I know. It was a loaded question. I think what qualifies as a "living wage" has changed over the years.

Asking AI...

These numbers seem crazy high me.
I'm currently single and $43,000 is LOW for me to be comfortable and I live in a central Maryland suburb not a large urban center. I would have a difficult time doing anything but living paycheck to paycheck at that level.
I was looking at it from the basic needs angle and not comfortable level.
Yes, thats what paycheck to paycheck is
Housing, gas/ins(trans cost), and health care
What is the going rate for a living wage these days?
Highly dependent upon where one lives. NYC is different cost of living than Des Moines, Iowa.
I know. It was a loaded question. I think what qualifies as a "living wage" has changed over the years.

Asking AI...

These numbers seem crazy high me.
Why? They don't seem that high to me.
I think they are high if we're working off the idea that everyone should earn a living wage. "Living wage" gets tossed around like its the minimum someone working a full time job should expect to make.

Its interesting to see Childcare and transportation added to basic needs. Feels like those are more recent additions to the basic needs list.
Not sure of timing of the costs in the calculation but transportation is definitely a need for living expenses. Can't get to and from by walking or biking all the time and often the chance at a better job requires a car.
I agree a vehicle increases a person's chances of getting a better job. I don't agree that it needs to be on the basic needs list. Everyone's transportation costs are going to vary by situation, typically if transportation costs are higher for a worker it's because of a tradeoff somewhere else... location, salary, ect.
Public transportation is still a cost and it decreases flexibility. And frankly, outside of certain population areas often public transportation is not viable.
 
What is the going rate for a living wage these days?
Highly dependent upon where one lives. NYC is different cost of living than Des Moines, Iowa.
I know. It was a loaded question. I think what qualifies as a "living wage" has changed over the years.

Asking AI...

These numbers seem crazy high me.
I'm currently single and $43,000 is LOW for me to be comfortable and I live in a central Maryland suburb not a large urban center. I would have a difficult time doing anything but living paycheck to paycheck at that level.
I was looking at it from the basic needs angle and not comfortable level.
Yes, thats what paycheck to paycheck is
paycheck to paycheck is a lifestyle. I know people living paycheck to paycheck that make a very good salary. I think i'm struggling with the fact that basic needs used to be what someone needed to survive. Now basic needs is what someone needs to be comfortable.
 
You make great points, @SFBayDuck, but how can we do more for those "left behind"? That's 35% is a pretty big chunk of the population, and it seems like it's only going to grow as home ownership rates drop.
Stop spending like drunken sailors so that inflation cools and interest rates are allowed to drop. Also not importing 10M more people in in an uncontrolled manner to compete for housing. These two items will dramatically help.
so what, stop immigration? you realize the impacts to the economy if that happens, right?
Of course not. We have a robust legal immigration system.
 
Ah, honestly Max, I believe we are viewing the terms from a different lens. Basic living indicates to me food, clothing, shelter, health care, transportation, communication. I don;t know how $43000 aids the ability to add much more than that.
 
from the MIT living wage model...

The most recent update to the calculator included a few changes to its methodology. The calculator’s estimates now include cell phone and Wi-Fi expenses, as well as civic engagement expenditures, such as pets, clubs and movie or museum excursions.
 
Ah, honestly Max, I believe we are viewing the terms from a different lens. Basic living indicates to me food, clothing, shelter, health care, transportation, communication. I don;t know how $43ooo aids the ability to add much more than that.
Probably. I came up through the military starting out at 14k in 2000. Current starting rate is 24k a year. Sure it comes with low end housing (sharing a room with multiple people), Food (served only at certain times) and low end medical care. Those are basic needs getting met in my eyes.
 
I think they are high if we're working off the idea that everyone should earn a living wage.
Why? It's what it costs to not be under water in today's economy.
Because not every job is worthy of starting at 21 dollars

McDonald's Crew Team Member listing in the LA area. $20-$22/hour.

