Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
This stance I understand. I would not vote for Hillary Clinton in the primary. If she got the nom and was against Trump (and probably quite a few other Republicans) I would certainly vote for her.
I'm kind of in this line of thinking as well.
Very convenient your lack of naming corrupt R’s but I’m sure that’s just an oversight.
Well there goes 90% of Capital Hill both past and present.I was responding to a post about Hillary. I'm more than willing to concede that corrupt R's should not be eligible either.
This is nothing new with McConnell. That operation he had to replace his brain with a cheap pair of rubber flip-flops happened a long, long time ago.
Welcome to the 3rd party protest club. We have refreshments but you’ll need to bring snacks.
I am done with this thinking. A bit is negative attitude and thinking if Trump is the nominee again, America is getting what it deserves, and a bit is just not being happy about going this route last time and not voting 3rd party like I usually was for POTUS. If there is one or other of the party's nominee that I could say with a straight face I really like I could be talked into voting that way, but no more of this voting to keep somebody else out nonsense for me.
I did that by voting for McMullin in 2016 and it gave us Trump. I think I can live with the Democrat better than 4 more years of DJT. While I agree with you with both parties I hope too many don't do what you are saying or we will see a repeat of 2016.
No if it is Trump I will vote for the Democrat nominee, there is no way I want DJT anywhere near the White House ever again.
I think he views that Trump can be controlled and used for McConnell’s interests. It’s a logical position from his perspective. Undoubtedly he’d prefer a more normal Republican president though.lazyike said:
This is the viewpoint of many smart, thoughtful Republicans such as yourself that I encounter all the time.
Trump's "leadership" was Red State only. Because its always and only about him. How anyone would want that again IS beyond the pale.
Obviously we don’t see eye to eye on this, but one point I would add: your use of the phrases “Trump/Pence” and “Biden/Harris” are misleading. Neither Mike Pence nor Kamala Harris has played any real or significant role in this nation’s governance. No Vice President in modern history has, with the possible exception of **** Cheney. VPs serve a largely ceremonial purpose. They are there to help the President get elected, that’s all.
That’s understandable. Right now, based on what I know, a Presidential race between Harris and Pence would honestly be a tossup for me. I could very easily vote for Pence in that situation.
He made some very unfortunate and rather absurd comments about 10 years ago regarding some LGBT issues, Disney, etc. And of course as a moderate liberal I disagree with him on several policy issues. But he is, from what I can see, a decent man, competent, a believer in our form of government, and I would have no problem at all with him as my President.
You would vote for kamala harris? For president of the united states?
There are other people I would prefer but I would have no problem voting for Harris to be my President. She is smart, highly competent, a good person, and has very good ideas.
We said the same thing about Hillary and Biden.
