What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

What have we learned after week 3? (1 Viewer)

J.Addai will produce big numbers because he's in a great system.
J Addai is a better GL RB than Edge, and Manning is now passing less at the GL than he used to because of that. People need to give credit where it's due. :thumbup:
 
Ever think that maybe Roddy White's improvement has less to do with Vick/Joey than it does to do with Roddy White/coaching/offensive balance/playcalling/the fact that he's starting?

 
Stud WR's are inconsistent, they always throw in a goose egg here and there. Through three weeks so far it has definitely been the year of the stud WR. Steve Smith gave owners a bad beat today, expect a similar week or two from Chad Johnson, TJ Houshmanzadah, Terrell Owens etc. Be happy with what you have gotten up to this point, it's way above average for WR's to this point.
They're not quite the elite wideouts that you mentioned, but how wbout Javon Walker and Hines Ward laying a gigantic egg this sunday? It almost cost me a win this week.
 
Ever think that maybe Roddy White's improvement has less to do with Vick/Joey than it does to do with Roddy White/coaching/offensive balance/playcalling/the fact that he's starting?
When Michael Jenkins is the one to have a big game next time, you'll probably be right.
 
I'm going to get bashed for this next one but it's what I truly believe, I have posted this in the game threads for the past three weeks an I've been slammed several times (although I must admit, not today.) The Denver Broncos are not that good. They are not the "Best of the West." They are not better than the free falling Chargers, even though SD has Norv Turner at the helm, lost both their OC & DC, along with their HC this winter, San Deigo's talent far superceeds the Donkey's. Don't go re-hashing rushing stats & receiving stats for, rushing & receiving yards against etc. Bottom line, this Bronco team should have taken care of business against the sub par Jaguars, not to mention that the should have blown out the Raiders & Bills in previous weeks. These Broncos are just not as good as their fans would like us to believe they are. God help them if the Patriots come to town.
The Broncos own the Patriots. As far as the Broncos not being that good, I'd say it's more of a work in progress. They have so many new players on offense and Defence. They need time to gel. And Jim Bates needs to seriously think about trying to stop the run now and then. That's killing them more than anything else. The Broncos really miss Al Wilson.
 
I learned the Packers are going to be fun to watch.

I learned Cutler's arm strength has been way over-reported. I mean he wound up and threw his bomb with all his might and Marshall had to stop and wait for it and it only went 50 yards. 38 year old Favre still has more arm.

I learned that the Cowboy game must have been meaningless for the Bears. After all Grossman is awesome except in meaningless games. At least that's what Bears fans assured us last year.

The Patriots Wilfolk will be on dirty player watch even though he ultimately may have helped out the Bills.

Atlanta's recievers are better than Vick made them look.

 
That just picking the 2006 top scorers in a redraft league will get you losses. You have to do research. Case in point MJD and LJ. LT is a must and will be fine. Don't expect the 30 TD's hope for 20 at best.

Also, we are back to 1995-1996 when the football was flying and points were put up thru the air.

 
I won't quote the original post, but let me say it's excellent! :thumbup:

I will add:

TO is not only a complete beast on the field, but is now apparently a model teammate. Funny what success and a well-planned offensive scheme will do for the guy.

Randy Moss is the real deal and should've been selected in the early-mid 2nd rounds of most leagues (slipped to the late 5th in my redraft :bag: ). If he can stay healthy all year (no reason to think he can't), he could be the top WR.

The St. Louis Rams are the worst team on the field this year.

Speaking of squandering talent: The cloud of discontent hanging over San Diego is thick enough to cut with a knife. I would hate to be a Bolts fan.

The Patriots look unbeatable, as many thought they would be after putting together this team. However, as noted above, watch out for the Steelers! :thumbup:

Once again, the Rooneys prove they know what they're doing when hiring coaches. Here's to a fruitful next 20 years of the Mike Tomlin era! :towelwave:

 
Let me also add, in the words of Denny Green: The NFC is worse than we thought they were! What a bad conference. Is there any doubt that an AFC team will win this year's Superbowl?

 
TO is not only a complete beast on the field, but is now apparently a model teammate. Funny what success and a well-planned offensive scheme a fat paycheck will do for the guy.
There. Fixed.And as for the Bengals, you're supposed to go for 2 in that situation. If you go for the XP and go up 5, and then the other team scores a TD, the other team will go for 2. The other team isn't going to just kick the XP and settle for a 2 point lead. I thought that would be pretty obvious.

Things I learned (and sort of knew)

- When a guy wants the ball, give him the ball (Ronnie Brown, Steven Jackson, Vernon Davis).

- Peterson is most definitely for real. First guy in 23 games to rush for 100+ against the Chiefs. I feel guilty for taking 3 games to acknowledge this.

