Value Swings if Tush Push is Banned (1 Viewer)

[Cowboysfan8]

Can we get back on the topic instead of going after me and making it personal?

 

[Deamon]

The Eagles now have another shot at the SB because w/out that play they most likely wouldn't make it to the playoffs.

It's clear trolling (and really bad trolling) at this point, but to even say they added 4 wins on the season by doing a fully legal play, which can be converted at a high percentage on a normal sneak, just shows you know absolutely NOTHING about football (if you're being serious. Which we all know you're not).

Maybe you'll have to think about your own team now that you have nothing less to troll about. Zzzzzzzzzz,

Trolling = "things I don't agree with".

ok look- The "battle" is over for now. You lost. If you want to- regroup for the "war".

For now, sure. But it's not over. Expect next year for this to get kai-boshed and for the Eagles to be forced to figure out how to get over the goal line w/out a cheat code.

So for now. Can we let it go?

He will never let it go.

The Eagles now have another shot at the SB because w/out that play they most likely wouldn't make it to the playoffs.

It's clear trolling (and really bad trolling) at this point, but to even say they added 4 wins on the season by doing a fully legal play, which can be converted at a high percentage on a normal sneak, just shows you know absolutely NOTHING about football (if you're being serious. Which we all know you're not).

Maybe you'll have to think about your own team now that you have nothing less to troll about. Zzzzzzzzzz,

Trolling = "things I don't agree with".

trolling= repeatedly stating facts which are demonstrably false in an effort to rile up another

I think its assuredly clear to everyone that he doesn't actually believe these things and gets glory out of his posts. Sad, really.
Never seen someone care more about a rival team than their own. Well, besides a couple other guys in here

You have no idea what you're talking about and stop trying to divine my motives simply because we disagree. Focus on the debate of the tush-push instead of childish and personal attacks. It just shows you have nothing to stand on when you go after me personally and trying to curry favor and gather your "mean girls" group to go after me is also absurd and childish.

No one is holding a gun to your head and telling you to read and post in these threads.

I know exactly what I'm talking about. You said you didn't think the 14-3 Eagles would have made the playoffs last year if they didn't Tush Push. You've been given data where you are clearly wrong (unless for some reason you think Hurts' qb sneak percentage would have dropped from around 90% to under 1%). You don't really believe that, and are trying to play the "it's just a disagreement, I can have that opinion". Yes, you can have that opinion but if you do then it shows your lack of knowledge about the sport.

But hey, maybe soon enough you'll get back to discussing your own team (Packers) instead of obsessing about 1 play and making it obvious to any and everyone what you're trying to do here. Weak Sauce.

Oh, so you're the Topic Manager? Do I have some paperwork I need to fill out and submit to you for your approval on what topics to discuss?

Don't be absurd.

And posts like this just prove my point even more

Thanks for that.

Prove your point? You're the guy who insisted that posters could only discuss topics you approve of.

Can we get back on the topic instead of going after me and making it personal? You don't have any moral high ground here and going after me only makes you look like YOU have no defense to the actual topic.

Sure we can get back to the topic. Please explain to me how you believe the Eagles would have lost 5 more games last year without the tush push. Give me examples of the games they would have lost and how that play won them the game specifically. And how you think Hurts' QB sneak would have failed in each of those situations given he converts it traditionally around 90%.

Go on.

 

[Deamon]

Didn't think so.

 

[Deamon]

The Eagles now have another shot at the SB because w/out that play they most likely wouldn't make it to the playoffs.

It's clear trolling (and really bad trolling) at this point, but to even say they added 4 wins on the season by doing a fully legal play, which can be converted at a high percentage on a normal sneak, just shows you know absolutely NOTHING about football (if you're being serious. Which we all know you're not).

Maybe you'll have to think about your own team now that you have nothing less to troll about. Zzzzzzzzzz,

Trolling = "things I don't agree with".

ok look- The "battle" is over for now. You lost. If you want to- regroup for the "war".

For now, sure. But it's not over. Expect next year for this to get kai-boshed and for the Eagles to be forced to figure out how to get over the goal line w/out a cheat code.

So for now. Can we let it go?

He will never let it go.

The Eagles now have another shot at the SB because w/out that play they most likely wouldn't make it to the playoffs.

It's clear trolling (and really bad trolling) at this point, but to even say they added 4 wins on the season by doing a fully legal play, which can be converted at a high percentage on a normal sneak, just shows you know absolutely NOTHING about football (if you're being serious. Which we all know you're not).

