What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

US Healthcare stinks thread (2 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Terminalxylem

Footballguy
Post your personal gripes with the healthcare system here.

This can either be from the perspective of those employed in healthcare, adjacent industries like insurance, or patients.

I'll reserve my thoughts for now. Please limit Mexican food tangents.
 
I have a specific type of asthma - "cough variant asthma". There are very specific medicines that help me keep it at bay.

Insurance won't give me those medicines. So I use other medicine and suffer.

Not only that...they usually don't approve anything my doctors prescribe. So then I have to waste countless hours and aggravation just trying to get both parties to agree to something. If I leave it to the doctors, they never get to it. I have it to the insurance company... Well **** me.
 
After being in other countries to observe the way they practice medicine, I've come to realize that "specialty" in this country is nothing more than a money-making scheme and only provides the illusion of quality care. It just solidifies my opinion that healthcare should not be a "for-profit" industry.
absolutely
 
And btw... I end up buying the meds that DO work when we do our regular/yearlyish visit to Mexico. Because I have to buy medicine in Mexico instead of in the US where I actually pay for... You know... INSURANCE.

I'm in the middle of this cough asthma being awful and only getting worse... Because **** me, according to the insurance company.
 
After being in other countries to observe the way they practice medicine, I've come to realize that "specialty" in this country is nothing more than a money-making scheme and only provides the illusion of quality care. It just solidifies my opinion that healthcare should not be a "for-profit" industry.
I had a work project where I had to analyze other countries health systems and really understand the markets for 6 or 7 countries that we were evaluating entering. You are absolutely right. It's like someone willingly paying over MSRP for a car with no interest in haggling, even though their friend just bought the same car for $5K under invoice.

There's plenty of templates that we could just copy/paste and save money. US has no interest
 
After being in other countries to observe the way they practice medicine, I've come to realize that "specialty" in this country is nothing more than a money-making scheme and only provides the illusion of quality care. It just solidifies my opinion that healthcare should not be a "for-profit" industry.

Seems like everyone is agreeing with you but unpack this for me a little. Are you saying that going to see a specialist doctor for say GI issues is not a good thing? Or just they take advantage of it and gouge you (and insurance) for seeing a specialist?
 
And btw... I end up buying the meds that DO work when we do our regular/yearlyish visit to Mexico. Because I have to buy medicine in Mexico instead of in the US where I actually pay for... You know... INSURANCE.

I'm in the middle of this cough asthma being awful and only getting worse... Because **** me, according to the insurance company.
Is it the insurance company's fault or the government and pharma companies fault for gouging Americans and selling at or below cost to foreign nations?

Insurance companies make good scapegoats but as far as I know they are the only part of the equation (providers, pharma, insurance, government) whose profits are regulated.
Trying to understand how this still isn't the insurance company's fault that they refuse to approve meds that work and instead leave me to suffer. That I have to buy elsewhere is secondary.
 
Currently going through a situation with insurance. Surgery scheduled in mid-September. Insurance waited 7 weeks then denied the surgery 1 week prior because we had not tried 6 weeks of physical therapy first. Doctor confirmed that PT won't help. Physical therapist confirmed that PT won't help. Had insurance denied the surgery when it was originally scheduled, we could have done the 6 weeks and moved forward. By waiting until mid-November to issue the denial, insurance intends to push the procedure into 2024 after my high-deductible plan resets.

I opened an urgent appeal, to which the insurance is required to respond in 24 hours. It's been 2 weeks, and neither I, the doctor, or the state healthcare advocate have been able to speak to anyone at Aetna about the situation. They don't answer the phone, they don't answer e-mail, they don't respond to legal requests from the advocate, and they don't call back. All of this is wildly illegal of course, but there's no real remedy available to me.
 
After being in other countries to observe the way they practice medicine, I've come to realize that "specialty" in this country is nothing more than a money-making scheme and only provides the illusion of quality care. It just solidifies my opinion that healthcare should not be a "for-profit" industry.

Seems like everyone is agreeing with you but unpack this for me a little. Are you saying that going to see a specialist doctor for say GI issues is not a good thing? Or just they take advantage of it and gouge you (and insurance) for seeing a specialist?
Look at it this way. The human body is a functioning system where all the systems interact with one another and impact one another. Do you want a doctor that knows how all of it works together or one that's chosen to ignore 95% of the equation and focus on just one part not being able to articulate how the treatment they are providing you for a specific symptom is going to impact the whole? We are sold the idea that a doctor who specializes is better because they are focused on that one part. Reality is a "specialist" is a doctor who has chosen to focus on one system and forego the rest. Forget the time it takes to get a resolution or the cost for a minute.
 