- QB's and WR's will not have good fantasy days against Denver.

- The Lions have no business running the football.

- Matchups are still the best way to go with a starting lineup. You look at statistics all offseason when deciding who to draft, so why stop once you get into the season?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm gonna have to do something about my QB situation Bulger isn't doing it for me and I don't think Schwaub is going to be the answer.

 
TO is not only a complete beast on the field, but is now apparently a model teammate. Funny what success and a well-planned offensive scheme a fat paycheck will do for the guy.
And as for the Bengals, you're supposed to go for 2 in that situation. If you go for the XP and go up 5, and then the other team scores a TD, the other team will go for 2. The other team isn't going to just kick the XP and settle for a 2 point lead. I thought that would be pretty obvious.
But then that other team (Seattle) still has to convert the 2-pointer. A failed attempt by Seattle still results in a game-winning FG attempt for the Bengals, rather than a game-tying FG attempt. I am in complete agreement with other posters that going for 2 when only up 4 is a bad decision...and barring a fumbled kickoff by Cincy, the game played out EXACTLY why you don't go for 2 in that situation (a go ahead TD for Seattle and Cincy getting the ball back with the chance for a FG to tie, rather than to potentially win).

 
Last edited by a moderator:
TO is not only a complete beast on the field, but is now apparently a model teammate. Funny what success and a well-planned offensive scheme a fat paycheck will do for the guy.
And as for the Bengals, you're supposed to go for 2 in that situation. If you go for the XP and go up 5, and then the other team scores a TD, the other team will go for 2. The other team isn't going to just kick the XP and settle for a 2 point lead. I thought that would be pretty obvious.
But then that other team (Seattle) still has to convert the 2-pointer. A failed attempt by Seattle still results in a game-winning FG attempt for the Bengals, rather than a game-tying FG attempt. I am in complete agreement with other posters that going for 2 when only up 4 is a bad decision...and barring a fumbled kickoff by Cincy, the game played out EXACTLY why you don't go for 2 in that situation (a go ahead TD for Seattle and Cincy getting the ball back with the chance for a FG to tie, rather than to potentially win).
... so it's a better idea to put the game in the other team's hands and let them go for 2? Personally I would want my offense on the field, determining the outcome of the game whether they get it done or not. Just a matter of opinion I guess. That 2 point chart has said go for 2 when up by 4 since it was created.
 
As a long-time Redskins homer, this pains me no end, but...

Joe Gibbs should retire. The Skins had no business losing that game yesterday, and the reasons they lost were

1. Poor play-calling

2. Poor preparation for a two-minute drill

3. Poor personnel decisions

4. Poor clock management

All of those are the head coach's responsibility, at heart. And this is not the first time - I have not seen a well-executed two-minute deal at the end of a game in four years.

They still might have lost in overtime, but there is no excuse why they didn't get there.

 
As a long-time Redskins homer, this pains me no end, but...Joe Gibbs should retire. The Skins had no business losing that game yesterday, and the reasons they lost were1. Poor play-calling2. Poor preparation for a two-minute drill3. Poor personnel decisions4. Poor clock managementAll of those are the head coach's responsibility, at heart. And this is not the first time - I have not seen a well-executed two-minute deal at the end of a game in four years. They still might have lost in overtime, but there is no excuse why they didn't get there.
I am not a skins fan but I agree. The end of that game was painful.
 
1. You can't spell DEAD JAM without MJD.

2. Bill Bellichik hates Maroney owners (with a passion).

3. Henry snuck in and cashed on a carry inside the 10 yard line. Shanahan mistakenly pointed to him on the sideline instead of Selvin Young.

4. Marion Barber III is a must-start, no matter what I've been telling myself the last 3 weeks.

5. Penguin tried, but still cannot ruin this thread

6. Tom Brady is going to throw 38 TD's this season.

 
As a long-time Redskins homer, this pains me no end, but...Joe Gibbs should retire. The Skins had no business losing that game yesterday, and the reasons they lost were1. Poor play-calling2. Poor preparation for a two-minute drill3. Poor personnel decisions4. Poor clock managementAll of those are the head coach's responsibility, at heart. And this is not the first time - I have not seen a well-executed two-minute deal at the end of a game in four years. They still might have lost in overtime, but there is no excuse why they didn't get there.
I have to agree. For the life of me, I have no idea why they'd pull Portis at the goalline. He would have punched it in.
 
As a long-time Redskins homer, this pains me no end, but...Joe Gibbs should retire. The Skins had no business losing that game yesterday, and the reasons they lost were1. Poor play-calling2. Poor preparation for a two-minute drill3. Poor personnel decisions4. Poor clock managementAll of those are the head coach's responsibility, at heart. And this is not the first time - I have not seen a well-executed two-minute deal at the end of a game in four years. They still might have lost in overtime, but there is no excuse why they didn't get there.
:shrug: Like watching a trainwreck in slow motion...
 
