benson_will_lead_the_way
Footballguy
This is generally the season when a WR will make his way into the NFL's elite. So who will it be from this group? Who will improve the most? Who will just be a bust?
This is an urban legend of epic proportions, but if people want to buy into it I'm not going to stop them.This is generally the season when a WR will make his way into the NFL's elite.
This is an urban legend of epic proportions, but if people want to buy into it I'm not going to stop them.This is generally the season when a WR will make his way into the NFL's elite.
I agree. Edwards & Clayton have already put pretty solid numbers up, but Williamson has been a huge bust so far. I think he'll bounce back somewhat, though he definately won't be the best of this bunch.2007 PredictionsBraylon Edwards = Most production from this groupTroy Williamson = Most improved
I was just looking for a thread on the "3rd year WR theory", but was coming up empty. Is there such a thing, or did I read an article last year?I think that Jackson is in line for the most improved; no clear cut #1 WR, a QB with some more experience, and all eyes on LT.This is an urban legend of epic proportions, but if people want to buy into it I'm not going to stop them.This is generally the season when a WR will make his way into the NFL's elite.
This is an urban legend of epic proportions, but if people want to buy into it I'm not going to stop them.This is generally the season when a WR will make his way into the NFL's elite.![]()
williamson ( can't catch ) + jackson ( can't throw ) = incomplete pass2007 PredictionsBraylon Edwards = Most production from this groupTroy Williamson = Most improved
Agreed.When one says a player who most improves it means that player has not produced yet. And that is Williamson from this list. Even Jackson has shown more by now than Williamson has but I think Williamson will have a good enough season and make people stop doubting him. That will mean he will be the most improved of these WR even though some of them may have better seasons than he does.2007 Predictions
Troy Williamson = Most improved
They certainly do. It is more a matter of what benchmarks your using for a player "breaking out" or not.RBs more than any other position have productive rookie years but in looking at historical data on RBs there is a large tendency for RBs to improve on thier EOY points scored ranking compared to other RBs in thier 3rd (and 4th) seasons than they do in thier 1st 2 seasons. So that would mean a 3 year break out tendency for RBs is a trend that may be stronger than it is for WRs (although I have not taken the time to run those rumbers. Construx boy has but I have not looked deeply into it enough to see if his analysis was using similar or the same parameters as myself and Driver were using for the RB).It also could be a WR that had a good year last year but a great year this season.Off the top of my head but the 3rd year rule last year.Roy Williams made the jump, Lee Evans, Bernard Berrian, and others (I may be wrong here but some players did achieve that "urban myth" last season)
Logically speaking, any player's 'year' in the league could be the breakout one. Urban myths work when people only remember the instances when the myth seems to hold true. When it doesn't work, little/no attention is given.It also could be a WR that had a good year last year but a great year this season.
Off the top of my head but the 3rd year rule last year.
Roy Williams made the jump, Lee Evans, Bernard Berrian, and others (I may be wrong here but some players did achieve that "urban myth" last season)
Logically speaking, any player's 'year' in the league could be the breakout one. Urban myths work when people only remember the instances when the myth seems to hold true. When it doesn't work, little/no attention is given.It also could be a WR that had a good year last year but a great year this season.
Off the top of my head but the 3rd year rule last year.
Roy Williams made the jump, Lee Evans, Bernard Berrian, and others (I may be wrong here but some players did achieve that "urban myth" last season)
People want to believe in them. So selective memory kicks in, and they believe.
Id
So, how many leagues are you drafting Vince Young in this year?Logically speaking, any player's 'year' in the league could be the breakout one. Urban myths work when people only remember the instances when the myth seems to hold true. When it doesn't work, little/no attention is given.It also could be a WR that had a good year last year but a great year this season.
Off the top of my head but the 3rd year rule last year.
Roy Williams made the jump, Lee Evans, Bernard Berrian, and others (I may be wrong here but some players did achieve that "urban myth" last season)
People want to believe in them. So selective memory kicks in, and they believe.
IdLike the Madden curse as well. Superstition and statistical data mining to make your "selective memory" case don't really hold any validity.
Actually, Jackson is pretty good. Based upon what do you say he "can't throw"?williamson ( can't catch ) + jackson ( can't throw ) = incomplete pass2007 PredictionsBraylon Edwards = Most production from this groupTroy Williamson = Most improved
I think this makes the point more than anything. It shows that WRs are most likely to beak out in years 2,3,4. Not that many produce big numbers as rookies (CJ owners beward) and not that many break out fifth year and beyond. Are there exceptions? Of course. The only "myth" part is if you take as dogma and limit it to year three. But in fact, year three is a year in which many WRs do breakout, and if you combine if with years 2 and four, that accounts for nearly 70% of break out production. Individually, it is the single highest year with 12 breakouts, followed by year two with 11. Myth confirmed.If we set the bar at first 1000 yard receiving season . . .
