detfan782004
Footballguy
I have heard it will be Caldwell but with Gabriel trade and Jackson the rookie who will emerge as Tom Brady's number 1? He always gets his passing yards so someone has to get them right.
Yup, I would not be surprised if Branch still lead them in receptions at the end of the year.Thanks.Clear as mud.I guess at this point Troy Williamson has more value than any of them anyhow.
Well I already have D Jackson (still not 100 percent)L. Evans (seems to do well with Losman)A. Johnson (hope he bounces back)Stallworth (he makes me nervous now that he has to learn new offense)Troy Williamson will be pretty good this year, but i took a good look at Gabriel, and depending on what kind of league you're in, i'd take a look at Gabriel too,...Gabriel more in Keeper, Williamson more in seasonal, just cause Williamson is in Minn. and Gabriel in NE,...maybe if Williamson was somewhere else i'd flop it for ya.![]()
![]()
![]()
Yet, for a lot of us that play in leagues that make no distinction between WR/TE, they're all the same to us.You need to relax, and quit the superiority act. It's tired.The poster asked the Question, Who is the clear cut #1 WR WR WR
Ben Watson is a TE, he is not a WR. Ben Watson will likely be the best receiving option, yet he is still not a WR. How about answering the mans question the way it was asked.
Also when someone says "Who is the #2 WR for the Saints" then the answer is NOT Reggie Bush, he is a RB.
Logic people, it's not that hard.
I am so confused, what did you just say???Troy Williamson will be pretty good this year, but i took a good look at Gabriel, and depending on what kind of league you're in, i'd take a look at Gabriel too,...Gabriel more in Keeper, Williamson more in seasonal, just cause Williamson is in Minn. and Gabriel in NE,...maybe if Williamson was somewhere else i'd flop it for ya.![]()
![]()
![]()
Yet, for a lot of us that play in leagues that make no distinction between WR/TE, they're all the same to us.You need to relax, and quit the superiority act. It's tired.The poster asked the Question, Who is the clear cut #1 WR WR WR
Ben Watson is a TE, he is not a WR. Ben Watson will likely be the best receiving option, yet he is still not a WR. How about answering the mans question the way it was asked.
Also when someone says "Who is the #2 WR for the Saints" then the answer is NOT Reggie Bush, he is a RB.
Logic people, it's not that hard.
Yet, for a lot of us that play in leagues that make no distinction between WR/TE, they're all the same to us.You need to relax, and quit the superiority act. It's tired.The poster asked the Question, Who is the clear cut #1 WR WR WR
Ben Watson is a TE, he is not a WR. Ben Watson will likely be the best receiving option, yet he is still not a WR. How about answering the mans question the way it was asked.
Also when someone says "Who is the #2 WR for the Saints" then the answer is NOT Reggie Bush, he is a RB.
Logic people, it's not that hard.
Superiority? Give it a rest, I don't do that at all. Well, the poster who posed the question and his content is this "I have heard it will be Caldwell but with Gabriel trade and Jackson the rookie who will emerge as Tom Brady's number 1? He always gets his passing yards so someone has to get them right."Ya think maybe he's in the middle of a draft and Watson could be gone but Caldwell/Gabriel/Brown are still available?Yet, for a lot of us that play in leagues that make no distinction between WR/TE, they're all the same to us.You need to relax, and quit the superiority act. It's tired.The poster asked the Question, Who is the clear cut #1 WR WR WR
Ben Watson is a TE, he is not a WR. Ben Watson will likely be the best receiving option, yet he is still not a WR. How about answering the mans question the way it was asked.
Also when someone says "Who is the #2 WR for the Saints" then the answer is NOT Reggie Bush, he is a RB.
Logic people, it's not that hard.
This is deep manSuperiority? Give it a rest, I don't do that at all. Well, the poster who posed the question and his content is this "I have heard it will be Caldwell but with Gabriel trade and Jackson the rookie who will emerge as Tom Brady's number 1? He always gets his passing yards so someone has to get them right."Ya think maybe he's in the middle of a draft and Watson could be gone but Caldwell/Gabriel/Brown are still available?Yet, for a lot of us that play in leagues that make no distinction between WR/TE, they're all the same to us.You need to relax, and quit the superiority act. It's tired.The poster asked the Question, Who is the clear cut #1 WR WR WR
Ben Watson is a TE, he is not a WR. Ben Watson will likely be the best receiving option, yet he is still not a WR. How about answering the mans question the way it was asked.
