jamesbrownkid is your classic "trying to get under your skin so you think about blocking me guy" he has a few equivalents (have you ever seen squisition's work?) on the other side of the political aisle
It's nice to have someone to keep the FFS fair and balanced.
John I appreciate your honest opinion but you are wrong here. This is a super liberal forum, like whacky level, and they go out of their way to attack me for my support of Trump / conservative views. I don't care that they attack me, those are issues that they have to deal with themselves.
There is definitely a trend in some of these ignore lists, the FFA sure does get agitated by a conservative point of view.I don't get the hate for you JBK. Your post volume is high but the content is mostly just sharing facts. I guess some people don't like hearing things that conflict with their beliefs.
It's not a hate of the conservative point of view. Have you actually read his posts in the Bernie Sanders thread? Pointless attacks with no reasonability whatsoever. He derserves the ban he just got.
It looks like he posted something about Bernie being a lunatic, which is said dozens of times a day across multiple threads about Trump. I don't see anything wrong with that.He made a comment about people encouraging transgender children. Not sure I see the problem there either.
Posted a picture of some kid with a Bernie shirt on and talking #### about Trump. The horror!
Commented that Bernie was a communist (okay this is a slight stretch from socialist) and a pervert (based on his writings this could be true, but who isn't a pervert deep down).
Then banned.
If he was banned for making negative comments about a candidate then that is pretty hypocritical. There are two threads that are comprised of mostly people denigrating Trump and his supporters, not to mention snide remarks in many other threads.
If he was banned because his beliefs were different than the majority here then that is disappointing.
If he was banned because his posting was considered trolling then something ain't right. There are plenty of other posters here who's content adds no actual value to the thread topic being discussed.
If he was banned for something else then maybe it was justified.
ETA: I will agree that his posting had an agenda, I don't see anything wrong with that. This place could use a little more balance. It probably would have been more effective though if the frequency and intensity were dialed down a bit. A young buck coming into this middle aged left leaning forum guns blazing is probably not going to last long.
(This is all under the assumption he is a real poster and not some TGunz or Squiz alias just trying to get a rise out of people, in which case I would have to say well done)