YEAR TEN
Kennison
YEAR NINE
TBrown
YEAR SIX
Stokley
YEAR FIVE
Housh, Chambers, Horn, Bryant, Mason, McCardell, JSmith
YEAR FOUR
Harrison, Wayne, Driver, Furrey, Ward, Muhammad, Bennett, Price, Toomer, Chrebet
YEAR THREE
Owens, Evans, Smith, Walker, Williams, Coles, SMoss, Booker, Keyshawn, RSmith, Moulds, Lelie
YEAR TWO
Johnson, Holt, Burress, D-Jax, AJohnson, Fitzgerald, Bruce, MRobinson, Boston, K-Rob, Burleson
YEAR ONE
Colston, Galloway, Boldin, Glenn, RMoss, Clayton
IIRC, these were the only guys that were active at any point last year that have had at least one year with 1000 yards receiving. The spread was all over the map (and if we looked back 5 years or 10 years earlier the distribution pattern would be different).
While Year Three was well-represented, it's not like it had three times as many players than other years.
People can read more on this HERE and HERE.
He was in that draft class and has a chance to start. Didn't want to exclude people.Bri said:May I ask how Roby made your list?![]()
He was in that draft class and has a chance to start. Didn't want to exclude people.Bri said:May I ask how Roby made your list?![]()
az_prof said:Actually, Jackson is pretty good. Based upon what do you say he "can't throw"?KING said:williamson ( can't catch ) + jackson ( can't throw ) = incomplete pass2007 PredictionsBraylon Edwards = Most production from this groupTroy Williamson = Most improved
Theres a surprise. Your man love for this guy just wont quit.-OZ- said:Most improved 1. MJones
Theres a surprise. Your man love for this guy just wont quit.-OZ- said:Most improved 1. MJones![]()
36 for 43241 for 643 aren't good numbers.Theres a surprise. Your man love for this guy just wont quit.-OZ- said:Most improved 1. MJones![]()
You're right, I actually stand behind my picks. Aside from his coach's recent comments, which can be interpreted differently by reasonable minds, what exactly has he done or not done, to warrant the criticism? When he's been on the field, he's done well. Especially when you consider all the facts.
They're not bad either. If you expected him to light up the NFL in his 1st two seasons, I understand the disapointment. Personally, I love the talent, but didn't expect him to step in and be Randy Moss or even Marvin Harrison. Would you be upset with any of these 3 WRs on your team now (their first two seasons, similar to Jones's)A: 27 for 345; 49 for 716 B: 23 for 319; 41 for 716 C: 15 for 246; 61 for 638 Now, he doesn't have Peyton Manning throwing him the rock (A), or Brett Favre (B). Maybe ( C ) is his upside, but IMO he is more physically talented.36 for 43241 for 643 aren't good numbers.Theres a surprise. Your man love for this guy just wont quit.-OZ- said:Most improved 1. MJones![]()
You're right, I actually stand behind my picks. Aside from his coach's recent comments, which can be interpreted differently by reasonable minds, what exactly has he done or not done, to warrant the criticism? When he's been on the field, he's done well. Especially when you consider all the facts.
1. Talent2. He did alright with Frye3. We don't know which QB will start, I suspect the coach will play whomever is better4. Most of us are not saying he'll be top 5 or even top 10, just the best from this groupI'm just curious why you guys are so high on Braylon Edwards? With a rookie QB at the helm I just don't see why you guys think he will be so productive.
this is not accurateKING said:williamson ( can't catch ) + jackson ( can't throw ) = incomplete pass2007 PredictionsBraylon Edwards = Most production from this groupTroy Williamson = Most improved
Whether it was Anderson or Frye he did pretty well. BTW He was in Romeo's doghouse(and should have been) so he's got some "growing up" to do but I expect him to behave. There was a drop in his play while he was in the doghouse.For me, re Braylon, I guess I'd give the Q right back to you(original poster) and ask "what do you expect to see from a young WR?" IMO He's done whatever that is. Key 3rd downs, work despite double team, get open deep fast, block, tough catch over the middle. Rice did everything perfectly. Braylon doesn't, there's no sugar coating here. I use Rice as a barometer of sorts and well Braylon's got a ways to improve. Doing those things once, as you know, doesn't mean he's a great player yet either. As much of us pretend we're NFL scouts, Braylon seems to be a WR that has alot going for him.1. Talent2. He did alright with Frye3. We don't know which QB will start, I suspect the coach will play whomever is better4. Most of us are not saying he'll be top 5 or even top 10, just the best from this groupI'm just curious why you guys are so high on Braylon Edwards? With a rookie QB at the helm I just don't see why you guys think he will be so productive.
Here is a third year WR thread from last year, take it for what its worth, a simple study that isn't perfect.http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index...00&hl=StudyI was just looking for a thread on the "3rd year WR theory", but was coming up empty. Is there such a thing, or did I read an article last year?I think that Jackson is in line for the most improved; no clear cut #1 WR, a QB with some more experience, and all eyes on LT.This is an urban legend of epic proportions, but if people want to buy into it I'm not going to stop them.This is generally the season when a WR will make his way into the NFL's elite.
The way it's worded you'd have to vote for someone like Vincent Jackson. He had 108 fantasy points last year. He could easily double his production. Guys like Edwards and Clayton would have to score close to 400 to double their production. That's not going to happen.
If Mathis can stay healthy, I would not be surprised to see him starting across from AJ. People forget that he made the Pro Bowl (as a returner) in his rookie year.15 4 13 114 Jerome Mathis Texans Hampton