Week 8 Early Rankings (1 Viewer)

[The Doctor]

removed

 

[AngryPatriot]

excellent post

 

[glong989]

For the 1,000,000th time - these early rankings do not need to be scrutinized and questioned. They will change as the week moves along.

 

[BroadwayG]

you guys see somthing i dont?

A great matchup?

 

[T J]

For the 1,000,000th time - these early rankings do not need to be scrutinized and questioned. They will change as the week moves along.

That one does.

 

[Trizzler]

There's a reason we pay for this service; you're defeating that purpose by posting subscriber material for the world to see.

1. Early rankings are only meant to assist MEMBERS in making waiver decisions.

2. Non-members aren't supposed to see these rankings, hence the membership factor. Think about what you're posting.

 

[Banemorth]

There's a reason we pay for this service; you're defeating that purpose by posting subscriber material for the world to see. 1. Early rankings are only meant to assist MEMBERS in making waiver decisions.2. Non-members aren't supposed to see these rankings, hence the membership factor. Think about what you're posting.

If you think what he posted would be of assistance to ANYONE you need your head checked. OH yeah non-members couldn't figure out to start Ray Rice and Fred Jackson! The Chris Johnson recommendation assists no one.

 

[ldizzle]

There's a reason we pay for this service; you're defeating that purpose by posting subscriber material for the world to see. 1. Early rankings are only meant to assist MEMBERS in making waiver decisions.2. Non-members aren't supposed to see these rankings, hence the membership factor. Think about what you're posting.

If you think what he posted would be of assistance to ANYONE you need your head checked. OH yeah non-members couldn't figure out to start Ray Rice and Fred Jackson! The Chris Johnson recommendation assists no one.

many people are having second thoughts on chris johnson in a redraft. if my opponent was down on him and had other reliable options and say that he wasnt a paying subscriber, it would tick me off. so to say that assists no one, maybe you should get checked.ETA: i also vote that it is collusion to post subscriber material on the board

 

[T J]

There's a reason we pay for this service; you're defeating that purpose by posting subscriber material for the world to see. 1. Early rankings are only meant to assist MEMBERS in making waiver decisions.2. Non-members aren't supposed to see these rankings, hence the membership factor. Think about what you're posting.

If you think what he posted would be of assistance to ANYONE you need your head checked. OH yeah non-members couldn't figure out to start Ray Rice and Fred Jackson! The Chris Johnson recommendation assists no one.

many people are having second thoughts on chris johnson in a redraft. if my opponent was down on him and had other reliable options and say that he wasnt a paying subscriber, it would tick me off. so to say that assists no one, maybe you should get checked.ETA: i also vote that it is collusion to post subscriber material on the board

Cool. A collusion thread. Count me in.

 

[THE SNOWMAN]

Even if it is early rankings (which it obviously is) Chris Johnson should be nowhere near the 3rd spot.

 

[hines]

why do they post these when they are obviously useless?

 

[solorca]

I thought that the early rankings were actually sent out to the mailing list? I could be wrong though.

 

[joffer]

why do they post these when they are obviously useless?

because everyone complains when they don't?

 

[BroadwayG]

why do they post these when they are obviously useless?

because everyone complains when they don't?

Noone on this forum complains about anything.

 

[MarcO]

Even if it is early rankings (which it obviously is) Chris Johnson should be nowhere near the 3rd spot.

Against a Colts defense that gave up 240 yards on the ground last week? Despite his underwhelming stats to date, it seems like a reasonable early ranking.

 

[Apple Jack]

Even if it is early rankings (which it obviously is) Chris Johnson should be nowhere near the 3rd spot.

Against a Colts defense that gave up 240 yards on the ground last week? Despite his underwhelming stats to date, it seems like a reasonable early ranking.

The guy is in danger of being benched for Javon Ringer. Time to "temper expectations."

 

[MarcO]

Even if it is early rankings (which it obviously is) Chris Johnson should be nowhere near the 3rd spot.

Against a Colts defense that gave up 240 yards on the ground last week? Despite his underwhelming stats to date, it seems like a reasonable early ranking.

The guy is in danger of being benched for Javon Ringer. Time to "temper expectations."

Benched by a coach that said this:

"It is not all his fault. To run the ball well, it takes 10 other guys to help him out,"

Munchak said.for a guy with this stat line:21 carries for 62 yardsriiight...

 

[THE SNOWMAN]

Even if it is early rankings (which it obviously is) Chris Johnson should be nowhere near the 3rd spot.

Against a Colts defense that gave up 240 yards on the ground last week? Despite his underwhelming stats to date, it seems like a reasonable early ranking.

Your still living in what could happen land.

 

[meeka]

Even if it is early rankings (which it obviously is) Chris Johnson should be nowhere near the 3rd spot.

Against a Colts defense that gave up 240 yards on the ground last week? Despite his underwhelming stats to date, it seems like a reasonable early ranking.

Your still living in what could happen land.

To be fair, all of fantasy football is living in could happen land. Unless you play in a league where you get to set your lineups after the week is over.