I am also looking at adding jones. Our league counts return yardage. Anyone have any more insight on this guy?What about Jacoby Jones?Walter's gone for 10-12 Weeks...
Iirc he was supposed to be a breakout candidate as a number 2 to andre couple of years ago. He has flashed potential in the past...I am also looking at adding jones. Our league counts return yardage. Anyone have any more insight on this guy?What about Jacoby Jones?Walter's gone for 10-12 Weeks...
Good pick-up if you get return yardage. Houston homer here and been watching him for a while. Never has lived up to his potential in the passing game and drops a lot of balls but also high upside if he ever cashes in on his potential. If Walter is out, this should bump him up some. While AJ gets most of the redzone action in the passing game, Jones seem to get his fair of share of looks for a third option.I am also looking at adding jones. Our league counts return yardage. Anyone have any more insight on this guy?What about Jacoby Jones?Walter's gone for 10-12 Weeks...
The problem with Jones, aside from his inconsistency (which has already been mentioned), is that he only returns punts. He returned kickoffs for a week or two last year, but then stopped doing so (I don't know why). Danieal Manning was a very good KR for the Bears, and he returned one 46 yards yesterday. I don't see Jones getting much KR time this year unless Manning gets hurt. It is hard to rely on PR yards each week, as they can vary so much.As others have said, Jones has shown flashes, and with Walters out, he should see more targets. I'd be curious to see how Jones and Owen Daniels targets play out in the coming weeks. While not a bad flyer, I think there are a couple of players that are more valuable in a return yardage format, based on potential roles going forward:'Major said:Good pick-up if you get return yardage. Houston homer here and been watching him for a while. Never has lived up to his potential in the passing game and drops a lot of balls but also high upside if he ever cashes in on his potential. If Walter is out, this should bump him up some. While AJ gets most of the redzone action in the passing game, Jones seem to get his fair of share of looks for a third option.I am also looking at adding jones. Our league counts return yardage. Anyone have any more insight on this guy?What about Jacoby Jones?
Walter's gone for 10-12 Weeks...
Good pick-up if you get return yardage. Houston homer here and been watching him for a while. Never has lived up to his potential in the passing game and drops a lot of balls but also high upside if he ever cashes in on his potential. If Walter is out, this should bump him up some. While AJ gets most of the redzone action in the passing game, Jones seem to get his fair of share of looks for a third option.I am also looking at adding jones. Our league counts return yardage. Anyone have any more insight on this guy?What about Jacoby Jones?
Walter's gone for 10-12 Weeks...
Sunday, John Clayton was among those reporting that Houston receiver Kevin Walter was out 10-12 weeks with a broken collarbone.
Monday, Gary Kubiak said that report was erroneous, and that Walter is merely dealing with a significant bruise.
“Good news,” Kubiak told Houston reporters Monday afternoon. “I just got done talking to our doctors. It has been reported that Kevin had a fracture. He does not. He does not have a fracture. It’s being treated as a bad bruise right now and we should know more here in a couple days. He’s obviously probably going to miss a few days and we’ll see where he’s at middle of the week and end of the week, but he does not have a fracture. That’s good news. [Derrick] Ward has a sprained ankle and he’ll be day-to-day.”
Even with the good news, Kubiak said the team would look at some receivers Tuesday. With Andre Johnson, Walter, Jacoby Jones and Bryant Johnson the team currently has just four on the 53-man roster.
“If all is said and we’re here Wednesday and we think Kevin is going to be fine, we maybe can continue to survive another week, but we’re going to look at some guys here tomorrow,” he said. “Obviously, we’ve got a couple guys on our practice squad that we could possibly move up, but we’d like to have at least four of them healthy going into each week, so we’ll see.”
Walter is a reliable and underrated piece to the Texans offense. It’s good news for the team that there is good news on him.
Jones is a bum. He's a solid punt returner but underwhelms as a WR. He drops the ball a lot and just is below average. If you get retun yards perhaps he is worth a look, but otherwise, nah.Iirc he was supposed to be a breakout candidate as a number 2 to andre couple of years ago. He has flashed potential in the past...I am also looking at adding jones. Our league counts return yardage. Anyone have any more insight on this guy?What about Jacoby Jones?Walter's gone for 10-12 Weeks...