For the most part, have been very fortunate with 2 kids. My 2nd child was 8 weeks premi so like 7 weeks in the nicu.. She also had to get a hernia surgery. Kids have been to the emergency room multiple times for lacerations or broken bones. I had to get some steroid injections for disc compression. I don't recall ever paying anything beyond premiums and copays.

Now if we're talking dental insurance, I have my share of gripes.
 
Last edited:
I don't recall ever paying anything beyond premiums and copays.

The costs of co-pays alone has kept me away from going to the doctor for anything for years**. "Having insurance" doesn't always help with maintaining one's good health. Catastrophic situations, sure. Regular health maintenance? Checking something out early before it gets bad? Nuh-uh.

** I mean, I go if things are bad enough. But just to go get something bearable checked out as a "better safe than sorry" thing? Never.
 
After being in other countries to observe the way they practice medicine, I've come to realize that "specialty" in this country is nothing more than a money-making scheme and only provides the illusion of quality care. It just solidifies my opinion that healthcare should not be a "for-profit" industry.

Seems like everyone is agreeing with you but unpack this for me a little. Are you saying that going to see a specialist doctor for say GI issues is not a good thing? Or just they take advantage of it and gouge you (and insurance) for seeing a specialist?
Look at it this way. The human body is a functioning system where all the systems interact with one another and impact one another. Do you want a doctor that knows how all of it works together or one that's chosen to ignore 95% of the equation and focus on just one part not being able to articulate how the treatment they are providing you for a specific symptom is going to impact the whole? We are sold the idea that a doctor who specializes is better because they are focused on that one part. Reality is a "specialist" is a doctor who has chosen to focus on one system and forego the rest. Forget the time it takes to get a resolution or the cost for a minute.

Not trying to be argumentative but I guess I'm not sure I understand why this is a bad thing. I actually do want a doctor who is really well versed with say gallbladders taking my gallbladder out. I totally get how they may use this as a means to make more money but unless I'm not understanding you, I don't see where the illusion of quality care comes in.
 
My biggest gripe is that nobody knows how much something is going to cost beforehand. It's hard to make an informed decision about a treatment not knowing the cost. Medical treatment seems to be one of the only industries that discuss products and services without telling you how much it will cost. I understand just doing what needs to be done in an emergency situation and then figuring out costs later. But, in non-emergency situations, they should tell me the cost of each thing they are suggesting that I do. "We'd like to do an CT scan. That's going to be $X out of your pocket. We also want to run some blood tests and that will be $Y."
 
My biggest gripe is that nobody knows how much something is going to cost beforehand. It's hard to make an informed decision about a treatment not knowing the cost. Medical treatment seems to be one of the only industries that discuss products and services without telling you how much it will cost. I understand just doing what needs to be done in an emergency situation and then figuring out costs later. But, in non-emergency situations, they should tell me the cost of each thing they are suggesting that I do. "We'd like to do an CT scan. That's going to be $X out of your pocket. We also want to run some blood tests and that will be $Y."
The nice thing about paying for a plan (higher premiums naturally) that doesn't have a deductible and doesn't have coinsurance is that I don't have to worry about that stuff. Just need to make sure its in network.
 
Insurance companies talking about how important you are, your family, protecting you, your health....blah blah blah And then at any chance they get they do everything in their power not to pay or fulfill your claims.

United, Aetna and Cigna seem to be a few of the worst.
 
After being in other countries to observe the way they practice medicine, I've come to realize that "specialty" in this country is nothing more than a money-making scheme and only provides the illusion of quality care. It just solidifies my opinion that healthcare should not be a "for-profit" industry.

Seems like everyone is agreeing with you but unpack this for me a little. Are you saying that going to see a specialist doctor for say GI issues is not a good thing? Or just they take advantage of it and gouge you (and insurance) for seeing a specialist?
Look at it this way. The human body is a functioning system where all the systems interact with one another and impact one another. Do you want a doctor that knows how all of it works together or one that's chosen to ignore 95% of the equation and focus on just one part not being able to articulate how the treatment they are providing you for a specific symptom is going to impact the whole? We are sold the idea that a doctor who specializes is better because they are focused on that one part. Reality is a "specialist" is a doctor who has chosen to focus on one system and forego the rest. Forget the time it takes to get a resolution or the cost for a minute.

Not trying to be argumentative but I guess I'm not sure I understand why this is a bad thing. I actually do want a doctor who is really well versed with say gallbladders taking my gallbladder out. I totally get how they may use this as a means to make more money but unless I'm not understanding you, I don't see where the illusion of quality care comes in.
This is likely an unfortunate example you've brought up as a gallbladder can be taken out by interns who are just starting out with minimal to no risk. But without getting into specific treatments and more at a philosophical level, I find it significantly more appealing to have a doctor who has the knowledge and ability to do it all. Similar to my expectations for my mechanic to be able to work on all aspects of my vehicle. It's far less error-prone to have one chef in the kitchen than 20 who aren't talking to each other...at least in my opinion. Really the only one exception I can think of in terms of legit specialists is a brain surgeon.
 
