Hawkeye21
Footballguy
Wasn't Ebron out in other games and it did nothing for Tate?With no Ebron this week, Tate could see some extra targets
Wasn't Ebron out in other games and it did nothing for Tate?With no Ebron this week, Tate could see some extra targets
Ebron hasn't missed a gameWasn't Ebron out in other games and it did nothing for Tate?
According to ol' Jim Bob Cooter, Tate is going to have a huge week. Not sure what they've been waiting for.Ebron hasn't missed a game
That's crazy. Those are top 12 WRs RoS. I guess I would trade a 25-36 level WR for him if I was desperate at RB, but I definitely would not part with even a 13-24 WR for Coleman. He's on the lesser end of a RBBC.I tried to trade for him last weekend but the guy wanted either Jordy or Evans for him. I'd rather have my WRs than take the risk on a RB like him. He's done well but who knows how that backfield is going to be all season.
And earlier in the thread people were mad at me for stating that people are overvaluing RBs. I know there is position scarcity but that doesn't make me want to give up a top WR for a mediocre RB just because the options are slim. That's why I try to be stacked at WR and grab a bunch of RBs hoping one of them does well.That's crazy. Those are top 12 WRs RoS. I guess I would trade a 25-36 level WR for him if I was desperate at RB, but I definitely would not part with even a 13-24 WR for Coleman. He's on the lesser end of a RBBC.
Agree, I think he actually does rate Tate that highly still or he'd be dropped.Wasn't Ebron out in other games and it did nothing for Tate?
That's why it's better to be stacked at RB.And earlier in the thread people were mad at me for stating that people are overvaluing RBs. I know there is position scarcity but that doesn't make me want to give up a top WR for a mediocre RB just because the options are slim. That's why I try to be stacked at WR and grab a bunch of RBs hoping one of them does well.
What's funny is just when I am about to panic about the state of my rotating RB2 position, I look at the other 11 teams in the league and realize their situation is as bad or worse. My guess is there are two or three teams in any given league stacked at RB and the rest are scrambling. Don't overreact and kill yourself at a position of strength to chase when you don't need to as everyone else is chasing the same weakness.That's why it's better to be stacked at RB.
Check out your league's teams right now, I'm sure there's lots of people desperate for RB help. On the other hand, there's enough WRs to go around. Don't get me wrong I wouldn't trade an elite WR for a middling RB either, but in-season it's gonna be a lot easier to deal RBs for WRs than the other way around.
What you just described is referred to as positional scarcity. There aren't that many good RBs, so they are scarce compared to their fantasy counterpart, WRs.The only thing scarce about RBs in PPR is the very top 5 or 6 guys. There are a ton of crappy RB2 types, but not really position scarcity...
Not in the context it is being used above. I was responding to people saying because of scarcity, a WR1 is equal to an RB2 in value. I say that's wrong because RB2 are not scarce.Skoo said:What you just described is referred to as positional scarcity. There aren't that many good RBs, so they are scarce compared to their fantasy counterpart, WRs.
Same here. I've been trying to trade RBs for WRs all season so far.Hawkeye21 said:And earlier in the thread people were mad at me for stating that people are overvaluing RBs. I know there is position scarcity but that doesn't make me want to give up a top WR for a mediocre RB just because the options are slim. That's why I try to be stacked at WR and grab a bunch of RBs hoping one of them does well.
I've been tryouts no to move Melvin Gordon for a WR 2 and have no takers.Same here. I've been trying to trade RBs for WRs all season so far.
I'd still take Hopkins alone for other 5 players combined.In my league: A Team traded Hopkins, Arian Foster, Sproles for Forte, Powell, and Sanders
I like the Hopkins side as well but based on their team composition it was a fairly even trade.I'd still take Hopkins alone for other 5 players combined.
What WRs were you targeting?I've been tryouts no to move Melvin Gordon for a WR 2 and have no takers.
