Don't know about the others, but mine was just a joke. Ravens are the team I really like.um 7 votes Denver? think it has to be Ravens or Steelers right now and with the Steelers hurting so much edge BAL
Mike Brown'GOB said:Who voted for the Bengals?
Changing my vote because of this convincing post.If you haven't answered Houston Texans in this poll, you are doing it all wrong. Wake the F UP, sharks! This is the best TEAM in the AFC. Only the Packers are better in the entire league.
Best defense in the NFL. Best rushing attack. Best team at time of possession. Brian Burke over at NFL Advanced Stats has had the Texans ranked #1 for most of, if not all, the entire season. There are numerous statistical categories that back me up, but just consider the fact that the Texans keep winning despite losing key players to injury. What other team has shown that type of resiliency?Changing my vote because of this convincing post.If you haven't answered Houston Texans in this poll, you are doing it all wrong. Wake the F UP, sharks! This is the best TEAM in the AFC. Only the Packers are better in the entire league.
They didn't just lose that game, they got badly beat up by a mauling defense. Ask Big Ben.Remember, that was early in the season when the Texans were still learning Phillips' new defense. They have only gotten better.'Fensalk said:In the Ravens defense, they lost to the Titans in week 2 when they still had Britt and Hasselbeck. That was a better Titans team than what is out there now. In the Steelers' defense, they lost to the Texans when they still had Mario Williams and Schaub.
Baltimore.Philadelphia.Best defense in the NFL. Best rushing attack. Best team at time of possession. Brian Burke over at NFL Advanced Stats has had the Texans ranked #1 for most of, if not all, the entire season. There are numerous statistical categories that back me up, but just consider the fact that the Texans keep winning despite losing key players to injury. What other team has shown that type of resiliency?Changing my vote because of this convincing post.If you haven't answered Houston Texans in this poll, you are doing it all wrong. Wake the F UP, sharks! This is the best TEAM in the AFC. Only the Packers are better in the entire league.
Baltimore and Philadelphia? What about them? Neither is more highly ranked defensively or in rushing or in ToP than the Houston Texans. Sorry, but your post is wrong and non-sensical.Baltimore.Philadelphia.Best defense in the NFL. Best rushing attack. Best team at time of possession. Brian Burke over at NFL Advanced Stats has had the Texans ranked #1 for most of, if not all, the entire season. There are numerous statistical categories that back me up, but just consider the fact that the Texans keep winning despite losing key players to injury. What other team has shown that type of resiliency?Changing my vote because of this convincing post.If you haven't answered Houston Texans in this poll, you are doing it all wrong. Wake the F UP, sharks! This is the best TEAM in the AFC. Only the Packers are better in the entire league.
How many teams with the best time of possession in the league have ever won the Super Bowl?
Houston has a solid defense but without Schuab at QB the offense will sputter - especially in the playoffs. Add the fact that this will be the first time in the playoffs for the Texans and that they will most likely be on the road at some point in Baltimore, NE or Pittsburgh then I don't think that they get by those teams and make the SB. Good team and a welcome addition to the playoffs but injuries will prevent this team for going as far as they might have. Next year they will only be stronger and the dominance of the Colts in the AFC South maybe broken for the next few years.If you haven't answered Houston Texans in this poll, you are doing it all wrong. Wake the F UP, sharks! This is the best TEAM in the AFC. Only the Packers are better in the entire league.
Get a little grip, brother. They're pretty good and most of us here are pretty happy to see a new face come out of the AFC South. If they are indeed the best team, it is by the slimmest of margins and others are hardly "non-sensical" for thinking otherwise.Baltimore and Philadelphia? What about them? Neither is more highly ranked defensively or in rushing or in ToP than the Houston Texans. Sorry, but your post is wrong and non-sensical.Baltimore.Philadelphia.Best defense in the NFL. Best rushing attack. Best team at time of possession. Brian Burke over at NFL Advanced Stats has had the Texans ranked #1 for most of, if not all, the entire season. There are numerous statistical categories that back me up, but just consider the fact that the Texans keep winning despite losing key players to injury. What other team has shown that type of resiliency?Changing my vote because of this convincing post.If you haven't answered Houston Texans in this poll, you are doing it all wrong. Wake the F UP, sharks! This is the best TEAM in the AFC. Only the Packers are better in the entire league.
