Man In The Box
Footballguy
Seattle 27
Colts 19
Colts 19
Pretty sure he's also the highest-rated postseason passer in history. In those three road losses, he passed for an average of 400 yards and nearly 3 TDs. He's never had a defense this good before. IIRC, no team in the league has more road wins over the last few years than the Saints.Brees is 0-3 on the road in the playoffs. Betting on him seems like a losing one to me. Especially given that Philly is a particularly harsh environment.I didn't expect them to be a front-runner or anything, but the lack of votes for New Orleans is surprising to me. A lot of people seem to be more comfortable than I am betting against Drew Brees in the playoffs...
Brees per game numbers in the playoffs;Home games - 31 of 44, 70.9%, 351 yds, 2.8 TDs, 0.2 IntsPretty sure he's also the highest-rated postseason passer in history. In those three road losses, he passed for an average of 400 yards and nearly 3 TDs. He's never had a defense this good before. IIRC, no team in the league has more road wins over the last few years than the Saints.Brees is 0-3 on the road in the playoffs. Betting on him seems like a losing one to me. Especially given that Philly is a particularly harsh environment.I didn't expect them to be a front-runner or anything, but the lack of votes for New Orleans is surprising to me. A lot of people seem to be more comfortable than I am betting against Drew Brees in the playoffs...
Again, I didn't expect the Saints to be favorites or anything, but it seems odd to me that the NFC team with the fewest votes is also the team with a top-10 defense and arguably one of the 10 greatest quarterbacks of all time. Road or home, that seems like a pretty tough combination to top.
I'm a little bit surprised that the Chiefs have 1 less vote than the Saints. - Don't they get some key defensive guys back, like Houston?Brees per game numbers in the playoffs;Home games - 31 of 44, 70.9%, 351 yds, 2.8 TDs, 0.2 IntsPretty sure he's also the highest-rated postseason passer in history. In those three road losses, he passed for an average of 400 yards and nearly 3 TDs. He's never had a defense this good before. IIRC, no team in the league has more road wins over the last few years than the Saints.Brees is 0-3 on the road in the playoffs. Betting on him seems like a losing one to me. Especially given that Philly is a particularly harsh environment.I didn't expect them to be a front-runner or anything, but the lack of votes for New Orleans is surprising to me. A lot of people seem to be more comfortable than I am betting against Drew Brees in the playoffs...
Again, I didn't expect the Saints to be favorites or anything, but it seems odd to me that the NFC team with the fewest votes is also the team with a top-10 defense and arguably one of the 10 greatest quarterbacks of all time. Road or home, that seems like a pretty tough combination to top.
Away games - 35 of 57, 61.6%, 407 yds, 2.6 TDs, 1 Ints
He's been a compiler of yds through massive amounts of attempts in the road games. The drop in efficiency is massive though.
Two of those three road games came against elite, top-3 defensive units (2006 Chicago, 2011 San Francisco). And that "lower efficiency" was still over 7 yards per attempt, a nearly 3:1 TD:INT ratio, and a QB rating over 90 (91.5, to be exact).Brees per game numbers in the playoffs;Pretty sure he's also the highest-rated postseason passer in history. In those three road losses, he passed for an average of 400 yards and nearly 3 TDs. He's never had a defense this good before. IIRC, no team in the league has more road wins over the last few years than the Saints.Brees is 0-3 on the road in the playoffs. Betting on him seems like a losing one to me. Especially given that Philly is a particularly harsh environment.I didn't expect them to be a front-runner or anything, but the lack of votes for New Orleans is surprising to me. A lot of people seem to be more comfortable than I am betting against Drew Brees in the playoffs...
Again, I didn't expect the Saints to be favorites or anything, but it seems odd to me that the NFC team with the fewest votes is also the team with a top-10 defense and arguably one of the 10 greatest quarterbacks of all time. Road or home, that seems like a pretty tough combination to top.
Home games - 31 of 44, 70.9%, 351 yds, 2.8 TDs, 0.2 Ints
Away games - 35 of 57, 61.6%, 407 yds, 2.6 TDs, 1 Ints
He's been a compiler of yds through massive amounts of attempts in the road games. The drop in efficiency is massive though.
Yeah, of course he played worse against good defensive teams. I didn't take his worst possible samples. I took the only 3 games he's ever played on the road in the playoffs. So they happen to be against a few good defensive teams. That's the nature of the playoffs, good teams typically get in. If NO is going to make it to the Super Bowl they will have to do it on the road vs. either Sea or Car, worse yet both. I'm not saying they can't do. I'm saying it seems like a losing bet to pick them for the Super Bowl. You said you wouldn't bet against Brees in the playoffs. I'm not really sure why. His team will be on the road for at least 2 games and they have never won even one road game in his history of the playoffs. He's played well, I've never said otherwise. He hasn't played nearly as well vs. his home games, though. Personally, I'd be shocked if NO made the SB.Two of those three road games came against elite, top-3 defensive units (2006 Chicago, 2011 San Francisco). And that "lower efficiency" was still over 7 yards per attempt, a nearly 3:1 TD:INT ratio, and a QB rating over 90 (91.5, to be exact).Brees per game numbers in the playoffs;Home games - 31 of 44, 70.9%, 351 yds, 2.8 TDs, 0.2 IntsPretty sure he's also the highest-rated postseason passer in history. In those three road losses, he passed for an average of 400 yards and nearly 3 TDs. He's never had a defense this good before. IIRC, no team in the league has more road wins over the last few years than the Saints.Brees is 0-3 on the road in the playoffs. Betting on him seems like a losing one to me. Especially given that Philly is a particularly harsh environment.I didn't expect them to be a front-runner or anything, but the lack of votes for New Orleans is surprising to me. A lot of people seem to be more comfortable than I am betting against Drew Brees in the playoffs...