Also when someone says "Who is the #2 WR for the Saints" then the answer is NOT Reggie Bush, he is a RB.
Logic people, it's not that hard.
Ya think maybe his draft is over and Watson is rostered and the 3 WRS are not?
Ya think you could just help the guy out with his question without saying a TE is a WR?
Ya think his league uses WR and TE as the same thing like yours?
Ya think ???
As the poster said "He always gets his passing yards so someone has to get them right." and as we responded, it will be Watson. I also responded that I would not be suprised if Branch still lead the team at the end of the year. Did that not answer his question, alteast based on my oppinion because nobody knows the answer to his questions.Superiority? Give it a rest, I don't do that at all. Well, the poster who posed the question and his content is this "I have heard it will be Caldwell but with Gabriel trade and Jackson the rookie who will emerge as Tom Brady's number 1? He always gets his passing yards so someone has to get them right."Ya think maybe he's in the middle of a draft and Watson could be gone but Caldwell/Gabriel/Brown are still available?Yet, for a lot of us that play in leagues that make no distinction between WR/TE, they're all the same to us.You need to relax, and quit the superiority act. It's tired.The poster asked the Question, Who is the clear cut #1 WR WR WR
Ben Watson is a TE, he is not a WR. Ben Watson will likely be the best receiving option, yet he is still not a WR. How about answering the mans question the way it was asked.
Also when someone says "Who is the #2 WR for the Saints" then the answer is NOT Reggie Bush, he is a RB.
Logic people, it's not that hard.
Ya think maybe his draft is over and Watson is rostered and the 3 WRS are not?
Ya think you could just help the guy out with his question without saying a TE is a WR?
Ya think his league uses WR and TE as the same thing like yours?
Ya think ???
You're right, the worst part is nobody knows the answer to these questions, not even me the Superior...As the poster said "He always gets his passing yards so someone has to get them right." and as we responded, it will be Watson. I also responded that I would not be suprised if Branch still lead the team at the end of the year. Did that not answer his question, alteast based on my oppinion because nobody knows the answer to his questions.Superiority? Give it a rest, I don't do that at all. Well, the poster who posed the question and his content is this "I have heard it will be Caldwell but with Gabriel trade and Jackson the rookie who will emerge as Tom Brady's number 1? He always gets his passing yards so someone has to get them right."Ya think maybe he's in the middle of a draft and Watson could be gone but Caldwell/Gabriel/Brown are still available?Yet, for a lot of us that play in leagues that make no distinction between WR/TE, they're all the same to us.You need to relax, and quit the superiority act. It's tired.The poster asked the Question, Who is the clear cut #1 WR WR WR
Ben Watson is a TE, he is not a WR. Ben Watson will likely be the best receiving option, yet he is still not a WR. How about answering the mans question the way it was asked.
Also when someone says "Who is the #2 WR for the Saints" then the answer is NOT Reggie Bush, he is a RB.
Logic people, it's not that hard.
Ya think maybe his draft is over and Watson is rostered and the 3 WRS are not?
Ya think you could just help the guy out with his question without saying a TE is a WR?
Ya think his league uses WR and TE as the same thing like yours?
Ya think ???
Thanks, the original post got me confused.I was saying that Gabriel might take more time to develop in NE than Williamson in Minn, but i like Gabriels value in NE over long-term than Williamsons in Minn.
Superiority? Give it a rest, I don't do that at all.
I wouldn't have said a word if not for that line.Logic people, it's not that hard.
Oops, you got me. Just a little.Superiority? Give it a rest, I don't do that at all.
I wouldn't have said a word if not for that line.Logic people, it's not that hard.