How many teams with the best time of possession in the league have ever won the Super Bowl?
Houston - 208 points allowed; Baltimore - 202 points allowed. Houston - 4.7 yards per play allowed; Baltimore - 4.4 yards per play allowed. Eagles have 5.2 YPC to Houston's 4.3; Eagles have 114 rushing first downs, Texans have 108.Baltimore and Philadelphia? What about them? Neither is more highly ranked defensively or in rushing or in ToP than the Houston Texans. Sorry, but your post is wrong and non-sensical.Baltimore.Philadelphia.Best defense in the NFL. Best rushing attack. Best team at time of possession. Brian Burke over at NFL Advanced Stats has had the Texans ranked #1 for most of, if not all, the entire season. There are numerous statistical categories that back me up, but just consider the fact that the Texans keep winning despite losing key players to injury. What other team has shown that type of resiliency?Changing my vote because of this convincing post.If you haven't answered Houston Texans in this poll, you are doing it all wrong. Wake the F UP, sharks! This is the best TEAM in the AFC. Only the Packers are better in the entire league.
How many teams
That is not what I meant. I meant that his post did not make sense to me since it is factually incorrect. Unless he was making a different point...Get a little grip, brother. They're pretty good and most of us here are pretty happy to see a new face come out of the AFC South. If they are indeed the best team, it is by the slimmest of margins and others are hardly "non-sensical" for thinking otherwise.Baltimore and Philadelphia? What about them? Neither is more highly ranked defensively or in rushing or in ToP than the Houston Texans. Sorry, but your post is wrong and non-sensical.Baltimore.Philadelphia.Best defense in the NFL. Best rushing attack. Best team at time of possession. Brian Burke over at NFL Advanced Stats has had the Texans ranked #1 for most of, if not all, the entire season. There are numerous statistical categories that back me up, but just consider the fact that the Texans keep winning despite losing key players to injury. What other team has shown that type of resiliency?Changing my vote because of this convincing post.If you haven't answered Houston Texans in this poll, you are doing it all wrong. Wake the F UP, sharks! This is the best TEAM in the AFC. Only the Packers are better in the entire league.
How many teams with the best time of possession in the league have ever won the Super Bowl?
Except that is not how those rankings are determined. As for your question, I have no idea.Houston - 208 points allowed; Baltimore - 202 points allowed. Houston - 4.7 yards per play allowed; Baltimore - 4.4 yards per play allowed. Eagles have 5.2 YPC to Houston's 4.3; Eagles have 114 rushing first downs, Texans have 108.Baltimore and Philadelphia? What about them? Neither is more highly ranked defensively or in rushing or in ToP than the Houston Texans. Sorry, but your post is wrong and non-sensical.Baltimore.Philadelphia.Best defense in the NFL. Best rushing attack. Best team at time of possession. Brian Burke over at NFL Advanced Stats has had the Texans ranked #1 for most of, if not all, the entire season. There are numerous statistical categories that back me up, but just consider the fact that the Texans keep winning despite losing key players to injury. What other team has shown that type of resiliency?Changing my vote because of this convincing post.If you haven't answered Houston Texans in this poll, you are doing it all wrong. Wake the F UP, sharks! This is the best TEAM in the AFC. Only the Packers are better in the entire league.
How many teams
And, I ask again, how many teams with the best time of possession in the league have ever won the Super Bowl?
Who said anything about rankings? If you mean to say the Texans have the highest ranked defense according to yards allowed, and the most rushing yards in the league, then you should have written that. If you want to know how a team with that leads the league in rushing yards and overall yards allowed, while featuring a rookie quarterback plays, here you go.Except that is not how those rankings are determined. As for your question, I have no idea.Houston - 208 points allowed; Baltimore - 202 points allowed. Houston - 4.7 yards per play allowed; Baltimore - 4.4 yards per play allowed. Eagles have 5.2 YPC to Houston's 4.3; Eagles have 114 rushing first downs, Texans have 108.Baltimore and Philadelphia? What about them? Neither is more highly ranked defensively or in rushing or in ToP than the Houston Texans. Sorry, but your post is wrong and non-sensical.Baltimore.Philadelphia.Best defense in the NFL. Best rushing attack. Best team at time of possession. Brian Burke over at NFL Advanced Stats has had the Texans ranked #1 for most of, if not all, the entire season. There are numerous statistical categories that back me up, but just consider the fact that the Texans keep winning despite losing key players to injury. What other team has shown that type of resiliency?Changing my vote because of this convincing post.If you haven't answered Houston Texans in this poll, you are doing it all wrong. Wake the F UP, sharks! This is the best TEAM in the AFC. Only the Packers are better in the entire league.
