What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Week 10 - Buy Low/ Sell High (1 Viewer)

I tried to trade for him last weekend but the guy wanted either Jordy or Evans for him.  I'd rather have my WRs than take the risk on a RB like him.  He's done well but who knows how that backfield is going to be all season.
That's crazy. Those are top 12 WRs RoS. I guess I would trade a 25-36 level WR for him if I was desperate at RB, but I definitely would not part with even a 13-24 WR for Coleman. He's on the lesser end of a RBBC.

 
That's crazy. Those are top 12 WRs RoS. I guess I would trade a 25-36 level WR for him if I was desperate at RB, but I definitely would not part with even a 13-24 WR for Coleman. He's on the lesser end of a RBBC.
And earlier in the thread people were mad at me for stating that people are overvaluing RBs.  I know there is position scarcity but that doesn't make me want to give up a top WR for a mediocre RB just because the options are slim.  That's why I try to be stacked at WR and grab a bunch of RBs hoping one of them does well.

 
And earlier in the thread people were mad at me for stating that people are overvaluing RBs.  I know there is position scarcity but that doesn't make me want to give up a top WR for a mediocre RB just because the options are slim.  That's why I try to be stacked at WR and grab a bunch of RBs hoping one of them does well.
That's why it's better to be stacked at RB.

Check out your league's teams right now, I'm sure there's lots of people desperate for RB help. On the other hand, there's enough WRs to go around. Don't get me wrong I wouldn't trade an elite WR for a middling RB either, but in-season it's gonna be a lot easier to deal RBs for WRs than the other way around.

 
That's why it's better to be stacked at RB.

Check out your league's teams right now, I'm sure there's lots of people desperate for RB help. On the other hand, there's enough WRs to go around. Don't get me wrong I wouldn't trade an elite WR for a middling RB either, but in-season it's gonna be a lot easier to deal RBs for WRs than the other way around.
What's funny is just when I am about to panic about the state of my rotating RB2 position, I look at the other 11 teams in the league and realize their situation is as bad or worse.  My guess is there are two or three teams in any given league stacked at RB and the rest are scrambling.  Don't overreact and kill yourself at a position of strength to chase when you don't need to as everyone else is chasing the same weakness.

 
The only thing scarce about RBs in PPR is the very top 5 or 6 guys.   There are a ton of crappy RB2 types,  but not really position scarcity... 

 
The only thing scarce about RBs in PPR is the very top 5 or 6 guys.   There are a ton of crappy RB2 types,  but not really position scarcity... 
What you just described is referred to as positional scarcity. There aren't that many good RBs, so they are scarce compared to their fantasy counterpart, WRs.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
What's the value of Alshon these days? I have really good WR's and there's a team in my league that has lousy WR's. no ppr. I was thinking of offering Alshon for C. Michael. Is that a fair trade or to much to give up? I have real trouble gauging the value of my players, I think I'm to attached to them, so some of my trade offers are often seen as lopsided. How do you stop that?

 
Skoo said:
What you just described is referred to as positional scarcity. There aren't that many good RBs, so they are scarce compared to their fantasy counterpart, WRs.
Not in the context it is being used above.   I was responding to people saying because of scarcity,  a WR1 is equal to an RB2 in value.   I say that's wrong because RB2 are not scarce.  

To clarify,  the top 5 or 6 RBs are extra valuable due to scarcity,  but beyond that there is no extra value given to all other RBs because of scarcity at the top. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I just traded Snead and RB Henry for Dez - salary league, taking a chance to win with Dez in a few weeks. I considered him a buy low

 
Hawkeye21 said:
And earlier in the thread people were mad at me for stating that people are overvaluing RBs.  I know there is position scarcity but that doesn't make me want to give up a top WR for a mediocre RB just because the options are slim.  That's why I try to be stacked at WR and grab a bunch of RBs hoping one of them does well.
Same here. I've been trying to trade RBs for WRs all season so far. 

 
I'm thinking about selling Gurley in redraft for Fitz. I'm loaded at RB but lost Watkins and Josh Gordon and just dropped M Floyd. We'll see how he does this week.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Early week 6 buy - John Brown.  - 1 catch for 11 yards with Stanton,  64 of 68 offensive snaps, #2 next to Fitzgerald.  Michael Floyd trending downward with less snaps than Jaron Brown, and a big drop in the first half.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
In my league: A Team traded Hopkins, Arian Foster, Sproles for  Forte, Powell, and Sanders

 
Last edited by a moderator:
What's the value of Alshon these days? I have really good WR's and there's a team in my league that has lousy WR's. no ppr. I was thinking of offering Alshon for C. Michael. Is that a fair trade or to much to give up? I have real trouble gauging the value of my players, I think I'm to attached to them, so some of my trade offers are often seen as lopsided. How do you stop that?
This is a good offer if you are stacked at WR.  Christine Michael is a top 10 bellcow RB until further notice.  I can't see him fading to a random backup role if and when Rawls ever makes it back.

