Matthews would have been better on the Texans but SD is a good place for him even if they are a pass first team now.Totally agree with Romo, Gore and Smith, also think Calvin and Staffords stock rises with Best as a weapon both in the running game as well as a receiving RB.Post Day 1:
Stock up:
Ryan Matthews
Tony Romo
Frank Gore, Alex Smith (two new O-linemen)
Down
Miles Austin?
Fred Jackson
Roy Williams
Marshawn Lynch (unless Spiller is a sign he WILL be traded)
Still too many RB's out there to call Slaton a winner.......Winners
Sam Bradford
DeMaryius Thomas
Steve Slaton
Losers
Darren Sproles
Brady Quinn
Kevin Smith
I agree... as a Vikes fan, this sucked!CB-Kyle Wilson-NYJIf he can steal the job opposite Revis, he'll get thrown to a lot with Revis on the other side...Plus he's just a really good CB in his own right.
I have said this in other threads as well, but I will repeat here. IMO, Bulaga is vastly overrated. He may be an improvement over what the Packers currently have, but in no way do I think he is a top 10 talent. I hope he does well though, the Favre-less Packers are one of my favorite teams to watch.Stock Up:Aaron RodgersRyan Grant(the Packers stole a top 10 OT with the 23rd pick)
I have said this in other threads as well, but I will repeat here. IMO, Bulaga is vastly overrated. He may be an improvement over what the Packers currently have, but in no way do I think he is a top 10 talent. I hope he does well though, the Favre-less Packers are one of my favorite teams to watch.Stock Up:Aaron RodgersRyan Grant(the Packers stole a top 10 OT with the 23rd pick)
Not likely as Quinn looks like he is a few years away from getting washed out of the league. My thoughts on the Okung non pick was that Pioli is fine with Albert as his LT, they have a pick in mind at 36, might make a trade for an interior lineman or Berry was too good to pass on.Biggest Losers
All Broncos - From offense to defense, just a total mess. I don't see an organized plan here to build a team. 3 straight reaches last year (Moreno, Ayers, and Smith) and 2 more this year (Thomas, Tebow). If/when Tebow becomes their starting QB, yuuuuuuuccckkkkkkk! Here's hoping Brady Quinn can hold him off.....What a horrible mistake by Bowlen entrusting a newbie like McDaniels with this much authority. Kid doesn't have a clue.
I don't like Quinn all that much, but I see Tebow as a major flop at QB. Worst pick, especially for what they gave up, in at least the past 10 years of the NFL draft. You need more than strong character to play QB in the NFL, skill-set just isn't there.And with the Chiefs, I'm not questioning the selection of Berry, he should be phenomenal. I'm referring to fantasy value, and Okung woukd have raised that entire offense's fantasy value, plain and simple, rewgardless of Albert having to move or not. Adding another top-flight o-lineman could only help them in moving the ball and scoring points, i.e., fantasy relevance. This has nothing todo with whether they made the right pick or not. If I own Charles, Bowe, or Cassel in fantasy land, I would have been rooting for Okung to be the pick, unless you're a Chiefs fan........Not likely as Quinn looks like he is a few years away from getting washed out of the league. My thoughts on the Okung non pick was that Pioli is fine with Albert as his LT, they have a pick in mind at 36, might make a trade for an interior lineman or Berry was too good to pass on.Biggest Losers
All Broncos - From offense to defense, just a total mess. I don't see an organized plan here to build a team. 3 straight reaches last year (Moreno, Ayers, and Smith) and 2 more this year (Thomas, Tebow). If/when Tebow becomes their starting QB, yuuuuuuuccckkkkkkk! Here's hoping Brady Quinn can hold him off.....What a horrible mistake by Bowlen entrusting a newbie like McDaniels with this much authority. Kid doesn't have a clue.
and just what do you do for a living? my bet it's not a NFL GM. i see all these posts that say tebow will be a bust and he may be that, but i think alot of you are just taking what the talking heads have been saying and typing it out. myself. i live in SEC country so i have seen him play more than most....tebow is very strong mentally and he is very coachable, so instead of calling him a bust now lets wait a year or 2.I don't like Quinn all that much, but I see Tebow as a major flop at QB. Worst pick, especially for what they gave up, in at least the past 10 years of the NFL draft. You need more than strong character to play QB in the NFL, skill-set just isn't there.