ETA: I don't' really have a point with that, just saying out here on the West Coast getting close to $20 an hour pretty much is starting wage for almost anything.
 
Last edited:
Microsoft this year:

$45.8 Million paid to CEO
$60 Billion in stock buybacks announced
2500 employees laid off.

:coffeecup:
Brutal

The reallllly mystifying part to me is that the USA could bully all these corporations. Any company threatening to leave the USA is either lying, or has a really singular product.

Because not only is the US the gold standard for consumers, but sooo many other countries take their cues from the US, in so many different ways. Any company that didn't want to pay their taxes, great. Remove yourself from the US market, go sell your laptops in Estonia.

There's a hundred ways the US could put it's thumb on the scale to eff with companies who try and skirt their tax liability. We don't, because our leaders are bought and paid for, and the propaganda has been swallowed by the masses, so there isn't even a strong demand for change.
I think this is the right battle to be picking.
Obviously it depends on the business. A business that is mainly providing a service (housecleaning or consulting for example) will make it over a corner grocery store where the cost of goods are higher because they cannot get preferred pricing.
It depends on the business, sure. It depends on the business in that some businesses are more reliant than others on the cheapest labor force available.

And a corner grocery store is a good example. Not every small business has a right to make it. That's capitalism. If that grocery isn't doing enough business to support employees above poverty wages, maybe it's a bad business. If a fast food restaurant isn't doing enough volume to pay it's people more than high school kids, maybe that is a poorly run fast food restaurant.
I think this is the wrong battle to be picking.

One of the reasons we have the former problem? The latter.
 
You make great points, @SFBayDuck, but how can we do more for those "left behind"? That's 35% is a pretty big chunk of the population, and it seems like it's only going to grow as home ownership rates drop.

It's a combination of finding ways to help those people while also supporting the growth of the economy at all levels. And that ain't easy.

Build more housing, with a focus on affordable and starter homes/condos (are those even a thing anymore?). Better fund education from preschool through college, but especially vocational schools. Reform that leads to a balance on immigration, especially as birth rates continue to decline in the US. Continue to increase energy independence. Support the ability to form and grow the small businesses that employ nearly half of all Americans. Make healthcare (and pharmaceuticals) more affordable and accessible for everyone. Continue to support and reward innovation, which is one of the true drivers of the economy.

And do all those things while better balancing government spending and determining who (people and corps) should be paying for what via taxes.

But the "how" or prioritization on any of those things (and several others I'm sure I didn't include) is impossible to get into here, because that becomes inherently political and reasonable people can, and do, disagree.
 
from the MIT living wage model...

The most recent update to the calculator included a few changes to its methodology. The calculator’s estimates now include cell phone and Wi-Fi expenses, as well as civic engagement expenditures, such as pets, clubs and movie or museum excursions.
That's quite the moving target. We tend to take a pretty myopic view of these things and the ball gets shifted as progress is made.

This is a great chart to view a baseline - the US has eliminated extreme poverty and is doing a wonderful job over the years of decreasing real poverty. It's interesting that now poverty here includes museum excursions as a factor. That tells you the real success the US is having in this area.

As an addendum - this is how the world is doing on extreme poverty. Almost miraculous progress.
 
from the MIT living wage model...

The most recent update to the calculator included a few changes to its methodology. The calculator’s estimates now include cell phone and Wi-Fi expenses, as well as civic engagement expenditures, such as pets, clubs and movie or museum excursions.
That's quite the moving target. We tend to take a pretty myopic view of these things and the ball gets shifted as progress is made.

This is a great chart to view a baseline - the US has eliminated extreme poverty and is doing a wonderful job over the years of decreasing real poverty. It's interesting that now poverty here includes museum excursions as a factor. That tells you the real success the US is having in this area.

As an addendum - this is how the world is doing on extreme poverty. Almost miraculous progress.
No doubt the phrase "First World Problem" is based on reality. Living hard in the US is still better than living hard elsewhere for sure.
 