My biggest gripe has been the talks about productivity and labor costs--and the ever increasing expectations surrounding productivity.

I started as a hospitalist in 2017. We would have 14-16 patients to start the day. Some days as low as 12. In the winter, it would get busier. Maybe we'd see 18 patients. 20 was a really busy day.

I remember at a point in the winter asking our medical director why we didn't have a 5th doctor for ~100 patients. He told me there was this super secret, super magical labor number that only the corporation knew how to calculate. That number had to be above 1.6 for 3 consecutive months to warrant a 5th doctor. Since it wasn't, we really weren't all that busy, and we should be able to manage.

Covid happened and broke everything. There was a time the hospitals were full to the brim. But at the onset, we were actually super dead. No one wanted to go to the hospital for fear of Covid. People would show up weeks after having had a stroke trying to avoid the hospital. And in this dead period, the hospital felt the squeeze. Team Health (staffing company) felt the squeeze. And so they both passed it on to us.

In 2021, we're talking about that magical super secret 1.6 number. It's supposed to get you a 5th doctor, right? Well now, it gets you 4. In fact, if you're below 1.6 on any given day, you need to cut hours. We need to improve labor costs. The hospital and company gotta make money. Also, if you're not being sent home you need to see more patients.

The old 14-16 is dead and gone. We routinely started with 22+ patients. That's before any new patients need to come in through the ER. Nurses have it worse. What used to be 4 patients is now 7. Administration wants to give them 8, but they all swear they'll quit. And they back it up. Nurses are leaving the hospital quicker than we can graduate new ones.
 
Last edited:
After being in other countries to observe the way they practice medicine, I've come to realize that "specialty" in this country is nothing more than a money-making scheme and only provides the illusion of quality care. It just solidifies my opinion that healthcare should not be a "for-profit" industry.

Seems like everyone is agreeing with you but unpack this for me a little. Are you saying that going to see a specialist doctor for say GI issues is not a good thing? Or just they take advantage of it and gouge you (and insurance) for seeing a specialist?
Look at it this way. The human body is a functioning system where all the systems interact with one another and impact one another. Do you want a doctor that knows how all of it works together or one that's chosen to ignore 95% of the equation and focus on just one part not being able to articulate how the treatment they are providing you for a specific symptom is going to impact the whole? We are sold the idea that a doctor who specializes is better because they are focused on that one part. Reality is a "specialist" is a doctor who has chosen to focus on one system and forego the rest. Forget the time it takes to get a resolution or the cost for a minute.

Not trying to be argumentative but I guess I'm not sure I understand why this is a bad thing. I actually do want a doctor who is really well versed with say gallbladders taking my gallbladder out. I totally get how they may use this as a means to make more money but unless I'm not understanding you, I don't see where the illusion of quality care comes in.
This is likely an unfortunate example you've brought up as a gallbladder can be taken out by interns who are just starting out with minimal to no risk. But without getting into specific treatments and more at a philosophical level, I find it significantly more appealing to have a doctor who has the knowledge and ability to do it all. Similar to my expectations for my mechanic to be able to work on all aspects of my vehicle. It's far less error-prone to have one chef in the kitchen than 20 who aren't talking to each other...at least in my opinion. Really the only one exception I can think of in terms of legit specialists is a brain surgeon.

Interesting. I'm curious what our doctors around here think about that. Not saying you are wrong but I'm not sure I've ever really heard folks saying specialists are a bad thing. I do agree that I want my GP to know "everthing" and advise accordingly but it just seems crazy to me with so many things a doctor would have to know that some specialists aren't needed for a variety of issues/diseases/conditions.

@Terminalxylem @gianmarco
 
After being in other countries to observe the way they practice medicine, I've come to realize that "specialty" in this country is nothing more than a money-making scheme and only provides the illusion of quality care. It just solidifies my opinion that healthcare should not be a "for-profit" industry.

Seems like everyone is agreeing with you but unpack this for me a little. Are you saying that going to see a specialist doctor for say GI issues is not a good thing? Or just they take advantage of it and gouge you (and insurance) for seeing a specialist?
Look at it this way. The human body is a functioning system where all the systems interact with one another and impact one another. Do you want a doctor that knows how all of it works together or one that's chosen to ignore 95% of the equation and focus on just one part not being able to articulate how the treatment they are providing you for a specific symptom is going to impact the whole? We are sold the idea that a doctor who specializes is better because they are focused on that one part. Reality is a "specialist" is a doctor who has chosen to focus on one system and forego the rest. Forget the time it takes to get a resolution or the cost for a minute.

