What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Why Has Trump Weighed In On Cases Like Jussie Smollet But Remained Silent About The Coast Guard Guy? (1 Viewer)

He identifies with the guy in the Coast Guard, just like he identified with Cesar Sayoc. These are his base. What's he going to say about them?

 
Are you surprised? Politics brother...same reason Pelosi, Harris and Booker spouted off right away before the facts were in..they were pandering to their base just as Trump does.

 
Da Guru said:
Are you surprised? Politics brother...same reason Pelosi, Harris and Booker spouted off right away before the facts were in..they were pandering to their base just as Trump does.
this is true

Trump was harder in his response to Smollett maybe because Smollett is part of the left, liberal, Democrat anti-Trump hate that is still spinning and the 24x7x365 media hate that exists .... and we know Trump likes attacking the anti-Trump media and anti-Trump Hollywood that Smollett lives in. Plus Smollett framed MAGA 

 
this is true

Trump was harder in his response to Smollett maybe because Smollett is part of the left, liberal, Democrat anti-Trump hate that is still spinning and the 24x7x365 media hate that exists .... and we know Trump likes attacking the anti-Trump media and anti-Trump Hollywood that Smollett lives in. Plus Smollett framed MAGA 
So seven years? Three hundred and sixty-five weeks?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
this is true

Trump was harder in his response to Smollett maybe because Smollett is part of the left, liberal, Democrat anti-Trump hate that is still spinning and the 24x7x365 media hate that exists .... and we know Trump likes attacking the anti-Trump media and anti-Trump Hollywood that Smollett lives in. Plus Smollett framed MAGA 
That he takes time to tweet about this Smolett nut, which serves no purpose other than to gin up his trailer park base, is laughable.

That we are used to this behavior from the president is just sad honestly.  

The guy is just pathetic. 

 
I literally just saw a clip of him weighing in on the Coast Guard guy on Meet the Press.
I posted on Facebook this how Trump shares some responsibility with his the "NY Times the true enemy of the people" I then stated that while I an no fan of Sanders how immediately following the shooting of Republicans at the baseball field Bernie Sanders immediately condemned in the strongest terms the shootings by someone who apparently was a supporter of his. I said as soon as the President "condemns" the plans of this coast guard guy I would remove the post. Obviously my post is still there. Trump saying it is sad is not condemning.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I posted on Facebook this how Trump shares some responsibility with his the "NY Times the true enemy of the people" I then stated that while I an no fan of Sanders how immediately following the shooting of Republicans at the baseball field Bernie Sanders immediately condemned in the strongest terms the shootings by someone who apparently was a supporter of his. I said as soon as the President "condemns" the plans of this coast guard guy I would remove the post. Obviously my post is still there. Trump saying it is sad is not condemning.
Trump continuously calls the media 'enemy of the people' because he wants his base to treat them as a literal enemy. In Trump's mind, what was sad is that the guy got busted.

 
That he takes time to tweet about this Smolett nut, which serves no purpose other than to gin up his trailer park base, is laughable.

That we are used to this behavior from the president is just sad honestly.  

The guy is just pathetic. 
yes because the left / liberals / Democrats never attack anyone huh ? lol

 
Trump continuously calls the media 'enemy of the people' because he wants his base to treat them as a literal enemy. In Trump's mind, what was sad is that the guy got busted.
c'mon

that's like saying in Kamala Harris' mind its only sad Smollett got caught

the media absolutely lies and manipulates and controls how people see/process/believe

 
yes because the left / liberals / Democrats never attack anyone huh ? lol
He’s the president. Would be nice if he had an ounce of dignity. 

Who give a #### what some lunatic C list actor scam is trying to run. The president tweets about it. He loves this crap. 

Instead of you guys constantly crying about some fake news nonsense you should just accept that it’s your guy’s truest art.

He’s like Walter Cronkite of tabloid garbage. 

 
He's a mentally ill, racist narcissist who lacks empathy and tweeting anything negative about the white supremacist from his toilet would have made his MAGA base angry. That's it. That's the reason. 

 
“I think it’s a shame,” Trump told reporters during an afternoon appearance in the Oval Office. “I think it’s a very sad thing when a thing like that happens. I’ve expressed that.”

Asked by a reporter Friday whether he bears any personal responsibility from his own rhetoric, Trump said he did not.

“I think my language is very nice,” the president replied.

Anyone waiting on an apology from this clown is going to be very disappointed. There is no bar too low. No lie too big.