Happy you weighed in here, dkp. Most people throw around "corporate" to paint all business owners as evil and soulless. When in fact most are small/medium size owners who are decent people and also have a right to make a living. Helps balance the "fat cats with super yachts" and other similar tropes that seem to always make their way into the conversation.
While it's true that more business owners are those who own small/medium businesses, the "corporate fat cats" have more total employees. When discussing worker compensation and corporate profits, I think it makes more sense to look at the total number of employees rather than the total number of businesses (many of which may have no employees at all).
 
You make great points, @SFBayDuck, but how can we do more for those "left behind"? That's 35% is a pretty big chunk of the population, and it seems like it's only going to grow as home ownership rates drop.
Stop spending like drunken sailors so that inflation cools and interest rates are allowed to drop. Also not importing 10M more people in in an uncontrolled manner to compete for housing. These two items will dramatically help.
so what, stop immigration? you realize the impacts to the economy if that happens, right?
Of course not. We have a robust legal immigration system.

Agree with Sand here. The best thing we can do for our kids is stop spending money we don't have. If the economy is doing so great there's no reason to run the government at such a large deficit.
 
You make great points, @SFBayDuck, but how can we do more for those "left behind"? That's 35% is a pretty big chunk of the population, and it seems like it's only going to grow as home ownership rates drop.
Stop spending like drunken sailors so that inflation cools and interest rates are allowed to drop. Also not importing 10M more people in in an uncontrolled manner to compete for housing. These two items will dramatically help.
so what, stop immigration? you realize the impacts to the economy if that happens, right?
Of course not. We have a robust legal immigration system.

Agree with Sand here. The best thing we can do for our kids is stop spending money we don't have. If the economy is doing so great there's no reason to run the government at such a large deficit.
I think most people agree with that but how we get there is a different story and where people just can't agree.
 
You make great points, @SFBayDuck, but how can we do more for those "left behind"? That's 35% is a pretty big chunk of the population, and it seems like it's only going to grow as home ownership rates drop.
Stop spending like drunken sailors so that inflation cools and interest rates are allowed to drop. Also not importing 10M more people in in an uncontrolled manner to compete for housing. These two items will dramatically help.
so what, stop immigration? you realize the impacts to the economy if that happens, right?
Of course not. We have a robust legal immigration system.

Agree with Sand here. The best thing we can do for our kids is stop spending money we don't have. If the economy is doing so great there's no reason to run the government at such a large deficit.
of course, everyone needs to stop spending. but no me, i need my stuff.
 
I think they are high if we're working off the idea that everyone should earn a living wage.
Why? It's what it costs to not be under water in today's economy.
Because not every job is worthy of starting at 21 dollars

McDonald's Crew Team Member listing in the LA area. $20-$22/hour.

ETA: I don't' really have a point with that, just saying out here on the West Coast getting close to $20 an hour pretty much is starting wage for almost anything.


IIRC $20/hr is the minimum wage for fast-food jobs in CA
 
I think they are high if we're working off the idea that everyone should earn a living wage.
Why? It's what it costs to not be under water in today's economy.
Because not every job is worthy of starting at 21 dollars

McDonald's Crew Team Member listing in the LA area. $20-$22/hour.

ETA: I don't' really have a point with that, just saying out here on the West Coast getting close to $20 an hour pretty much is starting wage for almost anything.


IIRC $20/hr is the minimum wage for fast-food jobs in CA

Could be. Checked here in Eugene as well, which has a much lower COL, and saw some down at $16 but most were $18-$20.

And guess who still can't fill jobs here...a town with 20K college students? Fast food and QSR restaurants. Places are randomly closed for a day due to staffing issues, service is incredibly slow at some spots, several have reduced hours due to it, and others have simply closed because they literally couldn't staff the place.
 
I think they are high if we're working off the idea that everyone should earn a living wage.
Why? It's what it costs to not be under water in today's economy.
Because not every job is worthy of starting at 21 dollars

McDonald's Crew Team Member listing in the LA area. $20-$22/hour.