Not trying to be argumentative but I guess I'm not sure I understand why this is a bad thing. I actually do want a doctor who is really well versed with say gallbladders taking my gallbladder out. I totally get how they may use this as a means to make more money but unless I'm not understanding you, I don't see where the illusion of quality care comes in.
This is likely an unfortunate example you've brought up as a gallbladder can be taken out by interns who are just starting out with minimal to no risk. But without getting into specific treatments and more at a philosophical level, I find it significantly more appealing to have a doctor who has the knowledge and ability to do it all. Similar to my expectations for my mechanic to be able to work on all aspects of my vehicle. It's far less error-prone to have one chef in the kitchen than 20 who aren't talking to each other...at least in my opinion. Really the only one exception I can think of in terms of legit specialists is a brain surgeon.

Interesting. I'm curious what our doctors around here think about that. Not saying you are wrong but I'm not sure I've ever really heard folks saying specialists are a bad thing. I do agree that I want my GP to know "everthing" and advise accordingly but it just seems crazy to me with so many things a doctor would have to know that some specialists aren't needed for a variety of issues/diseases/conditions.

@Terminalxylem @gianmarco
I would be an easy person too persuade that a field had become to over-run with specialists, but medicine strikes me as an odd example to pick for that. If I have cancer, it seems logical to me that I might want to visit with an oncologist. Heart problems, a cardiologist. Problems with my kid, a pediatrician. My wife sees a gynecologist. And so on.

I wouldn't want to go to any of those people for my annual check-in, but it's surprising to me to see someone argue that they don't have a valid role in the health care system.
 
Last edited:
My biggest gripe is that nobody knows how much something is going to cost beforehand. It's hard to make an informed decision about a treatment not knowing the cost. Medical treatment seems to be one of the only industries that discuss products and services without telling you how much it will cost. I understand just doing what needs to be done in an emergency situation and then figuring out costs later. But, in non-emergency situations, they should tell me the cost of each thing they are suggesting that I do. "We'd like to do an CT scan. That's going to be $X out of your pocket. We also want to run some blood tests and that will be $Y."
Came in here to post this. I recently began specialized physical therapy to treat a running injury - the hospital couldn't tell me how much it would cost because they didn't know how much my insurance would cover. My insurance didn't know how much it would cost because they didn't have a bill from the hospital yet. I've completed six visits over the last couple months and just now got my first bill - it says I owe $200 with no description of how many visits that's for. Waiting for either party to let me know if I'm on the hook for just $200 or $1,200+. Good stuff.
 
My biggest gripe is that nobody knows how much something is going to cost beforehand. It's hard to make an informed decision about a treatment not knowing the cost. Medical treatment seems to be one of the only industries that discuss products and services without telling you how much it will cost. I understand just doing what needs to be done in an emergency situation and then figuring out costs later. But, in non-emergency situations, they should tell me the cost of each thing they are suggesting that I do. "We'd like to do an CT scan. That's going to be $X out of your pocket. We also want to run some blood tests and that will be $Y."
This too. It's ridiculous if not criminal.
 
After being in other countries to observe the way they practice medicine, I've come to realize that "specialty" in this country is nothing more than a money-making scheme and only provides the illusion of quality care. It just solidifies my opinion that healthcare should not be a "for-profit" industry.

Seems like everyone is agreeing with you but unpack this for me a little. Are you saying that going to see a specialist doctor for say GI issues is not a good thing? Or just they take advantage of it and gouge you (and insurance) for seeing a specialist?
Look at it this way. The human body is a functioning system where all the systems interact with one another and impact one another. Do you want a doctor that knows how all of it works together or one that's chosen to ignore 95% of the equation and focus on just one part not being able to articulate how the treatment they are providing you for a specific symptom is going to impact the whole? We are sold the idea that a doctor who specializes is better because they are focused on that one part. Reality is a "specialist" is a doctor who has chosen to focus on one system and forego the rest. Forget the time it takes to get a resolution or the cost for a minute.

Not trying to be argumentative but I guess I'm not sure I understand why this is a bad thing. I actually do want a doctor who is really well versed with say gallbladders taking my gallbladder out. I totally get how they may use this as a means to make more money but unless I'm not understanding you, I don't see where the illusion of quality care comes in.
This is likely an unfortunate example you've brought up as a gallbladder can be taken out by interns who are just starting out with minimal to no risk. But without getting into specific treatments and more at a philosophical level, I find it significantly more appealing to have a doctor who has the knowledge and ability to do it all. Similar to my expectations for my mechanic to be able to work on all aspects of my vehicle. It's far less error-prone to have one chef in the kitchen than 20 who aren't talking to each other...at least in my opinion. Really the only one exception I can think of in terms of legit specialists is a brain surgeon.