This is a good offer if you are stacked at WR. Christine Michael is a top 10 bellcow RB until further notice. I can't see him fading to a random backup role if and when Rawls ever makes it back.What's the value of Alshon these days? I have really good WR's and there's a team in my league that has lousy WR's. no ppr. I was thinking of offering Alshon for C. Michael. Is that a fair trade or to much to give up? I have real trouble gauging the value of my players, I think I'm to attached to them, so some of my trade offers are often seen as lopsided. How do you stop that?
Seems plenty fair to me. Usually it's the Gordon owner that doesn't want to trade. Did you try going after the DT owner? It seems most of them want to sell.Hilton, Marshall, Benjamin.
I was able to move Gordon for ARob, I feel iffy about it for this week but ROS I'm much happier.kittenmittens said:I would trade Gordon for either of those guys, but I don't own Gordon and I think he looks awful despite the production.
Nicely done IMO. I like Miller more than Gordon and KB more than Cooks ROS.I traded Gordon and Cooks for Lamar Miller and KBenjamin.
Yeah me too, I was happy with it.Nicely done IMO. I like Miller more than Gordon and KB more than Cooks ROS.
I own each Baldwin and Crowell in several leagues... I wouldn't have traded either for Gio+Brown.Just watched an owner trade Baldwin for Crowell. If I would have known I would have given Bernard and John Brown.
IMO Gordon is a sell high guy. He is getting some TDs, but he is also struggling to get 40yds against bad run Ds. Never been a huge fan, so I am waiting the other shoe to drop.Seems plenty fair to me. Usually it's the Gordon owner that doesn't want to trade. Did you try going after the DT owner? It seems most of them want to sell.
catching 7 passes for 35 yds and 1 TD. That's Tate's huge week.According to ol' Jim Bob Cooter, Tate is going to have a huge week. Not sure what they've been waiting for.
Moved Gordon and Hurns in a deep bench 12tm 3wr ppr dyno for Hilton and an early 2017 1st (1-4) I'm rebuilding and going nowhere, so it felt right. The TDS prob won't keep coming like this.IMO Gordon is a sell high guy. He is getting some TDs, but he is also struggling to get 40yds against bad run Ds. Never been a huge fan, so I am waiting the other shoe to drop.
Does your league get points for handing it off to Jerick McKinnon or Matt Asiata, or AP when he comes back? Does Bradford get points when the D scores a pick 6?Buying Sam Bradford.easy playoff schedule and all indoors or at warm climates.
Actually it's a lot of TDs.IMO Gordon is a sell high guy. He is getting some TDs, but he is also struggling to get 40yds against bad run Ds. Never been a huge fan, so I am waiting the other shoe to drop.
Still seems like a good sell high on Gordon and buy low on Marshall to me. TE upgrage was a good bonus as well.Tried to trade Gordon as well this week. The only offer I got was for Marshall or Fitz (though I do own Robinson and DT already, so no takers from there obviously) and made the deal for Marshall (and got Eifert for Ebron in the package), which seems to be in line with the other trades here. I guess he's just a too obvious sell high candidate and the warning signs are too easy to see.
I think Osweiler should get better as the season progresses but up to this point the best you can say about him is that he has been a reasonable game manager. I don't think he favorably compares to what Hoyer did in Houston last year (lower Y/A, lower TD%, higher INT%).Dr. Brew, loving those Chad Johnson comparisons eh![]()
But I agree Hopkins will be up and down. He was 3rd in the NFL last year in targets and is somewhere around 22nd this year - slightly below Will Fuller. And his QB hasn't significantly improved from last year so it's not like he is getting significantly higher quality targets. A great player that just may not get enough opportunities.
Yeah, I still like the trade. I was curios what Gordon was going for in other leagues, but it doesn't seem that I left a lot of actual value on the table (maybe there are owners who would pay more, but they aren't in my league). And Gordon won't keep scoring TDs at that rate, while Marshall should start converting more of that boatload of targets soon. I probably wouldn't get Marshall for him in a week or two, especially in PPR.Still seems like a good sell high on Gordon and buy low on Marshall to me. TE upgrage was a good bonus as well.