I own Alshon and have to hold cause I don't have the depth.  While I think his targets come around with White now out of the picture, I think Alshon is simply hurt.  He is laboring on a bad knee and it is very difficult to get healthy in season.

 
Fitz or Landry  too much for Gordon?

Other wrs I have are a brown, ar15, and Evans.  RBs not worth mentioning.

 
I would trade Gordon for either of those guys,  but I don't own Gordon and I think he  looks awful despite the production. 

 
kittenmittens said:
I would trade Gordon for either of those guys,  but I don't own Gordon and I think he  looks awful despite the production. 
I was able to move Gordon for ARob, I feel iffy about it for this week but ROS I'm much happier.

 
Seems plenty fair to me.  Usually it's the Gordon owner that doesn't want to trade.  Did you try going after the DT owner?  It seems most of them want to sell.
IMO Gordon is a sell high guy.  He is getting some TDs, but he is also struggling to get 40yds against bad run Ds.  Never been a huge fan, so I am waiting the other shoe to drop. 

 
IMO Gordon is a sell high guy.  He is getting some TDs, but he is also struggling to get 40yds against bad run Ds.  Never been a huge fan, so I am waiting the other shoe to drop. 
Moved Gordon and Hurns in a deep bench 12tm 3wr ppr dyno for Hilton and an early 2017 1st (1-4)  I'm rebuilding and going nowhere, so it felt right. The TDS prob won't keep coming like this. 

 
Buying Sam Bradford.easy playoff schedule and all indoors or at warm climates.

Selling Alshon, he's same guy he was last year extremely frustrating performances packed with occasional surprises..

Buying J. Howard everywhere. He's here to stay. 

Buying Dixon. K. Cousins. Rams D.

 
Buying Sam Bradford.easy playoff schedule and all indoors or at warm climates.
Does your league get points for handing it off to Jerick McKinnon or Matt Asiata, or AP when he comes back?  Does Bradford get points when the D scores a pick 6?

Don't get me wrong.....Bradford has played really well.  But he is never going to have a high ceiling since the game script will likely never allow it....MIN should have the lead in most games.....teams are struggling to score even 20 points against the MIN D.  Bradford does have a low floor....a game like 175 yds, no TDs, and 1 int....that would kill you that week.

Pass on Bradford.

 
IMO Gordon is a sell high guy.  He is getting some TDs, but he is also struggling to get 40yds against bad run Ds.  Never been a huge fan, so I am waiting the other shoe to drop. 
Actually it's a lot of TDs.

But I agree, I would sell Gordon if I can package Gordon + a good piece and end up with Zeke or Bell or DJ.  Worth a shot.

OTOH, Gordon is getting the volume and doesn't really have competition for carries, so his floor is pretty high.

 
14 team Dynasty .. no ppr

Sold.. Decker and Sims

Bought.. Maclin

Decker health worries me and this is Sims last week before Martin return. Also gives me a roster spot for K and D for bye weeks coming soon. 

 
Tried to trade Gordon as well this week. The only offer I got was for Marshall or Fitz (though I do own Robinson and DT already, so no takers from there obviously) and made the deal for Marshall (and got Eifert for Ebron in the package), which seems to be in line with the other trades here. I guess he's just a too obvious sell high candidate and the warning signs are too easy to see.

 
Tried to trade Gordon as well this week. The only offer I got was for Marshall or Fitz (though I do own Robinson and DT already, so no takers from there obviously) and made the deal for Marshall (and got Eifert for Ebron in the package), which seems to be in line with the other trades here. I guess he's just a too obvious sell high candidate and the warning signs are too easy to see.
Still seems like a good sell high on Gordon and buy low on Marshall to me.  TE upgrage was a good bonus as well.

 
Dr. Brew, loving those Chad Johnson comparisons eh ;)

But I agree Hopkins will be up and down.  He was 3rd in the NFL last year in targets and is somewhere around 22nd this year - slightly below Will Fuller.  And his QB hasn't significantly improved from last year so it's not like he is getting significantly higher quality targets.  A great player that just may not get enough opportunities.
I think Osweiler should get better as the season progresses but up to this point the best you can say about him is that he has been a reasonable game manager.  I don't think he favorably compares to what Hoyer did in Houston last year (lower Y/A, lower TD%, higher INT%).

 
Still seems like a good sell high on Gordon and buy low on Marshall to me.  TE upgrage was a good bonus as well.
Yeah, I still like the trade. I was curios what Gordon was going for in other leagues, but it doesn't seem that I left a lot of actual value on the table (maybe there are owners who would pay more, but they aren't in my league). And Gordon won't keep scoring TDs at that rate, while Marshall should start converting more of that boatload of targets soon. I probably wouldn't get Marshall for him in a week or two, especially in PPR.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top