FosterMcCoyRiceMcFaddenEveryone else and whoever is left in the tier when I pick a RB again.FosterRiceMcCoyCJ2KMcFaddenMJDForte MurrayMathewsCharles?
He will get fewer carries, fewer goal line looks, and fewer targets, in my opinion. His per carry totals will get a solid rise, I think. But I don't think it will make up for the loss of other opportunities.Why are people discounting Forte? M.Bush? He is RB #4 right now IMO
Look back at his previous seasons - the number of touchdowns was never a big part of Forte's total fantasy points - especially in PPR leaguesHe will get fewer carries, fewer goal line looks, and fewer targets, in my opinion. His per carry totals will get a solid rise, I think. But I don't think it will make up for the loss of other opportunities.Why are people discounting Forte? M.Bush? He is RB #4 right now IMO
Very true, but it's never a good thing when a team has another back for GL touches. I also anticipate him losing carries and receptions, in general.Look back at his previous seasons - the number of touchdowns was never a big part of Forte's total fantasy points - especially in PPR leaguesHe will get fewer carries, fewer goal line looks, and fewer targets, in my opinion. His per carry totals will get a solid rise, I think. But I don't think it will make up for the loss of other opportunities.Why are people discounting Forte? M.Bush? He is RB #4 right now IMO
He had 0 goal line TDs last year anyway, I believe. So what if he loses goal line carries? He didn't have them to begin with.He will get fewer carries, fewer goal line looks, and fewer targets, in my opinion. His per carry totals will get a solid rise, I think. But I don't think it will make up for the loss of other opportunities.Why are people discounting Forte? M.Bush? He is RB #4 right now IMO
Not every depth move means massive loss of production to the incumbent and more talented starter.This was an upgrade (bush) because MB3 and K.Bell were not getting it done once Forte was hurt. They needed a player like himLoving Forte's value right now.He had 0 goal line TDs last year anyway, I believe. So what if he loses goal line carries? He didn't have them to begin with.He will get fewer carries, fewer goal line looks, and fewer targets, in my opinion. His per carry totals will get a solid rise, I think. But I don't think it will make up for the loss of other opportunities.Why are people discounting Forte? M.Bush? He is RB #4 right now IMO
getting of the PUP would be huge & playing in pre-season, although I doubt Minny would do that.What will it take to vault AP back into the Top 10?
7 of his 17 touchdowns (41%) over the past 3 seasons have come from the 10 or closer.Currently... Bush has received the vast majority of redzone work.He had 0 goal line TDs last year anyway, I believe. So what if he loses goal line carries? He didn't have them to begin with.He will get fewer carries, fewer goal line looks, and fewer targets, in my opinion. His per carry totals will get a solid rise, I think. But I don't think it will make up for the loss of other opportunities.Why are people discounting Forte? M.Bush?
He is RB #4 right now IMO
1 year. It takes time to come back from this type of injury. He'll feel like himself next season unless he tears something else.getting of the PUP would be huge & playing in pre-season, although I doubt Minny would do that.What will it take to vault AP back into the Top 10?
For it to be September, 2013What will it take to vault AP back into the Top 10?
He only had 3 TDs last year. None were at the goal line. (OOps: he also had a 56 yard rec TD week 1)So 7 TDs out of 14 (50%) in the two previous seasons, when there REALLY wasn't any competition.7 of his 17 touchdowns (41%) over the past 3 seasons have come from the 10 or closer.Currently... Bush has received the vast majority of redzone work.He had 0 goal line TDs last year anyway, I believe. So what if he loses goal line carries? He didn't have them to begin with.He will get fewer carries, fewer goal line looks, and fewer targets, in my opinion. His per carry totals will get a solid rise, I think. But I don't think it will make up for the loss of other opportunities.Why are people discounting Forte? M.Bush?
He is RB #4 right now IMO
He had 12 rushes inside the ten, Barber had 11. I expect that ratio to change. They didn't sign Bush to simply be the backup, he will get touches and TDs. The offense will not rely on Forte as much as it did last year. His numbers will drop.He had 0 goal line TDs last year anyway, I believe. So what if he loses goal line carries? He didn't have them to begin with.