Interesting. I'm curious what our doctors around here think about that. Not saying you are wrong but I'm not sure I've ever really heard folks saying specialists are a bad thing. I do agree that I want my GP to know "everthing" and advise accordingly but it just seems crazy to me with so many things a doctor would have to know that some specialists aren't needed for a variety of issues/diseases/conditions.

@Terminalxylem @gianmarco
We know nothing else. When you go to another country and you see doctors perfectly capable of treating cancer along with being able to operate on your heart should it be required a lightbulb goes off. Patient-focused treatment looks very different than symptom-focused treatment.
 
After being in other countries to observe the way they practice medicine, I've come to realize that "specialty" in this country is nothing more than a money-making scheme and only provides the illusion of quality care. It just solidifies my opinion that healthcare should not be a "for-profit" industry.

Seems like everyone is agreeing with you but unpack this for me a little. Are you saying that going to see a specialist doctor for say GI issues is not a good thing? Or just they take advantage of it and gouge you (and insurance) for seeing a specialist?
Look at it this way. The human body is a functioning system where all the systems interact with one another and impact one another. Do you want a doctor that knows how all of it works together or one that's chosen to ignore 95% of the equation and focus on just one part not being able to articulate how the treatment they are providing you for a specific symptom is going to impact the whole? We are sold the idea that a doctor who specializes is better because they are focused on that one part. Reality is a "specialist" is a doctor who has chosen to focus on one system and forego the rest. Forget the time it takes to get a resolution or the cost for a minute.

Not trying to be argumentative but I guess I'm not sure I understand why this is a bad thing. I actually do want a doctor who is really well versed with say gallbladders taking my gallbladder out. I totally get how they may use this as a means to make more money but unless I'm not understanding you, I don't see where the illusion of quality care comes in.
This is likely an unfortunate example you've brought up as a gallbladder can be taken out by interns who are just starting out with minimal to no risk. But without getting into specific treatments and more at a philosophical level, I find it significantly more appealing to have a doctor who has the knowledge and ability to do it all. Similar to my expectations for my mechanic to be able to work on all aspects of my vehicle. It's far less error-prone to have one chef in the kitchen than 20 who aren't talking to each other...at least in my opinion. Really the only one exception I can think of in terms of legit specialists is a brain surgeon.
There's a lot to try and unpack with this post, but it doesn't seem like you have a good understanding of the above. If by intern, you're talking about an internist taking out your gallbladder, that's just not possible nor is it a good idea at all. If you're talking about a surgical intern, that's a different story, but all that refers to is level of training and no, interns should not be doing that unsupervised.

There's reasons for specialization in medicine and that's across the world. Now, there has definitely been a shift with instances of TOO much specialization and there's been an overall loss of generalists that do more, but, for example, in more rural areas, that skillset is still needed and there and gets done. This could be a pages long discussion, though.
 
My biggest gripe is that nobody knows how much something is going to cost beforehand. It's hard to make an informed decision about a treatment not knowing the cost. Medical treatment seems to be one of the only industries that discuss products and services without telling you how much it will cost. I understand just doing what needs to be done in an emergency situation and then figuring out costs later. But, in non-emergency situations, they should tell me the cost of each thing they are suggesting that I do. "We'd like to do an CT scan. That's going to be $X out of your pocket. We also want to run some blood tests and that will be $Y."
There's just no good answer for this because the same test will cost every person a different amount based on their level of coverage. You can actually get that information if you contact your insurance company prior to getting it done.

It's unfortunate and one of the huge downsides of insurance companies and their ability to dictate medical care.
 
After being in other countries to observe the way they practice medicine, I've come to realize that "specialty" in this country is nothing more than a money-making scheme and only provides the illusion of quality care. It just solidifies my opinion that healthcare should not be a "for-profit" industry.

Seems like everyone is agreeing with you but unpack this for me a little. Are you saying that going to see a specialist doctor for say GI issues is not a good thing? Or just they take advantage of it and gouge you (and insurance) for seeing a specialist?
Look at it this way. The human body is a functioning system where all the systems interact with one another and impact one another. Do you want a doctor that knows how all of it works together or one that's chosen to ignore 95% of the equation and focus on just one part not being able to articulate how the treatment they are providing you for a specific symptom is going to impact the whole? We are sold the idea that a doctor who specializes is better because they are focused on that one part. Reality is a "specialist" is a doctor who has chosen to focus on one system and forego the rest. Forget the time it takes to get a resolution or the cost for a minute.

