What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Video: Manhatten sized chunk of glacier breaking into ocean (1 Viewer)

Wingnut

Footballguy
Pretty cool stuff. At 3:33 into the video they give a good idea of scale with an illustration.

Massive Chunk of Glacier Breaks Off Into Ocean

February 18, 2014 | by Lisa Winter

article: http://www.iflscience.com/environment/massive-chunk-glacier-breaks-ocean

youtube video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hC3VTgIPoGU#t=47

Two filmmakers record a large chunk of glacier breaking off and sinking into the ocean while filming the award-winning documentary Chasing Ice. It was the single largest calving event that has ever been recorded. Over the course of 75 minutes, they watched almost five square kilometers (3 square miles) of ice break away. This isn’t just a little crust of ice either, it’s about 915 meters (3000 feet) The video shows a time lapse of what that process looks like over the course of a few seconds. At the end of the video, the filmmakers show what it would look like if lower Manhattan were sitting in that same area. It is a humbling feeling to see such a great expanse of ice fall into the water as if it were nothing.

Glacial retreat is just one of many parameters that scientists use when studying climate change. As global temperatures rise, the glaciers cannot hold the sea water as ice any longer. As they melt, the sea levels will rise. Scientists have calculated that sea levels appear to be rising at 3.5 millimeters (0.14 inches) over the last 25 years. On the surface, that sounds meager enough… unless you know how to multiply. Globally, sea levels are up as much as 8 inches (20 centimeters) in the last 100 years alone. Unfortunately, glacier retreat and subsequent sea level increase have sped up over the last two decades.

By 2100, it is estimated that sea levels will rise as much as 40-120 centimeters (16-48 inches). Unfortunately, because of all of the combining factors that play into glacial retreat and rising sea levels, more precise numbers cannot be given. On the upper end of that scale, millions living in cities like New York, London, Miami, and Los Angeles will be displaced. Entire islands could disappear. The changing ocean waters are also expected to impact the fish populations and could very well reduce the food supply. These consequences are going to be catastrophic.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
So we risen 0.14 inches in the last 25 years, but the nut jobs tell is they project 16-48 inches over the next 85 years. Total buffoons.

 
If only, if only...it had really been Manhattan floating away in the ocean.. Yeah, I know it's not really possible, but a man can dream, can't he?

 
So we risen 0.14 inches in the last 25 years, but the nut jobs tell is they project 16-48 inches over the next 85 years. Total buffoons.
So we risen 0.14 inches in the last 25 years, but the nut jobs tell is they project 16-48 inches over the next 85 years. Total buffoons.
How do you respond to the fact that it took 100 years for that glacier to retreat 8 miles (1902-2001) but from 2000-2010 it retreated 9 miles?
 
So we risen 0.14 inches in the last 25 years, but the nut jobs tell is they project 16-48 inches over the next 85 years. Total buffoons.
So we risen 0.14 inches in the last 25 years, but the nut jobs tell is they project 16-48 inches over the next 85 years. Total buffoons.
How do you respond to the fact that it took 100 years for that glacier to retreat 8 miles (1902-2001) but from 2000-2010 it retreated 9 miles?
I am not sure what any facts are. She needs an editor. She meant to say 3.5 mm per year over the last 25 years, but she left out the 'per year' part. And that is not really true. The latest data shows a rate of about 1.6 mm per year. That would correspond to about a 5 inch rise in sea levels by 2100. Not quite the 16-48 inch range described by the author and just a bit less than the 20 foot rise Al Gore talks about. I am not sure I would worry about a temporary change in the rate one glacier retreats. I for one am a bit happy most of North America is no longer covered by glaciers.

 
jon_mx said:
Chaka said:
jon_mx said:
So we risen 0.14 inches in the last 25 years, but the nut jobs tell is they project 16-48 inches over the next 85 years. Total buffoons.
jon_mx said:
So we risen 0.14 inches in the last 25 years, but the nut jobs tell is they project 16-48 inches over the next 85 years. Total buffoons.
How do you respond to the fact that it took 100 years for that glacier to retreat 8 miles (1902-2001) but from 2000-2010 it retreated 9 miles?
I am not sure what any facts are. She needs an editor. She meant to say 3.5 mm per year over the last 25 years, but she left out the 'per year' part. And that is not really true. The latest data shows a rate of about 1.6 mm per year. That would correspond to about a 5 inch rise in sea levels by 2100. Not quite the 16-48 inch range described by the author and just a bit less than the 20 foot rise Al Gore talks about. I am not sure I would worry about a temporary change in the rate one glacier retreats. I for one am a bit happy most of North America is no longer covered by glaciers.
That's nice. You didn't answer my question. I was not asking about rising sea levels or climate change, I was asking about this glacier.

 
Homer J Simpson said:
DiStefano said:
If only, if only...it had really been Manhattan floating away in the ocean.. Yeah, I know it's not really possible, but a man can dream, can't he?
Why would you want that? :confused:
You know, to get rid of all those obnoxious New Yorkers.