Bryant Johnson made the Houston roster and might be worth a look if he is the de facto WR2Jones is a bum. He's a solid punt returner but underwhelms as a WR. He drops the ball a lot and just is below average. If you get retun yards perhaps he is worth a look, but otherwise, nah.Iirc he was supposed to be a breakout candidate as a number 2 to andre couple of years ago. He has flashed potential in the past...I am also looking at adding jones. Our league counts return yardage. Anyone have any more insight on this guy?What about Jacoby Jones?Walter's gone for 10-12 Weeks...
with Eric Berry out for the year I doubt itThe problem with Jones, aside from his inconsistency (which has already been mentioned), is that he only returns punts. He returned kickoffs for a week or two last year, but then stopped doing so (I don't know why). Danieal Manning was a very good KR for the Bears, and he returned one 46 yards yesterday. I don't see Jones getting much KR time this year unless Manning gets hurt. It is hard to rely on PR yards each week, as they can vary so much.As others have said, Jones has shown flashes, and with Walters out, he should see more targets. I'd be curious to see how Jones and Owen Daniels targets play out in the coming weeks. While not a bad flyer, I think there are a couple of players that are more valuable in a return yardage format, based on potential roles going forward:Good pick-up if you get return yardage. Houston homer here and been watching him for a while. Never has lived up to his potential in the passing game and drops a lot of balls but also high upside if he ever cashes in on his potential. If Walter is out, this should bump him up some. While AJ gets most of the redzone action in the passing game, Jones seem to get his fair of share of looks for a third option.I am also looking at adding jones. Our league counts return yardage. Anyone have any more insight on this guy?What about Jacoby Jones?
Walter's gone for 10-12 Weeks...
Deji Karim, RB, JAC - 14/33, 3/39, 1 KR/26. Not a great average per carry (2.4), but 18 total touches is excellent. The backup to MJD in an offense that will likely try to run the ball to take pressure off Luke McCown, at least early in the season. May have been drafted.
Dexter McCluster, RB/WR, KAN - 4/42, 5/25, 4 KR/92, 1 FUM lost. 13 total touches is also pretty good. IIRC, Haley said somewhere that he wanted to get McCluster more touches (somewhere in the neighborhood of 5-10/game) and delivered in Week 1. The potential downside is we don't know how the touches will go if the Chiefs are actually able to run the ball - 18 total rushes against the Bills - and he split KR with Javier Arenas. Will the Chiefs defense rebound?
After Newton, this I think is the answer:Cobb. Just because he looked the most impressive of the young maybe undervalued receivers this weekend.What gets me is how slim the WR crop seems. Usually it seems like there are more prospects after week 1, but not so much this year.Otherwise, these are some possibilities I think in various leagues.Newton, Cam QB CARFitzpatrick, Ryan QB BUFSproles, Darren RB NOStarks, James RB GBHarrison, Jerome RB DETWard / Tate / SlatonCobb, Randall WR GBRoy W. / Hester / Knox - any CHI WR go undrafted?Gibson, Brandon WR STLSanders, Emmanuel WR PITArmstrong, Anthony WR WASMcCluster, Dexter WR KCMassaquoi, Mohamed WR CLEHenderson, Devery WR NO (or go Meachem, if avail)Hill, Jason WR JACBaldwin, Doug WR SEAJerome Simpson WR CIN Brandon LaFell WR CARDavis, Fred TE WASGresham, Jermaine TE CINChandler, Scott TE BUFDickson, Ed TE BALMoore, Evan TE CLEHanson, Jason K DETBailey, Dan K DALKasay, John K NORandall Cobb
8 for 58 in the passing game. That's the good news. And the only good news.He was 6 for 13 on the ground, and the only reason he had 8 receptions is because Tampa trailed for the last 3 quarters.Graham is not someone you'll be able to count on as long as Blount is in the picture.Earnest Graham anybody? He led the Bucs in carries AND receptions this week. If he's available, he's a must grab.
jerome simpson could be a sneaky pickup in some leagues. he was targeted 9 times. could be bc haden did well on aj green or bc of gradkowkis tendencies.
So did A. Brown for Pitt. I don't know why he only caught two of those passes can someone chime in and help me out on this one?Looks like he's the #5 WR(KR), it seems he's getting more looks because Sidney Rice is injured. No really sure what he's worth considering we have no idea what his roll will be once Rice is back healthy...........if he's ever back healthy.What do we know about this cat? I know he also had a big pre-season game and was undrafted.In pretty deep leagues, so most of names are gone.
Looking into the likes of Doug Baldwin WR Sea, Scott Chandler TE Buf, David Nelson WR Buf and possibly Caddy.

Only problem with Cobb is that it's a very crowded situation in GB. with some quality receivers ahead of him. The talent may be there, just not sure the opportunity is even with James Jones behind him in the pecking order and Driver probably losing playing time as the season progresses.After Newton, this I think is the answer:Cobb. Just because he looked the most impressive of the young maybe undervalued receivers this weekend.Randall Cobb
I agree. According to the Packers' depth chart, Cobb is listed behind James Jones. That would make him #5 right now behind Jennings, Driver, Jones, and Nelson. Which of these can Cobb surpass on the depth chart and have an impact? At this point I think I'd rather have Jones or Nelson, but I'm not sure who is higher in the pecking order.Only problem with Cobb is that it's a very crowded situation in GB. with some quality receivers ahead of him. The talent may be there, just not sure the opportunity is even with James Jones behind him in the pecking order and Driver probably losing playing time as the season progresses.After Newton, this I think is the answer:Randall Cobb
Cobb. Just because he looked the most impressive of the young maybe undervalued receivers this weekend.