I'd be shocked if Carson Palmer doesn't finish as the #1 FF QB. Chad & TJ have been rocking the house, Chris Henry will only make things better and their defense giving up points in bunches won't hurt matters. Seriously, I'd be shocked iat this point f even Payton out scores him, Brady may have a better shot at finishing 2nd.
And if Chris Perry is ready to go by then, the passing O is going to be sick. They'll atleast finish 9-7.
 
As a long-time Redskins homer, this pains me no end, but...Joe Gibbs should retire. The Skins had no business losing that game yesterday, and the reasons they lost were1. Poor play-calling2. Poor preparation for a two-minute drill3. Poor personnel decisions4. Poor clock managementAll of those are the head coach's responsibility, at heart. And this is not the first time - I have not seen a well-executed two-minute deal at the end of a game in four years. They still might have lost in overtime, but there is no excuse why they didn't get there.
I have to agree. For the life of me, I have no idea why they'd pull Portis at the goalline. He would have punched it in.
yeah Portis wouldn't have fallen over his own feet going into the endzone. just pitiful.
 
- Not necessarily learned, but just more confirmed - the SF passing game is horrid. But the SF pass D looks good.

- At week 3, all of the previous "abberation busts" such as the LT/LJ's/Evans'/MJD's have now hopped on the "trend" fence. S Jax showed signs of life despite STL losing yet another OL player. Ronnie Brown woke up. Those two might be letting owners breathe just the slightest bit easier, for now. The remaining question of the week - will Bush be jumping on the fence too?

- I didn't get to see the game, but what happened to Steve Smith? How did ATL shut him down? The lesson learned was that he COULD be shut down, I honestly did not know that.

- On a similar note, I don't think TO can be shut down. Some of those passes he caught were in heavy double traffic, and Romo didn't seem to even mind.

- Personal lesson learned this week: don't bench your studs (McNabb and Boldin sat). I exclude Lee Evans from that lesson. An extension of that lesson is that Campbell is not ready to start at QB for your FF team yet. Oops.

- Tampa Bay is good again?

- The Carolina defense has had two bad weeks and just made Harrington look like Manning, time to dump them.

- Speaking of Manning, given the chance, the Colts are going to run the ball instead of pass it.

- Jeremy Shockey is a TE I am seriously considering targeting in trades this week. Watching Eli's eyes during reads, on a lot of plays he would lock on Shockey and not even move to other options.

 
As Aikman mentioned, Campbell throws his deep ball too flat, doing that you need to be really accurate. If Campbell changes that giving Santana Moss time to run under it, Moss could be the Evans of this year.

 
Ever think that maybe Roddy White's improvement has less to do with Vick/Joey than it does to do with Roddy White/coaching/offensive balance/playcalling/the fact that he's starting?
When Michael Jenkins is the one to have a big game next time, you'll probably be right.
Receivers tend to have better numbers when teams throw the ball more.Here's another tip: cut Warrick Dunn.
 
Since it's inception, the Division Champ from the NFC South was the team that finished LAST the year prior.

Team that finished LAST in '06? The Tampa Bay Buccaneers.

 
Since it's inception, the Division Champ from the NFC South was the team that finished LAST the year prior.Team that finished LAST in '06? The Tampa Bay Buccaneers.
Very interesting stat. I think as long as Garcia can stay upright, that team can go far.
 
Bears homer, and these things kill me to admit...

-Brett Favre looks a lot more like the really good Brett Favre he's been most of his career, and not the Brett Favre of the last couple years.

-All Bears offensive players are not worth starting at this point. The Bears definitely made a HUGE mistake letting Thomas Jones go.

-Apparently Tony Romo isn't a one-season fluke.

 
My take on the Dallas rb situation. I am firmly in the "MB3 is way better than Jones" camp, but do not think Dallas should change how they are being used. I start Barber every week in a dynasty league and have Jones on the bench. I would love to see Barber get more carries and take over as the full time back, but the more you watch the Dallas offense move the ball and run up the score on teams, why should they change? Have the backs split carries. Give Barber the imprortant carries and save both of them from being overworked.

 
Pittsburgh United said:
Let me also add, in the words of Denny Green: The NFC is worse than we thought they were! What a bad conference. Is there any doubt that an AFC team will win this year's Superbowl?
Cowboys are the only team I see as a legit contender for the NFC
 
east2west said:
Special tems costed us games last year, this year look out. Pats fans that think they can roll over us, better watch your words. You can say we played nobody but we beat the 2-0 9'rs like red headed stepchildren
The Niners beat Arizona and St. Louis. Just sayin.
 