Florida was on national TV practically every week.and just what do you do for a living? my bet it's not a NFL GM. i see all these posts that say tebow will be a bust and he may be that, but i think alot of you are just taking what the talking heads have been saying and typing it out. myself. i live in SEC country so i have seen him play more than most....tebow is very strong mentally and he is very coachable, so instead of calling him a bust now lets wait a year or 2.I don't like Quinn all that much, but I see Tebow as a major flop at QB. Worst pick, especially for what they gave up, in at least the past 10 years of the NFL draft. You need more than strong character to play QB in the NFL, skill-set just isn't there.
and the highlighted part is not even close......jamarcus russell ring a bell
Maybe. But every year, fans get all stoked when top ten talent falls to the end of the first round. In my experience, it's usually a bad sign. Hopefully he'll be good, but fact is he was the fourth offensive tackle taken--which means three teams that really wanted a tackle passed on him. Not to mention some of the teams from 12-22 that could have used a tackle but went another direction with him on the board.MJD_Mafia said:Stock Up:Aaron RodgersRyan Grant(the Packers stole a top 10 OT with the 23rd pick)
I think it is easier to call some winners (Romo) and some losers (Fred Jackson), but most players like Forsett are far from being in the clear until much later rounds. I'm holding on judgement, esp with RBs, knowing there's some good talent out there.Personally, I'm a bit bummed San Diego didn't just wait and take a Dwyer or someone in the 2nd or 3rd.There are several more things that need to NOT happen still, but if those things don't happen I think Forsett is big winner. I guess he's a winner so far. At least through the first round.
lolPotential losers: Rivers and the SD passing game in general? They got a great RB that should step right into the starting gig that's not known for catching the ball. Rivers and VJax are very talented but could their past stats been tied into neccesity and the lack of a ground game?
MJD_Mafia said:Stock Up:
Aaron Rodgers
Ryan Grant
(the Packers stole a top 10 OT with the 23rd pick)
I don't think they "stole" him, but they got a "steal". Also, I think he meant he was a top 10 player in this draft who they got at 23.MJD_Mafia said:Stock Up:
Aaron Rodgers
Ryan Grant
(the Packers stole a top 10 OT with the 23rd pick)Bulaga was the 4th OT taken. stole? or are you saying that Bulaga will be a top 10 OT in the league?
Bradford and Thomas from a financial stand point, right? Cause i don't see going to STL behind that line, and going to DEN as being great for fantasy purposes. Thomas is at least 2 years from making any consistent contribution, as is Tebow. but i get the feeling that Tebow will see the field much sooner than he should. gonna be really really hard for Orton to win that job.Revo said:Winners
Sam Bradford
DeMaryius Thomas
Steve Slaton
Losers
Darren Sproles
Brady Quinn
Kevin Smith
Something has to give in Dallas. They already pass more than they run and now they've traded for an elite WR. Either Dez doesn't live up to expectations or Witten and Austin take a pretty big cut in their production.Agree with your downs except add Witten to Austin and they will only be small hits. Romo should move to a top 5 FF QB.
What I do for a living is irrelevant. But what I don't do is spew out rhetoric from talking heads. I evaluate players based on what I understand about the game of football, what I have experienced in athletics, and what I have seen in the player(s) I critique. And you can wait all you want, this kid is not an NFL QB. Here's what I see to make this assertion.Duke1948 said:and just what do you do for a living? my bet it's not a NFL GM. i see all these posts that say tebow will be a bust and he may be that, but i think alot of you are just taking what the talking heads have been saying and typing it out. myself. i live in SEC country so i have seen him play more than most....tebow is very strong mentally and he is very coachable, so instead of calling him a bust now lets wait a year or 2.I don't like Quinn all that much, but I see Tebow as a major flop at QB. Worst pick, especially for what they gave up, in at least the past 10 years of the NFL draft. You need more than strong character to play QB in the NFL, skill-set just isn't there.
and the highlighted part is not even close......jamarcus russell ring a bell
Not exactly sure what to think there. He certainly wasn't helped, but it will take time for Thomas to adjust to the NFL. I think his value was pretty high after the trade of Marshall, so it's tough to say where he is now.Surprised no one has said Eddie Royal yet
Or that other Nebrask kid......#7, what was his name? See how soon we forget. Eric Crouch, I believe.Tebow reminds me a lot of Scott Frost - a proven college winner on the field who just didn't have the arm cut for the NFL.Frost was a 3rd rd pick.