Again, I didn't expect the Saints to be favorites or anything, but it seems odd to me that the NFC team with the fewest votes is also the team with a top-10 defense and arguably one of the 10 greatest quarterbacks of all time. Road or home, that seems like a pretty tough combination to top.
Away games - 35 of 57, 61.6%, 407 yds, 2.6 TDs, 1 Ints
He's been a compiler of yds through massive amounts of attempts in the road games. The drop in efficiency is massive though.
Think about that for a second. Let that sink in. We took Drew Brees' worst possible sample- road games are typically worse than home games, losses are typically worse than wins, and games against elite defenses are typically worse than games against average defenses, so a player's road losses against elite defenses will typically be his worst games. In Drew Brees' ROAD PLAYOFF LOSSES, he's still a 90+ rated passer. For comparison, in every single postseason game of Joe Montana's career, he's rated 95.6. Tom Brady has played 24 playoff games, and has only topped a 91.5 rating nine times (career postseason rating = 87.4).
Somehow, I don't find "Drew Brees is merely amazing in road losses, compared to unequaled in NFL history in his home wins" to be a very compelling argument as to why betting on him would be a loser...
Currently the Saints have the worst road record this year in the playoffs and they have to play the entire way on the road....sorry but ngth.Pretty sure he's also the highest-rated postseason passer in history. In those three road losses, he passed for an average of 400 yards and nearly 3 TDs. He's never had a defense this good before. IIRC, no team in the league has more road wins over the last few years than the Saints.Brees is 0-3 on the road in the playoffs. Betting on him seems like a losing one to me. Especially given that Philly is a particularly harsh environment.I didn't expect them to be a front-runner or anything, but the lack of votes for New Orleans is surprising to me. A lot of people seem to be more comfortable than I am betting against Drew Brees in the playoffs...
Again, I didn't expect the Saints to be favorites or anything, but it seems odd to me that the NFC team with the fewest votes is also the team with a top-10 defense and arguably one of the 10 greatest quarterbacks of all time. Road or home, that seems like a pretty tough combination to top.
Is there a team with a worse home record than the Eagles 4-4?Currently the Saints have the worst road record this year in the playoffs and they have to play the entire way on the road....sorry but ngth.Pretty sure he's also the highest-rated postseason passer in history. In those three road losses, he passed for an average of 400 yards and nearly 3 TDs. He's never had a defense this good before. IIRC, no team in the league has more road wins over the last few years than the Saints.Brees is 0-3 on the road in the playoffs. Betting on him seems like a losing one to me. Especially given that Philly is a particularly harsh environment.I didn't expect them to be a front-runner or anything, but the lack of votes for New Orleans is surprising to me. A lot of people seem to be more comfortable than I am betting against Drew Brees in the playoffs...
Again, I didn't expect the Saints to be favorites or anything, but it seems odd to me that the NFC team with the fewest votes is also the team with a top-10 defense and arguably one of the 10 greatest quarterbacks of all time. Road or home, that seems like a pretty tough combination to top.
They could definitely win in Carolina.Yeah, of course he played worse against good defensive teams. I didn't take his worst possible samples. I took the only 3 games he's ever played on the road in the playoffs. So they happen to be against a few good defensive teams. That's the nature of the playoffs, good teams typically get in. If NO is going to make it to the Super Bowl they will have to do it on the road vs. either Sea or Car, worse yet both.I'm not saying they can't do. I'm saying it seems like a losing bet to pick them for the Super Bowl. You said you wouldn't bet against Brees in the playoffs. I'm not really sure why. His team will be on the road for at least 2 games and they have never won even one road game in his history of the playoffs. He's played well, I've never said otherwise. He hasn't played nearly as well vs. his home games, though. Personally, I'd be shocked if NO made the SB.Two of those three road games came against elite, top-3 defensive units (2006 Chicago, 2011 San Francisco). And that "lower efficiency" was still over 7 yards per attempt, a nearly 3:1 TD:INT ratio, and a QB rating over 90 (91.5, to be exact).Brees per game numbers in the playoffs;Home games - 31 of 44, 70.9%, 351 yds, 2.8 TDs, 0.2 IntsPretty sure he's also the highest-rated postseason passer in history. In those three road losses, he passed for an average of 400 yards and nearly 3 TDs. He's never had a defense this good before. IIRC, no team in the league has more road wins over the last few years than the Saints.Brees is 0-3 on the road in the playoffs. Betting on him seems like a losing one to me. Especially given that Philly is a particularly harsh environment.I didn't expect them to be a front-runner or anything, but the lack of votes for New Orleans is surprising to me. A lot of people seem to be more comfortable than I am betting against Drew Brees in the playoffs...
Again, I didn't expect the Saints to be favorites or anything, but it seems odd to me that the NFC team with the fewest votes is also the team with a top-10 defense and arguably one of the 10 greatest quarterbacks of all time. Road or home, that seems like a pretty tough combination to top.
Away games - 35 of 57, 61.6%, 407 yds, 2.6 TDs, 1 Ints
He's been a compiler of yds through massive amounts of attempts in the road games. The drop in efficiency is massive though.
Think about that for a second. Let that sink in. We took Drew Brees' worst possible sample- road games are typically worse than home games, losses are typically worse than wins, and games against elite defenses are typically worse than games against average defenses, so a player's road losses against elite defenses will typically be his worst games. In Drew Brees' ROAD PLAYOFF LOSSES, he's still a 90+ rated passer. For comparison, in every single postseason game of Joe Montana's career, he's rated 95.6. Tom Brady has played 24 playoff games, and has only topped a 91.5 rating nine times (career postseason rating = 87.4).
Somehow, I don't find "Drew Brees is merely amazing in road losses, compared to unequaled in NFL history in his home wins" to be a very compelling argument as to why betting on him would be a loser...