I have personally learned that Romo will be in the starting lineup for me and Bulger will be on the bench, regardless of the matchups they have :goodposting:

 
spitkickers said:
- Not necessarily learned, but just more confirmed - the SF passing game is horrid. But the SF pass D looks good.
Nate Clements was worth every penny.Dude is a playmaker.So is Willis.BY still has it.Their run D will be their downfall though:Steven Jackson aside, Edge & FWP gashed them pretty good.Start your RBs against SF.Alligator Jackson and Ashley Simpson were a complete waste of money.Alex Smith is a good QB.He needs someone to throw to.Without a vertical threat, Gore will continue to find it tough going.They've taken about 1 shot down the field each game.Their run D isn't good enough to play so conservative on O.
 
east2west said:
Special tems costed us games last year, this year look out. Pats fans that think they can roll over us, better watch your words. You can say we played nobody but we beat the 2-0 9'rs like red headed stepchildren
The Niners beat Arizona and St. Louis. Just sayin.
Stillers better learn how to pass protect or Big Ben is going to get killed.Niners are not known for their pass rush, and they were all over him yesterday.Roth bailed them out time after time because of his size and strength.Hard to rely on that for a full season . . .
 
east2west said:
Special tems costed us games last year, this year look out. Pats fans that think they can roll over us, better watch your words. You can say we played nobody but we beat the 2-0 9'rs like red headed stepchildren
The Niners beat Arizona and St. Louis. Just sayin.
Stillers better learn how to pass protect or Big Ben is going to get killed.Niners are not known for their pass rush, and they were all over him yesterday.Roth bailed them out time after time because of his size and strength.Hard to rely on that for a full season . . .
Yet we still spanked them. Agree the O-line is the ? But will get beter as the season goes on. This o-line is goog.
 
Tampa will win more games this year than Denver! Denver can't stop the run, Tampa has one of the best defenses in football.....again.

Green bay will win more games than San Diego! This is the best WR corps that Favre has had in his entire career!

I would have never thought either of these coming into this season.

 
Penguin said:
Westbrook is the most under-rated player in FF, comparable to Tiki Barber. The guy is a yardage & TD machine, yet gets no respect year after year.
True, but the season is playing out in the way that people predicted who passed over him in the draft. Westbrook owners will have a season full of injury report drama. We are learning that this season is developing no differently.
 
Penguin said:
Westbrook is the most under-rated player in FF, comparable to Tiki Barber. The guy is a yardage & TD machine, yet gets no respect year after year.
True, but the season is playing out in the way that people predicted who passed over him in the draft. Westbrook owners will have a season full of injury report drama. We are learning that this season is developing no differently.
:no:
 
LILB811 said:
SayWhat? said:
LILB811 said:
Pittsburgh United said:
TO is not only a complete beast on the field, but is now apparently a model teammate. Funny what success and a well-planned offensive scheme a fat paycheck will do for the guy.
And as for the Bengals, you're supposed to go for 2 in that situation. If you go for the XP and go up 5, and then the other team scores a TD, the other team will go for 2. The other team isn't going to just kick the XP and settle for a 2 point lead. I thought that would be pretty obvious.
But then that other team (Seattle) still has to convert the 2-pointer. A failed attempt by Seattle still results in a game-winning FG attempt for the Bengals, rather than a game-tying FG attempt. I am in complete agreement with other posters that going for 2 when only up 4 is a bad decision...and barring a fumbled kickoff by Cincy, the game played out EXACTLY why you don't go for 2 in that situation (a go ahead TD for Seattle and Cincy getting the ball back with the chance for a FG to tie, rather than to potentially win).
... so it's a better idea to put the game in the other team's hands and let them go for 2? Personally I would want my offense on the field, determining the outcome of the game whether they get it done or not. Just a matter of opinion I guess. That 2 point chart has said go for 2 when up by 4 since it was created.
Apparently, then it's been wrong since it's been created. The decision being up 4 is irrelevant UNLESS there are 2 more scores in the game in some combination.If you are up 4 or 5 or 6, and the opponents get a FG or SF and no other scores happen you win. If you are up 4 or 5 and the opponents get a TD, you lose - if you do get up 6, you have a 1-2% chance to remain tied on missed PAT. So the move to go for two works here if: you give up a TD, stop the XP, and then score next. Still requires 2 scores.

So the decision when up by 4 has to be made assuming the opponents will score, and you will get the ball or fail to get the ball on an onside kick. Given that you know there needs to be another 2 scores for this decsion to be relevant, you need to positon yourself to win the most often you can if the next score goes as a TD against you. Safeties are unlikely, and even a FG leaves you in the lead.

Kick the XP, kick away, and if you give up a FG, the opponents are looking for an onside kick. If they score a TD, all you need is a FG to win, unless they made a 2, in which case a FG ties and TD still wins.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top