How many teams
And, I ask again, how many teams with the best time of possession in the league have ever won the Super Bowl?
Has Baltimore been committed to the run game of late, or are they just getting big leads in their most recent games? It looks like the latter, to me. They're 10-3 but are still in the top 10 in pass attempts.The Chargers game might be a good test to see if Baltimore is really different. But it's pretty clear what their weakness is: a mediocre passing game. Flacco's numbers aren't any better than Mark Sanchez' this year. Everyone loves the Baltimore D and Baltimore running game, but it's really hard to go far in today's NFL without a great passing game.I'm a Baltimore homer, so that influences my opinion, but I'm not sure what the Ravens' great flaw is. Since the debacle at Seattle, where they fumbled two kickoffs inside their own 20, and Ray Rice inexplicably got 5 carries (like he also did in the Jacksonville loss), they have totally committed to the run game and they've been rolling. During that time Rice has 96 carries for 470 yards (117.5 per game). Their offense has good balance, their defense is playing at an elite level, and they're 4-0And people bust on Flacco, but his 92-yard game-winning TD drive vs. Pittsburgh was big-time. Just imagine it was Tebow that did that.Houston is good, but they are not the best team in the AFC wtih Yates at QB. Even with Schaub at QB, the Ravens beat them 29-14, holding the Texans to 58 yards in the fourth quarter.
You are wrong. Against Cincy, the Ravens were down 7-0 and then led 17-14 midway through the third quarter.Against SF, the #1 rush defense in the NFL (both total yards and ypc), they were tired 6-6 midway through the third quarter. They ran the ball 29 times (despite a 2.8 ypc average by Rice) and threw 23 times - showing commitment to the run.Has Baltimore been committed to the run game of late, or are they just getting big leads in their most recent games? It looks like the latter, to me. They're 10-3 but are still in the top 10 in pass attempts.The Chargers game might be a good test to see if Baltimore is really different. But it's pretty clear what their weakness is: a mediocre passing game. Flacco's numbers aren't any better than Mark Sanchez' this year. Everyone loves the Baltimore D and Baltimore running game, but it's really hard to go far in today's NFL without a great passing game.I'm a Baltimore homer, so that influences my opinion, but I'm not sure what the Ravens' great flaw is. Since the debacle at Seattle, where they fumbled two kickoffs inside their own 20, and Ray Rice inexplicably got 5 carries (like he also did in the Jacksonville loss), they have totally committed to the run game and they've been rolling. During that time Rice has 96 carries for 470 yards (117.5 per game). Their offense has good balance, their defense is playing at an elite level, and they're 4-0
And people bust on Flacco, but his 92-yard game-winning TD drive vs. Pittsburgh was big-time. Just imagine it was Tebow that did that.
Houston is good, but they are not the best team in the AFC wtih Yates at QB. Even with Schaub at QB, the Ravens beat them 29-14, holding the Texans to 58 yards in the fourth quarter.
This needs to be said... how to you come to the conclusion that they will "most likely" be on the road in Baltimore, NE or Pit at some point this season? All 4 teams are currently tied at 10-3 and the Texans are currently a top the AFC and the #1 seed with Carolina, Indy and Tennessee to play. Assuming they beat all three of those teams (very likely) they would take the #1 seed in the AFC regardless of what Baltimore, NE or Pit do in the final three games. I'm not a Texans fan nor do I care how the AFC shapes up. However, immediately assuming they'll be on the road without actually looking at anything is silly.Houston has a solid defense but without Schuab at QB the offense will sputter - especially in the playoffs. Add the fact that this will be the first time in the playoffs for the Texans and that they will most likely be on the road at some point in Baltimore, NE or Pittsburgh then I don't think that they get by those teams and make the SB. Good team and a welcome addition to the playoffs but injuries will prevent this team for going as far as they might have. Next year they will only be stronger and the dominance of the Colts in the AFC South maybe broken for the next few years.If you haven't answered Houston Texans in this poll, you are doing it all wrong. Wake the F UP, sharks! This is the best TEAM in the AFC. Only the Packers are better in the entire league.