Seattle 24
New England 20
Seattle 24
New England 17
These are correct.Sea over NE
Betting on New Orleans is a losing bet because betting on any individual team is a losing bet. If there's any team that's going to outperform expectations, my money's on the team with a top-10 all-time QB backed up by a top-10 defense. That QB might be 0-3 on the road in the playoffs, but he's also probably the best road playoff QB in history by both raw stats and efficiency stats, and if his efficiency drops a lot, that's more a testament to his awesomeness at home than his struggles on the road.Yeah, of course he played worse against good defensive teams. I didn't take his worst possible samples. I took the only 3 games he's ever played on the road in the playoffs. So they happen to be against a few good defensive teams. That's the nature of the playoffs, good teams typically get in. If NO is going to make it to the Super Bowl they will have to do it on the road vs. either Sea or Car, worse yet both.I'm not saying they can't do. I'm saying it seems like a losing bet to pick them for the Super Bowl. You said you wouldn't bet against Brees in the playoffs. I'm not really sure why. His team will be on the road for at least 2 games and they have never won even one road game in his history of the playoffs. He's played well, I've never said otherwise. He hasn't played nearly as well vs. his home games, though. Personally, I'd be shocked if NO made the SB.Two of those three road games came against elite, top-3 defensive units (2006 Chicago, 2011 San Francisco). And that "lower efficiency" was still over 7 yards per attempt, a nearly 3:1 TD:INT ratio, and a QB rating over 90 (91.5, to be exact).Brees per game numbers in the playoffs;Home games - 31 of 44, 70.9%, 351 yds, 2.8 TDs, 0.2 IntsPretty sure he's also the highest-rated postseason passer in history. In those three road losses, he passed for an average of 400 yards and nearly 3 TDs. He's never had a defense this good before. IIRC, no team in the league has more road wins over the last few years than the Saints.Brees is 0-3 on the road in the playoffs. Betting on him seems like a losing one to me. Especially given that Philly is a particularly harsh environment.I didn't expect them to be a front-runner or anything, but the lack of votes for New Orleans is surprising to me. A lot of people seem to be more comfortable than I am betting against Drew Brees in the playoffs...
Again, I didn't expect the Saints to be favorites or anything, but it seems odd to me that the NFC team with the fewest votes is also the team with a top-10 defense and arguably one of the 10 greatest quarterbacks of all time. Road or home, that seems like a pretty tough combination to top.
Away games - 35 of 57, 61.6%, 407 yds, 2.6 TDs, 1 Ints
He's been a compiler of yds through massive amounts of attempts in the road games. The drop in efficiency is massive though.
Think about that for a second. Let that sink in. We took Drew Brees' worst possible sample- road games are typically worse than home games, losses are typically worse than wins, and games against elite defenses are typically worse than games against average defenses, so a player's road losses against elite defenses will typically be his worst games. In Drew Brees' ROAD PLAYOFF LOSSES, he's still a 90+ rated passer. For comparison, in every single postseason game of Joe Montana's career, he's rated 95.6. Tom Brady has played 24 playoff games, and has only topped a 91.5 rating nine times (career postseason rating = 87.4).
Somehow, I don't find "Drew Brees is merely amazing in road losses, compared to unequaled in NFL history in his home wins" to be a very compelling argument as to why betting on him would be a loser...
That's great and all. Ironically NO has played 3 playoff teams on the road this year. Their record.... 0-3.Betting on New Orleans is a losing bet because betting on any individual team is a losing bet. If there's any team that's going to outperform expectations, my money's on the team with a top-10 all-time QB backed up by a top-10 defense. That QB might be 0-3 on the road in the playoffs, but he's also probably the best road playoff QB in history by both raw stats and efficiency stats, and if his efficiency drops a lot, that's more a testament to his awesomeness at home than his struggles on the road.Yeah, of course he played worse against good defensive teams. I didn't take his worst possible samples. I took the only 3 games he's ever played on the road in the playoffs. So they happen to be against a few good defensive teams. That's the nature of the playoffs, good teams typically get in. If NO is going to make it to the Super Bowl they will have to do it on the road vs. either Sea or Car, worse yet both.I'm not saying they can't do. I'm saying it seems like a losing bet to pick them for the Super Bowl. You said you wouldn't bet against Brees in the playoffs. I'm not really sure why. His team will be on the road for at least 2 games and they have never won even one road game in his history of the playoffs. He's played well, I've never said otherwise. He hasn't played nearly as well vs. his home games, though. Personally, I'd be shocked if NO made the SB.Two of those three road games came against elite, top-3 defensive units (2006 Chicago, 2011 San Francisco). And that "lower efficiency" was still over 7 yards per attempt, a nearly 3:1 TD:INT ratio, and a QB rating over 90 (91.5, to be exact).Brees per game numbers in the playoffs;Home games - 31 of 44, 70.9%, 351 yds, 2.8 TDs, 0.2 IntsPretty sure he's also the highest-rated postseason passer in history. In those three road losses, he passed for an average of 400 yards and nearly 3 TDs. He's never had a defense this good before. IIRC, no team in the league has more road wins over the last few years than the Saints.Brees is 0-3 on the road in the playoffs. Betting on him seems like a losing one to me. Especially given that Philly is a particularly harsh environment.I didn't expect them to be a front-runner or anything, but the lack of votes for New Orleans is surprising to me. A lot of people seem to be more comfortable than I am betting against Drew Brees in the playoffs...
Again, I didn't expect the Saints to be favorites or anything, but it seems odd to me that the NFC team with the fewest votes is also the team with a top-10 defense and arguably one of the 10 greatest quarterbacks of all time. Road or home, that seems like a pretty tough combination to top.
Away games - 35 of 57, 61.6%, 407 yds, 2.6 TDs, 1 Ints
He's been a compiler of yds through massive amounts of attempts in the road games. The drop in efficiency is massive though.
