This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
I'd hate it, but only because I'm a Bengals fan. Neat idea though, and most of the divisions make a lot of sense. But I think of Cincinnati as midwest to the core. So being grouped with Carolina, Washington, and Baltimore feels very, very wrong. I know we're already grouped with Baltimore. But that's the weirdest team we're currently grouped with, and suddenly they would become the mostfitting which is really bad.
Put Detroit in the Great Lakes West
Put Buffalo in Northeast
Put Philadelphia in Mid Atlantic
then you can slide Cincinnati and Indianapolis into Great Lake East
I've argued for years now that it makes more sense to have a more regional approach to divisions and it's something that I liked about college football when I used to follow it.
Although my atlantic would be
jacksonville
tampa bay
miami
washington
south
dallas
houston
new orleans
arizona
big sky would be renamed mid west and would be
las vegas
denver
green bay
minn
To the last question, I will use the 1967 NFL. 16 teams divided into 4 divisions all starting with a "C". Central was all teams currently in the North. Capitol was the East except the Saints were in instead of the Giants. The other 2 divisions were all screwed up to say the least.
Don’t spend too much brainpower on this.5 years from now the Chargers, Jags and oh let’s go with the Cardinals, will probably be in Toronto, London and Mexico City. Or perhaps San Antonio, St. Louis, and Portland.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.