 
He’s the president. Would be nice if he had an ounce of dignity. 

Who give a #### what some lunatic C list actor scam is trying to run. The president tweets about it. He loves this crap. 

Instead of you guys constantly crying about some fake news nonsense you should just accept that it’s your guy’s truest art.

He’s like Walter Cronkite of tabloid garbage. 
oh I agree I wish he'd be more presidential 

he's not going to be and that's that - don't be shocked at this point on how Trump is

fake news is exactly Smollett and the liberal response wasn't to wait and see - it was attacking Trump and MAGA 

we both know that I think ............ Trump blasts people that attack him using media and that's what Smollett did, its what liberal media does, its what Hollywood does ..... that's his response like it or not. I don't like it for the most part, but its what it is

 
oh I agree I wish he'd be more presidential 

he's not going to be and that's that - don't be shocked at this point on how Trump is

fake news is exactly Smollett and the liberal response wasn't to wait and see - it was attacking Trump and MAGA 

we both know that I think ............ Trump blasts people that attack him using media and that's what Smollett did, its what liberal media does, its what Hollywood does ..... that's his response like it or not. I don't like it for the most part, but its what it is
I’m not shocked it makes me sad that this is what we are now. It’s pathetic. I expect some hack selling The Enquirer to troll not the President. 

You guys just dismissing this with “oh shucks that’s just how he acts” isn’t really a reasonable response. Sorry. 

Maybe I was busy, I definitely didn’t care about this story before or after the hoax or whatever it even is, but is I saw it all over all types of media so you can give the liberal media line a rest in regards to this story. 

 
I’m not shocked it makes me sad that this is what we are now. It’s pathetic. I expect some hack selling The Enquirer to troll not the President. 

You guys just dismissing this with “oh shucks that’s just how he acts” isn’t really a reasonable response. Sorry. 

Maybe I was busy, I definitely didn’t care about this story before or after the hoax or whatever it even is, but is I saw it all over all types of media so you can give the liberal media line a rest in regards to this story. 
I was hoping he'd be much better with the tweets and his nature of not being able to rise above media attacks etc. He's proven unable to do that. 

Its 100% reasonable response - that's who he's proven to be and I doubt he'll ever change. Be reasonable and logical and see it for what it is. Here is another piece of information ... the liberal media will not stop attacking him for another 2 or 6 years. They will not stop, as equally as he will not. That's their natures now, its who they are choosing to be. 

 
It really amazes me to see people still thinking they can play "gotcha" with Trump on issues like this.

Donald Trump is not a hypocrite. Hypocrisy is "the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform." But it has been obvious for a very long time that Trump has no moral standards beyond, "I am great, people who support me are great, people who oppose me are losers." All of his behaviors are 100% consistent with that standard. He is who we thought he was.

 
I’m not shocked it makes me sad that this is what we are now. It’s pathetic. I expect some hack selling The Enquirer to troll not the President. 

You guys just dismissing this with “oh shucks that’s just how he acts” isn’t really a reasonable response. Sorry. 

Maybe I was busy, I definitely didn’t care about this story before or after the hoax or whatever it even is, but is I saw it all over all types of media so you can give the liberal media line a rest in regards to this story. 
I was hoping he'd be much better with the tweets and his nature of not being able to rise above media attacks etc. He's proven unable to do that. 

Its 100% reasonable response - that's who he's proven to be and I doubt he'll ever change. Be reasonable and logical and see it for what it is. Here is another piece of information ... the liberal media will not stop attacking him for another 2 or 6 years. They will not stop, as equally as he will not. That's their natures now, its who they are choosing to be. 
The word you are looking for is predictable, not reasonable.  There is nothing reasonable about it...the fact that there is a response at all from him on this is laughable.  It's benneth the Presidency of the United States.  Always has been, always will be.  It's just as predictable that he's said virtually nothing of the terrorism coming from within the country.  That isn't reasonable either, so I guess at least you can say he's consistent?