Think about that for a second. Let that sink in. We took Drew Brees' worst possible sample- road games are typically worse than home games, losses are typically worse than wins, and games against elite defenses are typically worse than games against average defenses, so a player's road losses against elite defenses will typically be his worst games. In Drew Brees' ROAD PLAYOFF LOSSES, he's still a 90+ rated passer. For comparison, in every single postseason game of Joe Montana's career, he's rated 95.6. Tom Brady has played 24 playoff games, and has only topped a 91.5 rating nine times (career postseason rating = 87.4).
Somehow, I don't find "Drew Brees is merely amazing in road losses, compared to unequaled in NFL history in his home wins" to be a very compelling argument as to why betting on him would be a loser...
If I were in Las Vegas, I'd be putting money on New Orleans to make the superbowl, money on them to win the superbowl, and money on them in every individual game they played. You can think that's a losing bet. I think that's a winning bet. I think the combination of Drew Brees and Rob Ryan is very much a positive EV combination.
Well one was Seattle (what 24-2 at home, something like that?), one they lost with 5 seconds left (with a lineman getting collared on the way to Brady btw) to a team that's like 37-5 or so at home, and the other they lost with 20 seconds left (and got hit by a monsoon to boot) to a team that went 7-1 at home.jurb26 said:That's great and all. Ironically NO has played 3 playoff teams on the road this year. Their record.... 0-3.Adam Harstad said:Betting on New Orleans is a losing bet because betting on any individual team is a losing bet. If there's any team that's going to outperform expectations, my money's on the team with a top-10 all-time QB backed up by a top-10 defense. That QB might be 0-3 on the road in the playoffs, but he's also probably the best road playoff QB in history by both raw stats and efficiency stats, and if his efficiency drops a lot, that's more a testament to his awesomeness at home than his struggles on the road.jurb26 said:Yeah, of course he played worse against good defensive teams. I didn't take his worst possible samples. I took the only 3 games he's ever played on the road in the playoffs. So they happen to be against a few good defensive teams. That's the nature of the playoffs, good teams typically get in. If NO is going to make it to the Super Bowl they will have to do it on the road vs. either Sea or Car, worse yet both.I'm not saying they can't do. I'm saying it seems like a losing bet to pick them for the Super Bowl. You said you wouldn't bet against Brees in the playoffs. I'm not really sure why. His team will be on the road for at least 2 games and they have never won even one road game in his history of the playoffs. He's played well, I've never said otherwise. He hasn't played nearly as well vs. his home games, though. Personally, I'd be shocked if NO made the SB.Adam Harstad said:Two of those three road games came against elite, top-3 defensive units (2006 Chicago, 2011 San Francisco). And that "lower efficiency" was still over 7 yards per attempt, a nearly 3:1 TD:INT ratio, and a QB rating over 90 (91.5, to be exact).jurb26 said:Brees per game numbers in the playoffs;Home games - 31 of 44, 70.9%, 351 yds, 2.8 TDs, 0.2 IntsAdam Harstad said:Pretty sure he's also the highest-rated postseason passer in history. In those three road losses, he passed for an average of 400 yards and nearly 3 TDs. He's never had a defense this good before. IIRC, no team in the league has more road wins over the last few years than the Saints.jurb26 said:Brees is 0-3 on the road in the playoffs. Betting on him seems like a losing one to me. Especially given that Philly is a particularly harsh environment.Adam Harstad said:I didn't expect them to be a front-runner or anything, but the lack of votes for New Orleans is surprising to me. A lot of people seem to be more comfortable than I am betting against Drew Brees in the playoffs...
Again, I didn't expect the Saints to be favorites or anything, but it seems odd to me that the NFC team with the fewest votes is also the team with a top-10 defense and arguably one of the 10 greatest quarterbacks of all time. Road or home, that seems like a pretty tough combination to top.
Away games - 35 of 57, 61.6%, 407 yds, 2.6 TDs, 1 Ints
He's been a compiler of yds through massive amounts of attempts in the road games. The drop in efficiency is massive though.
Think about that for a second. Let that sink in. We took Drew Brees' worst possible sample- road games are typically worse than home games, losses are typically worse than wins, and games against elite defenses are typically worse than games against average defenses, so a player's road losses against elite defenses will typically be his worst games. In Drew Brees' ROAD PLAYOFF LOSSES, he's still a 90+ rated passer. For comparison, in every single postseason game of Joe Montana's career, he's rated 95.6. Tom Brady has played 24 playoff games, and has only topped a 91.5 rating nine times (career postseason rating = 87.4).
Somehow, I don't find "Drew Brees is merely amazing in road losses, compared to unequaled in NFL history in his home wins" to be a very compelling argument as to why betting on him would be a loser...
If I were in Las Vegas, I'd be putting money on New Orleans to make the superbowl, money on them to win the superbowl, and money on them in every individual game they played. You can think that's a losing bet. I think that's a winning bet. I think the combination of Drew Brees and Rob Ryan is very much a positive EV combination.