Maybe you'll have to think about your own team now that you have nothing less to troll about. Zzzzzzzzzz,

Trolling = "things I don't agree with".

trolling= repeatedly stating facts which are demonstrably false in an effort to rile up another

I think its assuredly clear to everyone that he doesn't actually believe these things and gets glory out of his posts. Sad, really.
Never seen someone care more about a rival team than their own. Well, besides a couple other guys in here

You have no idea what you're talking about and stop trying to divine my motives simply because we disagree. Focus on the debate of the tush-push instead of childish and personal attacks. It just shows you have nothing to stand on when you go after me personally and trying to curry favor and gather your "mean girls" group to go after me is also absurd and childish.

No one is holding a gun to your head and telling you to read and post in these threads.

I know exactly what I'm talking about. You said you didn't think the 14-3 Eagles would have made the playoffs last year if they didn't Tush Push. You've been given data where you are clearly wrong (unless for some reason you think Hurts' qb sneak percentage would have dropped from around 90% to under 1%). You don't really believe that, and are trying to play the "it's just a disagreement, I can have that opinion". Yes, you can have that opinion but if you do then it shows your lack of knowledge about the sport.

But hey, maybe soon enough you'll get back to discussing your own team (Packers) instead of obsessing about 1 play and making it obvious to any and everyone what you're trying to do here. Weak Sauce.

Oh, so you're the Topic Manager? Do I have some paperwork I need to fill out and submit to you for your approval on what topics to discuss?

Don't be absurd.

And posts like this just prove my point even more

Thanks for that.

Prove your point? You're the guy who insisted that posters could only discuss topics you approve of.

Can we get back on the topic instead of going after me and making it personal? You don't have any moral high ground here and going after me only makes you look like YOU have no defense to the actual topic.

Sure we can get back to the topic. Please explain to me how you believe the Eagles would have lost 5 more games last year without the tush push. Give me examples of the games they would have lost and how that play won them the game specifically. And how you think Hurts' QB sneak would have failed in each of those situations given he converts it traditionally around 90%.

Go on.

@BladeRunner predictably no response when actually asked to discuss his claims. You said Philly misses the playoffs last year without the play... Which games would they have lost without this play?

 

[BladeRunner]

The Eagles now have another shot at the SB because w/out that play they most likely wouldn't make it to the playoffs.

It's clear trolling (and really bad trolling) at this point, but to even say they added 4 wins on the season by doing a fully legal play, which can be converted at a high percentage on a normal sneak, just shows you know absolutely NOTHING about football (if you're being serious. Which we all know you're not).

Maybe you'll have to think about your own team now that you have nothing less to troll about. Zzzzzzzzzz,

Trolling = "things I don't agree with".

ok look- The "battle" is over for now. You lost. If you want to- regroup for the "war".

For now, sure. But it's not over. Expect next year for this to get kai-boshed and for the Eagles to be forced to figure out how to get over the goal line w/out a cheat code.

So for now. Can we let it go?

He will never let it go.

The Eagles now have another shot at the SB because w/out that play they most likely wouldn't make it to the playoffs.

It's clear trolling (and really bad trolling) at this point, but to even say they added 4 wins on the season by doing a fully legal play, which can be converted at a high percentage on a normal sneak, just shows you know absolutely NOTHING about football (if you're being serious. Which we all know you're not).

Maybe you'll have to think about your own team now that you have nothing less to troll about. Zzzzzzzzzz,

Trolling = "things I don't agree with".

trolling= repeatedly stating facts which are demonstrably false in an effort to rile up another

I think its assuredly clear to everyone that he doesn't actually believe these things and gets glory out of his posts. Sad, really.
Never seen someone care more about a rival team than their own. Well, besides a couple other guys in here

You have no idea what you're talking about and stop trying to divine my motives simply because we disagree. Focus on the debate of the tush-push instead of childish and personal attacks. It just shows you have nothing to stand on when you go after me personally and trying to curry favor and gather your "mean girls" group to go after me is also absurd and childish.

No one is holding a gun to your head and telling you to read and post in these threads.

I know exactly what I'm talking about. You said you didn't think the 14-3 Eagles would have made the playoffs last year if they didn't Tush Push. You've been given data where you are clearly wrong (unless for some reason you think Hurts' qb sneak percentage would have dropped from around 90% to under 1%). You don't really believe that, and are trying to play the "it's just a disagreement, I can have that opinion". Yes, you can have that opinion but if you do then it shows your lack of knowledge about the sport.

But hey, maybe soon enough you'll get back to discussing your own team (Packers) instead of obsessing about 1 play and making it obvious to any and everyone what you're trying to do here. Weak Sauce.

Oh, so you're the Topic Manager? Do I have some paperwork I need to fill out and submit to you for your approval on what topics to discuss?

Don't be absurd.

And posts like this just prove my point even more

Thanks for that.

Prove your point? You're the guy who insisted that posters could only discuss topics you approve of.