 
The word you are looking for is predictable, not reasonable.  There is nothing reasonable about it...the fact that there is a response at all from him on this is laughable.  It's benneth the Presidency of the United States.  Always has been, always will be.  It's just as predictable that he's said virtually nothing of the terrorism coming from within the country.  That isn't reasonable either, so I guess at least you can say he's consistent?
point - predictable then because I agree, its not reasonable to me for him to tweet like he does and I agree, not becoming a President the way he acts sometimes

Trump has denounced terrorism, white supremacy and racism .... maybe instead of jumping the gun like Kamala Harris did with Smollett Trump is waiting for the authorities to make their cases etc. ?  I dunno ... looks damning from what the media has reported on the Coast Guard guy but lets be honest - these two are far far apart from each other in what they are

you'd be better off comparing the GOP baseball game shooting with the Coast Guard guy .. and Smollett ? I don't know what to compare that too

 
point - predictable then because I agree, its not reasonable to me for him to tweet like he does and I agree, not becoming a President the way he acts sometimes

Trump has denounced terrorism, white supremacy and racism .... maybe instead of jumping the gun like Kamala Harris did with Smollett Trump is waiting for the authorities to make their cases etc. ?  I dunno ... looks damning from what the media has reported on the Coast Guard guy but lets be honest - these two are far far apart from each other in what they are

you'd be better off comparing the GOP baseball game shooting with the Coast Guard guy .. and Smollett ? I don't know what to compare that too
I don't compare events.  They stand on their own merits....I'm sort of funny that way.

When you have a chance I'd like clarification on the bold.  Are you missing the word "all" there?  Because without it, the statement is virtually meaningless given that it can be 100% accurate and have NOTHING to do with the post you quoted.  

 
I was hoping he'd be much better with the tweets and his nature of not being able to rise above media attacks etc. He's proven unable to do that. 

Its 100% reasonable response - that's who he's proven to be and I doubt he'll ever change. Be reasonable and logical and see it for what it is. Here is another piece of information ... the liberal media will not stop attacking him for another 2 or 6 years. They will not stop, as equally as he will not. That's their natures now, its who they are choosing to be. 
How do you want this clown show covered?

 
How do you want this clown show covered?
which clown show ?

we have Trump show

we have people who hate show

we have anti-Trump show

we have the Pelosi/Schumer show

we have liberal media show and conservative media show

there are a lot of shows going on right now :(  

 
:shrug:

The media doesn’t seem to be covering the Coast Guard guy as much


Trump was harder in his response to Smollett maybe because Smollett is part of the left, liberal, Democrat anti-Trump hate that is still spinning and the 24x7x365 media hate that exists .... 
I know that Trumpers probably don't do a lot of reconciling, but if they did, how would they reconcile this?  if the liberal anti-Trump media hates Trump every minute of every day, why wouldn't they be dedicating much more coverage to the Coast Guard trump-lovin' terrorist who was going to kill many people at least in part because of Trump's rhetoric instead of the gay, black, liberal man who faked a hate crime to put more money in his pocket?

 
if the liberal anti-Trump media hates Trump every minute of every day, why wouldn't they be dedicating much more coverage to the Coast Guard trump-lovin' terrorist who was going to kill many people at least in part because of Trump's rhetoric instead of the gay, black, liberal man who faked a hate crime to put more money in his pocket?
I suspect because its military and the information coming forth about the whole case is pretty tight and nobody knows much more

 
which clown show ?

we have Trump show

we have people who hate show

we have anti-Trump show

we have the Pelosi/Schumer show

we have liberal media show and conservative media show

there are a lot of shows going on right now :(  

Any president will always get all the news. Take one that has this many screw ups and it is the only show in town.

The amount of crazy stories this guy generates is pretty amazing.

 
Stealthycat said:
jomar said:
if the liberal anti-Trump media hates Trump every minute of every day, why wouldn't they be dedicating much more coverage to the Coast Guard trump-lovin' terrorist who was going to kill many people at least in part because of Trump's rhetoric instead of the gay, black, liberal man who faked a hate crime to put more money in his pocket?
I suspect because its military and the information coming forth about the whole case is pretty tight and nobody knows much more
Speculation is the bread and butter of the media you guys watch.  They'll say anything to get you to their sites.  They don't have to know #### about anything.  So this doesn't seem like a logical explanation.  I think jomar's question remains.

 
point - predictable then because I agree, its not reasonable to me for him to tweet like he does and I agree, not becoming a President the way he acts sometimes

Trump has denounced terrorism, white supremacy and racism .... maybe instead of jumping the gun like Kamala Harris did with Smollett Trump is waiting for the authorities to make their cases etc. ?  I dunno ... looks damning from what the media has reported on the Coast Guard guy but lets be honest - these two are far far apart from each other in what they are

you'd be better off comparing the GOP baseball game shooting with the Coast Guard guy .. and Smollett ? I don't know what to compare that too
No surprise that Trump slammed Smollett. If guilty, it was a frame job on MAGA and Smollett deserves to be ripped. But I do not care for Trump's silence on the Coast Guard guy. He can make a statement about his concern regarding the situation while still saying that the matter was under investigation.

