What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Which 3rd year WR will make the most improvement? (1 Viewer)

Which WR will make the biggest jump in their third season in the NFL?

  • Braylon Edwards

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Troy Williamson

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Mike Williams

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Matt Jones

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Mark Clayton

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Roddy White

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Reggie Brown

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Mark Bradley

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Vincent Jackson

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Courtney Roby

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Brandon Jones

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
I voted for Reggie Brown. I think with a healthy McNabb and Stallworth gone this could be a breakout year for Brown.

 
I think Mark Clayton will have the best season out of these guys. But Edwards and Brown will both be right there as well.

 
The way it's worded you'd have to vote for someone like Vincent Jackson. He had 108 fantasy points last year. He could easily double his production. Guys like Edwards and Clayton would have to score close to 400 to double their production. That's not going to happen.

 
2007 PredictionsBraylon Edwards = Most production from this groupTroy Williamson = Most improved
I agree. Edwards & Clayton have already put pretty solid numbers up, but Williamson has been a huge bust so far. I think he'll bounce back somewhat, though he definately won't be the best of this bunch.
 
This is generally the season when a WR will make his way into the NFL's elite.
This is an urban legend of epic proportions, but if people want to buy into it I'm not going to stop them.
I was just looking for a thread on the "3rd year WR theory", but was coming up empty. Is there such a thing, or did I read an article last year?I think that Jackson is in line for the most improved; no clear cut #1 WR, a QB with some more experience, and all eyes on LT.
 
2007 Predictions

Troy Williamson = Most improved
Agreed.When one says a player who most improves it means that player has not produced yet. And that is Williamson from this list. Even Jackson has shown more by now than Williamson has but I think Williamson will have a good enough season and make people stop doubting him. That will mean he will be the most improved of these WR even though some of them may have better seasons than he does.

I thought Williamson would break out last year but he struggled catching the ball and that hurt his confidence. Williamson has been working VERY hard on this all offseason. I won't be suprised to see him only drop one or 2 passes all season with the work he has put in. Jake Reed was able to fix this problem and I believe Williamson can too. The main difference here being Williamson is a much more gifted athlete than Reed ever was. I am very excited to see what Williamson can do this year and many are down on him which makes for a great value player.

 
It also could be a WR that had a good year last year but a great year this season.

Off the top of my head but the 3rd year rule last year.

Roy Williams made the jump, Lee Evans, Bernard Berrian, and others (I may be wrong here but some players did achieve that "urban myth" last season)

 
It also could be a WR that had a good year last year but a great year this season.Off the top of my head but the 3rd year rule last year.Roy Williams made the jump, Lee Evans, Bernard Berrian, and others (I may be wrong here but some players did achieve that "urban myth" last season)
They certainly do. It is more a matter of what benchmarks your using for a player "breaking out" or not.RBs more than any other position have productive rookie years but in looking at historical data on RBs there is a large tendency for RBs to improve on thier EOY points scored ranking compared to other RBs in thier 3rd (and 4th) seasons than they do in thier 1st 2 seasons. So that would mean a 3 year break out tendency for RBs is a trend that may be stronger than it is for WRs (although I have not taken the time to run those rumbers. Construx boy has but I have not looked deeply into it enough to see if his analysis was using similar or the same parameters as myself and Driver were using for the RB).
 
It also could be a WR that had a good year last year but a great year this season.

Off the top of my head but the 3rd year rule last year.

Roy Williams made the jump, Lee Evans, Bernard Berrian, and others (I may be wrong here but some players did achieve that "urban myth" last season)
Logically speaking, any player's 'year' in the league could be the breakout one. Urban myths work when people only remember the instances when the myth seems to hold true. When it doesn't work, little/no attention is given.

People want to believe in them. So selective memory kicks in, and they believe.

Id

 
It also could be a WR that had a good year last year but a great year this season.

Off the top of my head but the 3rd year rule last year.

Roy Williams made the jump, Lee Evans, Bernard Berrian, and others (I may be wrong here but some players did achieve that "urban myth" last season)
Logically speaking, any player's 'year' in the league could be the breakout one. Urban myths work when people only remember the instances when the myth seems to hold true. When it doesn't work, little/no attention is given.

People want to believe in them. So selective memory kicks in, and they believe.

Id
:ptts: Like the Madden curse as well. Superstition and statistical data mining to make your "selective memory" case don't really hold any validity.
 
If we set the bar at first 1000 yard receiving season . . .

YEAR TEN

Kennison

YEAR NINE

TBrown

YEAR SIX

Stokley

YEAR FIVE

Housh, Chambers, Horn, Bryant, Mason, McCardell, JSmith

YEAR FOUR

Harrison, Wayne, Driver, Furrey, Ward, Muhammad, Bennett, Price, Toomer, Chrebet

YEAR THREE

Owens, Evans, Smith, Walker, Williams, Coles, SMoss, Booker, Keyshawn, RSmith, Moulds, Lelie

YEAR TWO

Johnson, Holt, Burress, D-Jax, AJohnson, Fitzgerald, Bruce, MRobinson, Boston, K-Rob, Burleson

YEAR ONE

Colston, Galloway, Boldin, Glenn, RMoss, Clayton

IIRC, these were the only guys that were active at any point last year that have had at least one year with 1000 yards receiving. The spread was all over the map (and if we looked back 5 years or 10 years earlier the distribution pattern would be different).