0 and 3 isn't the best road playoff QB in history.Adam Harstad said:Betting on New Orleans is a losing bet because betting on any individual team is a losing bet. If there's any team that's going to outperform expectations, my money's on the team with a top-10 all-time QB backed up by a top-10 defense. That QB might be 0-3 on the road in the playoffs, but he's also probably the best road playoff QB in history by both raw stats and efficiency stats, and if his efficiency drops a lot, that's more a testament to his awesomeness at home than his struggles on the road.jurb26 said:Yeah, of course he played worse against good defensive teams. I didn't take his worst possible samples. I took the only 3 games he's ever played on the road in the playoffs. So they happen to be against a few good defensive teams. That's the nature of the playoffs, good teams typically get in. If NO is going to make it to the Super Bowl they will have to do it on the road vs. either Sea or Car, worse yet both.I'm not saying they can't do. I'm saying it seems like a losing bet to pick them for the Super Bowl. You said you wouldn't bet against Brees in the playoffs. I'm not really sure why. His team will be on the road for at least 2 games and they have never won even one road game in his history of the playoffs. He's played well, I've never said otherwise. He hasn't played nearly as well vs. his home games, though. Personally, I'd be shocked if NO made the SB.Adam Harstad said:Two of those three road games came against elite, top-3 defensive units (2006 Chicago, 2011 San Francisco). And that "lower efficiency" was still over 7 yards per attempt, a nearly 3:1 TD:INT ratio, and a QB rating over 90 (91.5, to be exact).jurb26 said:Brees per game numbers in the playoffs;Home games - 31 of 44, 70.9%, 351 yds, 2.8 TDs, 0.2 IntsAdam Harstad said:Pretty sure he's also the highest-rated postseason passer in history. In those three road losses, he passed for an average of 400 yards and nearly 3 TDs. He's never had a defense this good before. IIRC, no team in the league has more road wins over the last few years than the Saints.jurb26 said:Brees is 0-3 on the road in the playoffs. Betting on him seems like a losing one to me. Especially given that Philly is a particularly harsh environment.Adam Harstad said:I didn't expect them to be a front-runner or anything, but the lack of votes for New Orleans is surprising to me. A lot of people seem to be more comfortable than I am betting against Drew Brees in the playoffs...
Again, I didn't expect the Saints to be favorites or anything, but it seems odd to me that the NFC team with the fewest votes is also the team with a top-10 defense and arguably one of the 10 greatest quarterbacks of all time. Road or home, that seems like a pretty tough combination to top.
Away games - 35 of 57, 61.6%, 407 yds, 2.6 TDs, 1 Ints
He's been a compiler of yds through massive amounts of attempts in the road games. The drop in efficiency is massive though.
Think about that for a second. Let that sink in. We took Drew Brees' worst possible sample- road games are typically worse than home games, losses are typically worse than wins, and games against elite defenses are typically worse than games against average defenses, so a player's road losses against elite defenses will typically be his worst games. In Drew Brees' ROAD PLAYOFF LOSSES, he's still a 90+ rated passer. For comparison, in every single postseason game of Joe Montana's career, he's rated 95.6. Tom Brady has played 24 playoff games, and has only topped a 91.5 rating nine times (career postseason rating = 87.4).
Somehow, I don't find "Drew Brees is merely amazing in road losses, compared to unequaled in NFL history in his home wins" to be a very compelling argument as to why betting on him would be a loser...
If I were in Las Vegas, I'd be putting money on New Orleans to make the superbowl, money on them to win the superbowl, and money on them in every individual game they played. You can think that's a losing bet. I think that's a winning bet. I think the combination of Drew Brees and Rob Ryan is very much a positive EV combination.
Damn sight better than a QB who's never played a road or home playoff game in his history.0 and 3 isn't the best road playoff QB in history.Adam Harstad said:Betting on New Orleans is a losing bet because betting on any individual team is a losing bet. If there's any team that's going to outperform expectations, my money's on the team with a top-10 all-time QB backed up by a top-10 defense. That QB might be 0-3 on the road in the playoffs, but he's also probably the best road playoff QB in history by both raw stats and efficiency stats, and if his efficiency drops a lot, that's more a testament to his awesomeness at home than his struggles on the road.jurb26 said:Yeah, of course he played worse against good defensive teams. I didn't take his worst possible samples. I took the only 3 games he's ever played on the road in the playoffs. So they happen to be against a few good defensive teams. That's the nature of the playoffs, good teams typically get in. If NO is going to make it to the Super Bowl they will have to do it on the road vs. either Sea or Car, worse yet both.I'm not saying they can't do. I'm saying it seems like a losing bet to pick them for the Super Bowl. You said you wouldn't bet against Brees in the playoffs. I'm not really sure why. His team will be on the road for at least 2 games and they have never won even one road game in his history of the playoffs. He's played well, I've never said otherwise. He hasn't played nearly as well vs. his home games, though. Personally, I'd be shocked if NO made the SB.Adam Harstad said:Two of those three road games came against elite, top-3 defensive units (2006 Chicago, 2011 San Francisco). And that "lower efficiency" was still over 7 yards per attempt, a nearly 3:1 TD:INT ratio, and a QB rating over 90 (91.5, to be exact).jurb26 said:Brees per game numbers in the playoffs;Home games - 31 of 44, 70.9%, 351 yds, 2.8 TDs, 0.2 IntsAdam Harstad said:Pretty sure he's also the highest-rated postseason passer in history. In those three road losses, he passed for an average of 400 yards and nearly 3 TDs. He's never had a defense this good before. IIRC, no team in the league has more road wins over the last few years than the Saints.jurb26 said:Brees is 0-3 on the road in the playoffs. Betting on him seems like a losing one to me. Especially given that Philly is a particularly harsh environment.Adam Harstad said:I didn't expect them to be a front-runner or anything, but the lack of votes for New Orleans is surprising to me. A lot of people seem to be more comfortable than I am betting against Drew Brees in the playoffs...
Again, I didn't expect the Saints to be favorites or anything, but it seems odd to me that the NFC team with the fewest votes is also the team with a top-10 defense and arguably one of the 10 greatest quarterbacks of all time. Road or home, that seems like a pretty tough combination to top.
Away games - 35 of 57, 61.6%, 407 yds, 2.6 TDs, 1 Ints
He's been a compiler of yds through massive amounts of attempts in the road games. The drop in efficiency is massive though.
Think about that for a second. Let that sink in. We took Drew Brees' worst possible sample- road games are typically worse than home games, losses are typically worse than wins, and games against elite defenses are typically worse than games against average defenses, so a player's road losses against elite defenses will typically be his worst games. In Drew Brees' ROAD PLAYOFF LOSSES, he's still a 90+ rated passer. For comparison, in every single postseason game of Joe Montana's career, he's rated 95.6. Tom Brady has played 24 playoff games, and has only topped a 91.5 rating nine times (career postseason rating = 87.4).
