waiver dilemma, concede loss tonight? (1 Viewer)

[xenith]

I got caught w/ montgomery in my lineup, and of course we learned too late to grab anyone from early games to fill in.  My waivers lock every player whose game has kicked off that week, whether starter or not.  my only players not already locked were adams (already in my lineup) and dixon/ravens Def on BYE.  Little bit of a loophole, but it is what it is.

so i dropped the raven D for adam thielen (picked instead of gates, witten, t.williams, or any other packer in a very uncertain game plan projection)

i'm pretty much done for at this point.  down 35 pts, with thielen the only player from either team left.  not gonna happen.

Q is, considering the loophole scenario, i can still drop thielen for another team who hasn't played yet, and just concede the loss.  i'm seriously considering snatching paul perkins.

so what do you think?  shark move?  d!ck move?  slim shady move?

 

[Gally]

If the rules don't prohibit the move then there is nothing wrong with it.  If someone really wanted Perkins they would have him on their team already.  It's not like you figured out a way to pick up David Johnson. 

Nothing wrong with this move, until Thielen goes off for 40 pts that would have given you a win....hahahahaha

 

[themeistersinger]

nothing unethical about it at all IMHO.  And as Gally said you are accepting the risk of a monster game by Thielen.  I agree not very likely.  Depends on how high you are on Perkins.

I dropped Martellus Bennett about 12:50 on Sunday to pick up the Cowboy DST for use next week.