While Year Three was well-represented, it's not like it had three times as many players than other years.

People can read more on this HERE and HERE.

 
I'm going with Matt Jones (While I have nothing to base it on, I believe Leftwich stays healthy all year and the Jags finish neck and neck with the Colts in the South).

 
It also could be a WR that had a good year last year but a great year this season.

Off the top of my head but the 3rd year rule last year.

Roy Williams made the jump, Lee Evans, Bernard Berrian, and others (I may be wrong here but some players did achieve that "urban myth" last season)
Logically speaking, any player's 'year' in the league could be the breakout one. Urban myths work when people only remember the instances when the myth seems to hold true. When it doesn't work, little/no attention is given.

People want to believe in them. So selective memory kicks in, and they believe.

Id
:lmao: Like the Madden curse as well. Superstition and statistical data mining to make your "selective memory" case don't really hold any validity.
So, how many leagues are you drafting Vince Young in this year? :lmao:
 
Most production

1. Edwards

2. Brown

3. Clayton

Most improved

1. MJones

2. Williamson

3. BJones

 
If we set the bar at first 1000 yard receiving season . . .

YEAR TEN

Kennison

YEAR NINE

TBrown

YEAR SIX

Stokley

YEAR FIVE

Housh, Chambers, Horn, Bryant, Mason, McCardell, JSmith

YEAR FOUR

Harrison, Wayne, Driver, Furrey, Ward, Muhammad, Bennett, Price, Toomer, Chrebet

YEAR THREE

Owens, Evans, Smith, Walker, Williams, Coles, SMoss, Booker, Keyshawn, RSmith, Moulds, Lelie

YEAR TWO

Johnson, Holt, Burress, D-Jax, AJohnson, Fitzgerald, Bruce, MRobinson, Boston, K-Rob, Burleson

YEAR ONE

Colston, Galloway, Boldin, Glenn, RMoss, Clayton

IIRC, these were the only guys that were active at any point last year that have had at least one year with 1000 yards receiving. The spread was all over the map (and if we looked back 5 years or 10 years earlier the distribution pattern would be different).

While Year Three was well-represented, it's not like it had three times as many players than other years.

People can read more on this HERE and HERE.
I think this makes the point more than anything. It shows that WRs are most likely to beak out in years 2,3,4. Not that many produce big numbers as rookies (CJ owners beward) and not that many break out fifth year and beyond. Are there exceptions? Of course. The only "myth" part is if you take as dogma and limit it to year three. But in fact, year three is a year in which many WRs do breakout, and if you combine if with years 2 and four, that accounts for nearly 70% of break out production. Individually, it is the single highest year with 12 breakouts, followed by year two with 11. Myth confirmed.

 
I'm just curious why you guys are so high on Braylon Edwards? With a rookie QB at the helm I just don't see why you guys think he will be so productive.

 
az_prof said:
KING said:
2007 PredictionsBraylon Edwards = Most production from this groupTroy Williamson = Most improved
williamson ( can't catch ) + jackson ( can't throw ) = incomplete pass
Actually, Jackson is pretty good. Based upon what do you say he "can't throw"?
:lmao: Most of the Tarvaris Jackson bashing is coming from people that have not seen him play. He's got a cannon for an arm and would have put up much better numbers last year had he had a reliable set of hands to throw to. He's still got a lot to learn as far as reading defenses, but if Williamson can learn how to catch these two could be a good combo sooner rather than later.
 
-OZ- said:
Most improved 1. MJones
Theres a surprise. Your man love for this guy just wont quit. :lmao:
:rolleyes: You're right, I actually stand behind my picks. Aside from his coach's recent comments, which can be interpreted differently by reasonable minds, what exactly has he done or not done, to warrant the criticism? When he's been on the field, he's done well. Especially when you consider all the facts.
 
-OZ- said:
Most improved 1. MJones
Theres a surprise. Your man love for this guy just wont quit. :shrug:
:headbang: You're right, I actually stand behind my picks. Aside from his coach's recent comments, which can be interpreted differently by reasonable minds, what exactly has he done or not done, to warrant the criticism? When he's been on the field, he's done well. Especially when you consider all the facts.
36 for 43241 for 643 aren't good numbers.
 