Somehow, I don't find "Drew Brees is merely amazing in road losses, compared to unequaled in NFL history in his home wins" to be a very compelling argument as to why betting on him would be a loser...
If I were in Las Vegas, I'd be putting money on New Orleans to make the superbowl, money on them to win the superbowl, and money on them in every individual game they played. You can think that's a losing bet. I think that's a winning bet. I think the combination of Drew Brees and Rob Ryan is very much a positive EV combination.
How about the 32nd ranked pass defense (that's last folks) going up against the league's 2nd best passing offense? The weather should be coldish, but not wet.A lot of talk about Brees...How about the league's best rushing offense vs. the NO 19th ranked rush D? In a cold weather game?
How did he do last time in Seattle? I'll take your answer off the air Adam.Adam Harstad said:Pretty sure he's also the highest-rated postseason passer in history. In those three road losses, he passed for an average of 400 yards and nearly 3 TDs. He's never had a defense this good before. IIRC, no team in the league has more road wins over the last few years than the Saints.jurb26 said:Brees is 0-3 on the road in the playoffs. Betting on him seems like a losing one to me. Especially given that Philly is a particularly harsh environment.Adam Harstad said:I didn't expect them to be a front-runner or anything, but the lack of votes for New Orleans is surprising to me. A lot of people seem to be more comfortable than I am betting against Drew Brees in the playoffs...
Again, I didn't expect the Saints to be favorites or anything, but it seems odd to me that the NFC team with the fewest votes is also the team with a top-10 defense and arguably one of the 10 greatest quarterbacks of all time. Road or home, that seems like a pretty tough combination to top.
Quarterbacks can only control their own performance, and Drew Brees' performance in road playoff games has been scintillating. It's not his fault that he can throw for 400 yards, 2 TDs, and 0 INTs and still lose, while other QBs can complete 40% of their passes, throw for under 50 yards and an INT, and still win.0 and 3 isn't the best road playoff QB in history.Adam Harstad said:Betting on New Orleans is a losing bet because betting on any individual team is a losing bet. If there's any team that's going to outperform expectations, my money's on the team with a top-10 all-time QB backed up by a top-10 defense. That QB might be 0-3 on the road in the playoffs, but he's also probably the best road playoff QB in history by both raw stats and efficiency stats, and if his efficiency drops a lot, that's more a testament to his awesomeness at home than his struggles on the road.jurb26 said:Yeah, of course he played worse against good defensive teams. I didn't take his worst possible samples. I took the only 3 games he's ever played on the road in the playoffs. So they happen to be against a few good defensive teams. That's the nature of the playoffs, good teams typically get in. If NO is going to make it to the Super Bowl they will have to do it on the road vs. either Sea or Car, worse yet both.I'm not saying they can't do. I'm saying it seems like a losing bet to pick them for the Super Bowl. You said you wouldn't bet against Brees in the playoffs. I'm not really sure why. His team will be on the road for at least 2 games and they have never won even one road game in his history of the playoffs. He's played well, I've never said otherwise. He hasn't played nearly as well vs. his home games, though. Personally, I'd be shocked if NO made the SB.Adam Harstad said:Two of those three road games came against elite, top-3 defensive units (2006 Chicago, 2011 San Francisco). And that "lower efficiency" was still over 7 yards per attempt, a nearly 3:1 TD:INT ratio, and a QB rating over 90 (91.5, to be exact).jurb26 said:Brees per game numbers in the playoffs;Home games - 31 of 44, 70.9%, 351 yds, 2.8 TDs, 0.2 IntsAdam Harstad said:Pretty sure he's also the highest-rated postseason passer in history. In those three road losses, he passed for an average of 400 yards and nearly 3 TDs. He's never had a defense this good before. IIRC, no team in the league has more road wins over the last few years than the Saints.jurb26 said:Brees is 0-3 on the road in the playoffs. Betting on him seems like a losing one to me. Especially given that Philly is a particularly harsh environment.Adam Harstad said:I didn't expect them to be a front-runner or anything, but the lack of votes for New Orleans is surprising to me. A lot of people seem to be more comfortable than I am betting against Drew Brees in the playoffs...
Again, I didn't expect the Saints to be favorites or anything, but it seems odd to me that the NFC team with the fewest votes is also the team with a top-10 defense and arguably one of the 10 greatest quarterbacks of all time. Road or home, that seems like a pretty tough combination to top.
Away games - 35 of 57, 61.6%, 407 yds, 2.6 TDs, 1 Ints
He's been a compiler of yds through massive amounts of attempts in the road games. The drop in efficiency is massive though.
Think about that for a second. Let that sink in. We took Drew Brees' worst possible sample- road games are typically worse than home games, losses are typically worse than wins, and games against elite defenses are typically worse than games against average defenses, so a player's road losses against elite defenses will typically be his worst games. In Drew Brees' ROAD PLAYOFF LOSSES, he's still a 90+ rated passer. For comparison, in every single postseason game of Joe Montana's career, he's rated 95.6. Tom Brady has played 24 playoff games, and has only topped a 91.5 rating nine times (career postseason rating = 87.4).
Somehow, I don't find "Drew Brees is merely amazing in road losses, compared to unequaled in NFL history in his home wins" to be a very compelling argument as to why betting on him would be a loser...
If I were in Las Vegas, I'd be putting money on New Orleans to make the superbowl, money on them to win the superbowl, and money on them in every individual game they played. You can think that's a losing bet. I think that's a winning bet. I think the combination of Drew Brees and Rob Ryan is very much a positive EV combination.
True, but they did OK recently against Detroit (3) and Chicago (5).How about the 32nd ranked pass defense (that's last folks) going up against the league's 2nd best passing offense? The weather should be coldish, but not wet.A lot of talk about Brees...How about the league's best rushing offense vs. the NO 19th ranked rush D? In a cold weather game?