Best way to beat the Ratbirds is with an accurate QB who has a very quick release. Either that or have Ben Roethlisberger make a couple of miracle plays late in the game. San Diego has the former, a guy who has put up some fairly lofty numbers against Baltimore in the past, especially out there. This one has upset potential written all over it.Has Baltimore been committed to the run game of late, or are they just getting big leads in their most recent games? It looks like the latter, to me. They're 10-3 but are still in the top 10 in pass attempts.The Chargers game might be a good test to see if Baltimore is really different. But it's pretty clear what their weakness is: a mediocre passing game. Flacco's numbers aren't any better than Mark Sanchez' this year. Everyone loves the Baltimore D and Baltimore running game, but it's really hard to go far in today's NFL without a great passing game.I'm a Baltimore homer, so that influences my opinion, but I'm not sure what the Ravens' great flaw is. Since the debacle at Seattle, where they fumbled two kickoffs inside their own 20, and Ray Rice inexplicably got 5 carries (like he also did in the Jacksonville loss), they have totally committed to the run game and they've been rolling. During that time Rice has 96 carries for 470 yards (117.5 per game). Their offense has good balance, their defense is playing at an elite level, and they're 4-0And people bust on Flacco, but his 92-yard game-winning TD drive vs. Pittsburgh was big-time. Just imagine it was Tebow that did that.Houston is good, but they are not the best team in the AFC wtih Yates at QB. Even with Schaub at QB, the Ravens beat them 29-14, holding the Texans to 58 yards in the fourth quarter.
This is wrong. If all of the 10-3 AFC teams win out, the Ravens are the #1 seed. Right now the Texans are listed as #1 because they are 8-2 in the AFC and the Pats and Ravens are 7-2. That would change this weekend, as the Texans would remain 8-2 with a win over the Panthers, while the Ravens and Pats would match them at 8-2 with AFC wins.If all 3 teams finish 13-3, the tie-breaker would be Strength of Victory. Here are the current standings in that category:This needs to be said... how to you come to the conclusion that they will "most likely" be on the road in Baltimore, NE or Pit at some point this season? All 4 teams are currently tied at 10-3 and the Texans are currently a top the AFC and the #1 seed with Carolina, Indy and Tennessee to play. Assuming they beat all three of those teams (very likely) they would take the #1 seed in the AFC regardless of what Baltimore, NE or Pit do in the final three games. I'm not a Texans fan nor do I care how the AFC shapes up. However, immediately assuming they'll be on the road without actually looking at anything is silly.Houston has a solid defense but without Schuab at QB the offense will sputter - especially in the playoffs. Add the fact that this will be the first time in the playoffs for the Texans and that they will most likely be on the road at some point in Baltimore, NE or Pittsburgh then I don't think that they get by those teams and make the SB. Good team and a welcome addition to the playoffs but injuries will prevent this team for going as far as they might have. Next year they will only be stronger and the dominance of the Colts in the AFC South maybe broken for the next few years.If you haven't answered Houston Texans in this poll, you are doing it all wrong. Wake the F UP, sharks! This is the best TEAM in the AFC. Only the Packers are better in the entire league.