-OZ- said:
Most improved 1. MJones
Theres a surprise. Your man love for this guy just wont quit. :lol:
:thumbup: You're right, I actually stand behind my picks. Aside from his coach's recent comments, which can be interpreted differently by reasonable minds, what exactly has he done or not done, to warrant the criticism? When he's been on the field, he's done well. Especially when you consider all the facts.
36 for 43241 for 643 aren't good numbers.
They're not bad either. If you expected him to light up the NFL in his 1st two seasons, I understand the disapointment. Personally, I love the talent, but didn't expect him to step in and be Randy Moss or even Marvin Harrison. Would you be upset with any of these 3 WRs on your team now (their first two seasons, similar to Jones's)A: 27 for 345; 49 for 716 B: 23 for 319; 41 for 716 C: 15 for 246; 61 for 638 Now, he doesn't have Peyton Manning throwing him the rock (A), or Brett Favre (B). Maybe ( C ) is his upside, but IMO he is more physically talented.
 
The Bears Mark Bradley will make the most marked improvement over last year.

Vincent Jackson will have the best season - hands down.

Here are the prospects to choose from:

1 1 3 3 Braylon Edwards Browns Michigan

2 1 7 7 Troy Williamson Vikings South Carolina

3 1 10 10 Mike Williams Lions USC

4 1 21 21 Matt Jones Jaguars Arkansas

5 1 22 22 Mark Clayton Ravens Oklahoma

6 1 27 27 Roddy White Falcons Alabama-Birmingham

7 2 3 35 Reggie Brown Eagles Georgia

8 2 7 39 Mark Bradley Bears Oklahoma

9 2 23 55 Roscoe Parrish Bills Miami (FL)

10 2 26 58 Terrence Murphy Packers Texas A&M

11 2 29 61 Vincent Jackson Chargers Northern Colorado

12 3 4 68 Courtney Roby Titans Indiana

13 3 19 83 Chris Henry Bengals West Virginia

14 3 32 96 Brandon Jones Titans Oklahoma

15 4 13 114 Jerome Mathis Texans Hampton

16 4 15 116 Craphonso Thorpe Chiefs Florida State

17 4 17 118 Chase Lyman Saints California

18 4 30 131 Fred Gibson Steelers Georgia

19 4 35 136 Roydell Williams Titans Tulane

20 5 4 140 Airese Currie Bears Clemson

21 5 19 155 Larry Brackins Buccaneers Pearl River C.C.

22 5 38 174 Rasheed Marshall 49ers West Virginia

23 6 11 185 Chad Owens Jaguars Hawaii

24 6 16 190 Tab Perry Bengals UCLA

25 6 18 192 Dante Ridgeway Rams Ball State

26 6 21 195 Craig Bragg Packers UCLA

27 7 9 223 Marcus Maxwell 49ers Oregon

28 7 11 225 Paris Warren Buccaneers Utah

29 7 12 226 LeRon McCoy Cardinals Indiana (Pa.)

30 7 26 240 Harry Williams Jets Tuskegee

31 7 39 253 J.R. Russell Buccaneers Louisville

 
I'm just curious why you guys are so high on Braylon Edwards? With a rookie QB at the helm I just don't see why you guys think he will be so productive.
1. Talent2. He did alright with Frye3. We don't know which QB will start, I suspect the coach will play whomever is better4. Most of us are not saying he'll be top 5 or even top 10, just the best from this group
 
I'm just curious why you guys are so high on Braylon Edwards? With a rookie QB at the helm I just don't see why you guys think he will be so productive.
1. Talent2. He did alright with Frye3. We don't know which QB will start, I suspect the coach will play whomever is better4. Most of us are not saying he'll be top 5 or even top 10, just the best from this group
Whether it was Anderson or Frye he did pretty well. BTW He was in Romeo's doghouse(and should have been) so he's got some "growing up" to do but I expect him to behave. There was a drop in his play while he was in the doghouse.For me, re Braylon, I guess I'd give the Q right back to you(original poster) and ask "what do you expect to see from a young WR?" IMO He's done whatever that is. Key 3rd downs, work despite double team, get open deep fast, block, tough catch over the middle. Rice did everything perfectly. Braylon doesn't, there's no sugar coating here. I use Rice as a barometer of sorts and well Braylon's got a ways to improve. Doing those things once, as you know, doesn't mean he's a great player yet either. As much of us pretend we're NFL scouts, Braylon seems to be a WR that has alot going for him.
 
This is generally the season when a WR will make his way into the NFL's elite.
This is an urban legend of epic proportions, but if people want to buy into it I'm not going to stop them.
I was just looking for a thread on the "3rd year WR theory", but was coming up empty. Is there such a thing, or did I read an article last year?I think that Jackson is in line for the most improved; no clear cut #1 WR, a QB with some more experience, and all eyes on LT.
Here is a third year WR thread from last year, take it for what its worth, a simple study that isn't perfect.http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index...00&hl=Study

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The way it's worded you'd have to vote for someone like Vincent Jackson. He had 108 fantasy points last year. He could easily double his production. Guys like Edwards and Clayton would have to score close to 400 to double their production. That's not going to happen.
:angry: That's why I went with Brandon Jones. Clayton, Edwards & Brown already have decent seasons under their belt so I can't imagine their production increasing as much as a Jones or Jackson.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top