I am big on using VBD every year thanks to Joe's secret formula. Maybe i am not thinking this through hard enough but...
I am in a league that has a lot of crazy point categories. One is that QB's get more base points for a TD then a rb or wr and you get even more depending how long a TD is.
Now I understand QB's in itself changing in rankings because maybe Vick or McNabb will get more points for rushing and rushing TD's rather the just a pocket passer around the same rank.
What I dont understand is if the Overall Section slots the different positions based on value among all positionst... why would this change when i put my personal scoring into it? Brady is now the #2 overall pick where the generic has him later on. I understand QB's are more valuable but the value doesnt change amongst the Qb's compared to the other positions. There are still less Rb's in the world. etc... Just not sure why in an overall picture when you are drafting based on value compared to other positions it would change so much.
Thoughts?
I am in a league that has a lot of crazy point categories. One is that QB's get more base points for a TD then a rb or wr and you get even more depending how long a TD is.
Now I understand QB's in itself changing in rankings because maybe Vick or McNabb will get more points for rushing and rushing TD's rather the just a pocket passer around the same rank.
What I dont understand is if the Overall Section slots the different positions based on value among all positionst... why would this change when i put my personal scoring into it? Brady is now the #2 overall pick where the generic has him later on. I understand QB's are more valuable but the value doesnt change amongst the Qb's compared to the other positions. There are still less Rb's in the world. etc... Just not sure why in an overall picture when you are drafting based on value compared to other positions it would change so much.
Thoughts?