Which alias has the lowest member number? (1 Viewer)

[kupcho1]

:curious:

 

[Yankee23Fan]

Dodds is 2, no?

 

[fatguyinalittlecoat2]

Possibly me. Could be others that got assigned new member numbers and kept their old one.

 

[kupcho1]

Possibly me. Could be others that got assigned new member numbers and kept their old one.

583 could be very tough to beat.

 

[SofaKings]

Possibly me. Could be others that got assigned new member numbers and kept their old one.

583 could be very tough to beat.

hmmmm

 

[beaglemac]

Possibly me. Could be others that got assigned new member numbers and kept their old one.

583 could be very tough to beat.

I think I can beat that???

 

[the rover]

I can beat that.

 

[Please See Mine]

Winning

 

[phrozen]

Possibly me. Could be others that got assigned new member numbers and kept their old one.

583 could be very tough to beat.

The lowest I could think was Member #666

 

[Joe T]

Possibly me. Could be others that got assigned new member numbers and kept their old one.

583 could be very tough to beat.

The lowest I could think was Member #666

I used to have one that was #957 or so... but shick banned it. Then he later re-isued it as a prize in some contest.... so I'm not sure who has it now.

 

[taco breath]

back when i was younger i would make sure my aliai had low numbers.

 

[Winston Wolfe]

Possibly me. Could be others that got assigned new member numbers and kept their old one.

583 could be very tough to beat.

 

[kupcho1]

Winning

I think that will either be for MoP or LHUCKS. The powers-that-be are meeting on this as we speak.

 

[Statorama]

Winning

I think that will either be for MoP or LHUCKS. The powers-that-be are meeting on this as we speak.

What is this place coming to.

 

[Mr. Pickles]

I have one that is lower than my member number.

 

[kupcho1]

I have one that is lower than my member number.

Lower than 701!

Oh my

 

[Shatner!]

It's not the number that counts but the quality of the alias name that counts.

hazerssettofun:

 

[Tom Servo]

It's not the number that counts but the quality of the alias name that counts.

hazerssettofun:

 

[Scoresman]

you're not supposed to have aliases

 

[glumpy]

Other than remembering them how do you know numbers?

 

[skol asylum]

Other than remembering them how do you know numbers?

http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index.php?showuser=440

Look in browser at the URL.

 

[rockaction]

Other than remembering them how do you know numbers?

http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index.php?showuser=440

Look in browser at the URL.

I think we found him in another thread. Regardless, glumpy's just a fella who loves him a six pack of beers, IIRC.

eta* What the hell am I talking about? Don't take whatever I say today as anything serious. It's over.

 

[sbonomo]

Why did they get rid of user numbers....I guess the new crowd felt left out of the three digit meetings..

..well everyone should get a trophy right....

 

[Leroy Hoard]

Why did they get rid of user numbers....I guess the new crowd felt left out of the three digit meetings..

..well everyone should get a trophy right....

More like nobody gets a trophy.

 

[glumpy]

Thanks!

 

[Harry Manback]

Possibly me. Could be others that got assigned new member numbers and kept their old one.

583 could be very tough to beat.

The lowest I could think was Member #666

Who me?

 

[kupcho1]

Was this ever determined???

 

[Joe T]

Was this ever determined???

I think so.

 

[Short Corner]

you're not supposed to have aliases

Bet they come in handy when you get banned.