What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Which Rookie WR will be better (1 Viewer)

Which Rookie WR will be the better pick?

  • D.Mccluster

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • G.Tate

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • D.Thomas

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • A.Benn

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0

digphish

Footballguy
I am trying to decide which of these four rookie WR's will be better. In my league we can keep 5 guys plus one rookie, so essentially our rookie pick has 2 seasons to earn a keeper spot on our roster. So this is not a redraft league, but not quite Dynasty. Which of these 4 WR's is the guy to take? I have been leaning toward Golden Tate for what its worth. My draft is tomorrow so I'd like to get some feedback as well.

Thanks

 
williams was my first choice, but I am pretty sure he will be gone. McCluster seems electric, but so does Reggie Bush. I agree with Johnny U in that he is great for the chiefs, but not for fantasy.

 
Dez BryantBrandon LaFellMike Williams
Ditto to all 3 of these guys especially Mike Williams if he keeps his head screwed on right, Now to your 4 guys. Thomas is having health issues still. Tate has talent and must contend with Housh, Branch, Butler for playing time. McCluster will see time but not outproduce Benn. My guess is Benn holds more upside of these 4. Good shot 2 rookies start for Tampa(Benn & Williams). I like Williams to put up better numbers but if Freeman develops more then Benn holds some value as the Bucs #2 guys. So Benn would be my choice of the 4 you listed.
 
McCluster = Josh Cribbs. Great for NFL teams, not so much for fantasy teams.
Simply awful comparison. The Chiefs have big plans for McCluster in the offense from day one. Cribbs is just now being "worked in." Cribbs is an elite returner, and while McCluster may be good, he's at best the 2nd option on the team. McCluster in terms of his role is much more comparable to Harvin. Whether or not he approaches that impact remains to be seen, but he will get the opportunities.OP: unforgivable that you didn't mention PPR or not. In PPR I go McCluster every day of the week. Without PPR I don't consider him and look in Thomas' direction for a long-term upside play.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top