I agree, I think the game's worth talking about, should be a fun one.
How did Baltimore do against Denver in the regular season last year?How did he do last time in Seattle? I'll take your answer off the air Adam.Adam Harstad said:Pretty sure he's also the highest-rated postseason passer in history. In those three road losses, he passed for an average of 400 yards and nearly 3 TDs. He's never had a defense this good before. IIRC, no team in the league has more road wins over the last few years than the Saints.jurb26 said:Brees is 0-3 on the road in the playoffs. Betting on him seems like a losing one to me. Especially given that Philly is a particularly harsh environment.Adam Harstad said:I didn't expect them to be a front-runner or anything, but the lack of votes for New Orleans is surprising to me. A lot of people seem to be more comfortable than I am betting against Drew Brees in the playoffs...
Again, I didn't expect the Saints to be favorites or anything, but it seems odd to me that the NFC team with the fewest votes is also the team with a top-10 defense and arguably one of the 10 greatest quarterbacks of all time. Road or home, that seems like a pretty tough combination to top.
Can't get on board with you regarding the Colts. Sorry. They've been a below-average team since their bye (or since the Reggie Wayne injury, if you'd rather). I think they're the worst team in the playoffs, honestly...pizzatyme said:I agree Adam. Brees is not getting nearly enough love here.
I also think the Colts are under-appreciated on the board, but I'm a![]()
That's why they play the games.Can't get on board with you regarding the Colts. Sorry. They've been a below-average team since their bye (or since the Reggie Wayne injury, ifpizzatyme said:I agree Adam. Brees is not getting nearly
enough love here.
I also think the Colts are under-appreciated on the board, but I'm a![]()
you'd rather). I think they're the worst team in the playoffs, honestly...
Yeah, the Snowbowl vs DET was a bit of an anomaly and Cutler coming off his injury, then you've got Cassel going nuts plus Palmer with 3 TDs.True, but they did OK recently against Detroit (3) and Chicago (5).How about the 32nd ranked pass defense (that's last folks) going up against the league's 2nd best passing offense? The weather should be coldish, but not wet.A lot of talk about Brees...How about the league's best rushing offense vs. the NO 19th ranked rush D? In a cold weather game?
I agree, I think the game's worth talking about, should be a fun one.
You can't answer a question with another question!How did Baltimore do against Denver in the regular season last year?How did he do last time in Seattle? I'll take your answer off the air Adam.Adam Harstad said:Pretty sure he's also the highest-rated postseason passer in history. In those three road losses, he passed for an average of 400 yards and nearly 3 TDs. He's never had a defense this good before. IIRC, no team in the league has more road wins over the last few years than the Saints.jurb26 said:Brees is 0-3 on the road in the playoffs. Betting on him seems like a losing one to me. Especially given that Philly is a particularly harsh environment.Adam Harstad said:I didn't expect them to be a front-runner or anything, but the lack of votes for New Orleans is surprising to me. A lot of people seem to be more comfortable than I am betting against Drew Brees in the playoffs...
Again, I didn't expect the Saints to be favorites or anything, but it seems odd to me that the NFC team with the fewest votes is also the team with a top-10 defense and arguably one of the 10 greatest quarterbacks of all time. Road or home, that seems like a pretty tough combination to top.
The Eagles are one of the best at creating turnovers (iirc). Don't the Saints have a tendency to turn it over a bit - particularly on the road?Yeah, the Snowbowl vs DET was a bit of an anomaly and Cutler coming off his injury, then you've got Cassel going nuts plus Palmer with 3 TDs.True, but they did OK recently against Detroit (3) and Chicago (5).How about the 32nd ranked pass defense (that's last folks) going up against the league's 2nd best passing offense? The weather should be coldish, but not wet.A lot of talk about Brees...How about the league's best rushing offense vs. the NO 19th ranked rush D? In a cold weather game?
I agree, I think the game's worth talking about, should be a fun one.
I know they're capable of good defense, especially in the 2nd half of the year, they can get turnovers too. LBers who can play coverage and DT's who can push up the middle are key vs the Saints.
But still if we couldn't have Dallas, I'll take this matchup.
Have the Saints EVER won a road playoff game?SaintsInDome2006 said:Is there a team with a worse home record than the Eagles 4-4?ImTheScientist said:Currently the Saints have the worst road record this year in the playoffs and they have to play the entire way on the road....sorry but ngth.Adam Harstad said:Pretty sure he's also the highest-rated postseason passer in history. In those three road losses, he passed for an average of 400 yards and nearly 3 TDs. He's never had a defense this good before. IIRC, no team in the league has more road wins over the last few years than the Saints.jurb26 said:Brees is 0-3 on the road in the playoffs. Betting on him seems like a losing one to me. Especially given that Philly is a particularly harsh environment.Adam Harstad said:I didn't expect them to be a front-runner or anything, but the lack of votes for New Orleans is surprising to me. A lot of people seem to be more comfortable than I am betting against Drew Brees in the playoffs...
Again, I didn't expect the Saints to be favorites or anything, but it seems odd to me that the NFC team with the fewest votes is also the team with a top-10 defense and arguably one of the 10 greatest quarterbacks of all time. Road or home, that seems like a pretty tough combination to top.
Yeah, true, teams that do well vs the Saints run the ball well (PHI check x2), get TOs (yes, especially lately), and are good on the d-line and especially up the middle (not sure).The Eagles are one of the best at creating turnovers (iirc). Don't the Saints have a tendency to turn it over a bit - particularly on the road?Yeah, the Snowbowl vs DET was a bit of an anomaly and Cutler coming off his injury, then you've got Cassel going nuts plus Palmer with 3 TDs.True, but they did OK recently against Detroit (3) and Chicago (5).How about the 32nd ranked pass defense (that's last folks) going up against the league's 2nd best passing offense? The weather should be coldish, but not wet.A lot of talk about Brees...How about the league's best rushing offense vs. the NO 19th ranked rush D? In a cold weather game?