Very true. But sometimes they do, and I think Bush cuts into the pie.The fun part is putting your chips down and seeing what happens. So, to be cliche: we'll see.Not every depth move means massive loss of production to the incumbent and more talented starter.
This was an upgrade (bush) because MB3 and K.Bell were not getting it done once Forte was hurt. They needed a player like him
Loving Forte's value right now.
His ceiling has been lowered. I like a shot at the #1 overall RB from my first round RB.He won't be #1 overall RB material because of TDs - but he never has been, and he's a RB1. I'll be hoping against all hope that I can get him at 11.
I agree. I personally add McFadden and call it top 4. He's risky, but he has as much upside as anyone. I can't justify taking any of the others in the first round, in most formats. I don't like any of them that much more than the 1 or 2 that will be around in the 2nd.My top 10 as of now. People seem to be focusing on Forte's questions marks at the moment. But there are significant ???s about everyone after the consensus top 3.
As opposed to fictionally?Foster ArianRice RayMcCoy LeSeanJohnson ChrisJackson FredLynch MarshawnForte MattTurner MichaelBradshaw AhmadRichardson TrentThere is literally a 4 point difference between my #4 and #10 back.
I don't disagree, but they are a decent run blocking line. When talking about Forte, you shouldn't be worried about the o-line. He'll be fine.'Penguin said:Chicago's offensive line still stinks
Since when is the goal-line out to the 10 yard line?7 of his 17 touchdowns (41%) over the past 3 seasons have come from the 10 or closer.He had 0 goal line TDs last year anyway, I believe. So what if he loses goal line carries? He didn't have them to begin with.He will get fewer carries, fewer goal line looks, and fewer targets, in my opinion. His per carry totals will get a solid rise, I think. But I don't think it will make up for the loss of other opportunities.Why are people discounting Forte? M.Bush?
He is RB #4 right now IMO
I'm going to assume you got this from the 8/4 article in the Chicago Tribune, where the reporter takes a quote from Tice about Bush being the "goal-line" back and then the reporter suggests that Bush has gotten most of the "red-zone" work. I would love to see if anyone who has been at Bears TC can confirm that they saw this, because I haven't seen/heard of it anywhere else. I would want to see this reported in more than one place (where it may be a "mis-print" where the reporter says "red-zone" but means goal-line, as Tice was saying), or see it happen during pre-season games before I would drop Forte's yardage numbers.As noted, Forte has scored ZERO TDs the last 2 years from inside the 5 and has been top-10 (PPR scoring) the last two years (obviously PPG scoring, to account for his shortened 2011 season). So if he is going to lose ZERO TDs, how does that downgrade him?Currently... Bush has received the vast majority of redzone work.
You mean the McFadden who was on pace for 1750 YFS and 11 TDs last year before he got hurt (as he has EVERY SINGLE SEASON of his pro career)? Those numbers would have made him RB5 (non-PPR). I agree, he has a lot of upside, IF (huge IF) he can stay healthy for the whole season.BTW-Forte was on pace for just under 2000 YFS and 5 TDs before he got hurt (which is the first time he has missed any games in his NFL career), which would also have ranked him as RB5 last year.'Concept Coop said:I agree. I personally add McFadden and call it top 4. He's risky, but he has as much upside as anyone. I can't justify taking any of the others in the first round, in most formats. I don't like any of them that much more than the 1 or 2 that will be around in the 2nd.'VaTerp said:My top 10 as of now. People seem to be focusing on Forte's questions marks at the moment. But there are significant ???s about everyone after the consensus top 3.
And yet you have Richardson in your top 10 even though he's having his 2nd knee surgery in 6 months? I understand the allure of Richardson's talent and the situation, but I think the O-line on the right is still an issue, the defense will put them into situations requiring more passing, the knee is obviously a concern, and even though te learning curve for RBs is less than other positions he's still an unproven rookie.The truth probably is that there's just so many question marks on so many RBs, and yet so much talent, that there's easily around 10 RBs after the top tier that could all finish in just about any order.FosterRiceMcCoyForteCJ1kFred JacksonBradshawCharlesMJDRichardsonNo Dmac or Mathews because I don't believe they can be injury free, No Lynch because I think a 4-6 game suspension. If these things don't happen I see them top 10.