Now as mentioned by Ghost Rider the Falcons were starting a 3rd string QB at best when they lost all of those games. I think you are underestimating how much problems teams can have winning when a starting QB injury occurs to a team and you have to insert a 3rd string QB with much less talent. Look at the Stl Rams losing Bulger, the Eagles losing McNabb, the Jets losing Pennington etc etc. How bad would the Colts have done with Atl's D. Johnson starting for them over the last couple of years???? You are taking a 3rd string QB and viewieng how many wins he would get vs a starting NFL QB to prove the worth of Vick to his team; which does not make sense.
Vick has had some success in his career and got some wins and he is a good player, but at this point he is still an average to below average NFL QB.
Statistically he has been below average to say the least. I mean he has played in 56 NFL games since coming into the league and he has thrown for ONLY 49 TD's vs 39 INT's. He has however run for 19 TD's in that time frame which is awesome for a QB but that only puts him at 68 total TD's in his career running and throwing for the Atl Falcons. So for his career he has accounted for 1.2 Td production in 56 games out of the QB position which is not exactly spectacular numbers. Also, you can't exclude the fact that he has fumbled the ball 46 times losing 20 of those fumbels which means he is averaging a lost fumble every 3 games. Also, he has had to miss sometime due to injury in his young career which is a stat that should be noted as his style of play increases his percentage of getting hurt.
Now he does get some wins but if we are to look at wins and losses in games that M. Vick has started as an NFL qb for the Atl Falcons he has 31-wins vs 19 losses and 1 tie. That means his average winning percentage as the starting QB in Atl is 61% which would work out to 9.75 wins in a 16 game schedule. Know that is ok but not this amazing winning percentage that you speak so highly of. Once again leading me to believe that thus far in his career he is average at best.
I understand that Doug Johnson wasn't a good QB at all, but I don't think a decent team would go 2-10 just because of that. The Eagles have actually done very well in the past without McNabb(Feely and Detmer did well). 2-10 is a bad bad team, not a team that is one average QB away from being a super bowl contender and not a team that would go 3-1 to end the season with an average QB.What makes you think the Falcons have a good team? I already addressed their RBs and defense a few posts up. Their defense is not good at all, and I have no clue why theres this myth that they are. And their RBs are completely average without Vick there to keep defenses honest. I could name 15 RBs better than Warrick Dunn, maybe even 20! And I know you're not saying that their WRs are good. I'll admit that Alge Crumpler is a top 10 TE, but other than that, they are a poor team except for Vick.
Lets take an average QB. Say a guy like Drew Bledsoe, Aaron Brooks, or Kerry Collins. How well do you think the Falcons would do with them? I think they'd be about a 5-11 team. JMHO.