The first step is to admit there is a problem. Sounds like you are on the road to recovery.You're right, the worst part is nobody knows the answer to these questions, not even me the Superior...As the poster said "He always gets his passing yards so someone has to get them right." and as we responded, it will be Watson. I also responded that I would not be suprised if Branch still lead the team at the end of the year. Did that not answer his question, alteast based on my oppinion because nobody knows the answer to his questions.Superiority? Give it a rest, I don't do that at all. Well, the poster who posed the question and his content is this "I have heard it will be Caldwell but with Gabriel trade and Jackson the rookie who will emerge as Tom Brady's number 1? He always gets his passing yards so someone has to get them right."Ya think maybe he's in the middle of a draft and Watson could be gone but Caldwell/Gabriel/Brown are still available?Yet, for a lot of us that play in leagues that make no distinction between WR/TE, they're all the same to us.You need to relax, and quit the superiority act. It's tired.The poster asked the Question, Who is the clear cut #1 WR WR WR
Ben Watson is a TE, he is not a WR. Ben Watson will likely be the best receiving option, yet he is still not a WR. How about answering the mans question the way it was asked.
Also when someone says "Who is the #2 WR for the Saints" then the answer is NOT Reggie Bush, he is a RB.
Logic people, it's not that hard.
Ya think maybe his draft is over and Watson is rostered and the 3 WRS are not?
Ya think you could just help the guy out with his question without saying a TE is a WR?
Ya think his league uses WR and TE as the same thing like yours?
Ya think ???![]()
Oops, you got me. Just a little.Superiority? Give it a rest, I don't do that at all.
I wouldn't have said a word if not for that line.Logic people, it's not that hard.![]()
Sure there is, Deion Branch.Brady spreads the ball around so much, I'm not sure there is a clear #1
Sensative?The poster asked the Question, Who is the clear cut #1 WR WR WR
Ben Watson is a TE, he is not a WR. Ben Watson will likely be the best receiving option, yet he is still not a WR. How about answering the mans question the way it was asked.
Also when someone says "Who is the #2 WR for the Saints" then the answer is NOT Reggie Bush, he is a RB.
Logic people, it's not that hard.
Which is why I'm a bit hesitant on all the Watson hype, although that's for another thread. They also have another good receiving (and blocking) TE in Graham, and IIRC they just drafted a rookie TE (name escapes me) pretty early.Brady spreads the ball around so much, I'm not sure there is a clear #1
The other tight end is David Thomas and neither he nor Graham are anywhere close to what Watson is. I see the Pats playing many two tightend sets with Watson being the star and Graham having just enough to keep his value down as his contract is up after this year.Which is why I'm a bit hesitant on all the Watson hype, although that's for another thread. They also have another good receiving (and blocking) TE in Graham, and IIRC they just drafted a rookie TE (name escapes me) pretty early.Brady spreads the ball around so much, I'm not sure there is a clear #1
I still think that Branch will lead the team in receptions. I believe that they will kiss and make up sooner rather than later. Brown is too old and not a legitimate factor. Caldwell is not picking up the offense and will not be a factor either.Gabriel is new and may only be a threat to Branch or he may help out in a few weeks. Bellicheck can recoup a 5th round pick 6 or 7 times during the draft next year so that does not mean much to him.Childress could have some value, but certainly no where near Troy Williamson.Now that this has all been said, to get back to your statement in post #5, you are correct Troy Williamson has more value than any of the above mentioned NE receivers.To answer your question on post #1, Ben Watson will emerge as Brady’s number 1 just as Ben Coates was Bledsoe’s #1.Is that clearer than mud? Then again this is just my opinion so that may not mean much to anyone.Thanks for all the comments. I realize Watson is going to get a lot of balls but really just interested int he WR.
You need a bad operation.The poster asked the Question, Who is the clear cut #1 WR WR WR
Ben Watson is a TE, he is not a WR. Ben Watson will likely be the best receiving option, yet he is still not a WR. How about answering the mans question the way it was asked.
Also when someone says "Who is the #2 WR for the Saints" then the answer is NOT Reggie Bush, he is a RB.
Logic people, it's not that hard.
I was saying that Gabriel might take more time to develop in NE than Williamson in Minn, but i like Gabriels value in NE over long-term than Williamsons in Minn.
According to Stallworth it should be no problem learning the West Coast offense and part of that reason he says is because he's from California....seriously, he said that.Stallworth (he makes me nervous now that he has to learn new offense)
I heard it really wasn't a matter of his hamstring, but him picking up the playbook. If this is false, then yes, he would be my guess as the #1.What are the thoughts on Chad Jackson? With Branch out and Caldwell being terrible, I'd think Jackson would have a great chance to emerge. I thought he was a big-time talent with the size and the speed. He was looking good in camp, but obviously that injury set him back.The hamstring is still a problem, but I think Jackson might be the #1WR as soon as he returns. He's ahead of Gabriel in terms of digesting the playbook, and neither Caldwell nor Brown are very good. (And before anyone gets on the whole rookie on the Patriots thing, don't forget that Deion Branch was a stud as a rookie pre-injury. He ranked 10th in PPR leagues through five weeks, with 32/375/2 in the first five games of his career.)
