GregR
Footballguy
Count me amongst those who don't see the issue here.
As previously mentioned, Bowles was the Assistant Head Coach according to NFL.com's Miami coaching staff info. He seems the common sense choice then to succeed him so I don't get why anyone would have an issue with him being the one chosen.
If you asked Bowles, "Hey Todd, we would like to interview you for the head coaching job. We'll give you the choice of being the interim head coach and then interviewing you... or if you prefer we'll make Mike Nolan the interim head coach and still interview you. Which would you prefer?"
What do you think Bowles is going to say? If it were me, I'd take the head coaching experience and the chance to show I can run a team.
The only thing I think there is to comment about the situation is that it looks like they planned to can Sparano regardless of how the rest of the season went. Then sped that up when KC fired Haley so they wouldn't miss out on a chance to talk to their preferred candidates without having to "go behind Sparano's back" and do it while he's still the coach.
To which I'd say I don't really see a problem with doing that either. We can have a debate about if Sparano should have been fired at all, but nothing else about the situation seems to have been done in poor taste. Let alone in an attempt to circumvent the Rooney Rule.
As previously mentioned, Bowles was the Assistant Head Coach according to NFL.com's Miami coaching staff info. He seems the common sense choice then to succeed him so I don't get why anyone would have an issue with him being the one chosen.
If you asked Bowles, "Hey Todd, we would like to interview you for the head coaching job. We'll give you the choice of being the interim head coach and then interviewing you... or if you prefer we'll make Mike Nolan the interim head coach and still interview you. Which would you prefer?"
What do you think Bowles is going to say? If it were me, I'd take the head coaching experience and the chance to show I can run a team.
The only thing I think there is to comment about the situation is that it looks like they planned to can Sparano regardless of how the rest of the season went. Then sped that up when KC fired Haley so they wouldn't miss out on a chance to talk to their preferred candidates without having to "go behind Sparano's back" and do it while he's still the coach.
To which I'd say I don't really see a problem with doing that either. We can have a debate about if Sparano should have been fired at all, but nothing else about the situation seems to have been done in poor taste. Let alone in an attempt to circumvent the Rooney Rule.