When Manning was drafted the Colts already had 1st rounders Marvin Harrison and Tarik Glenn on the team. Luck and the Colts are starting from scratch.Luck following Manning, no doubt.
Agreed...the fact that Manning is still playing means Luck will be measured somewhat against him even though that's not fair...if 2-3 years from now Manning is still playing at an elite level and winning 11 games or so and the Colts are only winning 4-5 games than Luck will really feel the heat...one thing I would be very concerned about is Luck's supporting cast...not just the talent level but who are the veterans Luck and the other other youngsters can lean on...going young sounds good on paper but you need quality veterans around to lend stability and right now it appears the Colts are severely lacking in that area...it's tough enough following Manning on the field but right now it looks like Luck has to take over his leadership role as well...that's a lot of responsibility...Luck is the most universally praised prospects in history, and the Colts -- who have averaged 12 wins per season this past decade -- are letting one of the best players in the history of the game leave even though a dozen other teams are dying to land him, because they are drafting Luck. I don't know that there's ever been more pressure on a rookie QB.
On some level they will be compared, but no one is expecting Luck to lead the Colts to a SB any time soon. The team has been dismantled and expectations this year for Luck are going to relatively low for a #1 pick. If he looks decent and wins 4-5 games then the fans will be happy. There will some disappointment if Manning wins a SB for another team but most Colts fans will realize that he wasn't going to win another one in Indy. RG3 on the other hand is in a big media market and expected to win right away. The team mortgaged their future for him and if he doesn't deliver playoff wins he will be crushed by the media and blamed for all of the teams failures (i.e. "We could have had X, Y and Z Pro Bowl players if we hadn't traded for RG3").Agreed...the fact that Manning is still playing means Luck will be measured somewhat against him even though that's not fair...if 2-3 years from now Manning is still playing at an elite level and winning 11 games or so and the Colts are only winning 4-5 games than Luck will really feel the heat...one thing I would be very concerned about is Luck's supporting cast...not just the talent level but who are the veterans Luck and the other other youngsters can lean on...going young sounds good on paper but you need quality veterans around to lend stability and right now it appears the Colts are severely lacking in that area...it's tough enough following Manning on the field but right now it looks like Luck has to take over his leadership role as well...that's a lot of responsibility...Luck is the most universally praised prospects in history, and the Colts -- who have averaged 12 wins per season this past decade -- are letting one of the best players in the history of the game leave even though a dozen other teams are dying to land him, because they are drafting Luck. I don't know that there's ever been more pressure on a rookie QB.
Luck has MUCH more pressure.
People are excited to see how Luck plays but I think you are over-estimating what people are expecting out of him. The guy he's replacing completed just 56% of his passes and threw 28 INT's as a rookie, despite having a Pro Bowl RB and a 1st round WR going into his 3rd season.Even the guy you mention as a comparison, Eli Manning, took 5 years to complete more than 57% of his passes or become a Pro Bowl player and the Giants gave up a lot more to get him.Luck has MUCH more pressure.my thoughts:http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1094592-draft-analysis-are-we-underestimating-andrew-lucks-potential-to-underperform
And some guy wearing 28 in the backfield. Whose cerebral prowess(possibly unrivaled) prolly exponentially advanced a young Peyton'Donnybrook said:When Manning was drafted the Colts already had 1st rounders Marvin Harrison and Tarik Glenn on the team. Luck and the Colts are starting from scratch.'flapgreen said:Luck following Manning, no doubt.
All of that becomes moot if Peyton Manning's next team is highly successful. Luck's expectations already sky high, if the Colts are losing and Peyton's team is winning, the fans may take their frustation out on Luck... The comparison for Luck is Peyton, not Painter. It might not be rational, but that's how a good segment of sports team fanbases think.People are excited to see how Luck plays but I think you are over-estimating what people are expecting out of him. The guy he's replacing completed just 56% of his passes and threw 28 INT's as a rookie, despite having a Pro Bowl RB and a 1st round WR going into his 3rd season.Even the guy you mention as a comparison, Eli Manning, took 5 years to complete more than 57% of his passes or become a Pro Bowl player and the Giants gave up a lot more to get him.Luck has MUCH more pressure.my thoughts:http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1094592-draft-analysis-are-we-underestimating-andrew-lucks-potential-to-underperform
All that plus being called possibly the best QB prospect ever or this generation’s best QB prospect or the best QB prospect since John Elway or whatever else the so called experts are saying about this kid.Luck has to outplay two years of expectation, the legacy of Peyton Manning, the pressure of being the #1 pick, and Robert Griffin.He has way more pressure.
That is an interesting segment. If Hoge actually put in 120 hours of tape on these two I guess you have to value the opinion a little. Waiting for concussion jokes.... I wish I could recall his thoughts on Cam last year.
So does he.That is an interesting segment. If Hoge actually put in 120 hours of tape on these two I guess you have to value the opinion a little. Waiting for concussion jokes.... I wish I could recall his thoughts on Cam last year.
Good start!So does he.That is an interesting segment. If Hoge actually put in 120 hours of tape on these two I guess you have to value the opinion a little. Waiting for concussion jokes.... I wish I could recall his thoughts on Cam last year.
Yeah, 120 hours of film is hard to ignore. He gets to watch the actual coaches film, too. That makes a big difference. Hoge isn't all there IMO though so you have to take it with a grain of salt.What's most interesting is that he thinks real NFL teams are reconsidering who the #1 pick should be. Does he have actual NFL connections he's talked to that also support this theory? Something to think about anyway.That is an interesting segment. If Hoge actually put in 120 hours of tape on these two I guess you have to value the opinion a little. Waiting for concussion jokes.... I wish I could recall his thoughts on Cam last year.