I am shocked a NFL team has not given you a job because you know everything and can predict what every player will do...What I do for a living is irrelevant. But what I don't do is spew out rhetoric from talking heads. I evaluate players based on what I understand about the game of football, what I have experienced in athletics, and what I have seen in the player(s) I critique. And you can wait all you want, this kid is not an NFL QB. Here's what I see to make this assertion.Duke1948 said:and just what do you do for a living? my bet it's not a NFL GM. i see all these posts that say tebow will be a bust and he may be that, but i think alot of you are just taking what the talking heads have been saying and typing it out. myself. i live in SEC country so i have seen him play more than most....tebow is very strong mentally and he is very coachable, so instead of calling him a bust now lets wait a year or 2.I don't like Quinn all that much, but I see Tebow as a major flop at QB. Worst pick, especially for what they gave up, in at least the past 10 years of the NFL draft. You need more than strong character to play QB in the NFL, skill-set just isn't there.
and the highlighted part is not even close......jamarcus russell ring a bell
1. Below average arm strength
2. Lacks tight spirals and velocity even on intermediate throws
3. Extremely slow release
4. Severe lack of anticipation
5. Athleticism is decent, but in comparison to NFL standards (and defenders), not great
6. Bad mechanics - i.e., arm positioning, footwork, dropback, balance, delivery
7. Very far behind in reading defenses
8. Accuracy is subpar - NFL accuracy isn't based on collegiate completion %.......BALL PLACEMENT is critical (e.g., back shoulder, over-the-shoulder, low and tight, out in front, in-stride, etc.) as windows for completions are often very tight, and allowing the WR to accrue YAC is also vital
A list of negatives this long is not so easy to overcome for the most talented players, but for a guy who is essentially an option FB/RB who played QB in a system geared for him at the collegiate level surrounded by premier talent in relation to the other teams he faced (florida talent >>>> opponents, for the most part), it ain't happening! I'm taking my stand now, I've seen enough as there are many things on my 1-8 list that are simply deal killers, esp #4, which was glaring from what I witnessed at the Senior Bowl........
Alex Smith put up those type of numbers this past season on a per game basis.I think were looking at a huge fantasy breakout for him this year. He has all offseason knowing he's the #1 guy and has tons of weapons at his disposal.Frank Gore and Alex Smith, San Francisco 49ers -- The 49ers took two strong, aggressive lineman in the 1st round. If they pan out, you've got the makings of a really solid line and that can only mean good things for the 49ers skill positions. I'm actually warming up to Alex Smith as a fantasy sleeper this year. I could see a 3,500, 22-25 TD season without much trouble.
Fred Jackson, Buffalo Bills -- Because of the timing of when we go live each year, those of us that do projections for the site have already gotten far along, and then we tweak/alter as the draft unfolds. I was prepared to make a strong case for Fred Jackson as a top fantasy RB2 this year, particularly in PPR leagues. Obviously, with the Bills insisting they are keeping Lynch (I assumed they wouldn't) and then selecting Spiller top 10, that goes out the window. If they REALLY keep Lynch, it becomes a nightmare RBBC akin to what Tampa dealt with last year IMHO. If they move Lynch, then I'm more comfortable with Jackson as a contributor, but more as a RB3 in 10-team leagues, RB2 (low end) in 12-team leagues.
Tony Romo, Dallas Cowboys -- He was already firmly entrenched in that "not quite elite" tier, but with the addition of Dez Bryant, it's hard to imagine him as anything short of a 4,000-yard, 25-30 TD passer who has more protection against an injury than he would've prior to the Dez addition. The Cowboys still have some work to do on the offensive line though.
Frank Gore and Alex Smith, San Francisco 49ers -- The 49ers took two strong, aggressive lineman in the 1st round. If they pan out, you've got the makings of a really solid line and that can only mean good things for the 49ers skill positions. I'm actually warming up to Alex Smith as a fantasy sleeper this year. I could see a 3,500, 22-25 TD season without much trouble.
Steven Jackson, St. Louis Rams -- This is a contrarian view but I think the addition of Bradford hurts Jackson. To me, Bradford isn't a good bet to be a plus NFL QB, certainly not right away, but I think the Rams will feel the pressure to get him on the field. Without a major new anchor on the O-line, I see Jackson as having a tough time being a one man show again. Now, if the Rams add OL depth today and tomorrow, this is obviously much less of a concern.
Justin Forsett, Seattle Seahawks -- It's still way too early, but the Seahawks adding a franchise LT to the mix and not adding someone like Spiller or Best (yet), argues for potential RB2 upside for Forsett. Let's see if Seattle adds another RB though today or maybe acquires someone like Lynch before I'm willing to give the all clear on Justin's prospects.
Jahvid Best, Detroit Lions -- Best (along with Matthews and whoever Houston drafts today) have the clearest path to fantasy production among rookie RBs. Best goes to a team that HAS to use him, so the risk of his being a Felix Jones, 5-10 touches per game, change of pace are no longer a fear. I believed Best was the best fantasy RB prospect in this draft, and now he gets the chance to prove me right or wrong right away. To be clear, I think Matthews going to San Diego (and having SD trade up to 12 for him), makes him very much the odds on favorite to be the top fantasy rookie, but I also think you'll have to draft him several rounds earlier than Best.