Word is that he's been slow to digest the playbook . . . that, coupled with the fact that he's had very little practice time, leads me to believe that he won't be much of a factor in 2006 . . .What are the thoughts on Chad Jackson? With Branch out and Caldwell being terrible, I'd think Jackson would have a great chance to emerge. I thought he was a big-time talent with the size and the speed. He was looking good in camp, but obviously that injury set him back.The hamstring is still a problem, but I think Jackson might be the #1WR as soon as he returns. He's ahead of Gabriel in terms of digesting the playbook, and neither Caldwell nor Brown are very good. (And before anyone gets on the whole rookie on the Patriots thing, don't forget that Deion Branch was a stud as a rookie pre-injury. He ranked 10th in PPR leagues through five weeks, with 32/375/2 in the first five games of his career.)
With's Brady's top WR from 2005 gone, along with his second, fourth and fifth receivers, and with his top free agent acquisition WR being a dissapointment, and his highly drafted rookie WR failing to inspire confidence, I'm shocked at how high Brady's ADP still is. I know this thread isn't about Brady, but I don't know how he's still being drafted in the top ten. I understand that he's an excellent real life QB and he was very good last year, but the Patriots have gone through six WRs since then. An ADP of QB2 (although Palmer's ahead of him in most drafts by now) is mind-boggling.Word is that he's been slow to digest the playbook . . . that, coupled with the fact that he's had very little practice time, leads me to believe that he won't be much of a factor in 2006 . . .What are the thoughts on Chad Jackson? With Branch out and Caldwell being terrible, I'd think Jackson would have a great chance to emerge. I thought he was a big-time talent with the size and the speed. He was looking good in camp, but obviously that injury set him back.The hamstring is still a problem, but I think Jackson might be the #1WR as soon as he returns. He's ahead of Gabriel in terms of digesting the playbook, and neither Caldwell nor Brown are very good. (And before anyone gets on the whole rookie on the Patriots thing, don't forget that Deion Branch was a stud as a rookie pre-injury. He ranked 10th in PPR leagues through five weeks, with 32/375/2 in the first five games of his career.)
Don't hijack by comparing Vick to Brady please. Brady would love to have Vick's WRs. White/Jenkins/Lelie is much better than a lot of teams have, they just need a QB to throw them an accurate pass.I think Brady will spread the ball around, Watson is the only one that will be starter material, at least for a few weeks. If Branch loses his grievence, will he play this season?It's never a good thing for your TE to be your #1 receiver... just ask Michael Vick...
Last superbowl, i'd like to think Givens and Branch would have been a better situation for the Pats to argue no true #1 then what they've got now."clear cut #1 in NE at WR""jumbo shrimp""military intelligence"......oxymorons my friendThey even made commercials to mock the fact that there was no #1 during their Super Bowl days.
I think your not the sharpest knife in the drawer :11:Superiority? Give it a rest, I don't do that at all. Well, the poster who posed the question and his content is this "I have heard it will be Caldwell but with Gabriel trade and Jackson the rookie who will emerge as Tom Brady's number 1? He always gets his passing yards so someone has to get them right."Ya think maybe he's in the middle of a draft and Watson could be gone but Caldwell/Gabriel/Brown are still available?Yet, for a lot of us that play in leagues that make no distinction between WR/TE, they're all the same to us.You need to relax, and quit the superiority act. It's tired.The poster asked the Question, Who is the clear cut #1 WR WR WR
Ben Watson is a TE, he is not a WR. Ben Watson will likely be the best receiving option, yet he is still not a WR. How about answering the mans question the way it was asked.
Also when someone says "Who is the #2 WR for the Saints" then the answer is NOT Reggie Bush, he is a RB.
Logic people, it's not that hard.
Ya think maybe his draft is over and Watson is rostered and the 3 WRS are not?
Ya think you could just help the guy out with his question without saying a TE is a WR?
Ya think his league uses WR and TE as the same thing like yours?
Ya think ???