ETA: I don't' really have a point with that, just saying out here on the West Coast getting close to $20 an hour pretty much is starting wage for almost anything.


IIRC $20/hr is the minimum wage for fast-food jobs in CA

Could be. Checked here in Eugene as well, which has a much lower COL, and saw some down at $16 but most were $18-$20.

And guess who still can't fill jobs here...a town with 20K college students? Fast food and QSR restaurants. Places are randomly closed for a day due to staffing issues, service is incredibly slow at some spots, several have reduced hours due to it, and others have simply closed because they literally couldn't staff the place.
The 20/hr is now a requirement for fast food in Cali. But it effectively makes it that way for most/all businesses that employ entry level staff as they have to compete with it. (Which is why the fast food law was passed this way).
 
from the MIT living wage model...

The most recent update to the calculator included a few changes to its methodology. The calculator’s estimates now include cell phone and Wi-Fi expenses, as well as civic engagement expenditures, such as pets, clubs and movie or museum excursions.

LMFAO at including "pets, clubs and movie or museum excursions" as part of a living wage model. That is laughable.
 
from the MIT living wage model...

The most recent update to the calculator included a few changes to its methodology. The calculator’s estimates now include cell phone and Wi-Fi expenses, as well as civic engagement expenditures, such as pets, clubs and movie or museum excursions.

LMFAO at including "pets, clubs and movie or museum excursions" as part of a living wage model. That is laughable.
On the contrary, I think it's quite a good thing. It shows unequivocally that we, as a country, have done a fantastic job of stamping out actual poverty.
 
Last edited:
from the MIT living wage model...

The most recent update to the calculator included a few changes to its methodology. The calculator’s estimates now include cell phone and Wi-Fi expenses, as well as civic engagement expenditures, such as pets, clubs and movie or museum excursions.

LMFAO at including "pets, clubs and movie or museum excursions" as part of a living wage model. That is laughable.
On the contrary, I think it's quite a good thing. It shows unequivocally that we, as a country, have done a fantastic job of stamping out actual poverty.
Except that level of privilege yields unreasonable expectations and a lack of work ethic that is going to destroy this country from the inside out.

Our kids' generation is even softer than ours (which isn’t all that great) and will give it all away before we even know what happened. It's happening already and will result in regression to the mean (think global mean) sooner rather than later.
 
from the MIT living wage model...

The most recent update to the calculator included a few changes to its methodology. The calculator’s estimates now include cell phone and Wi-Fi expenses, as well as civic engagement expenditures, such as pets, clubs and movie or museum excursions.

LMFAO at including "pets, clubs and movie or museum excursions" as part of a living wage model. That is laughable.
On the contrary, I think it's quite a good thing. It shows unequivocally that we, as a country, have done a fantastic job of stamping out actual poverty.
Except that level of privilege yields unreasonable expectations and a lack of work ethic that is going to destroy this country from the inside out.

Our kids' generation is even softer than ours (which isn’t all that great) and will give it all away before we even know what happened. It's happening already and will result in regression to the mean (think global mean) sooner rather than later.
So said every generation in history...
 
from the MIT living wage model...

The most recent update to the calculator included a few changes to its methodology. The calculator’s estimates now include cell phone and Wi-Fi expenses, as well as civic engagement expenditures, such as pets, clubs and movie or museum excursions.

LMFAO at including "pets, clubs and movie or museum excursions" as part of a living wage model. That is laughable.
On the contrary, I think it's quite a good thing. It shows unequivocally that we, as a country, have done a fantastic job of stamping out actual poverty.
Except that level of privilege yields unreasonable expectations and a lack of work ethic that is going to destroy this country from the inside out.

Our kids' generation is even softer than ours (which isn’t all that great) and will give it all away before we even know what happened. It's happening already and will result in regression to the mean (think global mean) sooner rather than later.
So said every generation in history...
No, not really. Cool story, though.
 
from the MIT living wage model...