Not trying to be argumentative but I guess I'm not sure I understand why this is a bad thing. I actually do want a doctor who is really well versed with say gallbladders taking my gallbladder out. I totally get how they may use this as a means to make more money but unless I'm not understanding you, I don't see where the illusion of quality care comes in.
This is likely an unfortunate example you've brought up as a gallbladder can be taken out by interns who are just starting out with minimal to no risk. But without getting into specific treatments and more at a philosophical level, I find it significantly more appealing to have a doctor who has the knowledge and ability to do it all. Similar to my expectations for my mechanic to be able to work on all aspects of my vehicle. It's far less error-prone to have one chef in the kitchen than 20 who aren't talking to each other...at least in my opinion. Really the only one exception I can think of in terms of legit specialists is a brain surgeon.
There's a lot to try and unpack with this post, but it doesn't seem like you have a good understanding of the above. If by intern, you're talking about an internist taking out your gallbladder, that's just not possible nor is it a good idea at all. If you're talking about a surgical intern, that's a different story, but all that refers to is level of training and no, interns should not be doing that unsupervised.

There's reasons for specialization in medicine and that's across the world. Now, there has definitely been a shift with instances of TOO much specialization and there's been an overall loss of generalists that do more, but, for example, in more rural areas, that skillset is still needed and there and gets done. This could be a pages long discussion, though.
sorry...I sorta assumed we understood I was talking about surgical interns when talking about surgery. Apologies for not being clear. Hospital down the road from us has "gallbladder days" during the week. Wednesdays and Saturdays. That's all the ORs are open for from 8am to 3pm. They do dozens a day. It's pretty impressive. My wife's surgeon was a second year surgical resident. And to be clear, I am not saying there is not a place for some specialists, but I just don't see a reason for most of the specialists we have in this country. Yes, there are some exceptions especially when you get into disease.
 
Last edited:
My biggest gripe is that nobody knows how much something is going to cost beforehand. It's hard to make an informed decision about a treatment not knowing the cost. Medical treatment seems to be one of the only industries that discuss products and services without telling you how much it will cost. I understand just doing what needs to be done in an emergency situation and then figuring out costs later. But, in non-emergency situations, they should tell me the cost of each thing they are suggesting that I do. "We'd like to do an CT scan. That's going to be $X out of your pocket. We also want to run some blood tests and that will be $Y."
There's just no good answer for this because the same test will cost every person a different amount based on their level of coverage. You can actually get that information if you contact your insurance company prior to getting it done.

It's unfortunate and one of the huge downsides of insurance companies and their ability to dictate medical care.
It actually works really well at my eye doctor. They go through all the options and tell me how much it will cost me based on my insurance.
 
Interesting topic. Where to start…

My biggest issues are that it’s too expensive. And its too complicated. Pricing. Billing. And plan choice should be much more straightforward.

knowing I had at least one surgical procedure on the books this year, I opted to get the top tier insurance. Making sure that choice was the right one in regards to costs was crazy complicated. Having a broker helped. Like @General Malaise, my insurance premium is more than my mortgage. before committing to the procedure I attempted to find out what it would cost me out of pocket. just Figuring out who was going to bill me was an onerous task on it own. I couldn’t get an exact figure. I spent hours trying to figure it out. Loosely I thought it was going to be in the 2-7K range. what did it cost you ask? my 1 day outpatient procedure was billed at over 70K. I paid $112. Winning?!!! It was impossible for me to find out ahead of time what I would be paying. I knew the costs would be ridiculous and if I did not have the “platinum” :rolleyes: insurance, I’m know my out of pocket would have been much higher.
 
I'm 40 and healthy (at least internally. All kinda of aches and pains from years of sports and getting old) so I very rarely interact with the health care system at this point. But the thing that always drives me insane is that other countries get the same meds cheaper than we do. That's absolute total garbage.

We're already subsidizing defense costs for God knows how many countries (raising my taxes)....and then we have to bear the entire burden of R&D costs for the drug companies (while any profit they make overseas is basically gravy). Nonsense.

Easy to brag about your great government funded healthcase when we're footing the bill for your meds. Must be nice.
 
After being in other countries to observe the way they practice medicine, I've come to realize that "specialty" in this country is nothing more than a money-making scheme and only provides the illusion of quality care. It just solidifies my opinion that healthcare should not be a "for-profit" industry.

Seems like everyone is agreeing with you but unpack this for me a little. Are you saying that going to see a specialist doctor for say GI issues is not a good thing? Or just they take advantage of it and gouge you (and insurance) for seeing a specialist?
Look at it this way. The human body is a functioning system where all the systems interact with one another and impact one another. Do you want a doctor that knows how all of it works together or one that's chosen to ignore 95% of the equation and focus on just one part not being able to articulate how the treatment they are providing you for a specific symptom is going to impact the whole? We are sold the idea that a doctor who specializes is better because they are focused on that one part. Reality is a "specialist" is a doctor who has chosen to focus on one system and forego the rest. Forget the time it takes to get a resolution or the cost for a minute.