I agree, I think the game's worth talking about, should be a fun one.
I know they're capable of good defense, especially in the 2nd half of the year, they can get turnovers too. LBers who can play coverage and DT's who can push up the middle are key vs the Saints.
But still if we couldn't have Dallas, I'll take this matchup.
Nope!Have the Saints EVER won a road playoff game?SaintsInDome2006 said:Is there a team with a worse home record than the Eagles 4-4?ImTheScientist said:Currently the Saints have the worst road record this year in the playoffs and they have to play the entire way on the road....sorry but ngth.Adam Harstad said:Pretty sure he's also the highest-rated postseason passer in history. In those three road losses, he passed for an average of 400 yards and nearly 3 TDs. He's never had a defense this good before. IIRC, no team in the league has more road wins over the last few years than the Saints.jurb26 said:Brees is 0-3 on the road in the playoffs. Betting on him seems like a losing one to me. Especially given that Philly is a particularly harsh environment.Adam Harstad said:I didn't expect them to be a front-runner or anything, but the lack of votes for New Orleans is surprising to me. A lot of people seem to be more comfortable than I am betting against Drew Brees in the playoffs...
Again, I didn't expect the Saints to be favorites or anything, but it seems odd to me that the NFC team with the fewest votes is also the team with a top-10 defense and arguably one of the 10 greatest quarterbacks of all time. Road or home, that seems like a pretty tough combination to top.
What can I say? I guess I'm just gifted.You can't answer a question with another question!
Fade this Bracket:
GB
GB
SF
GB
SEA
CAR
CAR
CAR
PHI
PHI
NO
CIN
IND
IND
KC
IND
DEN
CIN
NE
CIN
CIN
CIN
SD
Just looking at it and figuring by hand, so these numbers might be off, but I've got the following (overall record in parentheses):So we know NO is 0-3 in the playoffs on the road all time. We also know they are 0-3 vs. Playoff teams this year on the road. Anyone know what they are over the entire career of Brees vs. Playoff teams on the road, regular season and postseason combined?
A reporter mentioned to Kelly that the Saints haven't won a road playoff game. Kelly responded by saying, yeah well Tampa never won a game under 40 degrees before either but they came in and beat the Eagles in the NFCCG a while back. Suffice to say I don't think the Eagles will look at that as a confidence booster - and the fans shouldn't either.Have the Saints EVER won a road playoff game?
Fade this Bracket:
GB
GB
SF
GB
SEA
CAR
CAR
CAR
PHI
PHI
NO
CIN
IND
IND
KC
IND
DEN
CIN
NE
CIN
CIN
CIN
SDComplete fade = SEA def. DEN
If I were chip Kelly I would tell you that the first two numbers mean little. It's the 0 in the td department tat makes a differenceYeah, the Snowbowl vs DET was a bit of an anomaly and Cutler coming off his injury, then you've got Cassel going nuts plus Palmer with 3 TDs.True, but they did OK recently against Detroit (3) and Chicago (5).How about the 32nd ranked pass defense (that's last folks) going up against the league's 2nd best passing offense? The weather should be coldish, but not wet.A lot of talk about Brees...How about the league's best rushing offense vs. the NO 19th ranked rush D? In a cold weather game?
I agree, I think the game's worth talking about, should be a fun one.
I know they're capable of good defense, especially in the 2nd half of the year, they can get turnovers too. LBers who can play coverage and DT's who can push up the middle are key vs the Saints, I don't know how they are on those points.
Here's one for you: who's covering Jimmy Graham? Witten just did 12/135/0.
But still if we couldn't have Dallas, I'll take this matchup.
Thanks. That's actually better than I expected. It would he interesting to see how that compares vs. Other teams but would be a ton of work.Just looking at it and figuring by hand, so these numbers might be off, but I've got the following (overall record in parentheses):So we know NO is 0-3 in the playoffs on the road all time. We also know they are 0-3 vs. Playoff teams this year on the road. Anyone know what they are over the entire career of Brees vs. Playoff teams on the road, regular season and postseason combined?
2012- 0-3 (7-9)
2011- 2-1 (13-3)
2010- 1-1 (11-5)
2009- 1-0 (13-2)
2008- 0-2 (8-8)
2007- 1-2 (7-9)
2006- 2-0 (10-6)
Assuming my numbers are right, and adding 2013 and his playoff record, that would make Drew Brees and the Saints 7-15 lifetime on the road against playoff teams. No idea how that'd stack up against anyone else, though.
Edit to add: In Brees' three seasons where he was .500 or worse, he was 1-7 against playoff teams in the regular season. In his five seasons where he had a winning record overall, he was 6-5 in the regular season, even including this year's egg. I would say that, when Drew Brees has had a good team around him, he hasn't really struggled to defeat playoff teams in the road.
Well Escobar went 1/17/1, so there's that (13/152/1 total DAL TEs).If I were chip Kelly I would tell you that the first two numbers mean little. It's the 0 in the td department tat makes a differenceYeah, the Snowbowl vs DET was a bit of an anomaly and Cutler coming off his injury, then you've got Cassel going nuts plus Palmer with 3 TDs.True, but they did OK recently against Detroit (3) and Chicago (5).How about the 32nd ranked pass defense (that's last folks) going up against the league's 2nd best passing offense? The weather should be coldish, but not wet.A lot of talk about Brees...How about the league's best rushing offense vs. the NO 19th ranked rush D? In a cold weather game?
I agree, I think the game's worth talking about, should be a fun one.
I know they're capable of good defense, especially in the 2nd half of the year, they can get turnovers too. LBers who can play coverage and DT's who can push up the middle are key vs the Saints, I don't know how they are on those points.
Here's one for you: who's covering Jimmy Graham? Witten just did 12/135/0.
But still if we couldn't have Dallas, I'll take this matchup.