The most recent update to the calculator included a few changes to its methodology. The calculator’s estimates now include cell phone and Wi-Fi expenses, as well as civic engagement expenditures, such as pets, clubs and movie or museum excursions.

LMFAO at including "pets, clubs and movie or museum excursions" as part of a living wage model. That is laughable.
On the contrary, I think it's quite a good thing. It shows unequivocally that we, as a country, have done a fantastic job of stamping out actual poverty.
Except that level of privilege yields unreasonable expectations and a lack of work ethic that is going to destroy this country from the inside out.

Our kids' generation is even softer than ours (which isn’t all that great) and will give it all away before we even know what happened. It's happening already and will result in regression to the mean (think global mean) sooner rather than later.
So said every generation in history...
No, not really. Cool story, though.
Ok Boomer, perhaps try not living as long and taking all the ss with you. Maybe work til your 75 instead of retiring in your 60's.
 
from the MIT living wage model...

The most recent update to the calculator included a few changes to its methodology. The calculator’s estimates now include cell phone and Wi-Fi expenses, as well as civic engagement expenditures, such as pets, clubs and movie or museum excursions.

LMFAO at including "pets, clubs and movie or museum excursions" as part of a living wage model. That is laughable.
On the contrary, I think it's quite a good thing. It shows unequivocally that we, as a country, have done a fantastic job of stamping out actual poverty.

It is a great thing that our country has reduced poverty.

A living wage should cover basic needs required to enable a person or family to be self-sufficient. Examples: food, housing, healthcare, transportation, clothing, education, communication.

Going to clubs and movies and having pets don’t fit that definition. A person or family can live comfortably without any of those things.
 
Kids are a luxury good in today's economy. I'll hit my $7k deductible this month for health insurance between myself and 2 kiddos. Would be tough to cover at $7.25/hour.
 
from the MIT living wage model...

The most recent update to the calculator included a few changes to its methodology. The calculator’s estimates now include cell phone and Wi-Fi expenses, as well as civic engagement expenditures, such as pets, clubs and movie or museum excursions.

LMFAO at including "pets, clubs and movie or museum excursions" as part of a living wage model. That is laughable.
On the contrary, I think it's quite a good thing. It shows unequivocally that we, as a country, have done a fantastic job of stamping out actual poverty.
Except that level of privilege yields unreasonable expectations and a lack of work ethic that is going to destroy this country from the inside out.

Our kids' generation is even softer than ours (which isn’t all that great) and will give it all away before we even know what happened. It's happening already and will result in regression to the mean (think global mean) sooner rather than later.
So said every generation in history...
No, not really. Cool story, though.
Yes, really. This has been covered ad nauseum. My favorite version is a series of quotes about how the next generation is this or that. They all sound like something you'd hear today, but they're from different eras dating back to the 1800s.
 
from the MIT living wage model...

The most recent update to the calculator included a few changes to its methodology. The calculator’s estimates now include cell phone and Wi-Fi expenses, as well as civic engagement expenditures, such as pets, clubs and movie or museum excursions.

LMFAO at including "pets, clubs and movie or museum excursions" as part of a living wage model. That is laughable.
On the contrary, I think it's quite a good thing. It shows unequivocally that we, as a country, have done a fantastic job of stamping out actual poverty.
Except that level of privilege yields unreasonable expectations and a lack of work ethic that is going to destroy this country from the inside out.

Our kids' generation is even softer than ours (which isn’t all that great) and will give it all away before we even know what happened. It's happening already and will result in regression to the mean (think global mean) sooner rather than later.
So said every generation in history...
No, not really. Cool story, though.
Yes, really. This has been covered ad nauseum. My favorite version is a series of quotes about how the next generation is this or that. They all sound like something you'd hear today, but they're from different eras dating back to the 1800s.
That doesn’t make it not true.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top