Not trying to be argumentative but I guess I'm not sure I understand why this is a bad thing. I actually do want a doctor who is really well versed with say gallbladders taking my gallbladder out. I totally get how they may use this as a means to make more money but unless I'm not understanding you, I don't see where the illusion of quality care comes in.
This is likely an unfortunate example you've brought up as a gallbladder can be taken out by interns who are just starting out with minimal to no risk. But without getting into specific treatments and more at a philosophical level, I find it significantly more appealing to have a doctor who has the knowledge and ability to do it all. Similar to my expectations for my mechanic to be able to work on all aspects of my vehicle. It's far less error-prone to have one chef in the kitchen than 20 who aren't talking to each other...at least in my opinion. Really the only one exception I can think of in terms of legit specialists is a brain surgeon.
There's a lot to try and unpack with this post, but it doesn't seem like you have a good understanding of the above. If by intern, you're talking about an internist taking out your gallbladder, that's just not possible nor is it a good idea at all. If you're talking about a surgical intern, that's a different story, but all that refers to is level of training and no, interns should not be doing that unsupervised.

There's reasons for specialization in medicine and that's across the world. Now, there has definitely been a shift with instances of TOO much specialization and there's been an overall loss of generalists that do more, but, for example, in more rural areas, that skillset is still needed and there and gets done. This could be a pages long discussion, though.
sorry...I sorta assumed we understood I was talking about surgical interns when talking about surgery. Apologies for not being clear. Hospital down the road from us has "gallbladder days" during the week. Wednesdays and Saturdays. That's all the ORs are open for from 8am to 3pm. They do dozens a day. It's pretty impressive. My wife's surgeon was a second year surgical resident. And to be clear, I am not saying there is not a place for some specialists, but I just don't see a reason for most of the specialists we have in this country. Yes, there are some exceptions especially when you get into disease.
So, based on this:

1) Surgery is a specialty. When you finish medical school, you enter a residency and surgery is one of those. Other examples: ophthalmology, family medicine, dermatology, orthopedics, etc.
So, when you were using that as an example against specializing, it didn't make much sense because your surgeon is a specialty. And it needs to be.
2) That's great that her surgeon was a 2nd year resident. That's when surgery residents learn to do those surgeries. But, even with the surgeon being a 2nd year resident, they were still supervised during the surgery by an attending surgeon who has completed the 5 years of surgery residency. That 2nd year wasn't doing it all by themselves, nor should they be. And it's not that the gall bladder surgery is complicated. It's not, compared to other surgeries. But, there's still always things that can go wrong in those small % of surgeries and that is a big reason why trainees still need to have supervision for ALL surgeries until all 5 years are completed (even if the attending is just in the room for part of the surgery).

The issue where specialization can sometimes be on the excess side is, as an example, the person that gets admitted to the hospital with asthma or pneumonia. Does the general internist need help from the pulmonologist for something like that even though it involves the lungs? Or the endocrinologist to help manage straight forward diabetes? There's some overlap when things get complicated. And in certain parts of the world (and even in this country), those specialists aren't available so the general internist learns to manage a lot more than those in big centers, for example, where every specialist is available to call. That's a different argument.
 
It just costs too damn much.

Yeah, this. My monthly insurance premium is more than the mortgage to my house. That seems bizarre to me.
Interesting observation. Health and shelter are closely intertwined, and each extremely important. Ultimately, the former is more important IMO, so I fundamentally believe we should provide universal, affordable (”free”, through taxes) healthcare.

But is it also possible we’re collectively undervaluing health relative to “stuff”, like a nice home?
 
Had a dental exam the other day. The dentist says I need more work and I should book a return appointment with the receptionist. The receptionist says there are no available times to book. I said --it's okay if it's way out in the future. She stares at me blankly and says there are NO times to book. I need to try again to book an appointment some other time.

WTF why do I have dental insurance. This is what health companies are doing now. Delaying and postponing care hoping you will die before they have to pay any more on you.
 
My dentist is booked pretty solid as well. Talking to them apparently a lot of dentists retired during covid, at least around here.

On the subject of dental insurance, about 15 years ago my insurer would still only cover the metal fillings that had already been completely phased out by just about every dentist. So, if you ever needed a filling, the insurance would reject it and you'd pay full cost for it. Fun times. I don't have that issue anymore, but my current dentist wants me to go for extra cleanings for my gum health, and there seems to be no rhyme or reason as for whether or not the insurance will cover any particular one. The office submits them all and lets me know a few weeks later whether or not I have to pay out of pocket.
 
It just costs too damn much.

Yeah, this. My monthly insurance premium is more than the mortgage to my house. That seems bizarre to me.
Interesting observation. Health and shelter are closely intertwined, and each extremely important. Ultimately, the former is more important IMO, so I fundamentally believe we should provide universal, affordable (”free”, through taxes) healthcare.

