gianmarco
Footballguy
Reread your bolded sections. As you did the last 3 yr average, I'll go ahead and give you the 3 yr totals and averages for the 4 guys you called out (Smith, Harrison, Holt, and TO). Mind you, for TO and Smith, I even skipped the years where TO was held out and Smith was injured, so I went with their best last 3 yrs.From top to bottom (3 yr avg)Obviously you missed my point EBF. I am not saying CJ will not have better #s than Housh, Roy W, Evans, Coles or Driver, BUT you can get all of those players at least 2 to 4 rounds later than CJGoing by your #s for a sec, in a PPR, 1 pt for 10 yards league:EBF said:2007 does not equal 2006. Chad has outproduced Houshmandzadeh every season they've been in the league. He's one of the steadiest WRs in the game. He has four straight years of at least 1,250 receiving yards and 7 TDs.Sweetness_34 said:Why is Chad Johnson so over-rated again? Why not get a legit stud like Harrison/TO/Holt/Steve Smith instead and then get Whoyomama at least 3 rounds after Chad?
CJ had 7 TDs last year and 5 of those came in 2 games. He had 0 TDs in 12 of his 16 games.....is this the consistency you expect from your #1 WR especially if you draft him before any of the above mentioned WRs?
Yes, he will get his ~80 or more catches and 1200+ yards, but so will Harrison, Holt, TO and Steve Smith (barring unforeseen injuries which you cannot predict for anyone) ..... so why bother with the TD downside with this guy?
Just for comparison sake, Whosyomama had 90 catches and 1081 yards to go with 9 TDs.....and this was despite only playing in 14 games....
Would you really want to get Chad at least 3 rounds before Whosyomama instead?
![]()
And I have not even mentioned WRs like Donald Driver, Lee Evans, Javon Walker, Laverneous Coles, Andre Johnson who could all be had a lot lower than CJ and would give you greater value.
This love affair with CJ just because he causes so much attention to himself is ridiculous.
In three years as a starter, Housh has averaged: 80 catches, 1005 yards, and 7 TDs
During that same time period, Chad has averaged: 93 catches, 1358 yards, and 8 TDs
Even if you account for missing games, there's still a significant difference between these two. Chad has had more yards in each of his past five seasons than Housh has ever had in a season.
Housh had a career year last year. Is it a sign of things to come? I don't know, but it's pretty common for players to regress after their career years. Remember, it wasn't long ago that Muhsin Muhammad, Chris Chambers, and Santana Moss were top 10 WRs. Yet no one ranks these guys above Chad Johnson and Torry Holt. Why? Because Chad and Holt have shown that they can do it every season.
As for Steve Smith, he's only eclipsed 1,200 yards once in his career. Injuries have certainly played a role in his lack of success, but his reputation exceeds his production. He's overrated and overvalued, IMO.
You also asked about TO, Harrison, and Holt. IMO, Owens is on the decline. I don't think he's the dominant player he once was. And with his injury and character issues, you'd have to be crazy to take him over Chad Johnson.
Harrison? I could justify taking him over Chad. His yardage totals have leveled off somewhat in the past few years, but the Colts offense gives him so many TD opportunities that he's still a stud.
I rank Holt close to Chad for redraft purposes. They're essentially the same player.
You mention a lot of guys who could have a better year than Chad Johnson. I won't argue that Andre Johnson and Lee Evans could have a better year. But I'd much rather put my money on the guy who should have a 1,300+ yard season as opposed to the guy who could.
Chad Johnson is my WR1 this season. Why? Because he always finishes in the top 10. Even if he doesn't end up as the WR1, he's going to anchor one of your starting WR slots. Also, the absence of red zone terror Chris Henry for a significant portion of the season should afford CJ increased touchdown opportunities. He's in his prime and entering an age range where WRs of his breed tend to have some of their finest years (check the careers of Rice, Harrison, and J. Smith).
We could very well see the best season of Johnson's career in 2007.
CJ has averaged 93 catches, 1358 yards, and 8 TDs => 276.8 Points
Housh has averaged 80 catches, 1005 yards, and 7 TDs => 222.5 Points
You get 3.4 PPG better from CJ instead of Housh.....is that worth drafting CJ in the 2nd or 3rd round when you can get Housh in the 4th/5th/6th round?
Ever heard of the concept of VALUE????
I can make the same argument now for Driver, Evans, Roy Williams, Andre Johnson, Coles etc..... CJ is the worst WR out of Steve Smith, Harrison, TO, Holt ..... if you have to take a WR in the 1st or 2nd round, go with one of those.....otherwise wait until the 4th or later and get one of those I mentioned.
If CJ wasn't entertaining he would not be over-rated like he is
Harrison--88 catches/1208 yds/13 TDs = 287 pts or 17.9 ppg
Holt--96 catches/1297 yds/10 TDs = 285 pts or 17.8 ppg
(CJ--93 catches/1358 yds/8 TDs = 277 pts or 17.3 ppg)
S. Smith--91 catches/1280 yds/9 TDs = 273 pts or 17 ppg
TO--81 catches/1160 yds/12 TDs = 269 pts or 16.8 ppg
Now, explain to me again why CJ is the worst of that group and why you should pass him up to wait for TJ who is "only" 3.4 ppg lower? TJ is "only" 4.0 ppg lower to the #1 WR in terms of averages over the last 3 yrs so why draft ANY of these guys, right?
ETA--CJ's total points for the last 4 years: 286, 276, 294, 266. So it's not like he's all over the place, either. This guy has been within 10-20 pts of his average the last 4 yrs. What more of a sure thing could you ask for that continues to finish in the top 5 and trails only Holt and Harrison during the last 3 yrs in terms of average FP in a PPR league? I really don't think some of you realize how good and consistent this guy is. It has nothing to do with the "hype". Also, out of the 5 guys listed, he has no "issues" or causes for concern like the age/possible decline of TO and Harrison or injuries for Smith and Holt. The guy is the youngest in the group without any injury history with a premier QB throwing to him in an offense that is essentially unchanged. He has the least likelihood of all 5 of these guys to disappoint.
Also, this is why these 5 guys are ranked in my top 5 as well in this thread. These guys just flat out perform year after year. I see no reason why anyone overtakes them yet. I know you can't always judge future performance by past performance, but none of them have given any reason to suggest they won't continue their repeated success.
Last edited by a moderator: