What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Which Of These Scenarios Are Examples Of Collusion? (1 Viewer)

the lone star

So my league doesn't have any hard anti-collusion rules, but I thought I would ask about these scenarios anyway. Please let me know which ones you think, if any, are examples of collusion.

Scenario 1: Team A trades players to Team B and they agree to split any earnings.

Scenario 2: Team C trades star players to Team D, but it is for what the league has determined as fair-market value. There is no agreement to split earnings, but Team C wants to trade to Team D because he dislikes the other owners in the league and wants to make things tougher for them.

Scenario 3: Team E agrees to not enter into trade talks that Team F is involved in, because Teams E and F have a close personal bond. Likewise, Team F agrees to not enter into trade talks if Team E is involved, but Team G wants to hear bids from all interested teams.

Scenario 4: Team H agrees to trade a certain package of draft picks to Team I, if Team I beats Team H in their matchup that week. The trade would still be for fair-market-value though. Also assume that teams have been able to make low-stakes bets like this in the past, but this particular instance definitely raises the stakes. No rule against bets though.

Scenario 5: Team J makes a bid on a free agent. Team J cannot increase his own bid on the player, so he asks Team K to increase the bid, so that Team J can come in after him and bid the player up again to the price that he wants. Team J is successful in doing this.

Scenario 6: The commissioner sends out mass texts to everyone in the league telling them to increase the bid on a star free agent. The commissioner is successful in doing this.

Please discuss below. Thanks

Last edited by a moderator:
No. It undermines the integrity of the league.  There doesn't need to be a rule to prevent collusion. 

Scenario 1:  Collusion in it's purest form

Scenario 2:  If trade is fair market value then no collusion.  It doesn't matter that one owner roots for another owner to win.  Maybe they are friends.

Scenario 3:  You can run your team how you want.  Not participating in trade talks (for whatever reason) is not collusion.

Scenario 4:  If the trade is fair market value then no collusion.  Doesn't matter why the trade is being made (bet). 


Users who are viewing this thread