That is a cool video. The wife and I did the Alaskan inside passage cruise last August, It is simply amazing at how how huge those glaciers are,

 
Chaka said:
jon_mx said:
So we risen 0.14 inches in the last 25 years, but the nut jobs tell is they project 16-48 inches over the next 85 years. Total buffoons.
jon_mx said:
So we risen 0.14 inches in the last 25 years, but the nut jobs tell is they project 16-48 inches over the next 85 years. Total buffoons.
How do you respond to the fact that it took 100 years for that glacier to retreat 8 miles (1902-2001) but from 2000-2010 it retreated 9 miles?
He is talking about worldwide sea level change. You are talking about one glacier. What about the glaciers that have advanced instead of retreated?

 
Are more glaciers advancing or retreating? And are the rates static?
Who cares. If all the glaciers melted, worldwide sea levels would rise 17 inches. The East Antarctic Ice Sheet has actually gained volume, and represents enough ice to raise sea levels 50 meters.

 
Not that I ever said anything as bizarre or fatalistic as all the glaciers melting but if I play along with your scenario why would only the glaciers be melting? Pretty sure if all the glaciers melted that would suggest that all the land locked ice would be melting too. Don'tcha think?

 
That is some awesome video. I am skeptical of the seriousness of climate change (it's real but overblown), but that's some fantastic stuff to watch. Is this a recent event or is it just part of the promotion of the film? The date on the story is yesterday but it never says when the calving occurred.

 
By 2100, it is estimated that sea levels will rise as much as 40-120 centimeters (16-48 inches). Unfortunately, because of all of the combining factors that play into glacial retreat and rising sea levels, more precise numbers cannot be given. On the upper end of that scale, millions living in cities like New York, London, Miami, and Los Angeles will be displaced. Entire islands could disappear. The changing ocean waters are also expected to impact the fish populations and could very well reduce the food supply. These consequences are going to be catastrophic.
My money is on the under.

Link

Los Angeles

The mean sea level trend is 0.83 millimeters/year with a 95% confidence interval of +/- 0.27 mm/yr based on monthly mean sea level data from 1923 to 2006 which is equivalent to a change of 0.27 feet in 100 years.

New York

The mean sea level trend is 2.77 millimeters/year with a 95% confidence interval of +/- 0.09 mm/yr based on monthly mean sea level data from 1856 to 2006 which is equivalent to a change of 0.91 feet in 100 years.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
By 2100, it is estimated that sea levels will rise as much as 40-120 centimeters (16-48 inches). Unfortunately, because of all of the combining factors that play into glacial retreat and rising sea levels, more precise numbers cannot be given. On the upper end of that scale, millions living in cities like New York, London, Miami, and Los Angeles will be displaced. Entire islands could disappear. The changing ocean waters are also expected to impact the fish populations and could very well reduce the food supply. These consequences are going to be catastrophic.
OH NOESSSSSS

Also LOL at 'calving event'.

 
That is some awesome video. I am skeptical of the seriousness of climate change (it's real but overblown), but that's some fantastic stuff to watch. Is this a recent event or is it just part of the promotion of the film? The date on the story is yesterday but it never says when the calving occurred.
I think I read it was in 2012
 
Visualization of arctic ice over the last 25 years (video)

http://www.iflscience.com/environment/watch-amazing-visualization-arctic-ice-over-last-25-years

Yesterday, IFLScience shared a video showing the largest glacial calving event ever recorded on film, as three square miles of thick ice broke off and fell into the ocean. It was met with a lot of skepticism, with many unsure of how one chunk would affect the overall well-being of the planet. With impeccable timing, a video produced by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) was presented this past week at the 2014 Meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), which helps put into perspective how an isolated glacier calving is related to long-term loss of Arctic ice with very real consequences.

Since January of 1987, NOAA has been tracking the volume of ice up in the Arctic using a combination of satellite data and buoys which provided physical markers of glacier boundaries. The 25 years worth of data was put together into a jaw-dropping animated video which shows all those years compressed into only one minute.

NOAA ranks the age of the ice on a scale of 1-9. Ice that is less than one year old is given a 1 while ice that is at least 9 years old receives a 9. In the video, the newer ice is denoted with dark blue and the older ice is shown as white, with a variable scale showing the different numbers in between. As you can see, the older ice is being shuffled away from the land into the ocean, where it will melt and add to the global sea level. At the beginning of the video, old and thick ice covered over a quarter of the Arctic. As of 2013, it has fallen to a meager 7 percent

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Chaka said:
jon_mx said:
So we risen 0.14 inches in the last 25 years, but the nut jobs tell is they project 16-48 inches over the next 85 years. Total buffoons.
jon_mx said:
So we risen 0.14 inches in the last 25 years, but the nut jobs tell is they project 16-48 inches over the next 85 years. Total buffoons.
How do you respond to the fact that it took 100 years for that glacier to retreat 8 miles (1902-2001) but from 2000-2010 it retreated 9 miles?
China pollution.
 
Homer J Simpson said:
DiStefano said:
If only, if only...it had really been Manhattan floating away in the ocean.. Yeah, I know it's not really possible, but a man can dream, can't he?
Why would you want that? :confused:
Manhattan produces an awful lot of greenhouse gases.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top