Kyle Orton, Denver Broncos -- For a guy that Josh McD insists he can win with, he sure is taking desperate measures to find alternatives. First he trades for Brady Quinn, and now he reaches in historic fashion for Tim Tebow. It's impossible for me to believe Orton won't have a short leash given the way Josh is scrambling for alternatives.
I just want to point something out in relation to this. I've yet to understand the "not quite elite" moniker. He's finished 2nd, 9th, and 6th the last 3 years. His 9th place finish was while missing 3 games (and would have easily been top 5 that year too).If you prorate his 2008 #'s for the 3 games he missed, here are his #'s the last 3 years:Tony Romo, Dallas Cowboys -- He was already firmly entrenched in that "not quite elite" tier, but with the addition of Dez Bryant, it's hard to imagine him as anything short of a 4,000-yard, 25-30 TD passer who has more protection against an injury than he would've prior to the Dez addition. The Cowboys still have some work to do on the offensive line though.
Is this just your opinion or do you have reasons for it?I think with Clifton and Tauscher mentoring the kid he could be as good as they have been.The Real Hipster Doofus said:I have said this in other threads as well, but I will repeat here. IMO, Bulaga is vastly overrated. He may be an improvement over what the Packers currently have, but in no way do I think he is a top 10 talent. I hope he does well though, the Favre-less Packers are one of my favorite teams to watch.MJD_Mafia said:Stock Up:Aaron RodgersRyan Grant(the Packers stole a top 10 OT with the 23rd pick)
Apparently they do. McCluster could be a return man as well as occasional RB though so it may not be that bad.do the Chefs hate Jamaal Charles or something?
He's still the best QB on the roster.Kyle Orton, Denver Broncos -- For a guy that Josh McD insists he can win with, he sure is taking desperate measures to find alternatives. First he trades for Brady Quinn, and now he reaches in historic fashion for Tim Tebow. It's impossible for me to believe Orton won't have a short leash given the way Josh is scrambling for alternatives.
They would have been better off with Saffold, but maybe they can still get a good OT. Too bad the Jets took Vlad.I don`t like the Lions taking Best late first. The Lions o-line stinks and Best is a small, horrible pass protecting RB. If Best is in the lineup Matt Stafford may not last the 11 games he played last season.
I thought it was the best possible outcome for Orton. It will be a long time before Tebow is ready to start.He's still the best QB on the roster.Kyle Orton, Denver Broncos -- For a guy that Josh McD insists he can win with, he sure is taking desperate measures to find alternatives. First he trades for Brady Quinn, and now he reaches in historic fashion for Tim Tebow. It's impossible for me to believe Orton won't have a short leash given the way Josh is scrambling for alternatives.
I don't disagree, but I think the addition of Dez limits Romo's downside.I just want to point something out in relation to this. I've yet to understand the "not quite elite" moniker. He's finished 2nd, 9th, and 6th the last 3 years. His 9th place finish was while missing 3 games (and would have easily been top 5 that year too).If you prorate his 2008 #'s for the 3 games he missed, here are his #'s the last 3 years:Tony Romo, Dallas Cowboys -- He was already firmly entrenched in that "not quite elite" tier, but with the addition of Dez Bryant, it's hard to imagine him as anything short of a 4,000-yard, 25-30 TD passer who has more protection against an injury than he would've prior to the Dez addition. The Cowboys still have some work to do on the offensive line though.
2007 -- 4211/36/19
2008 -- 4243/32/17
2009 -- 4483/26/9
I'm also going to ignore his fantastic stats in just over half a season in 2006 in his 1st year where he also prorates to the above #'s.
In other words, he's ALREADY a 4000 yd, 25-30 TD passer. He's honestly already been an elite QB. I think the Dez Bryant signing only raises his PERCEPTUAL value, not his ACTUAL value. His actual value was already that of a top 3-4 QB. I'm not sure his #'s will improve, but it's possible. This unfortunately just makes it harder to obtain what was a previously solid value play at QB.
Pats took Taylor Price, who I think will be a very good WR2.Ronnie Brown/Ricky WilliamsHow about Brandon Tate - with Pats passing on Dez/GTate....
Yep. This is shocking. He was in the running for the top RB in the class in February, now he's still sitting there in the fourth round. I'm really interested to see where he goes, I think he's a major value in the late first of drafts now.A loser that hasn't been mentioned yet - Jonathan Dwyer. Didn't get drafted in the first 3 rounds.