Right now, I'd rather have Cobb over Jones, but unless Rodgers is going to throw the ball 50 times, that might not be enough after Jennings, Finley, Driver and Jordy.I agree. According to the Packers' depth chart, Cobb is listed behind James Jones. That would make him #5 right now behind Jennings, Driver, Jones, and Nelson. Which of these can Cobb surpass on the depth chart and have an impact? At this point I think I'd rather have Jones or Nelson, but I'm not sure who is higher in the pecking order.Only problem with Cobb is that it's a very crowded situation in GB. with some quality receivers ahead of him. The talent may be there, just not sure the opportunity is even with James Jones behind him in the pecking order and Driver probably losing playing time as the season progresses.After Newton, this I think is the answer:Randall Cobb
Cobb. Just because he looked the most impressive of the young maybe undervalued receivers this weekend.
I know for a fact that on final drive w/ less than 30 seconds in the game, Ben threw 3 passes to Antonio Brown in the end zone that were out of bounds, as were 1-2 during the game. Brown had a big drop on 3rd down that would've made the conversion. Other than that he had 1 reception that went for negative yds (screen) and then another at some point during the game.Sanders played ahead of Brown in 3 WR sets.jerome simpson could be a sneaky pickup in some leagues. he was targeted 9 times. could be bc haden did well on aj green or bc of gradkowkis tendencies.So did A. Brown for Pitt. I don't know why he only caught two of those passes can someone chime in and help me out on this one?
I could be way off on this, but I think re-draft folks might be overthinking the Packers WR depth chart a bit too much at the risk of sleeping on a potential gem. As a guy with amazing slot production potential, isn't Cobb basically Donald Driver away from being fantasy relevant? If Driver goes down or becomes ineffective due to age, isn't the slot job all Cobb's no matter what happens with Jennings, Nelson or James Jones?Right now, I'd rather have Cobb over Jones, but unless Rodgers is going to throw the ball 50 times, that might not be enough after Jennings, Finley, Driver and Jordy.I agree. According to the Packers' depth chart, Cobb is listed behind James Jones. That would make him #5 right now behind Jennings, Driver, Jones, and Nelson. Which of these can Cobb surpass on the depth chart and have an impact? At this point I think I'd rather have Jones or Nelson, but I'm not sure who is higher in the pecking order.Only problem with Cobb is that it's a very crowded situation in GB. with some quality receivers ahead of him. The talent may be there, just not sure the opportunity is even with James Jones behind him in the pecking order and Driver probably losing playing time as the season progresses.After Newton, this I think is the answer:Randall Cobb
Cobb. Just because he looked the most impressive of the young maybe undervalued receivers this weekend.
WR Decker for the Broncos had a decent game. The talent is there. Of course, I only recommend to the rest of you as it is against my religion to roster a Bronco.
Great TC and preseason, but I really thought he was a year or two away from surpassing Eddie Royal. Now I'm not so sure. Very impressive.I didn't see the game. Was Decker in for Kick Offs (doesn't show up in the box because there were no returns) or just Punts?WR Decker for the Broncos had a decent game. The talent is there. Of course, I only recommend to the rest of you as it is against my religion to roster a Bronco.
If by "Gremshaw" you mean Jermaine Gresham, then absolutely.Would it be good to take Aaron Hernadez over Gremshaw? M. Lewis won't do crap at TE at this point...
thanks, still working on my coffee. and I take it the "absolutely" was to take Hernandez?If by "Gremshaw" you mean Jermaine Gresham, then absolutely.Would it be good to take Aaron Hernadez over Gremshaw? M. Lewis won't do crap at TE at this point...
I think Hernandez is the play here. He is part of a TEBC, but he is on the field for over 80% of the offensive plays,and a sick weapon, he plays more like a WR than a lumbering TE.thanks, still working on my coffee. and I take it the "absolutely" was to take Hernandez?If by "Gremshaw" you mean Jermaine Gresham, then absolutely.Would it be good to take Aaron Hernadez over Gremshaw? M. Lewis won't do crap at TE at this point...
If you're a subscriber, FBG did a nice piece in the preseason the NE TE's. Can't find the article tho. Basically he and Gronkowski are TE1s.I think Hernandez is the play here. He is part of a TEBC, but he is on the field for over 80% of the offensive plays,and a sick weapon, he plays more like a WR than a lumbering TE.thanks, still working on my coffee. and I take it the "absolutely" was to take Hernandez?If by "Gremshaw" you mean Jermaine Gresham, then absolutely.Would it be good to take Aaron Hernadez over Gremshaw? M. Lewis won't do crap at TE at this point...
Roy Wiliams???? Man, I'd drop his sorry ### for a Peanut Butter and Jelly sandwich!!!!! Seriously!!!! WTF???Would you guys drop Roy Williams for any of these wr's? And if so who is the pick up?HendersonGaffneyBranch