Additionally, if SF beats Pittsburgh next week Houston would fall below NE to the #3 spot if all 3 teams (Balt, Hou & NE) finish 13-3 for the season due to the lose of Strenght of Victory points caused by a Pittsburgh lose. Thus even though Houston is the #1 seed at the moment they could possibly fall out of that spot and be forced to win on the road in either Baltimore or NEThis is wrong. If all of the 10-3 AFC teams win out, the Ravens are the #1 seed. Right now the Texans are listed as #1 because they are 8-2 in the AFC and the Pats and Ravens are 7-2. That would change this weekend, as the Texans would remain 8-2 with a win over the Panthers, while the Ravens and Pats would match them at 8-2 with AFC wins.If all 3 teams finish 13-3, the tie-breaker would be Strength of Victory. Here are the current standings in that category:This needs to be said... how to you come to the conclusion that they will "most likely" be on the road in Baltimore, NE or Pit at some point this season? All 4 teams are currently tied at 10-3 and the Texans are currently a top the AFC and the #1 seed with Carolina, Indy and Tennessee to play. Assuming they beat all three of those teams (very likely) they would take the #1 seed in the AFC regardless of what Baltimore, NE or Pit do in the final three games. I'm not a Texans fan nor do I care how the AFC shapes up. However, immediately assuming they'll be on the road without actually looking at anything is silly.Houston has a solid defense but without Schuab at QB the offense will sputter - especially in the playoffs. Add the fact that this will be the first time in the playoffs for the Texans and that they will most likely be on the road at some point in Baltimore, NE or Pittsburgh then I don't think that they get by those teams and make the SB. Good team and a welcome addition to the playoffs but injuries will prevent this team for going as far as they might have. Next year they will only be stronger and the dominance of the Colts in the AFC South maybe broken for the next few years.If you haven't answered Houston Texans in this poll, you are doing it all wrong. Wake the F UP, sharks! This is the best TEAM in the AFC. Only the Packers are better in the entire league.
Baltimore - 67
Houston - 52
New England - 51
10 carries for Ray Rice last night. The Ravens are a pass-happy team, unless they get a big lead. And I don't trust the Ravens passing attack.You are wrong. Against Cincy, the Ravens were down 7-0 and then led 17-14 midway through the third quarter.Against SF, the #1 rush defense in the NFL (both total yards and ypc), they were tired 6-6 midway through the third quarter. They ran the ball 29 times (despite a 2.8 ypc average by Rice) and threw 23 times - showing commitment to the run.Has Baltimore been committed to the run game of late, or are they just getting big leads in their most recent games? It looks like the latter, to me. They're 10-3 but are still in the top 10 in pass attempts.The Chargers game might be a good test to see if Baltimore is really different. But it's pretty clear what their weakness is: a mediocre passing game. Flacco's numbers aren't any better than Mark Sanchez' this year. Everyone loves the Baltimore D and Baltimore running game, but it's really hard to go far in today's NFL without a great passing game.I'm a Baltimore homer, so that influences my opinion, but I'm not sure what the Ravens' great flaw is. Since the debacle at Seattle, where they fumbled two kickoffs inside their own 20, and Ray Rice inexplicably got 5 carries (like he also did in the Jacksonville loss), they have totally committed to the run game and they've been rolling. During that time Rice has 96 carries for 470 yards (117.5 per game). Their offense has good balance, their defense is playing at an elite level, and they're 4-0
And people bust on Flacco, but his 92-yard game-winning TD drive vs. Pittsburgh was big-time. Just imagine it was Tebow that did that.
Houston is good, but they are not the best team in the AFC wtih Yates at QB. Even with Schaub at QB, the Ravens beat them 29-14, holding the Texans to 58 yards in the fourth quarter.
Against Cleveland, they ran wild, amassing 290 yards on 49 carries. That is commitment to the run. Even then, it was only 10-3 midway through the third quarter before they broke the game open.
Against Indy, they ran 37 times -- this is the one game in the last 4 where the game was over early on and the Ravens just used the ground game to finish it up.
Way too early for that. The Steelers are banged up and on the west coast. If the Steelers lose then Baltimore controls their own destiny (as far as the AFC North goes).I still like Balt a great deal but their problems on the road are impossible to ignore at this point. All 4 of their losses have been on the road and this weeks was pretty hurtful IMO as it will likely erase them from any home games in the playoffs.
Why are you not sure when the Steelers already did that this year? And going along with Yudkin's post, beat them by holding them to less than 20 points and not forcing a TONE's defense stinks at times, but you gotta go with them. Yesterday showed that they are vulnerable against the run as well as the pass, but you have to be able to do both well, or be able to do the other well if they shut the other down, for 60 minutes, and I am not sure there will be an AFC playoff team that can do that.
With HOU not having a QB, Id put SD firmly as #4 in the AFC right now. Yeah, they still need help to get into the playoffs, but if were ranking teams currently, I dont see how they aren't 4th.I still like Balt a great deal but their problems on the road are impossible to ignore at this point. All 4 of their losses have been on the road and this weeks was pretty hurtful IMO as it will likely erase them from any home games in the playoffs. I'd have to rank themittNEBaltHouCinciDenSDNYJTennOak