 
Speculation is the bread and butter of the media you guys watch.  They'll say anything to get you to their sites.  They don't have to know #### about anything.  So this doesn't seem like a logical explanation.  I think jomar's question remains.
that's exactly CNN right there !!  I click is a few times a day, but its very anti-Trump 

 
Speculation is the bread and butter of the media you guys watch.  They'll say anything to get you to their sites.  They don't have to know #### about anything.  So this doesn't seem like a logical explanation.  I think jomar's question remains.
that's exactly CNN right there !!  I click is a few times a day, but its very anti-Trump 
Yep...his question remains.

As a different point, why do you keep going to sources like these every day?  It makes zero sense why you'd do this.

 
As a different point, why do you keep going to sources like these every day?  It makes zero sense why you'd do this.
I don't live in an echo chamber .... without going to liberal sites how would I have any chance to understand/learn from the other sides views ???

 
I don't live in an echo chamber .... without going to liberal sites how would I have any chance to understand/learn from the other sides views ???
I'm curious why you are more focused on the view of the "sides" rather than the issues.  Seems to me, you'd want to understand the issues much better than what you display here before you got caught up in the arguments by the "sides".  For actual liberal sites, you'll probably want to go to MSNBC way more as well as daily kos, vox, new republic.  On the scale, CNN is pretty middle of the road.  If you think THEY are "liberal" you're in for a rude awakening going to real liberal sites.

And I hate to break it to you but you absolutely live in an echo chamber...it's the echo chamber where every single thing is framed by the "sides" argument and viewed through that lens and that lens alone.  That's as good as you're going to get if you deal only with the US "news" outlets.....good luck.

 
I'm curious why you are more focused on the view of the "sides" rather than the issues.  Seems to me, you'd want to understand the issues much better than what you display here before you got caught up in the arguments by the "sides".  For actual liberal sites, you'll probably want to go to MSNBC way more as well as daily kos, vox, new republic.  On the scale, CNN is pretty middle of the road.  If you think THEY are "liberal" you're in for a rude awakening going to real liberal sites.

And I hate to break it to you but you absolutely live in an echo chamber...it's the echo chamber where every single thing is framed by the "sides" argument and viewed through that lens and that lens alone.  That's as good as you're going to get if you deal only with the US "news" outlets.....good luck.
its how I do things Commish

I'd love to spend a weekend fishing trip  ... with a liberal, anti-gun,  pro-abortion, pro-Hillary gay guy from Seattle. If I went with a guy who had all the same views as me, what the heck would I learn from that ? have a great time maybe, but what could I learn from him/her?

I do VOX... not MSNBC much. Washington Post. No echo chamber for me, but you can have your own opinion

 
I'm curious why you are more focused on the view of the "sides" rather than the issues.  Seems to me, you'd want to understand the issues much better than what you display here before you got caught up in the arguments by the "sides".  For actual liberal sites, you'll probably want to go to MSNBC way more as well as daily kos, vox, new republic.  On the scale, CNN is pretty middle of the road.  If you think THEY are "liberal" you're in for a rude awakening going to real liberal sites.

And I hate to break it to you but you absolutely live in an echo chamber...it's the echo chamber where every single thing is framed by the "sides" argument and viewed through that lens and that lens alone.  That's as good as you're going to get if you deal only with the US "news" outlets.....good luck.
its how I do things Commish

I'd love to spend a weekend fishing trip  ... with a liberal, anti-gun,  pro-abortion, pro-Hillary gay guy from Seattle. If I went with a guy who had all the same views as me, what the heck would I learn from that ? have a great time maybe, but what could I learn from him/her?

I do VOX... not MSNBC much. Washington Post. No echo chamber for me, but you can have your own opinion
What exactly do you think "echo chamber" means? :confused:  

And my point was, if you wanted the real deal "liberal" view, you wouldn't be on CNN trying to find it.  Those others I mentioned are pretty good sources, so I'd recommend dropping CNN since you can't stand them and picking up the others.  It doesn't make sense to frame something as something it's not if you can have the real thing in front of you simply by changing sources.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top