Can we get back on the topic instead of going after me and making it personal? You don't have any moral high ground here and going after me only makes you look like YOU have no defense to the actual topic.

Sure we can get back to the topic. Please explain to me how you believe the Eagles would have lost 5 more games last year without the tush push. Give me examples of the games they would have lost and how that play won them the game specifically. And how you think Hurts' QB sneak would have failed in each of those situations given he converts it traditionally around 90%.

Go on.

@BladeRunner predictably no response when actually asked to discuss his claims. You said Philly misses the playoffs last year without the play... Which games would they have lost without this play?

@Joe Bryant himself told you to knock this nonsense off. I told you I'm not going to play your "I'm right if you don't answer my question" games.

Give it up already.

 

[BladeRunner]

The Eagles now have another shot at the SB because w/out that play they most likely wouldn't make it to the playoffs.

It's clear trolling (and really bad trolling) at this point, but to even say they added 4 wins on the season by doing a fully legal play, which can be converted at a high percentage on a normal sneak, just shows you know absolutely NOTHING about football (if you're being serious. Which we all know you're not).

Maybe you'll have to think about your own team now that you have nothing less to troll about. Zzzzzzzzzz,

Trolling = "things I don't agree with".

ok look- The "battle" is over for now. You lost. If you want to- regroup for the "war".

For now, sure. But it's not over. Expect next year for this to get kai-boshed and for the Eagles to be forced to figure out how to get over the goal line w/out a cheat code.

So for now. Can we let it go?

He will never let it go.

The Eagles now have another shot at the SB because w/out that play they most likely wouldn't make it to the playoffs.

It's clear trolling (and really bad trolling) at this point, but to even say they added 4 wins on the season by doing a fully legal play, which can be converted at a high percentage on a normal sneak, just shows you know absolutely NOTHING about football (if you're being serious. Which we all know you're not).

Maybe you'll have to think about your own team now that you have nothing less to troll about. Zzzzzzzzzz,

Trolling = "things I don't agree with".

trolling= repeatedly stating facts which are demonstrably false in an effort to rile up another

I think its assuredly clear to everyone that he doesn't actually believe these things and gets glory out of his posts. Sad, really.
Never seen someone care more about a rival team than their own. Well, besides a couple other guys in here

You have no idea what you're talking about and stop trying to divine my motives simply because we disagree. Focus on the debate of the tush-push instead of childish and personal attacks. It just shows you have nothing to stand on when you go after me personally and trying to curry favor and gather your "mean girls" group to go after me is also absurd and childish.

No one is holding a gun to your head and telling you to read and post in these threads.

I know exactly what I'm talking about. You said you didn't think the 14-3 Eagles would have made the playoffs last year if they didn't Tush Push. You've been given data where you are clearly wrong (unless for some reason you think Hurts' qb sneak percentage would have dropped from around 90% to under 1%). You don't really believe that, and are trying to play the "it's just a disagreement, I can have that opinion". Yes, you can have that opinion but if you do then it shows your lack of knowledge about the sport.

But hey, maybe soon enough you'll get back to discussing your own team (Packers) instead of obsessing about 1 play and making it obvious to any and everyone what you're trying to do here. Weak Sauce.

Oh, so you're the Topic Manager? Do I have some paperwork I need to fill out and submit to you for your approval on what topics to discuss?

Don't be absurd.

And posts like this just prove my point even more

Thanks for that.

Prove your point? You're the guy who insisted that posters could only discuss topics you approve of.

Can we get back on the topic instead of going after me and making it personal? You don't have any moral high ground here and going after me only makes you look like YOU have no defense to the actual topic.

Sure we can get back to the topic. Please explain to me how you believe the Eagles would have lost 5 more games last year without the tush push. Give me examples of the games they would have lost and how that play won them the game specifically. And how you think Hurts' QB sneak would have failed in each of those situations given he converts it traditionally around 90%.

Go on.

@BladeRunner predictably no response when actually asked to discuss his claims. You said Philly misses the playoffs last year without the play... Which games would they have lost without this play?

@Joe Bryant himself told you to knock this nonsense off. I told you I'm not going to play your "I'm right if you don't answer my question" games.

Give it up already.

lol, no he told you to knock off your personal shots.

Wait...that's what you think?

Pretty sure he was asking BOTH of us to stop, but thanks for further proving my point you only want to hear what you want to hear.

 

[joey]

@Joe Bryant @FBG Moderator
More tush push threads that have run their course.

(No offense to the OP of course. He even asked for a Lock on the last page)

 

[Joe Bryant]

@Joe Bryant @FBG Moderator
More tush push threads that have run their course.

(No offense to the OP of course. He even asked for a Lock on the last page)

You're probably right on this one now that it's been settled for this year. Plenty of time for everyone doing projections to factor the ruling in.