But is it also possible we’re collectively undervaluing health relative to “stuff”, like a nice home?


I certainly don't know what the right answer should be for our country with regards to health care. Like everything else it feels like we've politicized health care here so change doesn't seem likely. Or at least, meaningful change. I'd be in favor of Medicare for All and just charge people based on what they make - like we do with taxes - but I can't see that happening here.
 
It just costs too damn much.

Yeah, this. My monthly insurance premium is more than the mortgage to my house. That seems bizarre to me.
Interesting observation. Health and shelter are closely intertwined, and each extremely important. Ultimately, the former is more important IMO, so I fundamentally believe we should provide universal, affordable (”free”, through taxes) healthcare.

But is it also possible we’re collectively undervaluing health relative to “stuff”, like a nice home?


I certainly don't know what the right answer should be for our country with regards to health care. Like everything else it feels like we've politicized health care here so change doesn't seem likely. Or at least, meaningful change. I'd be in favor of Medicare for All and just charge people based on what they make - like we do with taxes - but I can't see that happening here.
That would never work. The people that would pay nothing to very little would overwhelm the system.
 
It just costs too damn much.

Yeah, this. My monthly insurance premium is more than the mortgage to my house. That seems bizarre to me.
Interesting observation. Health and shelter are closely intertwined, and each extremely important. Ultimately, the former is more important IMO, so I fundamentally believe we should provide universal, affordable (”free”, through taxes) healthcare.

But is it also possible we’re collectively undervaluing health relative to “stuff”, like a nice home?


I certainly don't know what the right answer should be for our country with regards to health care. Like everything else it feels like we've politicized health care here so change doesn't seem likely. Or at least, meaningful change. I'd be in favor of Medicare for All and just charge people based on what they make - like we do with taxes - but I can't see that happening here.
That would never work. The people that would pay nothing to very little would overwhelm the system.
Just make it like any other government program. The federal income tax is already pretty progressive, so funding the health care system out of general tax revenues would have the effect of charging people who can afford it quite a bit while keeping it free for a large chunk of the population. You'll need bureaucrats to ration access to care, but insurance companies do that now -- we're just changing who the bureaucrats are.

Not saying I support this per se, just trying to steelman GM's proposal.
 
Had a dental exam the other day. The dentist says I need more work and I should book a return appointment with the receptionist. The receptionist says there are no available times to book. I said --it's okay if it's way out in the future. She stares at me blankly and says there are NO times to book. I need to try again to book an appointment some other time.

WTF why do I have dental insurance. This is what health companies are doing now. Delaying and postponing care hoping you will die before they have to pay any more on you.
I hate insurance companies as much as the next guy. That sounds more like an issue with that office though.
 
Years ago, my wife was in the hospital in an emergency situation. THe hospital she was in was our regular hospital, in the network. A specialist she regularly sees came in one day and did a check on her. The next day, the same Dr came in and announced that this visit was —I forget exactly the term... let's call it "not an office visit". OK, what is she going to do.... she's stuck in the hospital....refuse the check-up?

We got her home and received 2 bills, 1 covered by insurance for the 1st check-up, and a 2nd one for like $2k for the other "out of network" visit. Same hospital, same doctor, just somewhere it was decided that on that day he was not going to be working in-network.

such a f'ing joke
 
Last edited:
Years ago, my wife was in the hospital in an emergency situation. THe hospital she was in was or regular hospital, in the network. A specialist she regularly sees came in one day and did a check on her. The next day, the same Dr came in and announced that this visit was —I forget exactly the term... let's call it "not an office visit". OK, what is she going to do.... she's stuck in the hospital....refuse the check-up?

We got her home and received 2 bills, 1 covered by insurance for the 1st check-up, and a 2nd one for like $2k for the other "out of network" visit. Same hospital, same doctor, just somewhere it was decided that on that day he was not going to be working in-network.

such a f'ing joke
I believe that's called surprised billing and is illegal in a lot of states.
 
Years ago, my wife was in the hospital in an emergency situation. THe hospital she was in was or regular hospital, in the network. A specialist she regularly sees came in one day and did a check on her. The next day, the same Dr came in and announced that this visit was —I forget exactly the term... let's call it "not an office visit". OK, what is she going to do.... she's stuck in the hospital....refuse the check-up?

We got her home and received 2 bills, 1 covered by insurance for the 1st check-up, and a 2nd one for like $2k for the other "out of network" visit. Same hospital, same doctor, just somewhere it was decided that on that day he was not going to be working in-network.

such a f'ing joke
I believe that's called surprised billing and is illegal in a lot of states.
Apparently not in NY. WE fought it and got it chewed down a good amount but still pissed us off. We do not see that doctor anymore because of it
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top